Dombnkowski.pdf
Kevin Dombkowski, Petitioner V City Of Frankfort, Respondent · 24-003737-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
RECEIVED JUL 8 0 2024 \ rts ai (50 a MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information First Name M.l. Last Name/Company Name Kevin J Dombkowski Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 419 Harbor PI City or Town State ZIP Code Frankfort Mi 49635 Telephone Number Fax Number (734) 255-4528 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) kjd@med.umich.edu Section 2: Petitioner’s AttorneyiAutherized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Last Name Firm Name (if any) Tranlnfosqe06 2R762377-1 OW23/24 Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) Chih: aE Ant: $900 00 1D: JULIE SCULAKER City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 3: Subject Property Information How many If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? parcels are you | [[] vest [] No**
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check ail that appty)
[¥ True Cash and Taxable Value
[J Poverty Exemption
{0 Taxable Value Only (calculation)
[0 Disabled Veterans Exemption
[J uncapping of Taxable Value
{71 Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA)
[7] Exemption from Taxation (other than the denial of a
O classification
Principal Residence or Qualified Agricultural Exemption)
Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
The Assessed Value and State Equalized Value (SEV) for this propery is incorrect and has been so following the completion of an addition to ihe residence in 2021. Estoneous information
was subsequently added by the City of Frankfort Assessor to the property tax record resulting in an incorrectly high Assessed Value, SEV, and Taxable Value.
A petition was subsequently made to the Frankfort BOR (March 2024) which included delaits calculating the true square footage of the residence. A partat adjustment
was made by the BOR
to the Assessed Value with no explanation, but it st) reflects an incorrectly high value. A full copy of the palition filed to the BOR and their determination are enclosed in this appeal packet.
‘The Frankfort BOR pointed out in their determination that their assessment process uses the EXTERIOR building Gimensions, which was meant to clarify Ihat some of my square footage
calculations based on INTERIOR dimensions were inaccurate. Aside from thal, 2 issues remain that require a remedy: 1) although the exterior dimensions used by the City Assessor for the
“original residence” appear to be correct, the exterior dimensions used for the new addition® are not; and 2) the square faotage calculation for he *new addition” includes square footage for
a space thal daes not exist in the residence,
Issue 1. The exterior dimensions of he new addition from the builder's as-built drawings show a footprint of 2817 x 19'-0°, which is 634 sq. fL at 2 stories (total = 1,086 sq. ft). Ad additional
space of 44 sq. ftis projected as the enlry space and closet; a covered porch extends beyond Ihat for an distance of an additional 50°.
Frankforf's property Valuation Report schematic
shows a 30' x 20° addition, but also shows an incorrectly configured foyer space and covered porch which they catculate to be a total of 650 sq. ft, and this is counted as 2 stories {total =
1,300 sq. f1.). This results in a (1,300 - 1,068) = 232 sq. ft. overstatement of the building space.
fssue 2, The 2024 Property Valuation Report square footage detail {see enclosed March 2024 petition to the Frankfort BOR) includes a reference to square footage in the new addition as
being 2 stories at 650 sq. ft, which is incorrect as noted in Issue 1. However, it goes further to include an additional 650 sq, ft, as if some ather room of that size exisls in the residence.
it
does not, as can clearly be seen in the as-built drawings or by an on-site inspection of the properly.
§ inviled the BOR members to come to my home lo find tre phantom space (they
declined); it does not exist in my home. Note that the olher values for the original residence appear to be correct and are aot disputed here, This issue resulls in a 650 5g. it overstatement of
the building space.
Remedy, Combined, the issues note resull in an overstatement of (232 sq. fl. + 650 sq. fL) = 882 sq. ft. Using the Gily's average cost per sq. ft. mulliplier ($134.05), this results in the
building new cost belng overstated by $118,236, ($111,556 depreciated). Note that this is probably a canservative estimate since the new space in question should have a higher cost per
sq. ft. multiplier that he average cost used here. The total depreciated cost shown in the Property Valuation Report ($498,685) should be reduced by this value, yielding an approximate total
deprectated cost of $367,129,
Using the Cily's Ecanamic Condition Factor (ECF) of 1.5, this would yield an estimated true cash value of $580,693. Without explanation, the City Assessor assigned a true cash value of
$912,449, corresponding to a SEV and assessed value of $456,200. Based on comrections for the Issues detailed above, 1 believe that the assessed value should be approximately
(§580,693 / 2) = $290,347 which is the correction requasted from the Tax Tribunal, Likewise, | believe that $290,347 Is also a fair estimate of the taxable value which was incorrectly
increased based on the same miscalculations by lhe City Assessor.
Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
Year(s) you are appealing:
2024
Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? jw] Yes
dd No
If Yas, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision: [w.} March
0 July
|} December
tf No, check the applicable reason(s):
[m} Not required to attend
0 Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner
[I] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5)
Appealing within 36 days of State Tax Commission OrderPage 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 7: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form far additional, contiguous parcels.
