Full record / scpetition_valuation.pdf

scpetition_valuation.pdf

Jeff Brian Swartz Petitioner V Township Of Springfield Respondent · 26-000906-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

1 of 3

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM

VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL

MTT DOCKET NO. 

Petitioner’s Contact Information:

Filer Type:

Individual

Local Unit of Government:

First Name

Jeff

M.I.

Brian

Last Name

Swartz

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

12042 Rusty LN

City or Town

Davisburg

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48350

Telephone Number

2485050820

E-mail Address

jeff@carbscontracting.com

Subject Property Information:

How many parcels are you appealing?

2

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?

*If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel

Yes 

Property Address (No., Street)

Rusty LN

12042 Rusty LN

City or Town

Davisburg

County

Oakland

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48350

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Township Of Springfield (OAKLAND)

Check which of the following you are appealing: (check all that apply)

True Cash and Taxable Values

 

Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal:

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

2 of 3

We met with Springfield Township Board of Review and no revisions occurred. We believe this in error due to the lot being unbuildable as determined by Oakland 

County Health Division due to not being able to get separation between the well and septic per attached. For reference, the Valuation Report shows sold for 

$275,000 on 4/14/2022. This is partially true as this parcel was part of a purchase we made with (2) other adjoining properties with the total sale for all (3) 

properties to be $275,000. Also, the valuation report shows Lake Access, this is partially true due to the easement down the street owned by Springfield 

Township. I take this as not exclusive lake access for this property due to the access being owned by the Township and Big Lake is a public access lake.

Jurisdictional Issues:

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes

If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: March

If No, please check the applicable reason(s):

Year(s) Under Appeal:

2026

 

Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal:

Parcel Number:

U-07-28-353-014

Classification of Property: Personal (check one)

Residential (check one)

Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review:

81710

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

58780

What do you believe is the fair market value?

20000

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.

10000

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

 

 

Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal:

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

3 of 3

Parcel Number:

U-07-29-451-017

Classification of Property: Personal (check one)

Residential (check one)

Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review:

46660

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

33730

What do you believe is the fair market value?

35000

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.

17500

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner’s Signature: 

/s/ Jeffrey B Swartz

Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature:

/s/ 

Fee Information:

If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for 

the filing of this appeal.

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel 

with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each 

additional parcel being appealed.

Property tax appeal: Residential** Non-Residential

SEV or TV in contention*

 

 Filing fee*** Filing Fee**

$100,000 or less...........................................................................................$ 125.00 $250.00

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00.........................................................................$ 200.00 N/A

More than $500,000…..................................................................................$ 300.00 N/A

Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition?

Yes

PDF reading copy

← View full record