Dgi Fulton LLC, Petitioner Vs. Township Of Grand Rapids, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Dgi Fulton LLC
- Respondent
- Township Of Grand Rapids
Case overview
- Docket number
- 25-002316-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Kent
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | Order of Dismissal | Not recorded | Not recorded | 05/19/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 14 | Motion to Withdraw Appeal was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 05/16/2026 | $50.00 | Download |
| 13 | Order Placing Case on 9/16-30/26 PHGC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 02/17/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 12 | Order Removing Case from 7/16-31/26 PHGC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 02/17/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 11 | Granted | Not recorded | 9 | 02/17/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 10 | Order granting Motion. | Not recorded | 9 | 02/17/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 9 | Motion to Extend was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 02/05/2026 | $50.00 | Download |
| 8 | Prehearing General Call | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/18/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Appearance | RESP | Not recorded | 08/11/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/18/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | ET Case Info Sheet | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/18/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Proof of service of petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 07/08/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 06/09/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/09/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/21/2025 | $400.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 DGI Fulton LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002316 Township of Grand Rapids, Respondent. ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that the parties have filed a Joint Motion to Withdraw the appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. By:_____________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: May 19, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 DGI Fulton LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002316 Township of Grand Rapids, Respondent. ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that the parties have filed a Joint Motion to Withdraw the appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. By:_____________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: May 19, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 DGI Fulton LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002316 Township of Grand Rapids, Respondent. ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that the parties have filed a Joint Motion to Withdraw the appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. By:_____________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: May 19, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED AM MAY 1 9 2026 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBU NAL PROPERTY TAX YOUR PROPERTY TAX EXPERTS SINCE 1989 CONSULTANTS May 15, 2026 Clerk of the Court Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 RE: Property Tax Consultants for DGI Fulton LLC Parcel # 41-14-25-401-006, v. Grand Rapids Township Docket # 25-002316 Dear Clerk, This letter is to serve as our Joint Motion to Withdraw in the above-referenced matter. Enclosed is our check in the amount of $50 to cover the motion. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, [raninfosde0h 2A122483-1 05/18/26 § 5 Amit PROPERTY TAX _/s/ Joshua D. Beard (with permission) Grand Rapids Township Attorney
Page 2
1AY 2026 PM6 L PROPERTY TAX GONSULTANTS N 861 Pinecrest Ave SE East Grand Rapids, MI 49506 269.366.0300 Clerk of the Court Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 SEES TREEE pl gHallaf agp [Pg yp] pfeil Pog Boje]
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 DGI Fulton LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-002316 Grand Rapids Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND ORDER REMOVING CASE FROM JULY 16-31, 2026 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL ORDER PLACING CASE ON SEPTEMBER 16-30, 2026 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL On February 5, 2026, the parties filed a joint motion requesting that the Tribunal extend the deadline for the filing of valuation disclosures in this case. In the motion, the parties state that additional time is needed to complete their respective valuation disclosures and engage in settlement negotiations. The Tribunal has considered the motion and the case file and finds that the parties have shown good cause and granting the requested extension will facilitate the efficient administration of justice by providing the parties additional time to conduct discovery, engage in settlement negotiations, and prepare their cases for hearing. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Extend is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is REMOVED from the July 16-31, 2026 Prehearing General Call. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is PLACED on the September 16-30, 2026 Prehearing General Call. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their valuation disclosures by May 20, 2026. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their prehearing statements by May 20, 2026. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal witnesses, will not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this order except upon a finding
