Petersen.pdf

Andrew H Petersen, Petitioner V Township Of Golden, Respondent · 25-003564-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

RECEIVED 

AUG 0 6 2025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First Nam, 

M1. 

Lasg-Name{Company Name 

Andrew 

H 

Fe 

tersen 

Mailing Address (No., Sireet, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

935 

NN. 

Hoyne Ave 

City or Town 

1 

State 

ZIP Code 

C ht cng fo) 

To 

ob L 

Telephone 

Number 

77> ~-312—-\\1 

§ 8 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

I 

First Name 

M1. 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many 

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

parcelsareyou | [] yest 

[] No* 

appealing? 

*If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels. 

| 

**f no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted. 

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property's address] 

713 

nV. 

Golden 

Sands 

Dir Mears 

, A1, 49 436 

45

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply) 

# True Cash and Taxable Vaiue 

[J Poverty Exemption 

{J Taxable Value Only (calculation) 

[0 Disabled Veterans Exemption 

[J] Uncapping of Taxable Value 

[O Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

a Exemption from Taxation {other than the denial of a 

[J Classification 

Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

AVY 

My 

property (713 N Golden Sands Dr.) 

is The smallest 

] 

oldest 

jake front 

home 

mm 

Fhe 

Subdvigiom 

but 

iS 

assessed 

Sunlarly 

or Ngher Than 

myely farger, 

newer 

homes. 

The 

lark 

value 

alone 

1 

equal 

+o 

or 

exceeds 

larger 

neighborim 

lots, 

resulting " 

an 

ines 

wi table 

tox 

burden 

See 

afrached 

WrHen 

Chdement of Appeal 

and 

Exhibits 

Lor 

d etaily 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Year(s) you are appealing; 

2005S 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

DJ Yes 

[| No 

if Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: BJ Maro 

[1] July 

[[} December 

if No, check the applicable reason(s): 

O 

Not required to attend 

Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner 

[| Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, Include explanation in Section 5) 

[| Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 

Appealing within 36 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping 

2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 

I. BROWN, DPA 

N 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

] 

2 

Section 7: Valuation Information «use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

, 

Parcel ldentification Number: 

f 

bY “00 ~-320 

“018 

~ 00 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one} 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value {also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

§ 

1%8),300 

E 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

(S88, 160 

What do you believe is the fair market value {also known as True Cash Value)? 

EE 

2377, 

LYO 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

YoNg, 

60 

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

ug, kro 

: 

Section 8: Classification Information only the mi Dep't of Treasury may appeal this Issue to the Tribunal 

ER 

Parcel Identification Number: 

bH-00L~-3720 

~01¥Y~-00 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

pt 

Personal 

{check one} 

Agricuftural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

a: 

What do you believe is the property's classification? 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Ss, 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

# 

If improved property, how is the property currently being used? 

a 

single 

- family 

residentiad 

home 

or 

If improved property, for what use was the prbperty designed? 

Single 

- 

tardy 

resident al 

how 

e

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 

& BROWN. DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

Fee Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? 

[| Yes 

5 

no 

Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? 

J ves 

®vo 

If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. 

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. 

If you are appealing more than one 

parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus 

$25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of 

$1,000, 

if your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$125.00 

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 

$200.00 

$0ver $500,000.00 

$300.00 

if your property is 

NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fea is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$250.00 

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. 

if your property is 

NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is $100,000.01 or greater the 

appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed. 

Signature *required 

Ist 

Petitioner of Attorney/Authorjzed Representative’s Signature:

Written Statement of Appeal — 2028 Property Tax Assessment 

Parcel ID: 64-006-320-018-00 

Property Address: 713 N Golden Sands Dr, Mears, MI 49436 

Petitioner: Andrew Petersen 

Type of Appeal: Small Claims — Written Hearing Requested 

Dear Michigan Tax Tribunal, 

I'am submitting this written appeal of the 2025 property tax assessment for my home at 713 N 

Golden Sands Dr in Golden Township, Oceana County. I respectfully request a written hearing 

in the Small Claims Division and offer the enclosed supporting documentation as evidence of 

substantial inequity in my property's valuation. 

