25-003564.pdf

Andrew H Petersen, Petitioner V Township Of Golden, Respondent · 25-003564-TT

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

So 

EZ 

RECEIVED 

+4 

FEB 17 2026 

Andrew Petersen 

i 

MICHIG, 

. 

3 

935 N Hoyne Ave Chicago, IL 60622 

AN TAX TRIBUNAL 

. 

eagletwoblue@gmiail 

com 

Date: February 9, 2026 

To: 

: 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

P.O. Box 30232 

Lansing, MI 48909 

Subject: Explanation of Late Proof of Service — Docket No. 25-003564 

Dear Clerk of the Tribunal, 

Fam writing to provide the enclosed Proof of Service form and to explain the delay in submitting 

this required item in relation to my appeal for the property located at 713 N Golden Sands Dr. 

Mears, MI 49436 

; Parcel No. 64-006-320-018-00. 

After receiving the Notice of Docket dated October 9, 2025, I regretfully did not realize that 1 

, 

was required to notify Golden Township by mail at that time. I take responsibility for this 

oversight. I also understand that a reminder notice was later issued by the Tribunal, but I did not 

[ 

receive it due to a clerical address error: the notice was sent to "Chicago, MI" instead of 

"Chicago, IL," and as a result, it never reached me. 

In January 2026, upon contacting the Tribunal by phone, 

I learned for the first time that my 

appeal was being delayed due to the missing Proof of Service. Your office kindly advised that a 

corrected notice would be reissued and my address updated, which 

I appreciate. In February 

2026, I am still having an issue with mail delivery sent from the Tax Tribunal since my address 

remains Chicago, MI in the system. 

3 

As of today, I have now mailed a copy of the petition and docket notice to Barbie Eaton at 

Golden Township in Mears, MI as required. The signed Proof of Service form is enclosed with 

5 

this letter. 

: 

Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I respectfully ask that my appeal be allowed to 

proceed. 

Sincerely, 

fA

Page 2

RECEIVED

FEB 17 2026

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

MARLON {. BROWN, DPA

GOVERNOR

LANSING

DIRECTOR

Andrew H Petersen,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

MTT Docket No. 25-003564

Township Of Golden,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the

Tribunal's website.

By: __ Tribunal Clerk

Entered: October 9, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized

representatives.

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA

GOVERNOR

DIRECTOR

LANSING

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or

Non-Property tax disputes.

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal

(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable.

If you do not

submit this document, you may be held in default.

Section

1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

First Namg

RY On [Company Name

Andrew

¢etersen

Mailing Address (Nc, Street, P. i Gox or Rural Route)

935

No Hoyne Ave

City or Town

State

ZIP Code

Ch caao

6 LL

’

77% -23iL-\\ 68

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send alt correspondence via e-mail}

Section 2: Petitioner's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Last Nawe

Firm Name (if any)

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route}

City or Town

State

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT Lo send ati correspondence via email)

Section 3: Subject Property Information

How many

If you are appealing mare than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?

parcels areyou | [7] vest

[] No*

appealing?

*If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels.

{

**{f no, you must file separate appeals for each non-conligubus or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulled.

Property Address (No, Street, City, ST, ZIP)

[If multiple, RsUjirst property's address)

713

NN. Golden

Sands

Pir

Tears AL, 44436

Page 4

STAT 

OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (hock 

al 

nat apply) 

rf True Cash and Taxable Value 

{J Poverty Exemption 

[3 Taxable Vatue Only (catculation) 

ul] Disabled Veterans Exemption 

0 Uncapping of Taxable Value 

J 

Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA) 

jm} Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial 

of a 

{1 Classification 

Principat Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption) 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

My 

property (703 N Golden Sands De Yis fhe smallest 

ides) 

iakefrut home 

m 

the Subdivigion but 

iS 

assessed 

Stanilacly 

4 

hy hev 

than VATIaN 

Jargey) 

newer 

homes. 

The 

land 

value 

alene 

ig 

gual 

’ 

Fo 

or 

exceeds 

Jarqer 

neighboring 

[ots, 

resulting an 

ines 

ui tahie 

Fox 

burde A 

See 

abrached 

WeHen 

(udemenT of Appeal 

and 

Exhibits 

Cor 

detads 

AY 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

Year(s} you are appealing: 

2.018 

Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? DQ Yes 

LJ] No 

If Yas, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: 1) March 

[1 July 

[] December 

WH No, check the applicable reason(s}: 

Not required to attend 

[3 Assessment Changs Notice was not received by Petitioner 

[3 Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutuat Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) 

[J Appeating within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order 

Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping

Page 5

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

LANSING 

Section 7: Valuation Information “use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel Identification Number: 

LY 

~ 00 

~ 320 

018 

~ 006 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

{check one} 

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

ss 

0) 

[8],300 

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 

tf 

/58. 

