Dmitriy Katsman Petitioner V City Of Novi Respondent
- Petitioner
- Dmitriy Katsman
- Respondent
- City Of Novi
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-002443-TT
- Status
- Ready Schedule
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Oakland
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Notice of Filing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/25/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 06/30/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 06/25/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/25/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/14/2026 | $0.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Dmitriy Katsman, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002443 City Of Novi, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied by either the Michigan Department of Treasury or a County. Also, state taxes levied by the Michigan Department of Treasury, such as income taxes, are not subject to the informal settlement conference process.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002443 Page 2 of 2 MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or email taxtrib@michigan.gov. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Dmitriy Katsman, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002443 City Of Novi, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied by
Page 4
MTT
Page 5
STA
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
06/30/2026 Valuation Report 02:35 PM DB: Novi City 2026 50-22-32-401-053 2026 Est. T.C.V. KATSMAN, DMITRIY & NATALIA Property Class: 407 20774 RICHMOND DR Map #: CITY OF NOVI NORTHVILLE, MI 48167 Cost Est. for Res. Bldg: 1 Single Family TWO STORY Cls (11) Heating System: Forced Heat & Cool Ground Area = 2713 SF Floor Area = 3520 SF. phy/Ab.Phy/Func/Econ/Comb. % Good=87/100/100/100/87 Building Areas Stories Exterior Foundation Size Cost New 1 Story Brick Basement 1,906 2 Story Brick Basement 807 Total: 873,657 Other Additions/Adjustments Basement Living Area 2000 123,240 Plumbing 3 Fixture Bath 2 21,747 2 Fixture Bath 3 21,747 Extra Sink 2 3,610 Separate Shower 1 3,305 Porches CCP (1 Story) 60 2,845 CCP (1 Story) 367 14,985 Garages Class: B Exterior: Siding Foundation: 42 Inch (Unfinished) Base Cost 992 58,220 Common Wall: 1 Wall 1 -3,793 Water/Sewer Public Water 1 2,328 Public Sewer 1 2,328 Built-Ins Cook Top 1 1,613 Dishwasher 2 3,056 Garbage Disposal 2 924 Oven 2 5,302 Fireplaces Prefab 2 Story 1 5,750 Totals: 1,140,864 Notes: ECF (MAYBURY PARK OCCP 1609) 1.300 => TCV: B 10 Blt 2013 Depr. Cost 760,096 107,219 18,920 18,920 3,141 2,875 2,475 13,037 50,651 -3,300 2,025 2,025 1,403 2,659 804 4,613 5,002 992,565 1,290,335
Page 2
xxxD323UBRIENG J0U
INQ STYRTITAI PIWSSP UTSIAY UOTIPWIOIUI
sxx
206€LTS
|
|
lo6€ ‘9€9
06€°91S
000021
|
€zoz
|
URDTYSTW
‘PUBTYEQ
|
p
|
f
,
H
=
30
Ajuno)
‘tAoN
JO
AIT)
:0L
DPBSUIDTT
J06Z "EVs
|00T
02L
100T°58S
000°SET
¥20C|
qurOEdSNI §T0Z/9T/T0 dLS|*6007
-
6667
(0)
3ubriAdon
-I9zT-enbd
ayl
S00€ ‘69L
|
ooe “69¢
|00€‘6T9
000°0ST
520z| 03ASNI 1X3 5202/82/01
SC | stouzal
_coorzeaes
0066 ‘178
|
[noLg ‘cvs
l0L8’€v8
los ’€69
0000ST
9z0z|
IEUM
udyM
oum
antes
|z3y30
MaTASY
|antea
|snten
ante
|
aTgexel
/TePUNQTIL
|JO paeog
|pessassy
butpTTNg
pueT
E3-EY
uTterd
pootd
| mE
UN
.
