Full record / COMBINED ANSWER TO PETITION .pdf

COMBINED ANSWER TO PETITION .pdf

Holly M Manssur Petitioner V Township Of Fenton Respondent · 26-000436-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

Holly M Mannsur 

PETITIONER 

vs 

Township of Fenton 

RESPONDENT 

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-000436 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COUNTY OF GENESEE 

JULIA L. WILSON, being first duly sworn, deposes and states that on the 26th day of May, 2026 she mailed a 

true copy of ANSWER TO PETITION in the above-named case by placing same in an envelope so 

addressed with sufficient postage prepaid thereon and placing said envelope in the United States Mail, to 

the following: 

Holly M Manssur 

27490 Golden Shores Circle 

Fenton, MI 48430 

JULIE-BOURNE ORAA 

Notary Public. State of Michigan 

County of Genesee 

My Commission Expir s Apr. 07, 2028 

Acting in the County of

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

LANSING 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / UNCAPPING 

MTT DOCKET NO. ______________________ 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

Unit of Government 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

Telephone Number: 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name: 

M.I.: 

Last Name: 

Firm Name (if any): 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

Telephone Number: 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. Attach a 

separate sheet if necessary. 

Yes 

No 

Not Applicable 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more for all tax years at issue? 

Yes 

No 

26-000436

Fenton

MI

48430

Julia

L

Wilson

Fenton

MI

48430





Charter Township of Fenton

12060 Mantawauka Drive

810-629-3445

jwilson@fentontownship.org

Charter Township of Fenton

12060 Mantawauka Drive

810-629-3445

jwilson@fentontownship.org

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

LANSING 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

Yes 

No 

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

March 

July 

December 

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? 

Yes 

No 

If yes, cite the Board’s authority. 

Was the assessment at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? 

Yes 

If yes, explain 

No 

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

Yes 

No 

If so, what is the issue date? 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE 

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? 

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? 

Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Number: 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established 

by the Board of Review: 

Taxable Value established by the Board of Review: 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as true cash value)? 

What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash 

value by .5) 

What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed 

assessed value) 

Signature *Required 

Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ 













294,900

589.800

MCL 211.27a(3)

06-14-552-027

294,900

294,900

2/23/2026

294,900

See attached Answer Section 4.

5/26/26

26-000436

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

LANSING 

PAPER FILING INSTRUCTIONS FOR ANSWER TO 

VALUATION/UNCAPPING APPEAL 

Follow these instructions for filing this Small Claims answer form. For questions that are 

not answered by these instructions, please visit the Tribunal’s website at 

www.michigan.gov/taxtrib or contact the Tribunal at 517-335-9760. 

Mail the completed form to: 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

611 W. Ottawa St., Lansing, MI 48933 

U.S. Postal Mailing Address: PO BOX 30232, Lansing, MI 48909 

Other Carriers (UPS, FedEx, DHL): 

2nd Floor MTT, 2407 N. Grand River Avenue, Lansing, MI 48906 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information: If the respondent is a unit of 

government, the “Respondent” is not the assessor, Respondent is the unit of 

government filing the answer to the petition (i.e. city or township). If the respondent is 

not a unit of government, Respondent is the party or parties (i.e., taxpayer) filing the 

answer to the petition. Provide the name, address and daytime phone number for the 

respondent. 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact 

Information: If Respondent is a unit of government, Respondent must be represented 

by an attorney or authorized representative (i.e., assessor) to file an answer to the 

petition. If Respondent is not a unit of government (i.e., taxpayer), Respondent does 

not have to be represented by an attorney or authorized representative to file an answer 

to the petition. If Respondent is using an attorney or authorized representative, that 

attorney or authorized representative must provide all information requested in Section 

2 of the Answer Form. If Respondent elects to have an attorney or authorized 

representative, only the attorney or authorized representative will receive notices and 

documents from the Tribunal. 

IMPORTANT: If the contact information for Respondent or Respondent’s attorney or 

authorized representative, if listed, includes an email address, the Tribunal will use that 

email address to electronically serve all future documents issued by the Tribunal. Once 

an email address is provided, a request to opt out of electronic service must be made in 

writing. 

Section 3: Subject Property Information: 



Are the parcels contiguous or adjoining: If multiple parcels are being

appealed, indicate whether they are adjoining (i.e., next to each other). If all

parcels are not adjoining, list the parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings.

Use a separate sheet of paper if necessary.

Page 5

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

LANSING 



Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more:

Indicate whether the property had a Principal Residence Exemption of at least

50% for all tax years at issue at the time the petition was filed.