My home is a 520 square foot, single-story structure built in 1956 on a 0.235-acre lakefront lot. It 

is the smallest lakefront home on the smallest lakefront lot in the Golden Sands I & II 

subdivisions — and likely in all of Golden Township. It is also the oldest home in the 

neighborhood. 

Despite these facts, my property’s 2025 assessed value is $181,300, and my taxable value is 

$158,160 — assessments that are equal to or greater than neighboring lakefront properties 

that are significantly larger, newer, or more developed. While my neighbor comparisons are 

based on the latest available 2024 assessment and tax data, they clearly show inequities in land 

value and total tax burden when compared to my smaller, older property. 

The inequity becomes clear when comparing my property to a few directly neighboring homes 

(2024 data): 

» 

493 N Lighthouse Dr — 1,020 sq ft home on a 0.514-acre lot (more than twice my lot 

size). Land assessment: $271,200 — $4,520 less than mine. 2024 tax: $7,553 — only 

6% more than my 2024 tax of $7,123. 

¢ 

413 N Lighthouse Dr — 936 sq ft home on 0.539 acres (2.3x my lot size). Land 

assessment: $275,720 (same as mine). 2024 tax: $5,467 — $1,656 less than my 2024 

tax. 

* 

693 N Golden Sands Dr — 1,621 sq ft home on 0.332 acres. 2024 tax: $5,075 — $2,048 

less than my 2024 tax, despite being three times the size. This property also includes a 

detached structure used as an office or accessory building, which does not appear to be 

captured in the reported improvements. (See Exhibit B.) 

Photos of these properties and my own are included as Exhibit B, and a complete property 

comparison table is provided in Exhibit A.

I respectfully request a minimum 25% reduction to the 2025 taxable value of $158,160, 

resulting in a revised taxable value of no more than $118,620. This reduction would bring my 

property’s burden into alignment with those of comparable homes and reflect a more just 

assessment. 

For reference, I have included my original appeal letter submitted to the Golden Township 

Board of Review (Exhibit C). This document contains the same comparable property analysis 

(now updated as Exhibit A) and demonstrates the consistency and thoroughness of my case. | 

respectfully ask the Tribunal to consider this letter as additional supporting context. 

Thank you for your time and consideration. I am available to provide additional documentation if 

requested and welcome your review of the enclosed materials. 

Sincerely, 

Cle LA 

Andrew Petersen 

935 N. Hoyne Ave Chicago IL 60622 

773-312-1158

Address. 