160 

What do you believe is the Tair market value {atso known as True Cash Value)? 

237, 

L440 

SE 

Multiply the True Cash Value by .6 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 

Vong, 

6 ro 

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

Vogl 

L ro 

Section 8: Classification Information only the i bep't 

of Treasury 

may 

appeal 

this issue to the Tribunai* 

ry 

may 

app 

Parcel Identification Number: 

N 

N 

= 

oe 

JPEN 

_ 

~ 

bd - 00-320 

~01Y 

-0CO0 

Currant Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

i= 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

What do you believe is the property's classification? 

Real 

Personat 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Ulility 

{check one) 

if improved property, how is the property currently being used? 

Single 

= 

Cam 

ly 

resideatyed 

heme 

if improvedproperly, for what use was the properly designed? 

Single 

- 

framily 

resident 

wl 

hewn ¢ 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

~; 

It

Page 6

STATE 

OF NHCIHHGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

GOVERNOR 

Fee Information 

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the dale of tha Ring of this petition? 

[3 ves no 

Are you appeating ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? 

[3 Yes vo 

Ifyou answerod yes to either or both of the above questions, you are nol required to pay any filing fees. 

The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention, Ifyou are appealing more Tham one 

parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus 

$25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed 4 total filing fee of $1,000, 

if your property is residential property (see MGL 206.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$125.00 

$100,000.01 to $500,000.00 

$200.00 

$Over $500,000.00 

$300.00 

If your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and 

the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: 

Filing Fee is: 

$100,000.00 and under 

$250.00 

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. 

If your property is 

NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is $1 00,000.01 or greater the 

appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed. 

Signature ‘required 

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative's Signature: 

ist 

Com 

ya 

2

Page 7

Written Statement of Appeal — 2024 Property Tax Assessment

Parcel ID: 64-006-320-018-00

Property Address: 713 N Golden Sands Dr,

Mears, MI 49436

Petitioner: Andrew Petersen

Type of Appeal: Small Claims — Written Hearing Requested

Dear Michigan Tax Tribunal.

1 am submitting this written appeal of the 2025 property tax assessment for my home at

713 N

Golden Sands Dr in Golden Township, Oceana County.

| respectfully request a written hearing

in the Small Claims Division and offer the enclosed supporting documentation as evidence of

substantial inequity in my property's valuation.

My home is a 520 square fool. single-story structure built in 1956 on a 0.235-acre lakefront lot. It

is the smallest lakefront home on the smallest lakefront lot in the Golden Sands

1 & 11

subdivisions — and likely in all of Golden Township. It is also the oldest home in the

neighborhood.

Despite these facts, my property's 2025 assessed value is $181,300, and my taxable value is

$158,160 — assessments that are equal to or greater than neighboring lakefront properties

that are significantly larger, newer, or more developed. While my neighbor comparisons are

based on the latest available 2024 assessment and tax data. they clearly show inequities in land

value and total tax burden when compared to my smaller, older property.

The inequity becomes clear when comparing my property to a few directly neighboring homes

(2024 data):

e493 N Lighthouse Dr — 1,020 sq

ft home on a 0.5 14-acre lot (more than twice my lot

size). Land assessment; $271,200 —- $4,520 less than mine. 2024 tax: $7,553 — only

6% more than my 2024 tax of $7,123.

«413 N Lighthouse Dr —~ 936 sq ft home on 0.539 acres (2.3x my lot size). Land

assessment: $275,720 (same as mine). 2024 tax: $5,467 — $1,656 less than my 2024

tax.

e693 N Golden Sands Dr — 1.621 sq ft home on 0.332 acres. 2024 tax: $5,075 — $2,048

less than my 2024 tax, despite being three times the size. This property also includes a

detached structure used as an office or accessory building, which does not appear to be

captured in the reported improvements. (See Exhibit B.)