——
=
pueTiay
sutaey
juoxyIojem
puog
papooy
duremg
padeospue]
ybTH
MOT
butTTOoy
ER
Tene]
217s
__30 Aydeabodog
"$00T
‘uoT3oadsur
3TWIdd
$6202 8Z°0T
=
m—
Sa. ————
*STT3n punoibrspun
S9OUSNTIUT /SIUBUWOYD
epue
€Iv ‘LG
=
anTep
yse)
anil
sjuswasoxdu]
pueT PalBWTISH
BIOL
EE
12129
SL
0zL
GO'STT
932I0U0D
$1004
|
wor
asl
£900-00€-2€-22-0G
Z0G6'€T
66
825
£8°62
pues
uo OTig
:d/M/d
frie
WO¥d 5002/62/11
NO
LIITdS
89211
9L
vLS
€8°62
PUBS UO ¥OTIF
d/M/Q
|
57319974
91501
aL
0961
L878
23370U0D Gg
:d/M/a
pecs
gl)
& EE0DE
ET
anTeA
ysed
poo
g§
3ZTS
23ey
uoT3draosaq
|
z07em|
|
Sy
LIND
§93BUTIST
350)
Judwasoadul puet |
wont
|
|
SALVLSH
¥MdVd XdNAAYW
|
ATEnSPESY
609T ON NYTd WNINIWOGNOD
|
TBMSS WIOIF
AINAOD ANVTNVO
00000€
= onTes pueT
'1s3 [eI0L
S9IOW TPIOL £670
Loa
z€ OFS ‘Eg
‘NII
0
00T
©
S3I0Y
0€S5°0
Pp
- rel
[
uot3dTIosaQ
XBL
000‘00€
00T
00000€
dSVYE
<Y 3nTPA 33TS>
|
1:1
2
ElagIN
uoseay
[pve
@23ey
uyadeg
23uoxg
yadeg
obejuoxd
uoTadrIosaqg
sjuswaaoxdur
+ s1030ed
]
oTTand
6091#d000
MYVd XYNEAVW
TZZE€Y
STJPL PUT
JIOJ
S3]PWTISH
SNTBA puer
|
JuedeA|
|
onordnr]
x
|
L9T8%
IW HTTIAHILION
=
T
aI
==
=
Te.
SE TTR TTC
=
-
|
dd ANOWHOId
FLLOT
|
|
|
ILD
6LY
V¥AL/ADL
8FL'L89’'T
ADL
3ST 920C |
i
YITYLYN
3
ATMLTHA
NYRSI¥M
QEs01D|
1900-£1S|
€102/£2/L0
ISNOD MEN|
Th avn
SSBIPPY/OURN §,IBUMO
[skcislepee]
PPSO-€£TS|
PT0Z/€0/T0
IWSE HSINTA|
¥202/S0/2T
%00T
"I dd]
|
adso12d|
€000-62¥9d|
SZ0Z/6T/€0
|
T0004
soy
STOOHOS o1180d
ATTIIAHLION
: Toouos|
dd ONOWHDIY
PLLOT
snjelg|
Toquny|
a3eq
|
(s)3twrsq butpring|
v-d
:6uTuOZ| OANOD TYILNIAISHY
:SSerd|f
)
ssaappy Ajxadoig
r
{
i
0°00T
agad|
¥80d-566¢¥T|
HIONAT S,Wd¥-€0|
dD] TT0Z/L0/¥0
[000‘00T‘T |ONI
‘NOTLONWISNOO LTNVH¥H| NIATOH NYT NYOTHOIW
“#°S
0°00T
aaa)
2€9a-6€0L71T|
¥3IHIO/AASN ION-TZ
¥1d| ¥102/50/50 [006'669
|
VYANYS
3 180d
‘TTYH| ONI
‘NOILONYISNOD LTNVIdE
0°00T
| ¥IASNVEL AL¥II0Nd|
0£2a-86L657]
_ HISNET S.W4Y-£0|
wid
vz02/TT/TT. 000096 'T
ITYIYN
3 ATMIING
‘NVASIVM|
YIANYS
3 130M
‘TIVH
‘sueap
Ag|
sbeg
=n
|
2dAy|
a3eq
s0T1d
|
‘judd
POTITIBA
299717]
aTes
Jo
suiag|
*3sur|
sTes
|eTes
|
EERE)
I103ueI9H
9202/0€/90
uo pajutrig
ANYTMVO
:A3unod
IAON
JO ALID
IUOTIOTPSTIND
€G60-T0V-2€-2C-0G
:I9quUMN Te2IBgPage 3
+xxP223UBIENS JOU INQ STYETTSI POWSSP UTSISY UOTIBWIOIUL xxx T c<<<< *putoTtad s31a7dwod 707 anojurid uoTienTep 93S *HBuUOT 003 SUOTIBTNOTRD >>>>> cus Fai 7] v08 ¥vZ6 z Tesodstq abeqred gust pel Tenenon _ iheuutyd 659°C 960 '€ z I9YseMysTq rswe3T wng dung | : E cov'T £191 T dor 3002 7 3x0ddns z0014 (01) STbuT eyds Frat otades 19 0002| 1-s7060 THOYTER IRUTuS J Teuced i 0 oT13dss Te9 000T paus 1014 5z0'z 8zc'z T I9M3S OTTANd Trem, To7EN as I00Td ON s20'z 8ze’z 1 193M OTTANg Fieger (g) szo0og InoyTeM PIESUEH dry 19MdS/I93EM T5988 Bran : as butatI| 000g1°FAWED] | °T9Ed| | 00g ‘€e- €6L'E~ T TTeM T :TTEM uUouwwod = as uoT3edI59y Food (g€) 15905 0z2 ‘8S 766 3s0) ased I3mds/I93RM (FT) - (PoUSTUTIUN) YOUI Zp :UOTIBPUNOd BUTPTS :JIOTISIXE d :SSBTD wea Juen | _USTUTI Juswdsed (g) | SUSIIDS 3 SWIO3§ 5 10074 239I0U0D sxood oT3ed S9DBIED | sa00Ty qi otwezad poom pa3esl] ssers aTqnoqg LEO'ET S86 ‘FT L9E (Ax03s 1) 422 sutem STI OTWeIdD B L B f . : b ELGRE Juswese) SLY 'Z v8 ze 09 (Az03s 1) 402 T0073 TTL OTWRId) . 2 2 2U0D paInod ®PTTS "ZTIOH CRiERd Tomoys 23eiedss| 1 00 *ouo bung srqno si8'z s0e’e T z8moys s3exedss P— q5oT8 3 Ly THLE 019 '¢ z JUTS BIR 13TTOL BI1IXE Jusweseg (g) heii TAuTA 02681 LbL Tz € y3eE 2In3XTd putquNTa oN REE 02681 LbL'TZ z yleg 8INIXTA € JeSH 197BM IBTOS 0°0 :sastop 03 ybTaH USES Poo butquntg Tenuep
Page 4
+xyP@23U