713 N Golden Sands D 

413 N Lighthouse Dr. 

725 N Golden Sands D 

709 N Golden Sands D 

705 N Golden Sands D 

493 N Lighthouse Dr 

701 N Golden Sands D 

6893 N Golden Sands D 

717 N Golden Sands D 

507 N Lighthouse Dr 

637 N Golden Sands D 

2157 N White Birch Dr 

2173 N White Birch Dr 

1714 N Shore Or 

1913 N White Birch Ct 

2235 N Holiday Dr 

Year Built Stories 

1956 

1 

1370 

1 

1858 

1 

1960 Multi 

1930 Multi + Bac 

2016 Multi + Bas 

1990 Multi 

1860 

1 + Basen 

15860 

1 

1979 1+ walkout 

2000 Multi + bas 

1976 Multi 

1972 Multi 

1951 

1 

1978 Multi 

1981 Multi 

520 

936 

792 

1200 

1380 

1020 

1092 

0.235 

0.539 

1.273 

0.252 

0.273 

0.514 

0.31 

0.332 

0.235 

0.402 

0.22 

0.45 

1512 

0.39 

0.216 

0.409 

$275,720 

$275,720 

$422,400 

$275,720 

$275,720 

$271,200 

$275,720 

$275,720 

$275,720 

$271,200 

5 

96,000 

$ 65167 

$244,000 

$246,000 

$246,000 

$ 

85,000 

SqFt 

LotSize (Acr 

land value improvmer Waterfront 

$11,700 

$13,888 

$11,700 

$11,700 

$11,700 

$14,587 

N/A 

$35,082 

$11,700 

$15,442 

$40,233 

$19,351 

$20,043 

$490 

Exhibit 

A 

Yes Lake Mict 

Yes Lake Mict N/A 

Yes Lake Mict N/A 

Yes Lake Mict N/A 

Yes Lake Mict 

Yes take Mick 

Yes Lake Mict N/A 

Yes Lake Michigan 

Yes Lake Mict 

Yes Lake Mict 

Yes Silver Cre N/A 

Yes Silver Lak N/A 

Yes Silver Lak N/A 

Yes Silver Lak 

Yes Silver Lak N/A 

11,700 Yes; Upper Si N/A 

Bedroom: Bath Garage 

2 

3 

4 

2 

7 

4 

Deck/Patio 

1 No 

None 

N/A no 

Yes 670 ft sq deck 

N/A no 

N/A 

N/A No 

200 5q ft Deck, Patio 

2 No 

Yes; 792 sq ft treated wood 

2 No 

Yes 

N/A No 

N/A 

2 Yes 960 sq f 647 sq ft deck 

ino 

993 5q ft deck(s) 

6 No 

646 sq ft deck; Upper / Lower Deck 

N/A Yes 576 sq f Yes {2) 538 sq ft 

N/A Yes 384 sq f 728 5q ft (2) Deck 

N/A Yes 768 sq f 323 sq ft Deck 

2 Yes 576 5q f None 

N/A No 

Upper Deck, Lower Patio 

N/A Yes 576 sq f Upper Deck, Lower Deck, Dock 

Additional Features 

none 

144 sq ft porch 

264 ft of Lake frontage; abuts State Park 

Shed, 15" Vinyl Seawall, Outdoor Shower 

Porch 30 sq ft; shed; 15' Vinyl Seawall 

2016 new home; lakefront boulders 

N/A 

3 porches totaling S00+ sq ft ; 1236 sq ft bsm 

shed, lower beach deck 

2016 Remode! 

2 porches totaling 242 sq ft. 

Garage; Balcony, 32 ft sq 

Garage 

Shed, 120 ft Lake Frontage 

Shed 

100 ft Lake Frontage 

2024 Tax 

$7123 

$5,467 

$9,707 

$7,448 

$9,920 

$7,553 

$7,305 

$5,075 

$4,621 

$6,157 

$10,424 

$4,119 

$7,267 

$7,938 

$6,917 

52,813 

2024 Assess 2023 Tax 

2023 Asse: 2022 Tax 

2022 

BB BDBBDDBND 

BOND Dn 

165,500 

198,000 

215,000 

243,500 

251,800 

243,300 

247,000 

301,800 

258,800 

250,900 

333,500 

146,300 

272,800 

248,000 

143,000 

152,100 

$ 6,840 

$ 5,198 

$9,344 

$ 7,152 

$9,525 

$7,253 

$ 7,067 

$4841 

$5712 

$3955 

$ 6,750 

$7177 

$4,320 

$ 2,683 

$ 146,100 

$ 171,500 

$201,800 

$ 204,900 

$211,100 

$ 185,100 

$207,700 

$ 251,600 

$ 216,500 

$ 210,600 

$ 114,400 

$239,900 

$ 227,800 

$219,300 

$ 118,100 

$6,426 

$4,927 

$6,712 

$6,807 

$6,634 

$6,700 

$5,462 

$3,712 

$6,484 

$7,255 

$4,054 

$2,495 

$13 

$1€ 

$14 

$18 

$17 

$18 

$19 

$18 

$¢ 

$24 

sic 

$12 

3

Exhibit B 

(peye 

I 

of 

3) 