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002316 Page 2 of 2 of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement will result in holding a party or parties in default, as provided by TTR 237. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on May 20, 2026, which means all discovery has been requested, all motions to compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of litigating this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not permitted during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on September 16, 2026, which means all discovery has been requested, all motions to compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is limited to the opposing party’s valuation disclosure, the opposing party’s valuation expert, and the witnesses identified in the opposing party’s prehearing statement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a case listed on this call that is not scheduled for a date certain Prehearing Conference during the time frame indicated above may be scheduled for a date certain Prehearing Conference at any time subsequent to the completion date for this Prehearing General Call. Parties will, however, be notified in writing approximately one week before they are scheduled to appear. Entered: February 17, 2026 By _____________________________ smm/sb PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 DGI Fulton LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-002316 Grand Rapids Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND ORDER REMOVING CASE FROM JULY 16-31, 2026 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL ORDER PLACING CASE ON SEPTEMBER 16-30, 2026 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL On February 5, 2026, the parties filed a joint motion requesting that the Tribunal extend the deadline for the filing of valuation disclosures in this case. In the motion, the parties state that additional time is needed to complete their respective valuation disclosures and engage in settlement negotiations. The Tribunal has considered the motion and the case file and finds that the parties have shown good cause and granting the requested extension will facilitate the efficient administration of justice by providing the parties additional time to conduct discovery, engage in settlement negotiations, and prepare their cases for hearing. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Extend is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is REMOVED from the July 16-31, 2026 Prehearing General Call. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is PLACED on the September 16-30, 2026 Prehearing General Call. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their valuation disclosures by May 20, 2026. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their prehearing statements by May 20, 2026. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal witnesses, will not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this order except upon a finding
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002316 Page 2 of 2 of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement will result in holding a party or parties in default, as provided by TTR 237. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on May 20, 2026, which means all discovery has been requested, all motions to compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of litigating this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not permitted during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on September 16, 2026, which means all discovery has been requested, all motions to compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is limited to the opposing party’s valuation disclosure, the opposing party’s valuation expert, and the witnesses identified in the opposing party’s prehearing statement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a case listed on this call that is not scheduled for a date certain Prehearing Conference during the time frame indicated above may be scheduled for a date certain Prehearing Conference at any time subsequent to the completion date for this Prehearing General Call. Parties will, however, be notified in writing approximately one week before they are scheduled to appear. Entered: February 17, 2026 By _____________________________ smm/sb PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED AM FEB 1 1 2026 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX CONSULTANTS YOUR PROPERTY TAX EXPERTS SINCE 1989 February 4, 2026 Clerk of the Court Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 RE: Property Tax Consultants for DGI Fulton LLC Parcel # 41-14-25-401-006, v. Grand Rapids Township Docket # 25-002316 Dear Clerk, This letter is to serve as our Joint Motion to Extend Dates in the above-referenced matter. Enclosed is our check in the amount of $50 to cover the motion. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, Aylsworth Agent for DGI Fulton LLC JA/ac cc: Attorney, Grand Rapids Township
Page 2
. STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL DGI Fulton LLC, Petitioner, MTT DOCKET No. 25-002316 v PARCEL NO. 41-14-25-401-006 Grand Rapids Township, Respondent. / Jon Aylsworth Joshua D. Beard Property Tax Consultants Mika Meyers Representative for Petitioner Attorneys for Respondent 861 Pinecrest Avenue SE 900 Monroe Avenue NW Grand Rapids, MI 49506 Grand Rapids, MI 49503 (269) 366-0300 (616) 608-1107 jack@skylinepropertytax.com jbeard@mikameyers.com / JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DATES NOW COME the parties, through counsel, and state as follows in support of this Joint Motion to Extend Dates: 1. This case involves parcel 41-14-25-401-006 located in Grand Rapids Township. 2, On August 18,2025, the Tribunal Issued a Notice of July 16-31, 2026 Prehearing General Call and Order of Procedure that, in part, set the Valuation Disclosure
Page 3