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal: Provide the basis of Respondent’s 

answer to the appeal and any necessary explanation. 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues: 

If Petitioner is appealing the true cash and/or taxable values: 



Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR): Indicate

whether Petitioner protested the assessment at a BOR and, if so, which BOR

Petitioner attended (March, July, or December).



If the July or December BOR revised the assessments at issue: If the July or

December BOR revised the assessments at issue, indicate whether the BOR had

authority to make the revisions, and if so, identify the BOR’s authority.



Was the assessment at issue established as the result of a clerical error or

mutual mistake of fact: Indicate whether the assessment at issue was

established as a result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact, and if so,

identify the specific error or mistake and indicate how that error or mistake

resulted in the assessment.



Is Petitioner is appealing from a State Tax Commission Order: Indicate

whether Petitioner is appealing from a State Tax Commission (STC) order, and if

so, identify the date the STC order was issued.

If Petitioner is appealing the uncapping of a property’s taxable value: 



When was the Notice of Uncapping issued: Identify the date that the

uncapping notice was issued to Petitioner. Submit a copy of the uncapping

notice with the answer.



Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped: Identify the

statutory provision under which the property’s taxable value was uncapped.

Section 6: Valuation Information: Use the Multiple Parcel Form for additional parcels. 



Parcel Number: List the parcel number of the property being appealed.



Classification of Property: Check the classification of the property being

appealed.



Assessed Value established by the BOR: Provide the assessed value

established by the BOR for the tax year under appeal.



Taxable Value established by the BOR: Provide taxable value established by

the BOR for the tax year under appeal.



What do you believe is the fair market value: Identify what Respondent

believes the fair market value is for the tax year under appeal.



What do you believe is the assessed value: Identify what Respondent

believes the assessed is for the tax year under appeal.



What do you believe is the taxable value: Identify what Respondent believes

the taxable value is for the tax year under appeal.

Page 6

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

LANSING 

Signature: If Respondent is unrepresented, Respondent must sign the answer form. If 

an attorney or other authorized representative is identified in Section 2 of the answer 

form, the petition form must be signed by that representative and not Respondent. A 

unit of government must be represented. 

REMINDERS: 

You must submit the original, completed, signed answer form to the Tribunal. You 

should also keep a copy for yourself. 

The Tribunal will issue a Notice of Filing after an answer is filed and indicate the case is 

ready for the scheduling of a hearing. 

The Tribunal will send a notice of hearing to the parties no less than 45 days in advance 

of the hearing. 

To check the status of your appeal, visit our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib and 

click on the “Docket Search” option.

Page 7

Section 4 Answer. 

Petitioner appealed to the MBOR. Petitioner purchased for 8/13/2025 $550,00 . Assessed Value is at 

50% of market value based upon sales provided by the Respondent Sales Study of Lake Fenton Canal 

properties. Homes on Lake Fenton canals have NOT sold for $400,000. The range is from $485,000 

(with issued) to $800,000. Petitioner provided 3 sales comparable to the MBOR. The sales provided were 

the only the ones lower than petitioners sale price in the sales between 4/2023 and 12/31/2025. Tax 

day for 2026 assessments is December 31, 2025 NOT December 31, 2026. 

March Board of Review reviewed and found the following on supplied comparable by petitioner. There 

were 15 sales within the sales study time frame used by Assessor. All homes below not comparable due 

to construction type and condition compared to subject property. These were only 3 lower than subject 

sale price and were supported in the market as such. 

1.

13386 Fenton Road sold $485,000. This sale included a damaged home under partial

construction for the entire basement level, smoke damage in the main level and severl other

issues with the home. Assessor walked through the home with the new owners.

2.

1365 Blue Water Home sold for $488,000 with no updates and home very outdated from

the 1970’s. Home currently re sold with no changes at $500,000

3.

2414 Cranewood again home is out dated with no updates sold for $525,000

Subject property although a smaller home on the lake has a nice size yard and almost double the 

frontage as comparable provided by petitioner at 100ft. Home is of brick construction on all 4 sides and 

1008 sf is utilized for valuation as comparable are not. Home has been updated including a custom 

kitchen and both bathrooms. Also noted that the record card states recreational finish of 504 s.f., after 

reviewing it appears the basement finish has been updated to include finishes and wetbar which should 

be moved to living finish. Seller provided a home warranty on the home with the sale 

Based upon another review of this home along with comparable both provided by petitioner at MBOR 

and sales study from Assessor sales supports the current assessed and taxable values for the 2026 year 

True Cash Value of $589,800. 

26-00043626-000436

PDF reading copy

← View full record