26-000891.pdf

Clayton M Chargot Petitioner V City Of Cedar Springs Respondent · 26-000891-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Je 

RECEIVED 

it 

MAY 2 8 2026 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MIC {ie 

, 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

AN TOXRLRIBUB 

bw, DPA 

‘ 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION / QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTION 

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-000891 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

Unit of Government 

City of Cedar Springs (KENT) 

First Name 

Last Name 

Clayton 

M 

Chargot 

Firm Name (if any) 

Malling Addrass {No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

PO Box 362 

City or Town 

State 

2IP Code 

Cedar Springs 

Mi 

49319 

Telephone Number 23 1 5278873 

Email Address {do not enter unless you want MTT to send ail correspondence via email) 

cmchargot@yahoo.com 

Section 3: Subj ect Property Information *use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parceis, 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. Attach a 

Separate sheet if necessary, 

ves 

[CI No 

#4 Notappiicable 

Parcel Identification Number: 

41-02-25-429-011 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Persona! [J (check one) 

Agriculturai 1 

Commercial 

[J 

Industrial 

[1 

Residential 

[J 

 Timber-Cutover [1 

Developmental 

[J 

Utility 

[J {check one) 

Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more for all tax years at issue? 

[1 Yes 

No 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

Principal Residence Exemption was denied because property is held in an LLC. 

PR Exemption would be granted if the property was held in a Trust. 

Why the different treatment, as both are separate entities? 

The property is held in an LLC because 

| rent it out through AirBnB (less than 15%). 

It is an easy way to supplement my fixed retirement income. 

LLC status protects me from personal litigation. It's just smart risk management! 

| live in this property 100% (24/7/365), even when letted out to an AirBnB guest. 

It is my Principal Residence, so 

| am petitioning for the PR Exemption, as the code intended. 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

Check what action prompted this appeal: 

Notice of Dental of Principal Residence Exemption 

|_| Denlal by Board of Review 

[| Denial by Dept. of Treasury 

[] Other 

If you checked “other” above explain: 

If Petitioner is appealing from a Board of Review denial, check which Board of Review took action: 

[3 march 

[ ouly 

[] pecember 

List the date the Principal Residence Exemption or Qualified Agricultural Exemption was denied: 

02-25-2026 

Tax year(s) denied: 2 026 

Signature ‘required 

Respond, 

torney/Authorized Repl > Signature: 

“ 

Fo 

7H] (lcosd

vay 

9202 87 Avi 

PaAl@oay 

26 MAY 2026 PM 4 

L 

SaldbUSE 

O

Micraoant Tay 

[RO RuNbL 

PO 

Box 

202232 

LANSING Y NL 

43909 

AEEIE-TTEEEE 

IRAE CEO 

EU 

TE EH CTR HU

← View full record