3. The parties are in the process of exchanging information regarding the property and have engaged in good faith discussions in an attempt to resolve this matter. The parties continue to attempt resolution and need additional time. 4. Given the foregoing, and that it will greatly assist the parties and increase the likelihood that 1) settlement may be achieved, and 2) that the valuation disclosures provided by the parties will present the Tribunal with the most accurate and representative data with which to reach an independent conclusion of true cash value, the parties are asking the Tribunal to grant this motion by extending the valuation disclosure deadline by at least 60 days and place this matter on the September 16-30, 2026 Prehearing General Call and Order of Procedure. 5. Granting this Motion to Extend is proper under Tax Tribunal Act, MCL 205.732(c), which provides in pertinent part, “(t)he tribunal’s powers include, but are not limited to....(c) Granting other relief or issuing writs, orders, or directives that it deems necessary or appropriate in the process of disposition of a matter over which it may acquire jurisdiction.” 6. Given all of the foregoing, there is good cause for the Tribunal to grant this Motion to Extend, and granting this Motion is appropriate under the Tribunal’s February 18, 2022 Notice, MTT 2022-3. Notice MTT 2022-3 states in pertinent part: “the Tribunal will grant a first motion for extension or, at the very least, partially grant a first motion for extension if the motion is a joint motion filed by all parties in the case.” As mentioned, this is the parties first request for additional time. WHEREFORE, the parties request that this Honorable Tribunal grant the parties” Motion
Page 4
Respectfully submitted, ya : /s/ Joshua D. Beard Jon Aylswo Joshua Beard Property Tax Consultants Mika Meyers Representative for Petitioner Attorney for Respondent Date: February 2) , 2026 Date: February £2026
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Property Tax Consultants for: DGI Fulton LLC Petitioner \% Joint Motion to Extend Dates Grand Rapids Township Respondent PROOF OF SERVICE Jon Aylsworth, deposes and says that on February 4, 2026 he served a copy of the motion to withdraw relative to the above-captioned matter upon: Via USPS, with proper postage affixed thereto. Mika Meyer
Page 6
P
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 DGI Fulton LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-002316 Grand Rapids Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND ORDER REMOVING CASE FROM JULY 16-31, 2026 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL ORDER PLACING CASE ON SEPTEMBER 16-30, 2026 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL On February 5, 2026, the parties filed a joint motion requesting that the Tribunal extend the deadline for the filing of valuation disclosures in this case. In the motion, the parties state that additional time is needed to complete their respective valuation disclosures and engage in settlement negotiations. The Tribunal has considered the motion and the case file and finds that the parties have shown good cause and granting the requested extension will facilitate the efficient administration of justice by providing the parties additional time to conduct discovery, engage in settlement negotiations, and prepare their cases for hearing. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Extend is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is REMOVED from the July 16-31, 2026 Prehearing General Call. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is PLACED on the September 16-30, 2026 Prehearing General Call. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their valuation disclosures by May 20, 2026. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their prehearing statements by May 20, 2026. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal witnesses, will not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this order except upon a finding
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002316 Page 2 of 2 of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement will result in holding a party or parties in default, as provided by TTR 237. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on May 20, 2026, which means all discovery has been requested, all motions to compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of litigating this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not permitted during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on September 16, 2026, which means all discovery has been requested, all motions to compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is limited to the opposing party’s valuation disclosure, the opposing party’s valuation expert, and the witnesses identified in the opposing party’s prehearing statement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a case listed on this call that is not scheduled for a date certain Prehearing Conference during the time frame indicated above may be scheduled for a date certain Prehearing Conference at any time subsequent to the completion date for this Prehearing General Call. Parties will, however, be notified in writing approximately one week before they are scheduled to appear. Entered: February 17, 2026 By _____________________________ smm/sb PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED AM FEB 1 1 2026 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX CONSULTANTS YOUR PROPERTY TAX EXPERTS SINCE 1989 February 4, 2026 Clerk of the Court Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 RE: Property Tax Consultants for DGI Fulton LLC Parcel # 41-14-25-401-006, v. Grand Rapids Township Docket # 25-002316 Dear Clerk, This letter is to serve as our Joint Motion to Extend Dates in the above-referenced matter. Enclosed is our check in the amount of $50 to cover the motion. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, Aylsworth Agent for DGI Fulton LLC JA/ac cc: Attorney, Grand Rapids Township
Page 2
. STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL DGI Fulton LLC, Petitioner, MTT DOCKET No. 25-002316 v PARCEL NO. 41-14-25-401-006 Grand Rapids Township, Respondent. / Jon Aylsworth Joshua D. Beard Property Tax Consultants Mika Meyers Representative for Petitioner Attorneys for Respondent 861 Pinecrest Avenue SE 900 Monroe Avenue NW Grand Rapids, MI 49506 Grand Rapids, MI 49503 (269) 366-0300 (616) 608-1107 jack@skylinepropertytax.com jbeard@mikameyers.com / JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DATES NOW COME the parties, through counsel, and state as follows in support of this Joint Motion to Extend Dates: 1. This case involves parcel 41-14-25-401-006 located in Grand Rapids Township. 2, On August 18,2025, the Tribunal Issued a Notice of July 16-31, 2026 Prehearing General Call and Order of Procedure that, in part, set the Valuation Disclosure
Page 3
3. The parties are in the process of exchanging information regarding the property and have engaged in good faith discussions in an attempt to resolve this matter. The parties continue to attempt resolution and need additional time. 4. Given the foregoing, and that it will greatly assist the parties and increase the likelihood that 1) settlement may be achieved, and 2) that the valuation disclosures provided by the parties will present the Tribunal with the most accurate and representative data with which to reach an independent conclusion of true cash value, the parties are asking the Tribunal to grant this motion by extending the valuation disclosure deadline by at least 60 days and place this matter on the September 16-30, 2026 Prehearing General Call and Order of Procedure. 5. Granting this Motion to Extend is proper under Tax Tribunal Act, MCL 205.732(c), which provides in pertinent part, “(t)he tribunal’s powers include, but are not limited to....(c) Granting other relief or issuing writs, orders, or directives that it deems necessary or appropriate in the process of disposition of a matter over which it may acquire jurisdiction.” 6. Given all of the foregoing, there is good cause for the Tribunal to grant this Motion to Extend, and granting this Motion is appropriate under the Tribunal’s February 18, 2022 Notice, MTT 2022-3. Notice MTT 2022-3 states in pertinent part: “the Tribunal will grant a first motion for extension or, at the very least, partially grant a first motion for extension if the motion is a joint motion filed by all parties in the case.” As mentioned, this is the parties first request for additional time. WHEREFORE, the parties request that this Honorable Tribunal grant the parties” Motion
Page 4
Respectfully submitted, ya : /s/ Joshua D. Beard Jon Aylswo Joshua Beard Property Tax Consultants Mika Meyers Representative for Petitioner Attorney for Respondent Date: February 2) , 2026 Date: February £2026
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Property Tax Consultants for: DGI Fulton LLC Petitioner \% Joint Motion to Extend Dates Grand Rapids Township Respondent PROOF OF SERVICE Jon Aylsworth, deposes and says that on February 4, 2026 he served a copy of the motion to withdraw relative to the above-captioned matter upon: Via USPS, with proper postage affixed thereto. Mika Meyer
Page 6
P
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA ACTING DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF JULY 16 - 31, 2026 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF PROCEDURE DGI Fulton LLC, Petitioner, v Township of Grand Rapids, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 25-002316 Please be advised that 25-002316 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General Call commencing July 16, 2026. Parties will be notified at least one week before they are scheduled to appear. Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning, as provided by TTR 237. In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9), as of January 1, 2021, the responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on our website for more information. IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall: a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties in writing within 21 days of entry of this Order that no valuation disclosure is being filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.). b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures by March 19, 2026. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this Order (even though admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002316 Page 2 of 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their Prehearing Statements by March 19, 2026. Witnesses will not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this Order except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement may result in holding a party or parties in default, as provided by TTR 237. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on March 19, 2026, which means all discovery has been requested, all motions to compel have been filed and resolved, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of litigating this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not permitted during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on July 16, 2026, which means all discovery has been requested, all motions to compel have been filed and resolved, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is limited to the opposing party’s valuation disclosure, the opposing party’s valuation expert, and the witnesses identified on the opposing party’s Prehearing Statement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if this case is not scheduled for a date certain Prehearing Conference during the time frame indicated it may be scheduled for a date certain Prehearing Conference at
Page 3
ST
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
{03692426 1 }
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
_____________________
DGI Fulton LLC,
Petitioner,
v
Grand Rapids Charter Township,
Respondent.
