Full record / scpetition_valuation.pdf

scpetition_valuation.pdf

Caitlyn Fisher Petitioner V City Of Lansing Respondent · 26-002543-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

1 of 3

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM

VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL

MTT DOCKET NO. 

Petitioner’s Contact Information:

Filer Type:

Individual

Local Unit of Government:

First Name

Caitlyn

M.I.

Last Name

Fisher

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

1970 E Ashbrook Dr

City or Town

Owosso

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48867

Telephone Number

2487630043

E-mail Address

ulinskirentalsllc@gmail.com

Subject Property Information:

How many parcels are you appealing?

1

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?

*If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel

N/A 

Property Address (No., Street)

6027 Hughes Rd

City or Town

Lansing

County

Ingham

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48911

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Lansing (INGHAM)

Check which of the following you are appealing: (check all that apply)

Uncapping of Taxable Value

 

Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal:

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

2 of 3

My property at 6027 Hughes Rd in Lansing was bought as a property that needed work, particularly because it had a termite infestation that I've been working on 

remediating. The property was deeded from my sole-member LLC to my personal name and then back into my same sole-member LLC solely to satisfy some 

requirements from my lender between the end of 2024 & early 2025. I am, and have always been, the only member of the LLC and the only one who holds 

ownership interest in this property. Throughout the entire process, I am the only person who has held an ownership interest in this property. The property was 

transferred to my name in late 2024 and the taxes did not uncap for 2025. However, when I transferred the property back to my LLC in early 2025, the city is now 

trying to uncap my taxes for 2026. I am still the only owner of the property so this does not make sense, not to mention that I have transferred several properties 

to/from my LLC many times and never had this issue. As someone who owns multiple properties and always diligently pays her taxes, I find this to be an unjust 

and avaricious act from the city. In addition, I had first reached out about this tax uncapping issue to the City of Lansing assessing office in early March of 2026 and 

was told by the administrative assistant "I'll make sure the 6027 Hughes property gets corrected at the upcoming March Board of Review" via an email chain that I 

have and can provide. Then in June of 2026, I received a letter from the assessor that she will not change her decision. This, unfortunately, left me in a position 

where I was unable to present my case at all since I was previously told I didn't have to petition at the March Board of Review because it would be fixed as a 

mistake. So now I am reaching out to get assistance to correct this. Please help! Thank you for your time & consideration of my case!

Jurisdictional Issues:

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? No

If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: 

If No, please check the applicable reason(s):

Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact

Not required to attend

Year(s) Under Appeal:

2025

 

Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal:

Parcel Number:

33-01-05-05-379-041

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Residential (check one)

Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review:

42800

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

32405

What do you believe is the fair market value?

64810

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.

32405

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

3 of 3

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

32405

 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner’s Signature: 

/s/ Caitlyn Fisher

Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature:

/s/ 

Fee Information:

If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for 

the filing of this appeal.

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel 

with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each 

additional parcel being appealed.

Property tax appeal: Residential** Non-Residential

SEV or TV in contention*

 

 Filing fee*** Filing Fee**

$100,000 or less...........................................................................................$ 125.00 $250.00

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00.........................................................................$ 200.00 N/A

More than $500,000…..................................................................................$ 300.00 N/A

Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition?

No

PDF reading copy

← View full record