Devine Investment Properties Petitioner Vs. Township Of Denton Respondent
- Petitioner
- Devine Investment Properties
- Respondent
- Township Of Denton
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-001414-TT
- Status
- Default Petitioner
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Roscommon
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Amended Petition | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/24/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Reissued Order Holding Petitioner in Default | Not recorded | 6 | 09/17/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Order of Default of Petitioner | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/11/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 08/11/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/11/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Attachments to the Petition were filed | Not recorded | Not recorded | 05/26/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Attachments to the Petition were filed | Not recorded | Not recorded | 05/26/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/26/2026 | $475.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
v STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR DIRECTOR LANSING _____________________________, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) MTT Docket No. _____________________________, Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: _____________________________________________ (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is ___real ___personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as _________________________ 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s ___ March ___ July ___December Board of Review. MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Devine Investment Properties, LLC Denton Twp. 0031100250000 XX XX 201 Commercial XX
Page 2
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 2 of 4 8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 10. The property or properties at issue are located in _______________County. The property or properties’ address is: 11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): ________________________________________ 12. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 13. This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): ________the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values ________the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes ___No ________uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment ________the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______ 14. The tax year(s) at issue are: _______________________________________ Roscommon 3741 W. Houghton Lk. Dr. Houghton Lake, Michigan Denton Township P.O. Box 837 Perry, MI 48872 XXX 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 20. List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the relief requested (attach additional page if necessary):
Page 4
______________________________________________________________________
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-001414 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Petitioner Files Document Type: Amended Petition Attachment File Name: ET-Petition-Prop-fillable Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Devine Investment Properties, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 26-001414 Denton Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm REISSUED ORDER HOLDING PETITIONER IN DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in this case and finds that an order holding Petitioner in default was issued on August 11, 2026, because Petitioner failed to file a complete petition. The Tribunal erred in the entry of that order as it failed to properly serve the order on Petitioner, thus failing to properly notify Petitioner of the default. Consequently, the Tribunal finds it appropriate to reissue the Order of Default. Specifically, Petitioner failed to file a complete petition. See TTR 233. As such, Petitioner must file an amended petition within 14 days of the entry of this order. The amended petition shall note the docket number assigned by the Tribunal and if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s e-filing system, must be filed on the assigned docket number as an “amended petition.” Tribunal rules and information on Entire Tribunal petitions can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is held in DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the default: file a completed amended Entire Tribunal petition, indicating the docket number assigned previously assigned by the Tribunal. If filed via the Tribunal’s e-filing system, must be filed as an “amended petition.” Sample Entire Tribunal petitions are available online at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-001414 Page 2 of 2 Failure to comply with this order will result in Petitioner being required to file a motion to set aside the default. Entered: September 17, 2026 By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm kac PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Devine Investment Properties, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 26-001414 Township Of Denton, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner failed to file a complete petition. See TTR 233. As such, Petitioner must file an amended petition within 14 days of the entry of this order. The amended petition shall note the docket number assigned by the Tribunal and if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s e-filing system, must be filed on the assigned docket number as an “amended petition.” Tribunal rules and information on Entire Tribunal petitions can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: August 11, 2026 1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-001414 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