Parcel Identification Number:
10-51-010-156-01
Classification of Property:
Real
Personal
(check one)
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
Current Assessed Value {also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:
$431,200
Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:
$349,168
What do you believe is the fair market value {also known as True Cash Value)?
$580,693
Multiply the True Cash Value by .6 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.
$290,347
If you belleve the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Vaiue, enter your contention of Taxable Value.
$290,347
Section 8: Classification Information only the Mi Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal*
Parcel Identification Number:
Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review:
Real
Personat
{check one)
0
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
What do you believe is the property’s classification?
Real
Personal
(check one)
0
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
If improved property, how is the property currently being used?
If improved property, for what use was the property designed?Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Fee Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? a Yes [i] No Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? [J Yes [A No If you answered yes to either or both of the above questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $125.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00 $Over $500,000.00 $300.00 If your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. If your property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is $100,000.01 or greater the appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed. Signature *gequired ~~ Petitioner or Attos CA pH? s war of
Page 5
Form 618, Page 2
FOR BOARD OF REVIEW USE ONLY
INSTRUCTIONS: Incorporate a copy of this form and the assigned number in the Board of Review minutes.
Petition Number
PZ |Z
N/R 5). 0/10 _ /55
_ Y, J
1. ASSESSED VALUE
Disposition by > i Review, The Board of Review must state
———
a
[| Denied
Assessed Value Changed From
ys; 200
to]
AA3/
J 200
4
/
Record of vote - Board or three member committee of board
Chairperson’ {/] Yes
[
|No LL
vember: 3
ves
L] vo
bed)
Member: [ ]Yes [
]No
initials
Reason for board acfion org 723 LLdld) LE 7 DtecZe ge A
te VZ4 DotNet
dd
nL Pls, 7, ct
Lepr
LP) pred 2) EP
If you disagree with
the decision /, the Board of Review regarding tentative assessed value, you may appeal that decision by filing a petition with the
Michigan Tax Tribunal at P.O. Box 30232, Lansing, MI 48909. Commercial Real, Industrial Real, Developmental Real, Commercial Personal,
Industrial Personal and Utility Personal Property may be appealed by May 31. Agricultural Real, Residential Real, Timber-Cutover Real and Agricultura
Personal Property may be appealed by July 31. The petition must be filed on a Michigan Tax Tribunal form or a form approved by the Michigan Tax
Tribunal. Michigan Tax Tribunal forms are available at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib.
2. TENTATIVE TAXABLE VALUE
Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review must state the reason for its action below.
[
|Denied
[| Tentative Taxable Value Changed From
Record of vote - Board or three member committee of board
Chairperson: |_| Yes
[ | No
Member: [ | Yes
[ | No
Member: [ | Yes
[|] No
Initials
Initials
Tlnitials
Reason for board action
to
If you disagree with the decision of the Board of Review regarding tentative taxable value, you may appeal that decision by filing a petition with the
Michigan Tax Tribunal at P.O. Box 30232, Lansing, MI 48909. Commercial Real, Industrial Real, Developmental Real, Commercial Personal,
Industrial Personal and Utility Personal Property may be appealed by May 31. Agricultural Real, Residential Real, Timber-Cutover Real and
Agricultural Personal Property may be appealed by July 31. The petition must be filed on a Michigan Tax Tribunal form or a form approved by the
Michigan Tax Tribunal. Michigan Tax Tribunal forms are available at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib.
3. CLASSIFICATION
Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review must state the reason for its action below.
[Denied
[_] Classification Changed From
to
Record of vote - Board or three member committee of board
Chairperson:
JE
Member:
—
Member:
Sa
p
CJ Yes
LJ No
Initials
LJ Yes
LJ No
Initials
LJ Yes
[J No
Initials
Reason for board action
If you disagree with the decision of the Board of Review regarding classification, you may appeal by sending Form 2167 to the State Tax Commission
at P.O. Box 30471, Lansing, MI 48909 by June 30.
4. QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY EXEMPTION
Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review must state the reason for its action below.