Photos of these properties and my own are included as Exhibit B, and a complete property

Page 8

I'respectfully request a minimum 25% reduction to the 2025 taxable value of $158,160, 

resulting in a revised taxable value of no more than $118,620. This reduction would bring niy 

propeity’s burden into alignment with those of comparable homes and reflect a more just 

assessment. 

For reference, 

I have included my original appeal letter submitted to the Golden Township 

Board of Review (Exhibit C). This document contains the same comparable property analysis 

(now updated as Exhibit A) and demonstrates the consistency and thoroughness of my case. 

| 

respectfully ask the Tribunal to consider this letter as additional supporting context. 

Thank you for your time and consideration. 

I am available to provide additional documentation if 

requested and welcome your review of the enclosed materials. 

Sincerely, 

Andrew Petersen 

935 N. Hoyne Ave Chicago 11 60622 

773-312-1158

Page 9

Address 

713 N Golden Sands D 

413 N Ughthouse Dr 

725 N Golden Sands D 

709 N Golden Sands D 

705 N Golden Sands D 

493 N Lighthouse Or 

701 

Golden Sands © 

593 N Goiden Sands D 

717 Nu Golden Sands © 

507 N Lighthouse Or 

637 N Golden Sands © 

2157 N White Buch Or 

2173 N White Birch Dr 

1714 N Shore Or 

1913 N White Birch Ct 

2235 N Holiday Dr 

1956 

1370 

1858 

1960 

1980 

2016 

1990 

1960 

1960 

1979 

2000 

1876 

1572 

1951 

1978 

1581 

Year Built Stories 

- 

Mult 

Multi + Bar 

Multi + Bas 

Mutt 

1+ Basemi 

1 

1+ walkout 

Mults + bas, 

Maults 

Mulu 

Mult 

Mult 

520 

936 

792 

1200 

138C 

1020 

1092 

1621 

1600 

1717 

2912 

97% 

2200 

1461 

1350 

864 

SqFt 

Lot Size (Acr 

0.235 

0.53% 

1.273 

0.252 

0.273 

0.514 

0.31 

0.332 

0.235 

0.402 

0.22 

0.45 

1512 

0.39 

0.216 

0.409 

land value improvmer Waterfront 

$275,720 

$275.720 

$422,400 

$275,720 

$275,720 

$271,200 

$275,720 

$ 275,720 

$275,720 

$271,200 

$ 

96,000 

& 

85,167 

$244,000 

$245,000 

$246,000 

$ 

85,000 

Exhibir 

A 

$11,700 

513.888 

$11,700 

$11,700 

$11,700 

$14,587 

N/A 

$35,082 

511,700 

$15,442 

540,233 

519,351 

$520,043 

$450 

11,700 

Yes Lake Mic 

Yes Loke Mic N/A 

Yes Lake Mict N/A 

You Lake Mict N/A 

Yes Lake Mich 

Yes Lake Mich 

Yes Lake Mict N/A 

Yes Lake Michigan 

Yes Lake Mict 

Yes Lake Mict 

Yes Silver Cre N/A 

Yes Silver Lak N/A 

Yes Sitver Lak N/A 

Yes Sitver Lak 

Yes Silver Lak N/A 

Yes; Upper $i N/A 

Bedroom: Bath Garage 

2 

1% 

N/A no 

N/A no 

N/A No 

3 

2M 

4 

2 

No 

N/A No 

2 Yes 960 sq 

2 

loo 

7 

6no 

N/A Yes $76 sq 

N/A Yes 384 sgt 

Deck/Patio 

None 

Yes 670 ft sq deck 

N/A 

200 5q ft Deck, Patio 

Yes: 792 5g 

#t treated wood 

You 

N/A 

647 sq tt deck 

993 5 ft dock(s) 

545 50 ft deck: Upper / Lower Deck 

Yes (2) 538 sq ft 

728 5q ft (2) Deck 

N/A Yes 768 sq f 323 sq ft Deck 

4 

2 Yes $76sqf None 

N/A No 

N/A Yes 5765q 1 

Upper Deck, Lower Patio 

Upper Deck, Lower Dack, Dock 

Additional Features 

nane 

144 sq ft porch 

254 1 of Lake frontage: 

abuts State Park 

Shed, 15° Vinyl Seawall, 

Outdoor Showar 

Porch 30 sg ft: shed; 15° Vinyl Seawall 

2016 new home; lakefront boulders 

N/A 

3 porches totaking 500+ 5 1; 1236 3g ft bem 

shed, lower beach deck 

2016 Remodel 

2 porches totaling 242 sq ft. 

