Candace Properties LLC, Petitioner Vs. Township Of West Bloomfield, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Candace Properties LLC
- Respondent
- Township Of West Bloomfield
Case overview
- Docket number
- 25-002402-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Oakland
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Consent Judgment | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/17/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | Granted | PET | 5 | 07/17/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 07/08/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | ET Case Info Sheet | RESP | Not recorded | 07/08/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | A Stipulation has been received. | PET | Not recorded | 07/07/2025 | $0.00 | Download |
| 4 | A petition has been filed. | PET | Not recorded | 07/07/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Order Denying Motion | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/03/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | A Stipulation has been received. | PET | Not recorded | 06/27/2025 | $50.00 | Download |
| 1 | Order Severing from 24-001775 | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/13/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Candace Properties LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-002402 West Bloomfield Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Marcus L. Abood ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the Stipulation and finds that it comports with the mandates of State law.1 As a result, the Tribunal shall enter the parties’ Stipulation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all attachments, terms and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise indicated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be corrected to reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values as provided in this Consent Judgment within 20 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment.2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund as required by the Consent Judgment within 28 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall, unless otherwise indicated, include a proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and of penalty and interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also, unless otherwise indicated, separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being refunded. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall, unless otherwise indicated, bear interest from the date of payment to the date of judgment and the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any time period prior to 28 days after the issuance of this Consent Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2013, through June 30, 2016, at the rate of 4.25%, (ii) after June 30, 2016, through December 31, 2016, at the rate of 4.40%, (iii) after December 31, 2016, through June 30, 2017, at the rate of 4.50%, (iv) after June 30, 1 See MCL 211.27a. 2 See MCL 205.755.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002402 Page 2 of 2 2017, through December 31, 2017, at the rate of 4.70%, (v) after December 31, 2017, through June 30, 2018, at the rate of 5.15%, (vi) after June 30, 2018, through December 31, 2018, at the rate of 5.41%, (vii) after December 31, 2018, through June 30, 2019, at the rate of 5.9%, (viii) after June 30, 2019, through December 31, 2019, at the rate of 6.39%, (ix) after December 31, 2019, through June 30, 2020, at the rate of 6.40%, (x) after June 30 2020, through December 31, 2020, at the rate of 5.63%, (xi) after December 31, 2020, through June 30, 2022, at the rate of 4.25%, (xii) after June 30, 2022, through December 31, 2022, at the rate of 4.27%, (xiii) after December 31, 2022, through June 30, 2023, at the rate of 5.65%, (xiv) after June 30, 2023, through December 31, 2023, at the rate of 8.25%, (xv) after December 31, 2023, through June 30, 2024, at the rate of 9.30%, (xvi) after June 30, 2024, through December 31, 2024, at the rate of 9.50%, (xvii) after December 31, 2024, through June 30, 2025, at the rate of 9.47%, and (xviii) after June 30, 2025, through December 31, 2025, at the rate of 8.66%. This Consent Judgment resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. See docket look up for a copy of stipulation and for any possible refund paragraph. By Entered: July 17, 2025 am PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Candace Properties LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-002402 Charter Township of West Bloomfield, Respondent. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT 1. The case is pending in the _X_ Entire Tribunal OR __ Small Claims Division. 2. Property Parcel No: X-18-19-101-019 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 X-18-19-101-019 $ 621,780 $ 310,890 $ 310,890 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 X-18-19-101-019 $ 475,000 $ 237,500 $ 237,500 5. If stipulation addresses tax years other than the tax year originally appealed or tax years added through motions to amend that have been granted by the Tribunal, list the separate facts upon which the parties rely to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over those tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary):
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002402 Consent Judgment, Page 2 of 2 6. List separately any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would affect the execution of this Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint payment of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): • The parties agree that interest is waived on all refunds issued pursuant to this stipulation as to all applicable jurisdictions. • The parties agree that the stipulation regarding the subject property’s assessed and taxable values is strictly for settlement purposes only. • This stipulation constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, written or otherwise, as to the property’s assessment(s) for the tax year(s) at issue. • Pay refund jointly to “Colliers International, c/o Candace Properties LLC.” • Refund check must be sent to: Colliers International, Attn: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. Vice President | Tax Appeal, 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350, Royal Oak, MI 48067. Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative: Signed:_____/s/ Joshua T. Shillair____Dated: June 13, 2025__ Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674), Attorney for Petitioner Signature of Respondent’s Authorized Representative: Signed:/s/Laura Hallahan with permission by JTS_Dated:_June 27, 2025_ Laura M. Hallahan (P42101), Attorney for Respondent [Consent Judgment will be prepared by the Tribunal.]
