Southfield_2026_MTT_Valuation_Appeal_Filing_Packet_DRAFT.pdf
MaCherie Everson Petitioner V City Of Southfield Respondent · 26-002916-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Other Exemptions, Special Assessments, or NonProperty tax disputes. Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name MaCherie R. Everson Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 24910 Glenbrooke Drive City or Town State ZIP Code Southfield MI 48033 Telephone Number 248-388-0413 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) m.reeseeverson@gmail.com Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name M.I. Last Name Firm Name (if any) Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) Section 3: Subject Property Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. How many parcels are you If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? appealing? Yes* No** 1 **If No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel Property Address (No., Street) 24910 Glenbrooke Drive City or Town County State ZIP Code Oakland Southfield MI 48033 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City of Southfield
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Value Taxable Value Only (calculation) Uncapping of Taxable Value Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes No If Yes, check which BOR you attended: March July December If No, please check the applicable reason(s): Not required to attend Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping Other If you checked “other” above, explain: Year(s) under appeal: 2026
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 7: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Number: 76-24-20-326-070 Classification of Property: Real Personal (check one) Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential TimberCutover Developmental Utility (check one) Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: by the Board of Review: $70,000 $70,000 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? $130,000 What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed value by .5) $65,000 assessed value) $65,000 Fee Information Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at issue? Yes No If you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees. If the property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00 If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $125.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00 $Over $500,000.00 $300.00 If the property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. If the property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or greater the appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed. Signature *Required Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/
Page 4
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION MaCherie Reese Everson, Docket No. ____________ Petitioner, Tax Year: 2026 v. Parcel No. City of Southfield, 76-24-20-326-070 Respondent. ATTACHMENT A TO SECTION 5 STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR APPEAL AND RELIEF REQUESTED 1. Petitioner appeals the 2026 true cash value, assessed/state equalized value, and taxable value of the residential property located at 24910 Glenbrooke Drive, Southfield, Michigan 48033 (the “Property”). 2. The March 2026 Board of Review established an assessed/state equalized value of $70,000 and a taxable value presently understood to be $70,000. An assessed value of $70,000 corresponds to an asserted true cash value of $140,000. 3. Petitioner purchased the Property on March 7, 2025 for $130,000, approximately nine months before the December 31, 2025 tax day for the 2026 assessment. Petitioner will submit the closing documents and other competent evidence of the sale. 4. Under MCL 211.27(1), true cash value is the Property’s usual selling price. The purchase price is not automatically controlling or presumptive, but the recent sale is relevant market evidence. No substantial improvement between the March 2025 purchase and tax day supports an increase from the $130,000 purchase price to a $140,000 true cash value. 5. As of tax day, the Property also had material condition and deferred-maintenance issues affecting market value. Petitioner’s evidence will address conditions existing on or before December 31, 2025, including documented water intrusion/foundation concerns, mold-related conditions, an obsolete Pushmatic electrical panel, aging mechanical systems, and dated interior finishes and repair needs. Petitioner does not rely on conditions first arising after tax day. 6. Petitioner requests that the Tribunal determine the Property’s 2026 true cash value at $130,000, assessed/state equalized value at $65,000, and taxable value at $65,000, subject to correction if the Board of Review notice states a different taxable value than the provisional figure listed in the petition. 7. Petitioner further requests all resulting corrections to the assessment and tax rolls, together with any refund or credit and interest provided by law. 8. This valuation appeal is separate from Petitioner’s pending 2026 poverty-exemption application under MCL 211.7u. Nothing in this petition withdraws, replaces, moots, or waives that application or any right to review or appeal the City’s handling or disposition of it. Initial Supporting Evidence. Petitioner will attach the 2026 Board of Review decision or assessment notice and intends to submit the March 7, 2025 closing documents; dated photographs, inspection and repair records concerning conditions existing by tax day; the City property record card and valuation materials; and relevant market-comparable evidence. Additional evidence will be exchanged in accordance with the Tribunal’s scheduling order. 1