Exhibit B1 — 493 N Lighthouse Dr 

* Home Size: 1,020 sq ft (96% larger than my home) 

* Lot Size: 0.514 acres (2.2 times larger) 

Land Assessment: $271,200 — $4,520 less than mine 

* 2024 Tax: $7,553 (only 6% more than mine)

Exhbit 

Bo 

(peje 

2 of 3) 

* Lot Size: 0.539 acres (2.3 times larger) 

» Land Assessment: $275,720 — same as mine 

2024 Tax: $5,467 — $1,656 less than mine 

Exhibit B3 - 693 N Golden Sands Dr 

* Home Size: 1,621 sq ft (over 3 times larger) 

* Lot Size: 0.332 acres (41% larger than mine) 

2024 Tax: $5,075 — $2,048 less than mine 

* Note: An additional structure (accessory office/ dwelling unit) is visible on the property, though 

it does not appear in the listed improvements data. This highlights further disparity when 

compared to my property.

Exhibit 

[2 

( pyc 

3 

of 

3) 

Exhibit B4 — Subject Property (713 N Golden Sands Dr) 

* Home Size: 520 sq ft (smallest lakefront home in Golden Sands I & IT) 

* Lot Size: 0.235 acres (smallest lakefront lot in the area) 

* Land Assessment: $275,720 — equal to or higher than larger neighboring lots 

©2024 Tax: $7,123

6/16/25,2:09 PM 

Gmail - Appeal of 2025 Property Tax Assessment for 7t3 N Golden Sands Dr 

Exhibit C 

aye) ) 

Andrew8&Ankica P <eagletwoblue@gmail.com> 

Appeal of 2025 Property Tax Assessment for 713 N Golden Sands Dr 

5 messages 

Andrew&Ankica P <eagletwoblue@gmail.com> 

Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 11:56 AM 

To: "assessor@goldentownship.org" <assessor@goldentownship.org> 

Dear Golden Township Board of Review, 

I'am submitting this formal appeal of my 2025 property tax assessment for 713 N Golden Sands Dr due to clear inconsistencies that result in 

disproportionate taxation. A comparative analysis of similar properties within my subdivision and surrounding area demonstrates that my 

property has been significantly overvalued relative to its size, lot, and fair market value. Based on the dataa presented, I respectfully request an 

adjustment to more accurately reflect an equitable assessment. 

1. My Home is the Smallest in the Subdivision Yet Over-Assessed 

o 

My home is 520 square feet, considerably smaller than all comparable properties in the subdivision. 

* 

My lot size is 0.235 acres, making it one of the smallest in the area. 

¢ 

Despite being the smallest home on the smallest lot, my land is assessed at $275,720, which is equal to or higher than significantly 

larger properties in the area—an evident overvaluation. 

2. Discrepancy with 709 N Golden Sands Dr (Neighboring Property) 

A clear example of over-assessment is 709 N Golden Sands Dr, a neighboring property with a significantly larger structure and lot, yet a nearly 

identical tax burden: 

¢ 

Home Size: 709 N Golden Sands Dr is 1,200 square feet— more than 130% larger than mine. 

o 

Lot Size: Their lot is 7.24% larger (0.252 acres vs. 0.235 acres). 

o 

Tax Burden: Their 2024 tax is $7,448, just 4.6% more than mine ($7,123), despite their home being more than twice as large and ona 

larger lot. 

Assessment Discrepancy: Despite these significant differences, my land is valued at the exact same $275,720 as 709 N Golden Sands 

Dr—an inequitable and unjustifiable assessment. 

3. Further Property Comparisons Reinforce Overvaluation 

725 N Golden Sands Dr (Larger Home, Much Larger Lot, Lower Effective Tax Rate) 

» 

Home Size: 792 square feet (52% larger than mine). 

o 

Lot Size: 1.273 acres (more than 5.4 times larger). 