Statement of True Cash Value Justification Property Location: 3741 W. Houghton Lake Dr. Houghton Lake, Michigan Parcel #’s: 003-110-025-0000, 003-110-022-0000, 003-110-024-0000, 003-110-024-0000 Building Size: 34,700 square feet Year Built: Approx. 60 years old Condition: Average Occupancy: Vacant for approximately 2 years Purchase Price: $550,000 I am submitting this statement to support the true cash value of the above-referenced commercial property for purposes of assessment review. The most reliable indicator of a property’s true cash value is an arm’s-length sale. This property was purchased in an open and competitive national commercial real estate auction, where it was exposed to a broad pool of potential buyers. The auction format ensured that the final sale price of $550,000 reflects current market conditions and the collective judgment of informed market participants. Several factors inherent to the property significantly impact its market value: First, the building is approximately 60 years old and in average condition. Properties of this age typically require ongoing capital investment, modernization, and potential structural or mechanical updates. Buyers factor these anticipated costs into their purchase decisions, resulting in downward pressure on value. Second, the property consists of a large footprint of 34,700 square feet. In a small, seasonal market such as Houghton Lake, demand for large-format retail space is limited. Larger buildings generally command a lower price per square foot due to reduced buyer demand, higher carrying costs, and increased difficulty in leasing or repurposing the space. Third, the property has been vacant for nearly two years. Extended vacancy is a critical determinant of value, as it reflects functional and economic obsolescence. A vacant property generates no income and presents significant leasing risk, which investors account for through discounted purchase pricing. Additionally, prolonged vacancy may contribute to deferred maintenance and further reduce market appeal. Fourth, the property was marketed on a national auction platform, which typically attracts value- driven and investment-oriented buyers seeking properties with repositioning potential. Such sales environments often result in pricing that accurately reflects risk, required investment, and local market limitations. The purchase price equates to approximately $15.85 per square foot ($550,000 ÷ 34,700 sq ft), which is consistent with market expectations for large, older, vacant commercial properties in similar secondary and rural markets. This pricing level reflects the realities of limited tenant demand, high vacancy risk, and the capital required to return the property to productive use.
Page 2
Given these considerations, the recent arm’s-length transaction at $550,000 provides strong and credible evidence of the property’s true cash value. Any assessment significantly above this level would not accurately reflect current market conditions or the property’s actual economic utility. For these reasons, I respectfully request that the assessed value be adjusted to align with the demonstrated market value established by the recent purchase price. Sincerely, Charles Devine, Sole member Devine Investment Properties, LLC P.O. Box 837 Perry, MI 48872
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Individual Local Unit of Government First Name Charles M.I. Last Name/Company Name Devine Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) PO BOX 837 City or Town PERRY State Michigan ZIP Code 48872 Telephone Number 5177193418 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) charliesbars@hotmail.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 4 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 3741 W. Houghton Lake Dr. Houghton Lake Michigan 48629 Taxing Authority (City or Township) Township Of Denton (ROSCOMMON) County Roscommon If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) Yes Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain:
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 003-110-025-0000 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 329500 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 329500 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 268080 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 134040 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 003-110-024-0000 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 88900 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 88900 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 72329 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 36164 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 003-110-022-0000 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 182400 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 182400 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 148400 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 74200 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 003-110-012-0000 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 75200 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 75200 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 61192 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 30596 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being
Page 4
STATE
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Devine Investment Properties, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-001414 Township Of Denton, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: August 11, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