_____________________________________/
MTT Docket No. 25-002316
Parcel No. 41-14-25-401-066
APPEARANCE
Jon Aylsworth
Property Tax Consultants
861 Pinecrest Avenue SE
Grand Rapids, MI 49506
(269) 366-0300
jack@skylinepropertytax.com
_____________________________________/
Joshua D. Beard (P73388)
Mika Meyers PLC
Counsel for Respondent
900 Monroe Avenue, NW
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
(616) 632-8000
tax.tribunal.efile@mikameyers.com
jbeard@mikameyers.com
Mika Meyers PLC hereby enters its Appearance as counsel for Respondent, Grand Rapids
Charter Township, in the above-referenced matter.
Respectfully submitted,
MIKA MEYERS PLC
Attorneys for Respondent
Dated: August 11, 2025
By:
/s/ Joshua D. Beard
Joshua D. Beard (P73388)
900 Monroe Avenue, NW
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
(616) 632-8000
tax.tribunal.efile@mikameyers.comPage 2
{03692434 1 }
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
_____________________
DGI Fulton LLC,
Petitioner,
v
Grand Rapids Charter Township,
Respondent.
_____________________________________/
MTT Docket No. 25-002316
Parcel No. 41-14-25-401-066
PROOF OF SERVICE
Jon Aylsworth
Property Tax Consultants
861 Pinecrest Avenue SE
Grand Rapids, MI 49506
(269) 366-0300
jack@skylinepropertytax.com
_____________________________________/
Joshua D. Beard (P73388)
Mika Meyers PLC
Counsel for Respondent
900 Monroe Avenue, NW
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
(616) 632-8000
tax.tribunal.efile@mikameyers.com
jbeard@mikameyers.com
I, Kristi Solomon, hereby state that I am an employee in the law firm of Mika Meyers PLC,
and that on August 11, 2025, I served copies of the following document(s):
Appearance on behalf of Respondent Grand Rapids Charter Township
upon the following individual(s) by email:
Jon Aylsworth
Property Tax Consultants
jack@skylinepropertytax.com
I declare that the statements above are true to the best of my information, knowledge, and
belief.
Dated: August 11, 2025
/s/ Kristi SolomonThese are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE TAX TRIBUNAL DGI Fulton LLC, Petitioner MTT Docket No: 25-002316 Vv Parcel Number: 41-14-25-401-006 CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF GRAND RAPIDS, Respondent Property Tax Consultants DGI Fulton LLC Jon Aylsworth 2169 Center Industrial Ct 861 Pinecrest Ave SE Jenison, MI 49428 Grand Rapids, MI 49506 ANSWER OF GRAND RAPIDS CHARTER TOWNSHIP TO PETITION OF ASSESSMENT NOW COMES Respondent, the Charter Township of Grand Rapids, in answer to the Petition of DGI Fulton LLC, states as follows: 1. Respondent neither admits nor denies allegations contained in paragraph 1 and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. Respondent admits the allegations contained in paragraph 2. Respondent admits the allegations contained in paragraph 3. Respondent admits the allegations contained in paragraph 4. Respondent admits the allegations contained in paragraph 5. Respondent admits the allegations contained in paragraph 6. Respondent admits the allegations contained in paragraph 7.