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. 26-002443 Respondent’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government: City Of Novi (OAKLAND) First Name M.I. Last Name Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information, if any: First Name Jeanette M.I. Last Name Schrameck Firm Name (if any) City of Novi Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 45175 Ten Mile Rd City or Town Novi State Michigan ZIP Code 48175 Telephone Number 2483470486 E-mail Address jschrameck@cityofnovi.org Subject Property Information: Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. *If necessary, attach a separate sheet. N/A Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more? Yes
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal: The 2026 March Board of Review, acting within its authority as prescribed under State of Michigan Statute MCL 211.27a(3) denied petitioner's protest of assessed value. The Board of Review cited the property "at market value." The assessment as equalized does not exceed 50% of True Cash Value. The sales of similar properties justifies the value. Jurisdictional Issues: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES: Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended: March If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, please cite the Board’s authority? Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, please explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? No If yes, when was it issued? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE: When was the Notice of Uncapping issued? Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Valuation Information: Parcel Identification Number: 50-22-32-401-053 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 843870 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 841990 What do you believe is the fair market value? 1687740 What do you believe is the taxable value? Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent’s Signature: /s/ Jeanette Schrameck Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
LANSING
GRETCHEN WHITMER
GOVERNOR
RECEIVED
MAY 1 8 2026
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
MARLON |. BROWN, DPA
DIRECTOR
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
VALUATION / UNCAPPING
Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes.
Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Other
Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of
Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable.
If you do not submit this document, you may be held in
default.
Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information
First Name
ML
Last Name/Company Name
Dmitriy
Katsman
Mailing Address (No., Street, .0. Box or Rural Route)
20774 Richmond Dr.
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Northville
MI
48167
Telephone Number 734-358-9045
Email Address {do not enter unless you want MTT to send ali correspondence via email)
dmk@mestnet.org
Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information
1}
First Name
MI.
tast Name
Firm Name {if any)
Mailing Address {No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Telephone Number
Email Address (do not enter uniess you want MTT to send ali correspondence via email}
Section 3: Subject Property Information =use the multipte parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.
How many parcels are you
appealing?
1
Yes*
No**
**|f No, you must file separate appeals for each parce!
If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?
Property Address (No., Street)
