Slicker.pdf
Matthew G Slicker, Petitioner V Township Of White Lake, Respondent · 25-003533-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
RECEIVED
AUG 0 1 2025
MICHT
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GAN TAX TRIBUNAL
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL
Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or
Non-Property tax disputes.
Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal
{e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not
submit this document, you may be held in default.
Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information
First Name
ML
Last Name/Company Name
Matthew
G
Slicker
Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
408 Burgess Dr
City or Town
State
ZiP Code
White Lake
Mi
48386
Telephone Number 248-535-3342
E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)
adrienneslicker@gmail.com
Section 2: Petitioner's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information
1
First Name
M1.
Last Name
Firm Name (if any)
Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Telephone Number
Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email)
Section 3: Subject Property Information
How many
if you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?
parcelsareyou | [| ves*
[ ] No™
appealing?
*if yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels.
1
**If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted.
Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP)
[If multiple, list first property's address]Page 2
ay
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check
ai that apply)
{J True Cash and Taxable Value
[7 Poverty Exemption
[@ Taxable Value Only (calculation)
[1 Disabled Veterans Exemption
a Uncapping of Taxable Value
[J Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA)
[1 Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a
[O Classification
Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption)
Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
In 2021, My home was 1894 sft and the taxable value was $106,590 and my next door house was 2224 sft and taxable value
was approximately $106,900.
After doing and addition to my home in to make the total square footage of my to be 2245 sft,
the 2025 taxable value has been increased to $155,370 and the neighbors is $125,885.
| am using my neighbors house as a
comparison because they were built in similar years, location and size. The township reduced my taxable value to $63,730 in
2022 while
| added the addition to my house and are now reassessing it this year. While my addition did add value to the
house, it did not add taxable value as the taxable value has been too high for a number of years prior to my addition so
| have
been over paying in property taxes for years.
| understand that the prior year taxable value can not be appealed and that is
not what is being asked.
The other mistake that the township made is that the addition did not add the taxable value of $30,000 ($60,000 Actual Cash
Value) when compared to the next door neighbor's house. They added $30,000 based on the value of the addition to get to
the same square footage. They didn't take into account that there would have been a value to additional square footage
|
added if it already existed when comparing the 2 houses.
So if the 300 sft addition added $30,000 in taxable vaiue only a
portion of that would increase my taxable value above my neighbors as being new construction because there would have
been a value if the addition was already there.
| am asking for my taxable value to be in line with my neighbors that has the
similar size and location.
| also purchased my house prior to my neighbor so my taxes should have been lower. Adjustments
made after the 2008 market reduction have put me at a disadvantage as
| have been over paying since the adjustments.
Please see the attached breakdown of the comparable costs. There are a few methods to determine the taxable value but this
shows the townships method was flawed.
Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
Year(s) you are appealing:
2025
Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [4 Yes
[Hl] No
If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [EEA] March
[8] July
[I] December
If No, check the applicable reason(s):
O Not required to attend
[| Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner
[] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section §)
O Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission OrderPage 3
:
Pie
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 7: Valuation Information *use the multiple parce! form for additional, contiguous parcels.
Parcel identification Number:
Y-12-27-427-004
Classification of Property:
Real
Personal
{check one}
Agricultural
Commercial
industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one}
Current Assessed Value {also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:
$299,790
Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:
$155,370
What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?
$560,000
Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.
$280,000
if you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.
$133,991
Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal*
Parcel Identification Number:
Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review:
Real
Personal
{check one)
0
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
What do you believe is the property's classification?
Real
Personal
(check one)
O0
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(checkone)
tfimproved property, how is the property currently being used?
if improved property, for what use was the property designed?Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Fee Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? [A ves [1 No Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? O Yes [ No If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $125.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00 $Over $500,000.00 $300.00 If your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. If your property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is $100,000.01 or greater the appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed. Signature *Required Petitioner or Atjorney/Authgrized Representative’s Signature: Isl
Page 5
WHITE LAKE TOWNSHIP 7525 HIGHLAND RD WHITE LAKE, MI 48383 03/27/2025 SLICKER, MATTHEW SLICKER, ADRIENNE 408 BURGESS DR WHITE LAKE MI 48386-2813 PARCEL IDENTIFICATION: Y -12-27-427-004 BOARD OF REVIEW PETITION: 21 ---NOTICE OF BOARD OF REVIEW ACTION--- The Board of Review has examined your 2025 Assessed Value and/or Capped Value and has made the following decision: 2025 Assessed Value From: 2025 Assessed Value To: 312,340 299,790 2025 Capped Value From: 2025 Capped Value To: 167,920 155,370 2025 Taxable Value From: 2025 Taxable Value To: 167,920 155,370 Board of Review reason (code): 060 Board of Review Comments: agree assessor recommendation The 2025 Capped Value formula is the 2024 Taxable Value, minus Losses, increased in 2025 by the Inflation Rate Multiplier of 1.031, plus Additions. Taxable Value is the lower of Assessed Value or Capped Value unless there was a transfer of ownership in 2024. Your Taxes are levied on the Taxable Value. Further appeal of valuation may be made to the Michigan Tax Tribunal, PO Box 30232, Lansing
Page 6
408 Burgess Taxable Value Appeal *2025 Taxable Value = 2024 Taxable Value x CPI + Addition Value x 0.5 70,250x 1.031 + 60,000 x 0.5 = * Based on 2024 Actual Taxable Value Property Comparison Address 408 Burgess 400 Burgess SFT i . | Year Capped 2002 2013 2024 Taxable Value $70,250 $122,110 Cost per SFT of Taxable Value $55 2024 Taxable Value base on 400 Burgess prior to Addition (1894 sft) $103,991 Increased addition taxable value $30,000 Based on Twp Estimate of $60,000 of actual construction Costs Requested 2025 TaxableValue © © 133991 Township Recommended Taxable Value $156,810 $125,895
Page 7
JU 9589 0710 5270 190% SLEL 44 D5 fox 30232 Lansing ml 46Fa 9 Jresdifpe yi Joijiss jis flr fia BEER U.S. POSTAGE PAID FCM LETTER BLOOMFIELD HILLS MI 48302 JUL 30, 2025 $6.08 48909 $2324E502191-52 RDC 99