© 

2024 Tax: $9,707 (only $2,584 more than mine despite vastly more property). 

« 

Key Issue: My tax burden is disproportionately high given how little land and structure 

| own in comparison. 

413 N Lighthouse Dr (Larger Home, Lower Tax Burden)

6/16/25,2:09 PM Exh b t ¥ 

- (= ) 

Gmail - Appeal of 2025 Property Tax Assessment for 713 N Golden Sands Dr 

«2024 Tax: $7,553, only 6% more than mine despite being nearly twice the size and on a lot more than twice as large. 

« 

Land Value: $271,200, which is actually $4,520 less than my land assessment, despite having a lot more than twice as large. 

+ 

Key Issue: If a home nearly double my size with a lot twice as large has a lower land assessment than mine, my valuation is clearly 

inated beyond reason. 

4. Multi-Year Tax Trends Show Unjustified Increases 

+ 

My property tax has increased 4.1% from 2023 to 2024 and 6.4% from 2022 to 2023, despite no major improvements to the home or 

lot. 

«Over two years, my total assessment jumped from $139,300 to $165,500 

—a 19% increase. 

« 

In contrast, 709 N Golden Sands Dr saw the same 4.1% increase, despite having significantly greater value. 

5. Additional Context: Smallest Lakefront Property in the Township 

¢ 

713 N Golden Sands Dr is the smallest Lake Michigan frontage house on the smallest Lake Michigan lot in all of Golden Sands 

I or 

11 and likely still the smallest in all of Golden Township. 

o 

Additionally, my home is the oldest in my subdivision since it was the first built. 

s 

Many neighboring properties have decks or garages larger than my entire home, yet my assessed value remains disproportionately 

high. 

Request for Fair Adjustment 

Based on these substantial discrepancies, I am requesting a minimum reduction of 30% from the 2024 taxable value of $153,405, bringing it 

to a maximum of $107,384. This aligns more closely with comparable properties and prevents my continued over-taxation. 

I appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing this appeaf and look forward to discussing it further if necessary. 

I have attached some of 

the data | have compiled from the township (and realtor.com where necessary). Please let me know if additional documentation or clarification is 

required. 

Sincerely, 

Andrew (and Ankica) Petersen 

713_appeal_Data.png 

967K

6/16/25,2:09 PM Exh b L Kl 

- (= ) 

Gmail - Appeal of 2025 Property Tax Assessment for 713 N Golden Sands Dr 

«2024 Tax: $7,553, only 6% more than mine despite being nearly twice the size and on a lot more than twice as large. 

+ 

Land Value: $271,200, which is actually $4,520 less than my land assessment, despite having a lot more than twice as large. 

« 

Key Issue: If a home nearly double my size with a lot twice as large has a lower land assessment than mine, my valuation is clearly 

inflated beyond reason. 

4. Multi-Year Tax Trends Show Unjustified Increases 

* 

My property tax has increased 4.1% from 2023 to 2024 and 6.4% from 2022 to 2023, despite no major improvements lo the home or 

lot. 

+ 

Over two years, my total assessment jumped from $139,300 to $165,500—a 19% increase. 

» 

In contrast, 709 N Golden Sands Dr saw the same 4.1% increase, despite having significantly greater value. 

5. Additional Context: Smallest Lakefront Property in the Township 

¢ 

713 N Golden Sands Dr is the smallest Lake Michigan frontage house on the smallest Lake Michigan lot in all of Golden Sands 

I or 

It and likely still the smallest in all of Golden Township. 

» 

Additionally, my home is the oldest in my subdivision since it was the first built. 

+ 

Many neighboring properties have decks or garages larger than my entire home, yet my assessed value remains disproportionatety 

high. 

Request for Fair Adjustment 

Based on thesc substantial discrepancies, I am requesting a minimum reduction of 30% from the 2024 taxable value of $153,405, bringing it 

to a maximum of $107,384. This aligns more closely with comparable properties and prevents my continued over-laxation. 