Page 2
10. Respondent admits that these appear to be Petitioner’s contentions of the subject property’s value but denies that these contentions reflect the subject property’s actual true cash, assessed, state equalized, and taxable value. WHEREFORE, Respondent respectfully requests that this Honorable Tribunal affirm the assessed, state equalized, and taxable values of the subject property as placed on the 2025 tax roll by Respondent, dismiss the Petition, and grant Respondent its costs, attorney fees, and such other relief as the Tribunal deems appropriate. Bryan dager, poo II Township Assessor Grand Rapids Charter Township 1836 East Beltline NE Grand Rapids, MI 49525 616-855-5807 Dated: July 18, 2025
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE TAX TRIBUNAL DGI FULTON LLC, PETITIONER v MTT Docket No. 25-002316 GRAND RAPIDS CHARTER TOWNSHIP: RESPONDENT PROOF OF SERVICE State of Michigan County of Kent I, Bryan Jager, who being duly sworn, state that on the 18th day of July 2025, I served copies of the Answer to Petitioner’s Appeal with supporting documentation upon the following individuals: 1. Property Tax Consultants 2. DGI Fulton LLC Jon Aylsworth 2169 Center Industrial Ct 861 Pinecrest Ave SE Jenison, MI 49428 Grand Rapids, MI 49506 By placing said documents in an envelope addressed to the above party; retrieved by KCI Mailing Services for postage stamping and delivered to the United States Post Office for delivery. Dated: July 18, 2025 Bryagt Jagef, MAAO (3) Township Assessor Grand Rapids Charter Township
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-002316 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Township of Grand Rapids (KENT) Local Unit of Government/First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Bryan M.I. Last Name Jager Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 1836 E Beltline NE City or Town Grand Rapids State Michigan ZIP Code 49525 Telephone Number 616-361-7391 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) bjager@grandrapidstwp.org Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: Bryan Jager /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED AW JUL 10 2075 MICHIGAN TA, PROPERTY TAX X TRIBUNAL CONSULTANTS YOUR PROPERTY TAX EXPERTS SINCE 1989 July 8, 2025 RE: Notice of Docket Number for Entire Tribunal petition at Michigan Tax Tribunal MTT Docket #_gS ~ 00J Rb Enclosed please find a copy of the petition containing the docket number assigned by the Michigan Tax Tribunal, proof of service and copies of additional required documentation for the above captioned matter. Very truly yours, J, Isworth JA/ac Enclosures
Page 2
RECEIVED AP MAY 21 2025 PROPERTY TAX MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL CONSULTANTS YOUR PROPERTY TAX EXPERTS SINCE 1989 May 21, 2025 Clerk of the Court Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 RE: Property Tax Consultants for DGI Fulton LLC Parcel # 41-14-25-401-006, v. Grand Rapids Township Dear Clerk, Enclosed please find Petitioner's Petition and Proof of Service for filing in the above captioned matter. Also enclosed is our check in the amount of $400.00 representing the filing fee in this matter. Very truly yours, Enclosures
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Property Tax Consultants for DGI Fulton LLC, v MTT Docket No. 25-002316 Grand Rapids Township, PETITION Petitioner, DGI Fulton LLC, through their agent, Property Tax Consultants, petitions this Tribunal as follows: 1. Petitioner is DGI Fulton LLC whose principal office or address is 2169 Center Industrial Ct, Jenison, MI 49428. 2. Respondent, Grand Rapids Township, establishes levies and collects the property taxes on the subject property. 3. The property identification is # 41-14-25-401-006 and the subject property address is 4445 Fulton St NE, Grand Rapids, MI 495235. The property is classified as commercial, real property. Petitioner’s Property is presently used for commercial, Petitioner believes that Petitioner’s Property was originally designed to be used for commercial. 4. The property is located in Kent County and the school districts of Forest Hills Public and the Kent Intermediate School District and Grand Rapids Community College. 