Michigan Department of Treasury - 2766 (Rev. 03-25) L-4260 Property Transfer Affidavit This form is issued under authority of P.A. 415 of 1994. Filing is mandatory. This form must be filed whenever real estate or some types of personal property are transferred (even if you are not recording a deed). The completed Affidavit must be filed by the new owner with the assessor for the city or township where the property is located within 45 days of the transfer. The information on this form is NOT CONFIDENTIAL. 1. Street Address of Property 2. County 3. Date of Transfer (or land contract signed) 3741 W Houghton Lake Dr Roscommon October 28, 2025 4. Location of Real Estate (Check appropriate field and enter name in the space below.) 5. Purchase Price of Real Estate a city M Township O village $550,000.00 Denton 6. Seller's (Transferor) Name Goupil Investments, LLC 7. Property Identification Number (PIN). If you don't have a PIN, attach legal description. 8. Buyer's (Transferee) Name and Mailing Address PIN. This number ranges from 10 to 25 digits. It usually includes hyphens and sometimes includes Devine Investment Properties, LLC letters. It is found on the property tax bill and on the assessment notice. P.O. Box 837 Perry, MI 48872 003-110-021-0000, 003-110-022-0000, 003-111-024-0000 and 9. Buyer's (Transferee) Telephone Number 003-110-025-0000 (517)719-3418 Items 10-15 are optional. However, by completing them you may avoid further correspondence. 10. Type of Transfer. Transfers include, but are not limited to, deeds, land contracts, transfers involving trusts or wills, certain long-term leases and business interest. See Page 2 for list. [J Land Contract [J Lease M Deed OO other (specify) ~ 11. Was property purchased from a financial institution? | 12. Is the transfer between related persons? 13. Amount of Down Payment 0 ves M No 0 ves M No $550,000.00 14. If you financed the purchase, did you pay market rate of interest? 15. Amount Financed (Borrowed) O ves 0 No $0.00 EXEMPTIONS Certain transfers are exempt from uncapping. If you believe your transfer qualifies for an exemption, please indicate the type of exemption you're claiming below. Note that if an exemption is claimed, your assessor may request additional information to support your claim. [J Transfer from one spouse to the other spouse. [J Change in ownership solely to exclude or include a spouse. [J Transfer between certain family members *(see page 2). Describe relationship from each Transferor to each Transferee, attach additional page if necessary. Seller Name: Buyer Name: Relationship of Buyer to Seller: [1] Transfer of that portion of a property subject to a life lease or life estate (until the life lease or life estate expires). [m} Transfer between certain family members of that portion of a property after the expiration or termination of a life estate or life lease retained by transferor ** (see page 2). Describe relationship from each Transferor to each Transferee, attach additional page if necessary. Seller Name: Buyer Name: Relationship of Buyer to Seller: Transfer to effect the foreclosure or forfeiture of real property. Transfer by redemption from a tax sale. Transfer into a trust where the settlor or the settlor's spouse conveys property to the trust and is also the sole beneficiary of the trust. Transfer resulting from a court order unless the order specifies a monetary payment. Transfer creating or ending a joint tenancy if at least one person is an original owner of the property (or his/her spouse). Transfer to establish or release a security interest (collateral). Transfer of real estate through normal public trading of stock. Transfer between entities under common control or among members of an affiliated group. Transfer resulting from transactions that qualify as a tax-free reorganization under Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code. Transfer of qualified agricultural property when the property remains qualified agricultural property and affidavit has been filed. Transfer of qualified forest property when the property remains qualified forest property and affidavit has been filed. Transfer of land with qualified conservation easement (land only - not improvements). Other, as described in MCL 211.27a, specify: OoOooooooooooo CERTIFICATION: 1 cortty that he information above i rue and complete to the bast of my fnowledge. Printed Name Signature Date Devine Investment Properties, LLC AA /l October 28, 2025 Name and title, if signer is
Page 2
Ame
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 of 1 Docket #: 26-001414 Party Filing Document Party Filing Document: Petitioner Petitioner If 'other', Identify: File Document Type: fuFile:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
v STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR DIRECTOR LANSING ______________________, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, MTT Docket No. ___________ ______________________, Respondent. MULTIPLE PARCEL PETITION FORM ___ OF ___ 1. The classification of the property identified herein as established by Respondent’s Board of Review is: Tax Year Parcel Number Real/Personal Classification 2. The values for the property identified herein as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Charles Devine Denton TWP. 1 1 2026 0031100240000 Real 201 2026 0031100220000 Real 201 2026 0031100210000 Real 201 2026 0031100250000 Real 201 2026 0031100240000 177,800 88,900 88,900 2026 0031100220000 364,800 182,400 182,400 2026 0031100210000 150,400 75,200 75,200 2026 0031100250000 659,000 329,500 329,500
Page 2
MTT Docket No._____________ Page 2 of 2 3. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified herein are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 4. The values in dispute for the property identified herein are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2026 0031100240000 72,329 36,164 36,164 2026 0031100220000 148,400 74,200 74,200 2026 0031100210000 61,192 30,596 30,596 2026 0031100250000 268,080 134,040 134,040 2026 0031100240000 105,472 52,736 52,736 2026 0031100220000 216,400 108,200 108,200 2026 0031100210000 89,208 44,604 44,604 2026 0031100250000 390,920 195,460 195,460