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL CANDACE PROPERTIES LLC, Petitioner, v CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF WEST BLOOMFIELD, Respondent. Docket No. 25-002402 Parcel No. X-18-19-101-019 ____________________________________________________________________________/ JOSHUA T. SHILLAIR (P72674) COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL Attorney for Petitioner 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, MI 48067 LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) SETH A. O’LOUGHLIN (P80257) KELSEA M. MELCHER (P85821) HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Attorneys for Respondent 1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 (248) 731-3089 _____________________________________________________________________________/ ANSWER TO SEVERED PETITION AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES ANSWER Respondent, Charter Township of West Bloomfield, by and through its attorneys, Hallahan & Associates, P.C., responds to the allegations made in Petitioner’s Petition as follows: 1. Respondent admits that Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to parcel number X-18-19-101-019. As to the remaining allegations, Respondent lacks the information and knowledge necessary to respond to the truth of the allegations set forth in Paragraph 1 and therefore leaves Petitioner to its proofs.
Page 2
Entire Tribunal Property Tax Answer Page 2 of 5 2. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 2. 3. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 3. 4. Respondent lacks the information and knowledge necessary to respond to the allegations set forth in Paragraph 4 and therefore leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 5. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 5. 6. Respondent acknowledges Petitioner’s beliefs as to the issues in this appeal but denies that those issues have merit and further denies that Petitioner is entitled to any relief. 7. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 7. 8. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 8. 9. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 9. 10. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 $621,780 $310,890 $310,890 11. Respondent contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 $621,780 $310,890 $310,890 12. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 $0 $0 $0 13. Respondent acknowledges the relief requested by Petitioner in the final paragraph of its Petition but denies that Petitioner is entitled to such relief for the reasons stated above.
Page 3
Entire Tribunal Property Tax Answer Page 3 of 5 WHEREFORE, Respondent, Charter Township of West Bloomfield, requests the Tribunal dismiss the Petition, affirm Respondent’s assessed and taxable values, subject to county and state equalization, and award Respondent its costs and attorney fees. HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. /s/ Laura M. Hallahan__________________ LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) SETH A. O’LOUGHLIN (P80257) KELSEA M. MELCHER (P85821) Attorneys for Respondent 1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 Dated: July -8, 2025 (248) 731-3089 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Respondent, Charter Township of West Bloomfield, asserts the following affirmative defenses: 1. Petitioner fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action against Respondent and to support its claim for relief. 2. The Tribunal is charged with finding a property’s true cash value to determine the property’s lawful assessment. Alhi Development Co v Orion Twp, 110 Mich App 764, 767 (1981). 3. Petitioner has the burden of establishing the property’s true cash value. See MCL 205.737(3) and Kern v Pontiac Twp, 93 Mich App 612 (1974). 4. Petitioner has failed to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, error of law, discrimination, application of wrong principles, or illegality on the part of Respondent or its agents.
Page 4
Entire Tribunal Property Tax Answer Page 4 of 5 5. Petitioner has failed to allege that the mode and method of assessing the subject property fails to conform to the mode and method applied in the case of all other properties in Respondent’s taxing unit for the year in question. 6. Petitioner has failed to show that any factor other than fifty percent (50%) was applied to the true cash value of Petitioner’s property, as well as all others, to arrive at the respective assessments appearing on the roll, and also fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegations that the property’s taxable value is improper. 7. Petitioner asks the Tribunal to grant it preference by application of a self-chosen method of assessment contrary to the intent, purpose and law of this State. 8. Petitioner, in essence, asks the Tribunal to grant it an illegal preference by application of a method of assessment different from that employed in the assessment of other properties in Respondent’s taxing unit. 9. Petitioner, in essence, seeks by petition to challenge the process of county and state equalization as to which it has no legal standing and cannot maintain a cause of action. 10. Any decrease in the value of Petitioner’s property was a result of its own intentional acts and/or negligence and cannot be allowed to reduce Petitioner’s otherwise equitable tax burden. 11. Respondent has properly and lawfully assessed Petitioner’s property and established its taxable value in accordance with statutory and constitutional requirements. 12. Petitioner has failed to pursue its appeal in a timely fashion. 13. Respondent reserves the right to raise additional affirmative defenses as the same may become known to it during the course of these proceedings.
