Record Finder / 26-001406-TT
Michigan
Broomfield Village LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Mt Pleasant Respondent
- Petitioner
- Broomfield Village LLC
- Respondent
- City Of Mt Pleasant
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-001406-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Isabella
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Order of Dismissal | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/15/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 07/15/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/15/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Motion to Withdraw Appeal was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/09/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/26/2026 | $600.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
Order_of_Dismissal.2026-07-15_16-19-46.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 BROOMFIELD VILLAGE LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 26-001406 City Of Mt Pleasant, Respondent. ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that: Petitioner has filed a Motion to Withdraw the Petition prior to the Petition being served on Respondent. Thus, Respondent has not appeared in this case. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. APPEAL RIGHTS If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-001406 Page 2 of 2 the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: July 15, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 BROOMFIELD VILLAGE LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 26-001406 City Of Mt Pleasant, Respondent. ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that: Petitioner has filed a Motion to Withdraw the Petition prior to the Petition being served on Respondent. Thus, Respondent has not appeared in this case. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. APPEAL RIGHTS If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 26-001406 Page 2 of 2 the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: July 15, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST.,
Page 6
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Petition - Broomfield Apts Mt. Pleasant.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL BROOMFIELD VILLAGE LLC, Docket No. 26- Parcel No. 17-000-16530-00 Petitioner, v. CITY OF MOUNT PLEASANT, Respondent. Brian E. Etzel (P54905) WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, RATTNER & PLUNKETT, PC Attorneys for Petitioner 380 N. Old Woodward Ave., Ste. 300 Birmingham, MI 48009 (248) 642-0333 bee@wwrplaw.com ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION Petitioner Broomfield Village, LLC, by and through its attorneys, Williams, Williams, Rattner & Plunkett, PC, states as follows for its Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition. The Parties 1. Petitioner Broomfield Village, LLC is a Michigan limited liability company whose address is 722 W Broomfield St K01, Mt Pleasant, MI 48858. 2. Respondent City of Mount Pleasant is a Michigan municipal corporation with its primary offices located at 320 W. Broadway, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858.
Page 2
The Subject Property 3. Petitioner owns property identified as Parcel No. 17-000-16530-00 and commonly known as 1002 W Broomfield St., Mt Pleasant, MI 48858 (the “Subject Property”). 4. The Subject Property is located in Isabella County and is within the Mount Pleasant Public school district. 5. Respondent possesses jurisdiction to assess and collect property taxes for the Subject Property. The 2026 Assessment 6. For the 2026 tax year, Respondent classified the Subject Property as commercial improved property. 7. For the 2026 tax year, Respondent established the Subject Property’s assessment for property taxes as follows: True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 4,048,600 2,024,300 2,024,300 8. Petitioner contends that a lawful assessment of the Subject Property for the 2026 tax year cannot exceed the following amounts: True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2,500,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 9. The amounts in dispute therefore are as follows: True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 1,548,600 774,300 774,300 10. This Petition presents issues involving the Subject Property’s valuation for assessment purposes. Petitioner does not believe that this Petition presents any issues arising out of “additions” or “losses” as the General Property Tax Act, MCL 211.1 et seq. (the “GPTA”),
Page 3
defines those terms, but reserves its right to assert issues involving losses should information supporting such issues become available. 11. The Subject Property’s 2026 assessment (a) violates the Michigan Constitution, the GPTA, and other Michigan law, (b) is based on erroneous principles and information, (c) is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and (d) otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights. 12. Petitioner does not assert that the Subject Property’s 2026 assessment is not uniform aside from the lack of uniformity resulting from Respondent overestimating the Subject Property’s values. Conclusion and Request for Relief WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that this honorable Tribunal enter judgment revising the Subject Property’s 2026 assessment to be consistent with the values set forth in Paragraph 8 of this Petition and granting Petitioner all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan law. Respectfully Submitted, WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, RATTNER & PLUNKETT, PC By: /s/ Brian E. Etzel Brian E. Etzel (P54905) Dated: May 26, 2026 Attorneys for Petitioner
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name BROOMFIELD VILLAGE LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 722 W Broomfield St K01, , MI City or Town Mt Pleasant State Michigan ZIP Code 48858 Telephone Number 2486420333 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) beetzel@wwrplaw.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Brian M.I. E Last Name Etzel Firm Name (if any) Williams Williams Rattner & Plunkett PC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 380 N. Old Woodward Ave., Ste. 300 City or Town Birmingham State Michigan ZIP Code 48009 Telephone Number 2486420333 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) BEEtzel@wwrplaw.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 1002 W Broomfield St., , MI Mt Pleasant