5. This matter involves issues relating to the true cash and taxable values for the parcel referenced above for the 2025 tax year. 6. For tax year 2025, Respondent’s Board of Review determined an assessed value of $1,480,500 a state equalized value of $1,480,500 and a taxable value of $1,480,500. 7. Petitioner is filing directly with the Michigan Tax Tribunal. 8. The 2025 values set by the respondent are invalid and unlawful as they exceed the amount allowed by Michigan law and the Michigan Constitution and do not reflect the true cash value of the fee simple interest as of the applicable tax date. 9. Petitioner contends the true cash value of the subject property is $2,300,000 which would yield a state equalized value of $1,150,000 and the taxable value is $1,150,000. The amount in
Page 4
Dated: May 21, 2025 By: ya Jon ra. Tax Consultants 861 Pinecrest Ave SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49506 269-366-0300 | jack@skylinepropertytax.com
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Property Tax Consultants for: DGI Fulton LL.C Petitioner v PETITION MTT Docket # 25-002316 Grand Rapids Township Respondent PROOF OF SERVICE Jon Aylsworth, deposes and says that on July 8, 2025 he served a copy of the Petition relative to the above-captioned matter upon: Via certified mail, return receipt requested, with proper postage affixed thereto. Assessor, Grand Rapids Township 1836 East Beltline NE, Grand Rapids, MI 49525 Clerk, Grand Rapids Township 1836 East Beltline NE, Grand Rapids, MI 49525 Via United States First-Class mail with proper postage affixed thereto. Clerk, Kent County 300 Monroe Ave NW, Grand Rapids, MI 49503 Director of Equalization, Kent County 300 Monroe Ave NW, Grand Rapids, MI 49503 Secretary of School Board, Forest Hills Public School District 620 Forest Hills Ave SE,
Page 6
Prop
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
PROPERTY TAX
CONSULTANTS
YOUR PROPERTY TAX EXPERTS SINCE 1989
Wy. 21, 2023
RECEIVED
MAY 21 2025 (y.%
Clerk of the Court
STE
As P
Michigan Tax Tribunal
HIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
P.O. Box 30232
Lansing, MI 48909
RE:
Property Tax Consultants for DGI Fulton LLC
Parcel # 41-14-25-401-006, v. Grand Rapids Township
Dear Clerk,
Enclosed please find Petitioner's Petition and Proof of Service for filing in the above captioned matter.
Also enclosed is our check in the amount of $400.00 representing the filing fee in this matter.
Very truly yours,
‘Aylsworth
ac
i
{i
EnclosuresPage 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Property Tax Consultants for DGI Fulton LLC, \ MTT Docket No. Grand Rapids Township, PETITION Petitioner, DGI Fulton LLC, through their agent, Property Tax Consultants, petitions this Tribunal as follows: Petitioner is DGI Fulton LLC whose principal office or address is 2169 Center Industrial Ct, Jenison, MI 49428. Respondent, Grand Rapids Township, establishes levies and collects the property taxes on the subject property. The property identification is # 41-14-25-401-006 and the subject property address is 4445 Fulton St NE, Grand Rapids, MI 49525. The property is classified as commercial, real property. Petitioner’s Property is presently used for commercial. Petitioner believes that Petitioner’s Property was originally designed to be used for commercial. The property is located in Kent County and the school districts of Forest Hills Public and the Kent Intermediate School District and Grand Rapids Community College. This matter involves issues relating to the true cash and taxable values for the parcel referenced above for the 2025 tax year. For tax year 2025, Respondent’s Board of Review determined an assessed value of $1,480,500 a state equalized value of $1,480,500 and a taxable value of $1,480,500. Petitioner is filing directly with the Michigan Tax Tribunal. The 2025 values set by the respondent are invalid and unlawful as they exceed the amount allowed by Michigan law and the Michigan Constitution and do not reflect the true cash value of the fee simple interest as of the applicable tax date. Petitioner contends the true cash value of the subject property is $2,300,000 which would yield a state equalized value of $1,150,000 and the taxable value is $1,150,000. The amount in