Page 5
Entire Tribunal
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-002402 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Township Of West Bloomfield (OAKLAND) Local Unit of Government/First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Laura M.I. M Last Name Hallahan Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 City or Town Bloomfield Hills State Michigan ZIP Code 48302 Telephone Number 248-731-3087 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) MTT@hallahanlaw.com Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: Laura M Hallahan /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Candace Properties LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-002402 Charter Township of West Bloomfield, Respondent. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT 1. The case is pending in the _X_ Entire Tribunal OR __ Small Claims Division. 2. Property Parcel No: X-18-19-101-019 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 X-18-19-101-019 $ 621,780 $ 310,890 $ 310,890 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 X-18-19-101-019 $ 475,000 $ 237,500 $ 237,500 5. If stipulation addresses tax years other than the tax year originally appealed or tax years added through motions to amend that have been granted by the Tribunal, list the separate facts upon which the parties rely to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over those tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary):
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002402 Consent Judgment, Page 2 of 2 6. List separately any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would affect the execution of this Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint payment of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): • The parties agree that interest is waived on all refunds issued pursuant to this stipulation as to all applicable jurisdictions. • The parties agree that the stipulation regarding the subject property’s assessed and taxable values is strictly for settlement purposes only. • This stipulation constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, written or otherwise, as to the property’s assessment(s) for the tax year(s) at issue. • Pay refund jointly to “Colliers International, c/o Candace Properties LLC.” • Refund check must be sent to: Colliers International, Attn: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. Vice President | Tax Appeal, 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350, Royal Oak, MI 48067. Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative: Signed:_____/s/ Joshua T. Shillair____Dated: June 13, 2025__ Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674), Attorney for Petitioner Signature of Respondent’s Authorized Representative: Signed:/s/Laura Hallahan with permission by JTS_Dated:_June 27, 2025_ Laura M. Hallahan (P42101), Attorney for Respondent [Consent Judgment will be prepared by the Tribunal.]
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
2025 Entire Tribunal Severed Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Candace Properties LLC v Charter Township of West Bloomfield Parcel Number: X-18-18-305-042 MOAHR Docket No.: 25-002402 Page 1 of 5 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Candace Properties LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-002402 Charter Township of West Bloomfield, Respondent. _____________________________________________________________________________/ Colliers International By: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) Vice President | Tax Appeal Representative for Petitioner 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, MI 48067 O: 248-226-1632 C: 517-202-5500 F: 248-226-1633 Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) SETH A. O’LOUGHLIN (P80257) KELSEA M. MELCHER (P85821) HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Attorneys for Respondent 1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 (248) 731-3089 lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com soloughlin@hallahanlaw.com kmelcher@hallahanlaw.com _____________________________________________________________________________/ 2025 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL SEVERED PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. The Petitioner in this matter, Candace Properties LLC, has the legal residence or principal office address of P.O. Box 252451, West Bloomfield, MI 48323. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property taxes on property parcel no(s). (hereinafter referenced as the Subject Property) X-18-19-101-019. If the Subject Property in this petition includes more than one (1) real property tax parcel, the Subject Property’s tax parcels are contiguous.