Garage; Balcony, 32 ft sq 

Garage 

Shed. 120 tt Loke Frontage 

Shed 

100 

ft Lake Frontage 

202

Page 10

Exhibit B 

(peje 

| 

of 

3) 

ga 

Exhibit BI — 493 N Lighthouse Dr 

+ Home Size: 1,020 sq 1 (96% larger than my home) 

* Lot Size: 0.514 acres (2.2 times larger) 

* Land Assessment: $271,200 — $4,520 less than mine 

* 2024 Tax: $7,553 (only 6% more than mine)

Page 11

Exhibit 

Bo 

(peje 

2 

of 3) 

s Lot Size: 0.539 acres (2.3 times larger) 

hn 

Land Assessment: $275,720 — same as mine 

©2024 Tax: $5.467 — $1,656 less than mine 

Exhibit B3 — 693 N Golden Sands Dr 

Home Size: 1,621 sq ft (over 3 times larger) 

* Lot Size: 0.332 acres (41% larger than mine) 

©2024 Tax: $5.075 — $2,048 less than mine 

« Note: An additional structure (accessory office/ dwelling unit) is visible on the property, though 

‘ 

Br 

it does not appear in the listed improvements data. This highlights further disparity when 

compared to my property.

Page 12

Exhibit B4 — Subject Property (713 N Golden Sands Dr) 

* Home Size: 520 sq ft (smallest lakefront home in Golden Sands 

I & Il) 

* Lot Size: 0.235 acres (smallest lakefront lot in the area) 

* Land Assessment: $275,720 — equal to or higher than larger neighboring lots 

©2024 Tax: $7,123

Page 13

6/16/25.2:09 PM 

Gmail 

- Appeal of 2023 Property Tian Assessment for 713 N Golden Sands Dr 

Esher 

C 

©. 

) 

Andrew&Ankica P <eagletwoblue@gmail.com> 

Appeal of 2025 Property Tax Assessment for 713 N Golden Sands Dr 

5 messages 

Andrew8&Ankica P <eagletwoblue@gmail.com> 

Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 11:56 AM 

To: "assessor@goldentownship.org” <assessor@goldentownship.org> 

Dear Golden Township Board of Review, 

1am submiting this formal appeal of my 2025 property tax assessment for 713 N Golden Sands Dr due to clear inconsistencies that result in 

disproportionate taxation. A compara 

is of similar properties within my subdivision and surrounding area demonstrates that my 

property has been significantly overvalued relative to its 

size. fot, and fair market value. Based on the daa presented, 

[ respectfully request an 

adjustment to more accurately reflect an equitable assessment. 

> analy 

I. My Home is the Smallest in the Subdivision Yet Over-Assessed 

«My home is 520 square feet. considerably smatler than all comparable properties in the subdivision. 

« 

My lot size is 0.235 acres, making it one of the smakest in the area. 

= 

Despite being the simablest hone on the smallest lot, my land is assessed at $275,720. which is equal to or higher than significantly 

larger properties in the area 

an evident overvaluation. 

2. Discrepancy with 709 N Golden Sands Dr (Neighboring Property) 

A clear example of over-assessment is 709 N Golden Sands Dra neighboring property with a significantly larger structure and lot, yet a nearly 

identical tax burden: 

« 

Home Size: 709 N Golden Sands Dr is 1,200 square feet 

— more than 130% larger than mine. 

+ 

Lot Size: Their Jot is 7.24% larger (0.252 acres vs. (0.235 acres). 

o 

Tax Burden: Their 2024 tax is $7,448, just 4.6% more than mine ($7,123). despite their home being more than twice as large and on a 

larger lot. 

ipnificant differences, my land is valued at the exact same $275,720 as 709 N Golden Sands 

nent. 

+ 

Assessment Discrepancy: Despite the 

Dr—an inequitable and unjustifiable as 

3. Further Property Comparisons Reinforce Overvaluation 

725 N Golden Sands Dr (Larger Home, Much Larger Lot, Lower Effective ‘Tax Rate} 

+ 

Home Size: 792 square feet {52% larger than mine). 

« 

Lot Size: 1.273 acres (more than 54 times farger). 

o 

2024 Tax: $9,707 (only $2,584 more han mine despite vastly more property). 

o 

Key Issue: My tax burden is disproportionate high given how litte land and structure Town in comparison.