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 of 1 Docket #: 26-001414 Party Filing Document Party Filing Document: Petitioner Petitioner If 'other', Identify: File Document Type: fuFile:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
Statement of True Cash Value Justification Property Location: 3741 W. Houghton Lake Dr. Houghton Lake, Michigan Parcel #’s: 003-110-025-0000, 003-110-022-0000, 003-110-024-0000, 003-110-024-0000 Building Size: 34,700 square feet Year Built: Approx. 60 years old Condition: Average Occupancy: Vacant for approximately 2 years Purchase Price: $550,000 I am submitting this statement to support the true cash value of the above-referenced commercial property for purposes of assessment review. The most reliable indicator of a property’s true cash value is an arm’s-length sale. This property was purchased in an open and competitive national commercial real estate auction, where it was exposed to a broad pool of potential buyers. The auction format ensured that the final sale price of $550,000 reflects current market conditions and the collective judgment of informed market participants. Several factors inherent to the property significantly impact its market value: First, the building is approximately 60 years old and in average condition. Properties of this age typically require ongoing capital investment, modernization, and potential structural or mechanical updates. Buyers factor these anticipated costs into their purchase decisions, resulting in downward pressure on value. Second, the property consists of a large footprint of 34,700 square feet. In a small, seasonal market such as Houghton Lake, demand for large-format retail space is limited. Larger buildings generally command a lower price per square foot due to reduced buyer demand, higher carrying costs, and increased difficulty in leasing or repurposing the space. Third, the property has been vacant for nearly two years. Extended vacancy is a critical determinant of value, as it reflects functional and economic obsolescence. A vacant property generates no income and presents significant leasing risk, which investors account for through discounted purchase pricing. Additionally, prolonged vacancy may contribute to deferred maintenance and further reduce market appeal. Fourth, the property was marketed on a national auction platform, which typically attracts value- driven and investment-oriented buyers seeking properties with repositioning potential. Such sales environments often result in pricing that accurately reflects risk, required investment, and local market limitations. The purchase price equates to approximately $15.85 per square foot ($550,000 ÷ 34,700 sq ft), which is consistent with market expectations for large, older, vacant commercial properties in similar secondary and rural markets. This pricing level reflects the realities of limited tenant demand, high vacancy risk, and the capital required to return the property to productive use.
Page 2
Given these considerations, the recent arm’s-length transaction at $550,000 provides strong and credible evidence of the property’s true cash value. Any assessment significantly above this level would not accurately reflect current market conditions or the property’s actual economic utility. For these reasons, I respectfully request that the assessed value be adjusted to align with the demonstrated market value established by the recent purchase price. Sincerely, Charles Devine, Sole member Devine Investment Properties, LLC P.O. Box 837 Perry, MI 48872
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Individual Local Unit of Government First Name Charles M.I. Last Name/Company Name Devine Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) PO BOX 837 City or Town PERRY State Michigan ZIP Code 48872 Telephone Number 5177193418 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) charliesbars@hotmail.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 4 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 3741 W. Houghton Lake Dr. Houghton Lake Michigan 48629 Taxing Authority (City or Township) Township Of Denton (ROSCOMMON) County Roscommon If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) Yes Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain:
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 003-110-025-0000 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 329500 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 329500 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 268080 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 134040 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 003-110-024-0000 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 88900 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 88900 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 72329 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 36164 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 003-110-022-0000 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 182400 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 182400 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 148400 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 74200 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 003-110-012-0000 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 75200 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 75200 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 61192 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 30596 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being
Page 4
STATE
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.