Page 2
2025 Entire Tribunal Severed Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Candace Properties LLC v Charter Township of West Bloomfield Parcel Number: X-18-18-305-042 MOAHR Docket No.: 25-002402 Page 2 of 5 2. The Subject Property is located in Oakland County. 3. Respondent, Charter Township of West Bloomfield, assesses and collects property taxes on the Subject Property. 4. The Subject Property is classified as 202 Commercial vacant. The Subject Property is presently used or available for use for commercial purposes. Petitioners believe that the Subject Property was originally designed to be used for commercial purposes. 5. The Subject Property’s address is: 3190 Haggerty Rd, West Bloomfield, MI 48323 6. This appeal involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value and (d) uniformity. 7. There is an appeal pending for the Subject Property before the Michigan Tax under MTT Docket No. 25-002402. 8. A Stipulation has been reached and is enclosed. 9. Petitioner now moves to add the 2025 tax year to the aforementioned MTT proceeding. 10. The values for the Subject Property as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 X-18-19-101-019 $ 621,780 $ 310,890 $ 310,890 11. Petitioner contends that the actual values for the Subject Property are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 X-18-19-101-019 $ 475,000 $ 237,500 $ 237,500 12. The amount of value in contention for the Subject Property is:
Page 3
2025 Entire Tribunal Severed Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Candace Properties LLC v Charter Township of West Bloomfield Parcel Number: X-18-18-305-042 MOAHR Docket No.: 25-002402 Page 3 of 5 Tax Year Parcel Number Assessed Value in Contention 2025 X-18-19-101-019 $ 73,390 WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that this Honorable Michigan Tax Tribunal enter an Order reducing the 2025 assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value for the Subject Property to the values stated in Paragraph 11 above and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. Respectfully Submitted, COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL Representative for Petitioner By:_/s/Joshua Shillair____Dated: July 7_, 2025 Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) Vice President | Tax Appeal 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, MI 48067 O: 248-226-1632 F: 248-226-1633 Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com
Page 4
2025 Entire Tribunal Severed Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Candace Properties LLC v Charter Township of West Bloomfield Parcel Number: X-18-18-305-042 MOAHR Docket No.: 25-002402 Page 4 of 5 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Candace Properties LLC, Petitioner, v MOAHR Docket No. 25-002402 Charter Township of West Bloomfield, Respondent. __________________________________________________________________________/ Colliers International By: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) Vice President | Tax Appeal Representative for Petitioner 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, MI 48067 O: 248-226-1632 F: 248-226-1633 Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com ________________________________________________________________________/ PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF MICHIGAN ) )ss COUNTY OF OAKLAND ) _Jennifer Lunsford, states that on July __7__ 2025_, in compliance with TTR 221, they did place in the US mail a copy of Petitioner’s 2025 Entire Tribunal Severed Property Tax Petition with docket number, the Notice of Severed Docket Number issued by the Michigan Tax Tribunal for this appeal as well as this Proof of Service of Petition for the above captioned appeal to the units of government listed on the second page of this Proof of Service of Petition. _/s/Jennifer Lunsford_______ Jennifer Lunsford Joshua Shillair, Esq. States that he submitted electronically on July_7, 2025__, to the Michigan Tax Tribunal a copy of this Proof of Service of Petition at e-File through www.etaxappeal.lara.state.mi.us. /s/Joshua Shillair Joshua Shillair
Page 5
2025
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Candace Properties LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002402 Township Of West Bloomfield, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on June 27, 2025, and finds that: a consent judgment can only be entered if a stipulation is filed after the filing of a petition and answer. See TTR 253 and TTR 283. Because no answer has been filed in this case, the stipulation cannot be entered at this time and must be denied. IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be placed on a Prehearing General Call in the normal course of scheduling. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance of this order, no additional filing fee is required. By _____________________________ Marcus L. Abood, Tribunal Member Entered: July 3, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Candace Properties LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002402 Township Of West Bloomfield, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on June 27, 2025, and finds that: a consent judgment can only be entered if a stipulation is filed after the filing of a petition and answer. See TTR 253 and TTR 283. Because no answer has been filed in this case, the stipulation cannot be entered at this time and must be denied. IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be placed on a Prehearing General Call in the normal course of scheduling. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance of this order, no additional filing fee is required. By _____________________________ Marcus L. Abood, Tribunal Member Entered: July 3, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Candace Properties LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002402 Township Of West Bloomfield, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on June 27, 2025, and finds that: a consent judgment can only be entered if a stipulation is filed after the filing of a petition and answer. See TTR 253 and TTR 283. Because no answer has been filed in this case, the stipulation cannot be entered at this time and must be denied. IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be placed on a Prehearing General Call in the normal course of scheduling. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance of this order, no additional filing fee is required. By _____________________________ Marcus L. Abood, Tribunal Member Entered: July 3, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 25-002402 Page 4 of 4