Page 14

6/16/25, 2:09 PM

E x

vbi ! ¥

( 2 )

Gmail

- Appeal of 2025 Property Tax Assessment for 713 N Golden Sands Dr

2024 Tax: $7,553. only 6% more than mine despite bei ing nearly twice the size and on a lot more than twice as large.

Land Value: $271,200, which is actually $4,520 less than my land assessment, despite having a lot more than twice as large.

Key Issue: If a home nearly double my size with a lot twice as large has a lower land assessment than mine, my valuation is clearly

inflated beyond reason.

My property

tax has increased 4.1% from 2023 (0 2024 and 6.4% from 2022 to 2023, despite no major improvements to the home or

lot.

Over two years. my total assessment jumped from $139,300 to $165,500

—

19% increase.

In contrast, 709 N Golden Sands Dr saw the same 4.1% increase. despite having significantly ereater value.

5. Additional Context: Smallest Lakefront Property in the Township

713N Golden

Sands Dr is the smallest Lake Michigan frontage house on the smallest Lake Michigan lot in all of Golden Sands

| or

I and likely

still the smallest in all of Golden Tow nship.

Additionally, my home is the oldest in my subdivision since

it was the first built.

Many neighboring properties have decks or garages larger than my entire home. yet my assessed value remains disproportionately

high.

Request for Fair Adjustment

“Based on these substantial discrepancies. am requesting ao minimum reduction of 30% from the 2024 taxable value of $153,405, bringing

to a maximum of $107,384. This aligns more closely with comparable properties and prevents my continued over-taxation.

I appreciate your time and consideration in review ing this appeal and look forward to discussing it further if necessary.

| have attached some of

the data I have compiled Irom the tow nship (and

where necessary). Please let me know

if additional documentation or clarification is

tired.

required

~ Sincerely,

Andrew (and Ankica) Petersen

713 _appeal_Data.png

967K

Page 15

Address 

713 N Golden Sands D 

413 N Lighthouse Dr. 

725 N Golden Sands © 

709 N Golden Sands D 

705 N Golden Sands D 

293 N Lighthouse Dr 

701 N Golden Sands D 

693 N Golden Sands D 

717 N Golden Sands O 

507 N Lighthouse Dr 

637 N Golden Sans D 

2157 N White Birch Dr 

2173 N White Birch Dr 

1734 N Shore Dr 

1913 N White Birch Cx 

2255 N Holiday Dr 

1956 

197G 

1958 

1960 

1990 

2016 

1990 

1960 

1960 

1979 

2000 

1976 

1972 

1981 

1978 

1981 

Year Built Stories 

1 

1 

Multi 

Multi 

» Bas 

Multi + Bae 

Multi 

1+ Basen 

1 

1+ walkout 

Multi + bas 

Mite 

Mutt 

1 

Multi 

Mut 

Sqft 

520 

936 

52 

1200 

1330 

1020 

1092 

1621 

160C 

1737 

2912 

975 

2200 

1461 

1380 

854 

Lot Size {Act 

0.235 

0.539 

1.273 

0.252 

0.273 

0.514 

0.31 

0.332 

0.235 

0.402 

0.22 

0.43 

1.512 

0.3% 

0.216 

0.403 

£ NN 

C 

(peye 

3) 

