scanswer_valuation.pdf
Quest Trust Co Petitioner V Township Of Peninsula Respondent · 26-002429-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. 26-002429 Respondent’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government: Township Of Peninsula (GRAND TRAVERSE) First Name M.I. Last Name Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information, if any: First Name Sally M.I. Ann Last Name Murray Firm Name (if any) Peninsula Township Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 13235 Center Rd City or Town Traverse City State Michigan ZIP Code 49686 Telephone Number 2312237313 E-mail Address sallyannmurray8120@gmail.com Subject Property Information: Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. *If necessary, attach a separate sheet. N/A Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more? No
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal: The MBOR reviewed petitioner evidence and discounted the land 25% to account for the utility line bisecting the property. Notable: the parcel is zoned R1C and the location of the utility line would NOT interfere with a parcel division. Many parcels in this vicinity lack municipal sewer and water service. The assessing office has never had complaints of water quality issues. This was an estate sale as evidenced by the Multiple Listing Service, indicating there may have been a motivated seller. No conclusive comparable market data was provided by petitioner. Respondent land value, ECF analysis and record card to be provided. Requesting the AV/TV as determined by the MBOR be upheld. Jurisdictional Issues: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES: Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended: March If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, please cite the Board’s authority? Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, please explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? No If yes, when was it issued? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE: When was the Notice of Uncapping issued? Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Valuation Information: Parcel Identification Number: 28-11-336-098-00 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 216100 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 216100 What do you believe is the fair market value? 432200 What do you believe is the taxable value? 216100 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent’s Signature: /s/ Sally Murray Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/