20774 Richmond Dr.
State
Mi
City or Town
County
Northville
Oakland
ZIP Gode
48167Page 2
nn, | ol & STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check ai that apply) True Cash and Taxable Value O Taxable Value Only (calculation) [] Uncapping of Taxable Value Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal Assessed value of the subject property is at least 15% per sq. ft. higher than ANY adjoining property in the same subdivision, of similar age, with similar or better construction, same or better landscaping and amenities. Seeking to get assessed value in-line with the subdivision values. Prior to recent adjustment, it was already slightly higher, but after 2026 adjustment, it's severely overstated. Assessed value of subject property is $240/sq ft (making TCV ~$480/sqft), compared to $195/sq ft (vs $240) assessed value of comparables, inculding 1 recent sale. This computes to average TCV of comparables to $391/sq ft (vs $480). There is not a single property in the subdivision with similarily inflated assesed values per sq ft. All selected comparable properties include covered patios / lanais, outdoor in-ground gunite pools with built-in spas (subject property has no spa) and extensive landscaping and hard-scaping. See additional documentation attached. Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Dld you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes [0 No If Yes, check which BOR you attended: [M] March [] July [1 December if No, please check the applicable reason(s): [| Not required to attend [| Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 5 Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping Other If you checked “other” above, explain:
Page 3
GRETCHEN WHITMER STATE OF GOVERNOR Section 7: Valuation Information *use the mu DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MICHIGAN DIRECTOR Itiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Number: 50-22-32-401-053 Classification of Property: ~~ Real Personal [] (check one) Agricultural J ~~ Commercial (J Industrial (J Residential Timber-Cutover (] Developmental [J Utility [J (check one) Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: by the Board of Review: $843,870 $841,990 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? $1,518,966 What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed value by'5) $759,483 assessed value) $759,483 Fee Information Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at leas! issue? MM Yes [1 No If you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to t 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at pay any filing fees. MARLON I. BROWN, DPA If the property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00 If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $126.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00 $0ver $500,000.00 $300.00 If the property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. If the property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or greater the appeal does not qualify for
Page 4
CY
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Dmitriy Katsman, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002443 City Of Novi, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: June 25, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Dmitriy Katsman, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002443 City Of Novi, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: June 25, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Dmitriy Katsman, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002443 City Of Novi, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: June 25, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
LANSING
GRETCHEN WHITMER
GOVERNOR
RECEIVED
MAY 1 8 2026
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
MARLON |. BROWN, DPA
DIRECTOR
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
VALUATION / UNCAPPING
Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes.
Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Other
Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of
Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable.
If you do not submit this document, you may be held in
default.
Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information
First Name
ML
Last Name/Company Name
Dmitriy
Katsman
Mailing Address (No., Street, .0. Box or Rural Route)
20774 Richmond Dr.
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Northville
MI
48167
Telephone Number 734-358-9045
Email Address {do not enter unless you want MTT to send ali correspondence via email)
dmk@mestnet.org
Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information
1}
First Name
MI.
tast Name
Firm Name {if any)
Mailing Address {No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Telephone Number
Email Address (do not enter uniess you want MTT to send ali correspondence via email}
Section 3: Subject Property Information =use the multipte parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.
How many parcels are you
appealing?
1
Yes*
No**
**|f No, you must file separate appeals for each parce!
If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?
Property Address (No., Street)
20774 Richmond Dr.
State
Mi
City or Town
County
Northville
Oakland
ZIP Gode
48167Page 2
nn, | ol & STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check ai that apply) True Cash and Taxable Value O Taxable Value Only (calculation) [] Uncapping of Taxable Value Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal Assessed value of the subject property is at least 15% per sq. ft. higher than ANY adjoining property in the same subdivision, of similar age, with similar or better construction, same or better landscaping and amenities. Seeking to get assessed value in-line with the subdivision values. Prior to recent adjustment, it was already slightly higher, but after 2026 adjustment, it's severely overstated. Assessed value of subject property is $240/sq ft (making TCV ~$480/sqft), compared to $195/sq ft (vs $240) assessed value of comparables, inculding 1 recent sale. This computes to average TCV of comparables to $391/sq ft (vs $480). There is not a single property in the subdivision with similarily inflated assesed values per sq ft. All selected comparable properties include covered patios / lanais, outdoor in-ground gunite pools with built-in spas (subject property has no spa) and extensive landscaping and hard-scaping. See additional documentation attached. Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Dld you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes [0 No If Yes, check which BOR you attended: [M] March [] July [1 December if No, please check the applicable reason(s): [| Not required to attend [| Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 5 Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping Other If you checked “other” above, explain:
Page 3
GRETCHEN WHITMER STATE OF GOVERNOR Section 7: Valuation Information *use the mu DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MICHIGAN DIRECTOR Itiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Number: 50-22-32-401-053 Classification of Property: ~~ Real Personal [] (check one) Agricultural J ~~ Commercial (J Industrial (J Residential Timber-Cutover (] Developmental [J Utility [J (check one) Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: by the Board of Review: $843,870 $841,990 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? $1,518,966 What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed value by'5) $759,483 assessed value) $759,483 Fee Information Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at leas! issue? MM Yes [1 No If you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to t 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at pay any filing fees. MARLON I. BROWN, DPA If the property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00 If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $126.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00 $0ver $500,000.00 $300.00 If the property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. If the property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or greater the appeal does not qualify for
Page 4
CY
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.