{and value improvmer Waterfront 

$275,720 

$275.720 

$422,400 

$275,720 

$275,720 

$271,200 

$275.720 

$275,720 

275.720 

$ 271.200 

S$ 

96,000 

5 

65,167 

5 244,000 

$246,000 

$ 246,000 

5 

85.000 

$13,700 

$13.583 

$11,700 

$11,700 

$11,760 

$14,587 

N/A 

535.082 

$12.700 

515.442 

$40,233 

$19.351 

520,043 

$490 

11,700 

Yes Lake Mict 

Yes Lake Mit N/A 

Yes Lake 

Mich N/A 

Yes Lake Mict N/A 

Yes Lake Mict 

Yes Woke 

Mict 

Yes Lake Mict N/A 

Yes Loke Michigan 

Yes Lake Mich 

Yos Lake Mict 

Yes Silver Cre N/A 

Yes Sibvee Lak N/A 

Yes Silver Lak N/A 

Yes Shiver tak 

Yes Silver Lak N/A 

Yes: Upper Si NJA 

Bedroom: Bath Garage 

Deck/Patio 

2 

1No 

None 

N/A no 

Yes 670 ft sa dock 

N/A no 

N/A No 

200 sq ft Deck. Patio 

3 

2Ne 

Yes; 792 5g ft treated wood 

4 

2No 

You 

N/A No 

N/A 

2 Yes 960 5qf 647 5a ft deck 

2 

ino 

993 sq fr deck(s} 

7 

6Ne 

646 sq ft deck; Upper / Lower Deck 

N/A Yes S765q1 Yes {2) 538 <q ft 

N/A Yes 384 sq f 728 sq £1 {2) Deck 

N/A Yes 768 sq f 323 5q #2 Deck 

4 

2 Yes $7659 

Nong 

N/A No 

Upper Deck, Lower Pato 

N/A Yos 576 5g ¢ Upper Deck, Lower Deck, Dock 

Additional Features 

none 

134 sq ft porch 

264 11 of Lake frontage; abuts State Park 

Shed, 15° vinyl Seawall, Outdoor Shower 

Porch 30 sq it; shed, 15° Vinyl Seawal 

2016 new home: lakefront bouiders 

N/A 

3 porches totaling 500+ 5 

shed, lower beach deck 

2016 Remodel 

2 porches totaling 262 59 f 

Garage; Balcony, 32 ft sq 

Garage 

Shed, 120 ft Lake Frontage 

Shed 

100 ft Like Frontage 

L 1236 sq ft bsm 

2024 

$

Page 16

55 Whs-A

au) 2025 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION

FROM

GOLDEN TWP ASSESSOR

BARBIE EATON, MAAO

;

PO BOX 26

: i

MEARS MI 49436

PETERSEN ANDREW & ANKICA

935

NHOYNE AVE

CHICAGO IL 60622

PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: (Parcel Code required. Property address

and legal description optional.)

64-006-320-018-00

713 N GOLDEN SANDS

713 N GOLDEN SANDS DR WD-1.2001P25637 WD-1.2008P5689

QC-L2011P19059 GOLDEN SANDS LOT 18 & UNDIV INT IN

LOT 38. SPLIT ON 10/18/2011 INTO 006-320-018-00-01. 006-320

-018-00-02: COMBINED WITH 006-320-018-00-01 & 006-320-

018-00-02 IN 2015:

THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED

401

(RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED)

Thank you for attending this years March Board of Review. The Board has reviewed the information you supplied and the data necessary

to compute your assessment and taxable value.

The Board has completed their review of parcel number

64-006-320-018-00

They have made the following determination based on the information you supplied.

Board of Review Comments

THE ASSESSED VALUE DOES NOT EXCEED 50% OF THE TRUE CASH VALUE.

[2025 ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE

181.300

[2025

"BOARD OF REVIEW" ASSESSED VALUE

181,300

, (Ifthe above amounts are the same, no revisions have occured)

2025

ORIGINAL TAXABLE VALUE

158.160

2025

"BOARD OF REVIEW" TAXABLE VALUE

158.160

2025

PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION/QUALIFIED AG

0.0000

Please feel free to contact the assessor at the address listed above or call (231-873-4413) if vou have any questions.

i i

If you disagree with the determination of the March Board of Review you may appeal their decision to the Michigan

Tax Tribunal. All petitions for Commercial or Industrial property must by received by the Tribunal no later than May

31st. All petitions for Agricultural or Residential property must be received by the Tribunal no later than July 31st.

Page 17

3 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON | BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

A dew H. 

Petersen 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

MTT Docket No. Z 5A 

( ) 03S bY 

Township of 

Golden, 

Respondent(s) 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Aden 14 

Fo te Sen 

states that on 2/ Qq [2 b 

he/she 

[Name of person serving/mailing petition] 

[date of service] 

' 

\ 

* 

+ on 

served a copy of the Do cket N of) 44 / 

N felative to the above-captioned matter upon: 

[Provide name and address of the party/people being served] 

Golden 

Township AsSeSsor 

Barbie 

Eaton 

, 

MAAOD 

Po 

Pox 

2b 

MEARS 

, 

MI 

a4s6 

[Signature of person who is serving/mailing copy] 

Andre 

Peter $e nn 

[Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy]

Page 18

935 \} as er 

Chicago, 

TL (opr 

i C i 

Jan 

bl) 

cy

el

PDF reading copy

← View full record