Page 3
/] Dated: May 21, 2025 By: PF —— Jon Ayfsyforth, Property Tax Consultants 861 Pinecrest Ave SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49506 269-366-0300 | jack@skylinepropertytax.com
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Property Tax Consultants for: DGI Fulton LLC Petitioner Vv PETITION Grand Rapids Township Respondent PROOF OF SERVICE Jon Aylsworth, deposes and says that on May 21, 2025 he served a copy of the Petition relative to the above-captioned matter upon: Clerk of the Court, Michigan Tax Tribunal Via Hand Delivery ya Jon a
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 DGI Fulton LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 25-002316 Township of Grand Rapids, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this Notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this Notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this Notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the Notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: __Tribunal Clerk________ Entered: June 9, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
PROPERTY TAX
CONSULTANTS
YOUR PROPERTY TAX EXPERTS SINCE 1989
Wy. 21, 2023
RECEIVED
MAY 21 2025 (y.%
Clerk of the Court
STE
As P
Michigan Tax Tribunal
HIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
P.O. Box 30232
Lansing, MI 48909
RE:
Property Tax Consultants for DGI Fulton LLC
Parcel # 41-14-25-401-006, v. Grand Rapids Township
Dear Clerk,
Enclosed please find Petitioner's Petition and Proof of Service for filing in the above captioned matter.
Also enclosed is our check in the amount of $400.00 representing the filing fee in this matter.
Very truly yours,
‘Aylsworth
ac
i
{i
EnclosuresPage 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Property Tax Consultants for DGI Fulton LLC, \ MTT Docket No. Grand Rapids Township, PETITION Petitioner, DGI Fulton LLC, through their agent, Property Tax Consultants, petitions this Tribunal as follows: Petitioner is DGI Fulton LLC whose principal office or address is 2169 Center Industrial Ct, Jenison, MI 49428. Respondent, Grand Rapids Township, establishes levies and collects the property taxes on the subject property. The property identification is # 41-14-25-401-006 and the subject property address is 4445 Fulton St NE, Grand Rapids, MI 49525. The property is classified as commercial, real property. Petitioner’s Property is presently used for commercial. Petitioner believes that Petitioner’s Property was originally designed to be used for commercial. The property is located in Kent County and the school districts of Forest Hills Public and the Kent Intermediate School District and Grand Rapids Community College. This matter involves issues relating to the true cash and taxable values for the parcel referenced above for the 2025 tax year. For tax year 2025, Respondent’s Board of Review determined an assessed value of $1,480,500 a state equalized value of $1,480,500 and a taxable value of $1,480,500. Petitioner is filing directly with the Michigan Tax Tribunal. The 2025 values set by the respondent are invalid and unlawful as they exceed the amount allowed by Michigan law and the Michigan Constitution and do not reflect the true cash value of the fee simple interest as of the applicable tax date. Petitioner contends the true cash value of the subject property is $2,300,000 which would yield a state equalized value of $1,150,000 and the taxable value is $1,150,000. The amount in
Page 3
/] Dated: May 21, 2025 By: PF —— Jon Ayfsyforth, Property Tax Consultants 861 Pinecrest Ave SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49506 269-366-0300 | jack@skylinepropertytax.com
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Property Tax Consultants for: DGI Fulton LLC Petitioner Vv PETITION Grand Rapids Township Respondent PROOF OF SERVICE Jon Aylsworth, deposes and says that on May 21, 2025 he served a copy of the Petition relative to the above-captioned matter upon: Clerk of the Court, Michigan Tax Tribunal Via Hand Delivery ya Jon a
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.