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Michigan 48858 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Mt Pleasant (ISABELLA) County Isabella If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 17-000-16530-00 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 2024300 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 2024300 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 2500000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 1250000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 1250000 Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Brian E. Etzel Payment Information Amount: 600 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26052686924127 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-07-15_16-17-21.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 BROOMFIELD VILLAGE LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-001406 City Of Mt Pleasant, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: July 15, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Motion to Withdraw.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL BROOMFIELD VILLAGE, LLC, Petitioner, MTT Docket No. 26-001406 v Property I.D. No: 17-000-16530-00 CITY OF MT. PLEASANT, Respondent. / Brian E. Etzel (P54905) Williams Williams Rattner & Plunkett, P.C. Attorneys for Petitioner 380 N. Old Woodward Ave, Ste. 300 Birmingham, MI 4800 (248) 642-0333 beetzel@wwrplaw.com / PETITIONER’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL Petitioner Broomfield Village, LLC, by and through its attorneys, Williams, Williams, Rattner & Plunkett, P.C., moves this honorable Tribunal to enter an Order withdrawing this appeal, as follows: 1. This is a property tax appeal involving Petitioner’s commercial real property located in the City of Mt. Pleasant. 2. Tax year 2026 is the only tax year on appeal. 3. Petitioner submitted its Petition in this appeal on May 26, 2026. 4. Under TTR 237(4), “A petition may be withdrawn upon a motion filed by the
Page 2
2 petitioner before the answer or first responsive motion has been filed with the tribunal.” TTR 231(3). 5. No Answer or first responsive motion has been filed in this matter. 6. Petitioner therefore moves pursuant to TTR 237(4) for the withdrawal of its Petition. WHEREFORE, Petitioner Broomfield Village, LLC respectfully requests that this honorable Tribunal enter an Order withdrawing this appeal. Respectfully Submitted, WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, RATTNER & PLUNKETT, P.C. By:_/s/ Brian E. Etzel Brian E. Etzel (P54905) Dated: July 9, 2026 Attorneys for Petitioner
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
SubsequentFiling.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-001406 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Petitioner Files Document Type: Motion to Withdraw Appeal Attachment File Name: Motion to Withdraw Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Petition - Broomfield Apts Mt. Pleasant.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL BROOMFIELD VILLAGE LLC, Docket No. 26- Parcel No. 17-000-16530-00 Petitioner, v. CITY OF MOUNT PLEASANT, Respondent. Brian E. Etzel (P54905) WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, RATTNER & PLUNKETT, PC Attorneys for Petitioner 380 N. Old Woodward Ave., Ste. 300 Birmingham, MI 48009 (248) 642-0333 bee@wwrplaw.com ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION Petitioner Broomfield Village, LLC, by and through its attorneys, Williams, Williams, Rattner & Plunkett, PC, states as follows for its Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition. The Parties 1. Petitioner Broomfield Village, LLC is a Michigan limited liability company whose address is 722 W Broomfield St K01, Mt Pleasant, MI 48858. 2. Respondent City of Mount Pleasant is a Michigan municipal corporation with its primary offices located at 320 W. Broadway, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858.
Page 2
The Subject Property 3. Petitioner owns property identified as Parcel No. 17-000-16530-00 and commonly known as 1002 W Broomfield St., Mt Pleasant, MI 48858 (the “Subject Property”). 4. The Subject Property is located in Isabella County and is within the Mount Pleasant Public school district. 5. Respondent possesses jurisdiction to assess and collect property taxes for the Subject Property. The 2026 Assessment 6. For the 2026 tax year, Respondent classified the Subject Property as commercial improved property. 7. For the 2026 tax year, Respondent established the Subject Property’s assessment for property taxes as follows: True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 4,048,600 2,024,300 2,024,300 8. Petitioner contends that a lawful assessment of the Subject Property for the 2026 tax year cannot exceed the following amounts: True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2,500,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 9. The amounts in dispute therefore are as follows: True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 1,548,600 774,300 774,300 10. This Petition presents issues involving the Subject Property’s valuation for assessment purposes. Petitioner does not believe that this Petition presents any issues arising out of “additions” or “losses” as the General Property Tax Act, MCL 211.1 et seq. (the “GPTA”),
Page 3
defines those terms, but reserves its right to assert issues involving losses should information supporting such issues become available. 11. The Subject Property’s 2026 assessment (a) violates the Michigan Constitution, the GPTA, and other Michigan law, (b) is based on erroneous principles and information, (c) is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and (d) otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights. 12. Petitioner does not assert that the Subject Property’s 2026 assessment is not uniform aside from the lack of uniformity resulting from Respondent overestimating the Subject Property’s values. Conclusion and Request for Relief WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that this honorable Tribunal enter judgment revising the Subject Property’s 2026 assessment to be consistent with the values set forth in Paragraph 8 of this Petition and granting Petitioner all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan law. Respectfully Submitted, WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, RATTNER & PLUNKETT, PC By: /s/ Brian E. Etzel Brian E. Etzel (P54905) Dated: May 26, 2026 Attorneys for Petitioner
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name BROOMFIELD VILLAGE LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 722 W Broomfield St K01, , MI City or Town Mt Pleasant State Michigan ZIP Code 48858 Telephone Number 2486420333 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) beetzel@wwrplaw.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Brian M.I. E Last Name Etzel Firm Name (if any) Williams Williams Rattner & Plunkett PC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 380 N. Old Woodward Ave., Ste. 300 City or Town Birmingham State Michigan ZIP Code 48009 Telephone Number 2486420333 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) BEEtzel@wwrplaw.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 1002 W Broomfield St., , MI Mt Pleasant
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Michigan 48858 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Mt Pleasant (ISABELLA) County Isabella If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 17-000-16530-00 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 2024300 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 2024300 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 2500000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 1250000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 1250000 Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Brian E. Etzel Payment Information Amount: 600 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26052686924127 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.