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Candace Properties LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-002402 Charter Township of West Bloomfield, Respondent. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT 1. The case is pending in the _X_ Entire Tribunal OR __ Small Claims Division. 2. Property Parcel No: X-18-19-101-019 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 X-18-19-101-019 $ 621,780 $ 310,890 $ 310,890 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 X-18-19-101-019 $ 475,000 $ 237,500 $ 237,500 5. If stipulation addresses tax years other than the tax year originally appealed or tax years added through motions to amend that have been granted by the Tribunal, list the separate facts upon which the parties rely to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over those tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary):
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002402 Consent Judgment, Page 2 of 2 6. List separately any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would affect the execution of this Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint payment of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): • The parties agree that interest is waived on all refunds issued pursuant to this stipulation as to all applicable jurisdictions. • The parties agree that the stipulation regarding the subject property’s assessed and taxable values is strictly for settlement purposes only. • This stipulation constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, written or otherwise, as to the property’s assessment(s) for the tax year(s) at issue. • Pay refund jointly to “Colliers International, c/o Candace Properties LLC.” • Refund check must be sent to: Colliers International, Attn: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. Vice President | Tax Appeal, 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350, Royal Oak, MI 48067. Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative: Signed:_____/s/ Joshua T. Shillair____Dated: June 13, 2025__ Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674), Attorney for Petitioner Signature of Respondent’s Authorized Representative: Signed:/s/Laura Hallahan with permission by JTS_Dated:_June 27, 2025_ Laura M. Hallahan (P42101), Attorney for Respondent [Consent Judgment will be prepared by the Tribunal.]
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Candace Properties LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 24-001775 & 25-002402 West Bloomfield Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Kari L. Miles ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO AMEND ORDER SEVERING 2025 TAX YEAR AND ASSIGNING IT DOCKET NUMBER 25-002402 On May 16, 2025, Petitioner filed a motion requesting that the Tribunal permit them to amend the petition filed in this case to include the 2025 tax year. On June 6, 2025, Respondent filed a response to the motion. In the response, Respondent states that valuation disclosures and prehearing statements are due on July 7, 2025, leaving an insufficient amount of time for Respondent to “conduct discovery or prepare a valuation disclosure relevant to the 2025 tax year. . . .” The Tribunal has considered the motion, the response, and case file and finds that Petitioner timely filed its Motion to Amend, included the necessary information and filing fee, and otherwise met all requirements, as set forth in MCL 205.737 and MCL 205.735a. Due to the stage in which this case is at, however, and in the interest of judicial efficiency, the 2025 tax year shall be severed from this case and assigned to a new docket number. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Amend is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s assessment appeal for the 2025 tax year is SEVERED and ASSIGNED to Docket No. 25-002402. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall file a petition pertaining to the 2025 tax year within 21 days of entry of this order.1 The petition shall note the docket number assigned by the Tribunal for the 2025 tax year and if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s e-filing system, must be filed on the assigned 2025 docket number as a “Severed Petition.”2 1 See TTR 233. 2 Alternatively, the petition may be downloaded from the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib and mailed to the Tribunal via United States Postal Service at: Michigan Tax Tribunal, PO BOX 30232,
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 24-001775 & 25-002402 Page 2 of 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Tribunal shall issue a Notice of Docket after receipt of the petition for the 2025 tax year. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of the appeal for the 2025 tax year.3 Entered: June 13, 2025 By _____________________________ kac/jcr PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk Lansing, MI 48909. The petition may also be delivered to the Tribunal via overnight carrier (UPS, FedEx, or DHL) at: Michigan Tax Tribunal, 2nd Floor MTT, 2407 N. Grand River Avenue, Lansing, MI 48933. 3 See TTR 237.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.