Full record / 05._Property_Tax_Appeal_Answer_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.3fa6db88-677c-4f75-b1b4-0cee88e7160b.pdf

05._Property_Tax_Appeal_Answer_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.3fa6db88-677c-4f75-b1b4-0cee88e7160b.pdf

Nathaniel Kramer, Petitioner V Township Of Allouez, Respondent · 25-003060-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-003060

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Township Of Allouez (KEWEENAW)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Lisa

M.I.

R

Last Name

Karrio

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

3594 Five Mile Point Rd

City or Town

Allouez

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

49805

Telephone Number

906-235-8757

Fax Number

E-mail Address

lkarrio@gmail.com

Section 3: Subject Property Information

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

Yes

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another.

N/A 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this 

document, you may be held in default.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

The MBOR reduced the percent functional from 100% to 70% for this building to take into account the sloping auditorium floor of the main church room. 

Following Sales is illegal in Michigan, the sale price was not considered for the Assessed or Taxable values. The Township Sales Study was used to come up with 

Township ECF's and land values, Grant Township or other County sales were not included in the Township Sales Study, as the petitioner referred to as premium 

sales. 

As far as the other concerns of the property as in bathrooms, bedrooms, water damage, etc. all fall under "repair and maintenance" of the building when purchased. 

The location of the building was there when purchased along with the "neighbors" that were mentioned. 

As far as not receiving your Change Notice in February, the Town of Mohawk (and other towns in the Keweenaw) only has Post Office Boxes, no home delivery. 

Petitioner is required to give the correct mailing address to receive their notices/mailings/tax bills. Registered Deeds can be acquired at the Keweenaw County 

Courthouse, if one was required by the Post Office. 

In conclusion, the March BOR, gave the petitioner a 30% functional reduction for the church sloping floor. The Sale price was not considered as per "Following 

Sales" Bulletin of 19 of 1997.

Also, I am questioning if this petition was "timely filed"? There is no "date stamp" on the petition and no "postmarked" envelope included with the petition. It 

states on the MTT website it was downloaded on July 31st, but I did not receive a "Notice of Docket Number" until October 2nd. So I checked for a "Date Stamp" 

or "postmarked envelope" and there is neither on this petition.

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? March*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer.

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? 

If yes, cite the Board’s authority.

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No

If yes, explain.

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

If so, what is the issue date?

MI

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued?

The Change Notices were mailed out in February prior to the March BOR.

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped?

The Change Notices were mailed out in February prior to the March BOR.

The Change Notices were mailed out in February prior to the March BOR.

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR?

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption:

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS

Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended:

Tax Year(s) denied:

List the date the exemption was denied:

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.

Parcel Identification Number:

42-101-53-018-001-001

Classification of Property:

Real 

Residential

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:

59602

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:

59602

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

119204

Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.

59602

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Lisa R Karrio, MAAO (3)

PDF reading copy

← View full record