1 appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing this appeal and look forward to discussing it further if necessary. 

| have attached some of 

the data I have compiled from the township (and realtor.com where necessary). Please let me know if additional documentation or clarification is 

required. 

Sincerely, 

Andrew (and Ankica) Petersen 

713_appeal_Data.png 

967K

Exhibit 

C 

(paye 

3) 

3 

Address 

Year Built Stories 

SqFt 

Lot Size {Acs 

land value improvmer Waterfront 

Bedroom: Bath Garage 

Deck/Patio 

Additional Features 

2024 Tax 

2024 Assess 2023 Tax 

2023 Asse: 2022 Tax 2022 Ass 

4 

713NGoldenSandsD 

1956 

1 

520 

0.235 $275,720 

$11,700 Yes Lake Mict 

2 

1Ne 

None 

none 

$7,123 

$ 165500 

$6840 

$146300 

$6426 

$139,3¢ 

5 

413 N Lighthouse Dr. 

1570 

1 

936 

0.539 $275,720 

$13,888 YesiakeMictN/A 

N/A no 

Yes 670 ft sq deck 

144 59 ft porch 

$5467 

$ 198000 

$5198 

$171,500 

$4927 

 $160,9 

& 

725NGoldenSandsD 

1958 

1782 

1273 $422400 

$11,700 

Yestiake MictN/A 

N/A no 

N/A 

264 ft of Lake frontage; abuts State Park 

$9,707 

$ 215000 

$9,344 

$201,800 

7 

709NGoldenSandsD 

1960 Multi 

1200 

0252 

$275,720 

$11,700 Yestake MictN/A 

N/A No 

200 sq ft Deck, Patio 

Shed, 15" Vinyl Seawall, Outdoor Shower 

$7,448 

$ 243,500 

$7,152 

$204900 

$6712 

$1455¢ 

3 

705N GoldenSands D 

1990 Mukti + Bas 

1380 

0.273 $275720 

$11,700 

Yes Lake Mict 

3 

2No 

Yes; 792 sq ft treated wood 

Porch 30 sq ft; shed; 15' Vinyl Seawall 

$9,920 

$ 251,800 

$9,525 

$211,100 

$193,8C 

2 

493 N Lighthouse Dr 

2016 Multi + Bas 

1020 

0514 

$271,200 

$14,587 

Yes Lake Mict 

4 

2No 

Yes 

2016 new home; lakefront boulders 

$7553 

$ 243,300 

$7,253 

$185,100 

$6,807 

$1718 

10 

701N GoldenSandsD 

1990 Multi 

1092 

0.31 

$275,720 

N/A 

Yes Lake Mick N/A 

N/A No 

N/A 

N/A 

$7,308 

$ 247,000 

$7,067 

$207,700 

$6,634 

$191.2 

693 N Golden Sands D 

1960 1+ Basem: 

1621 

0.332 

$275,720 

$35,082 

Yes Lake Michigan 

2 Yes 960 sq 647 sq ft deck 

3 porches totaling 500+ sq ft ; 1236 sq ft bsm 

$5,075 

$ 301,800 

$4,841 

$251,600 

717N Golden Sands D 

1960 

1 

1600 

0.235 $275720 

$11,700 

Yes Lake Mick 

2 

ino 

993 sq ft deck(s) 

shed, lower beach deck 

$4621 

$ 258800 

$216,500 

$6700 

$198,5C 

507 N Lighthouse Dr 

1979 1+ walkout 

1717 

0.402 

$271,200 

$15,442 

Yes Lake Mick 

7 

&No 

646 sq ft deck; Upper / Lower Deck 

2016 Remode! 

$6,157 

$ 

250,900 

§ 5712 

$210,600 

$5462 

$193,0C 

637N Golden Sands D 

2000 Multi + bas 

2912 

0.22 

$ 95000 

$40,233 

YesSilverCre N/A 

N/A Yes 576sqf Yes (2) 538 sq ft 

2 porches totaling 242 sq ft. 

