26-001156.pdf

Kristin A Grimm Petitioner V City Of Kalamazoo Respondent · 26-001156-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

RECEIVED 

a 

MAY 27 2026 

& 

Haas 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN. DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM 

VALUATION / UNCAPPING 

MTT DOCKET NO. Zlo-yWW 

lo 

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information 

Unit of Government 

NB 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

PAR Somes Da 

City or Town; 

State: 

ZIP Cole: 

Vhedamoez on 

rE | WACO 

Telephone Number: 

2LaC\- DSO 1519 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

KAM noe ash 

@ pea, comm 

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name: 

M.l.: 

Last Name: 

N/A 

Firm Name (if any): 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route): 

City or Town: 

State: 

ZIP Code: 

Telephone Number: 

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email): 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Are the parcels listod by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? 

if no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. Atlacha 

separate sheet if necessary. 

Oves 

[Ono 1d Not Applicable 

Does the subject properly have a Principal Residence Exemption of 60% or more for all tax years at issue? 

IX 

ves 

8 no

= 

4 

i 

Ty 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 

|. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal 

The. 

nied Board 

Aid lower Prue SEY A Yaxelore. 

Vet 

0- Wie Yor 

back \n Nese Ze2te. TX Gan SX) 

Aopesting 

Yh 

dadision Yecaube “re Taian 

board 

Md act Lower 

WN 

valees Cnoogn Tw 

based 

on “Vo 

Soe Woy InGee Ween The 

Nora AG ned BEN ax Ne Caecd Gasested DA Nobeedobe 

The Condon A 270 oF Nonue Baur GS 00d 

+ Smaller Corogegad 

4 

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues 

Ney Mi LYS, 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES 

, 

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? 

| Yes 

LJ} No 

if yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: p< March 

jm} July 

[] December 

If the July or December 

BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? [_] Yes 

[No 

If yes, cite the Board's authority. 

Was the assessment at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? [_] Yes 

4 No 

. 

If yes, explain 

UNAS, our TT Weller no 

is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? UNAS Ce, uy ~ Deel Nes 

Yes 

No 

If so, what 

is the issue date? k- 

2) 

DI22% 1210 2 

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE 

When was the Notice of Uncapping, If applicable, issued? 

Uunsuce., 

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? LNsce. 

Section 6: Valuation Information use ihe muitipte parcel form for additiona, contiguous parcels. 

Parcet Number: 

Ole-771 -1- 

1 IT) 

Classification of Property: 

Real LJ 

Personal 

J 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

J 

Commercial {1 

Industrial] 

Residential [1 

 Timber-Cutover [1 

Developmental {J 

Utility [3 (check one)

THE 

CITY 

OF 

Management & Budget Services 

- Notice of March Board of Review Action - 

Assessor's Office 

/ 

241 West South Street 

nn 

Parcel Number: 06-27-117-118 

oar 8636 

Brag erly Address: 

398 SUMMIT DR 

www.kalamazoocity.org 

GRIMM, KRISTIN 

Property Class: 407 

398 SUMMIT DR 

» 

KALAMAZOO 

MI 

49001 

Petition #: Mar26-106 

Date Printed: 03/23/2026 

The Board of Review has completed their review of your property. The Board has made the 

following determination based on the information supplied to them by you or your representative. 

The Board stated the following reason(s) for changing (or not changing) your assessed and/or taxable 

value: 

Board of Review Comments: 

Board of Review reduced value based on petitioner's evidence and testimony. 

2026 

Original Assessed value (SEV) 

$201,300 

2026 

Board of Review Assessed Value decision 

$190,000 

Please note: If the amounts are the same, then the Board of Review's decision was not to change the value. 

2026 

Original Taxable Value 

$201,300 

2026 

Board of Review Taxable Value decision 

$190,000 

This notice informs you of the action taken by the Board of Review pursuant to your appeal or their review. An effort 

has been made to determine an assessment that is fair in relation to true cash value, as required by law, and equitable 

with respect to other assessments. 

NOTICE: YOUR RIGHT TO FURTHER APPEAL 

If you disagree with the decision of your local Board of Review, a further appeal of the assessed value and/or 

taxable value and/or qualified agricultural property exemption may be made to the Michigan Tax Tribunal, P.O. 

Box 30232, Lansing, MI 48909. 

If you have a Commercial Real, Industrial Real, Development Real, Commercial Personal, Industrial Personal or 

Utility Personal Property; the final date for filing such an appeal is May 31 of the current year, 2026 

If you have an Agricultrual Real, Residental Real, Timber-cut Over Real or Agricultural Personal Property; the

Agsin Ginn 

28Q Some ‘Oe 

YAadamez 

eo, ovis Noo 

GRAND RAPIDS MI 492 

23 MAY 2026AM 4 L 

Mieriopn 

16 

18 oened 

Lo WE ovo 

ST 

Lowrtody, OE LBA} 

ABTIF-10TOLL 

EPR he 

ped te

← View full record