Full record / 25-003077.pdf

25-003077.pdf

David Turner, Petitioner V Township Of Buchanan, Respondent · 25-003077-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

0CT 16 2025 

MICHIGAR TAX TRIBUNAL 

a 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

MTT DOCKET NO, 25-003077 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

First Name 

ML 

Last Name 

Township of Buchanan 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

15235 N Main Street 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Buchanan 

M 

ore 

Telephone Number 269-6 95-6442 

Emall Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

] 

First Name 

Mm. 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any} 

Mailing Address {No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZiP Code 

Telephone Number 

Email Address (do not enter untess you want MTT to send aif correspondence via email) 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

Yes 

[} No 

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. 

0 Yes 

0 No 

Not Applicable

Page 2

) 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

Petitioner did not apply or file form 5107 "Affidavit for Disabled Veterans Exemption” along with 

supporting documentation in 2024. 

Petitioner's wife did call in July of 2025. 

She stated that because their tax bill displayed 

"PROPERTY PRE: 

100" she must have misunderstood that to mean the Disabled Veterans 

Exemption had been applied for and granted for the 2024 tax year, 

Petitioner then discovered 

that the 2025 Disabled Veterans Exemption had not yet been applied for. 

Petitioner then applied 

for the 2025 Disabled Veterans Exemption and was approved. 

The form 5107 submitted by the petitioner as supporting evidence for this 2024 appeal was 

never received at the Township. 

Once again, the petitioner did not file the form 5107 "Affidavit for Disabled Veterans Exemption" 

along with supporting documentation in 2024. An exemption was not applied for; therefore, an 

exemption was never denied. 

This was not a clerical error or a mutual mistake of fact. The 

exemption was not applied for in 2024. 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [mi] Yes 

M'no 

if yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 0 March 

[| July 

[Ml] December 

if no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? [| Yes 

[| No 

*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. 

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? [i] Yes 

[m] No 

If yes, cite the Board's authority. 

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [mm] Yes 

[Hl] No 

If yes, explain 

Is Petitioner appeating from a State Tax Commission Order? 

[Ives 

Ono 

if so, what is the issue date?

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at 

a BOR? [| Yes 

No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [| March 

[W] July 

O December 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner's Poverty Exemption: 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS 

Did Petitioner request the exemption at a BOR? [a] Yes 

No 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: O March 

[Hl] July 

[Hl] December 

Tax Year(s) denied: 

List the date the exemption was denied: 

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? 

IF PETITIONER [S$ APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY 

What do you believe the classification shoutd be: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

0 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Section 6: Valuation Information use the multipte parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcei identification Number: 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Page 4

BUCHANAN CHARTER TOWNSHIP 

BUCHANAN MI 49107-8117 

11 OCT 2025 

AM49 L, 

* 

USA» 

FOR

Michigan 

Tax Tribunal 

PO 

BOX 30232 

Lansing, 

MI 48909 

Fall 

He bby yas 

0 

5 ps 

Oe 

MC

PDF reading copy

← View full record