$10,424 

$ 333,900 

2157 N White Birch Or 

1976 Muiti 

975 

045 

§ 

65167 

$19,351 YesSilverlakN/A 

N/A Yes 384sqf 728 sq ft (2) Deck 

Garage; Balcony, 32 ft sq 

$4119 

3 

146,300 

$3955 

$114,400 

$3,712 

$95.8 

2173 N White Birch Dr 

1972 Multi 

2200 

1512 

$244,000 

Yes Silver LakN/A 

N/A Yes 768 sq f 323 sq ft Deck 

Garage 

$7,267 

$ 

272,800 

$6750 

$239,900 

$6484 

 $242,9¢ 

1714 N Shore Dr 

1951 

11461 

0.33 $246000 

$20,043 

Yes Sitver Lak 

4 

2 Yes5765qf None 

Shed, 120 ft Lake Frontage 

$7938 

$ 248000 

$7777 

$227,800 

$7,255 

$193,0C 

1913 N White Birch Ct 

1978 Multi 

1350 

0.216 $246,000 

$450 

Yes Sitver Lak N/A 

N/A No 

Upper Deck, Lower Patio 

Shed 

$6917 

$ 

149,000 

$4320 

$119,300 

$4,054 

$1203 

2235 N Holiday 

Dr 

1981 Multi 

864 

0.409 

§ 

85,000 

11,700 Yes; Upper Si N/A 

N/A Yes 576 sq f Upper Deck, Lower Deck, Dock 

100 

ft Lake Frontage 

$2,813 

§ 

152,100 

$2,683 

$118,100 

$2,495 

$99,1C

2025 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION 

FROM 

GOLDEN TWP ASSESSOR 

BARBIE EATON, MAAO 

PO BOX 26 

MEARS MI 49436 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: (Parcel Code required. Property address 

and legal description optional.): 

64-006-320-018-00 

713 N GOLDEN SANDS] 

PETERSEN ANDREW & ANKICA 

713 N GOLDEN SANDS DR WD-L2001P25637 WD-L2008P5689 

935 N OE Ps 

QC-L2011P19059 GOLDEN SANDS LOT 18 & UNDIV INT IN 

CHI 

60 

LOT 38. SPLIT ON 10/18/2011 INTO 006-320-018-00-01, 006-320 

-018-00-02; COMBINED WITH 006-320-018-00-01 & 006-320- 

018-00-02 IN 2015; 

THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED 

401 

(RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) 

Thank you for attending this years March Board of Review. The Board has reviewed the information you supplied and the data necessary 

to compute your assessment and taxable value. 

The Board has completed their review of parcel number 

64-006-320-018-00 

They have made the following determination based on the information you supplied. 

Board of Review Comments 

THE ASSESSED VALUE DOES NOT EXCEED 50% OF THE TRUE CASH VALUE. 

| 2025 

ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE 

181,300 

| 

| 2025 "BOARD OF REVIEW" ASSESSED VALUE 

181,300 

| 

(If the above amounts are the same, no revisions have occured) 

2025 ORIGINAL TAXABLE VALUE 

158,160 

2025 "BOARD OF REVIEW" TAXABLE VALUE 

158,160 

2025 

PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION/QUALIFIED AG 

0.0000 

Please feel free to contact the assessor at the address listed above or call (231-873-4413) if you have any questions. 

If you disagree with the determination of the March Board of Review you may appeal their decision to the Michigan 

Tax Tribunal. All petitions for Commercial or Industrial property must by received by the Tribunal no later than May 

31st. All petitions for Agricultural or Residential property must be received by the Tribunal no later than July 31st.

Petersen 

Andeew 

935 N. 

H oy ne 

Ave. | 

Chicago 

, TL (op22 

OR 

i 

cla ie I 

Saal 

CC Noval 

) 

- 

5) 

~ 

Po. RO

| eo 0 

, 

JV\

← View full record