] Exemption Request Denied
L] Exemption percent modified from
% to
%
Record of vote - Board or three member committee of boardPage 6
Michigan Department of Treasury 618 (Rev. 11-12) Petition to Board of Review L-4035 This form is issued under the authority of P.A. 206 of 1893, as amended. Filing is voluntary, however you may not appeal to the Michigan Tax Tribunal or the State Tax Commission unless you first protest to the Board of Review. TO BE COMPLETED BY OWNER OR OWNER'S AGENT County | Owner's Name (Please Print or Type) Kevin Dombkowski and Julie Schumaker Township or City Frankfort Petitioner's Name (If Other than Owner. Please Print or Type) Benzie The undersigned protests the assessed value and/or the tentative taxable value and/or the property classification and/or the qualified agricultural property exemption of the following described property: Property Identified (Parcel code required. Property address & legal description optional) Parcel Number: 10-51-010-156-01 419 Harbor PI, Frankfort [] Qualified Agricultural Property Exemption [x] Assessed Value ] Tentative Taxable Value J Classification 1. PROTEST OF ASSESSMENT (Complete this section for a protest of assessed value and/or tentative taxable value) Protested Item Year 2024 Tentative Taxable Value $349,168 Owner's Estimate of True Cash Value $670,000 Assessed Amount $456,200 2. PROTEST OF CLASSIFICATION (Complete this section for a request to change the classification. The Board of Review must make their decision regarding classification in accordance with Section 211.34c¢ of the Michigan Compiled Laws. The Board of Review shall not be influenced by the effect that a particular classification has on that property's status as a homeowner's principal residence or qualified agricultural property.) Classification of property on this year's assessment roll Residential Classification should be (check one of the following): [] Agricultural [] Industrial [] commercial [] Residential ] Timber Cutover J Utility (Personal Property Only) [] Developmental 3. PROTEST OF EXEMPTION FOR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY (If the assessor has denied or changed the percentage of the exemption from the 18 mills of local school operating tax for qualified agricultural property, the owner may appeal this action to the March Board of Review. THE BOARD OF REVIEW HAS NO AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER OR ACT UPON THE EXEMPTION FROM THE 18 SCHOOL OPERATING MILLS FOR HOMEOWNER'S PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE PROPERTIES.) Rew qualified agricultural exemption granted by assessor (Enter 0 if exemption denie Percent qualified agricultural exemption requested by owner (Enter 100 if full exemption requested) 4. REASON FOR PROTEST State reason(s) for protest of assessed value and/or the tentative taxable value and/or classification and/or qualified agricultural property exemption The assessed value is based on incorrect square footage of the building and overstated value of other additions. This can be clearly demonstrated by reviewing the as-built drawings and corresponding square footage for the building and
Page 7
Michigan Department of Treasury 618 (Rev. 11-12) Petition to Board of Review L-4035 This form is issued under the authority of P.A. 206 of 1893, as amended. Filing is voluntary, however you may not appeal to the Michigan Tax Tribunal or the State Tax Commission unless you first protest to the Board of Review. TO BE COMPLETED BY OWNER OR OWNER'S AGENT Owner's Name (Please Print or Type) Petitioner's Name (If Other than Owner. Please Print or Type) Kevin Dombkowski and Julie Schumaker Township or City County Frankfort Benzie The undersigned protests the assessed value and/or the tentative taxable value and/or the property classification and/or the qualified agricultural property exemption of the following described property: Property Identified (Parcel code required. Property address & legal description optional) Parcel Number: 10-51-010-156-01 419 Harbor PI, Frankfort Protested Item Assessed Value [|_| Tentative Taxable Value [| Classification [_] Qualified Agricultural Property Exemption 1. PROTEST OF ASSESSMENT Bete Ey (Complete this section for a protest of assessed value and/or tentative taxable value) Assessed Amount Owner's Estimate of True Cash Value Tentative Taxable Value Year $456,200 $670,000 $349,168 2024 2. PROTEST OF CLASSIFICATION (Complete this section for a request to change the classification. The Board of Review must make their decision regarding classification in accordance with Section 211.34c of the Michigan Compiled Laws. The Board of Review shall not be influenced by the effect that a particular classification has on that property's status as a homeowner's principal residence or qualified agricultural property.) Classification of property on this year's assessment roll Residential Classification should be (check one of the following): . [7 Agricultural ] Industrial 1 Timber Cutover OJ Utility (Personal Property Only) Il Commercial | Residential Ol Developmental 3, PROTEST OF EXEMPTION FOR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY (If the assessor has denied or changed the percentage of the exemption from the 18 mills of local school operating tax for qualified agricultural property, the owner may appeal this action to the March Board of Review, THE BOARD OF REVIEW HAS NO AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER OR ACT UPON THE EXEMPTION FROM THE 18 SCHOOL OPERATING MILLS FOR HOMEOWNER'S PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE PROPERTIES.) Percent qualified agricultural exemption granted by assessor (Enter 0 if exemption Percent qualified agricultural exemption requested by owner (Enter 100 if full denied) exemption requested) 4, REASON FOR PROTEST State reason(s) for protest of assessed value and/or the tentative taxable value and/or classification and/or qualified agricultural property exemption The assessed value is based on incorrect square footage of the building and overstated value of other additions. This
Page 8
Form 618, Page 2 FOR BOARD OF REVIEW USE ONLY INSTRUCTIONS: Incorporate a copy of this form and the assigned number in the Board of Review minutes. Petition Number Parcel Code 1. ASSESSED VALUE Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review must state the-reason forte action below, [ ]Denied | ] Assessed Value Changed From to] lL Record of vote - Board or three member committee of board Chairperson: |_| Yes [_] No Reason for board action Initials MBmO8E: LC] Yes UJ No Initials Member: 0 Yes LJ No Initials If you disagree with the decision of the Board of Review regarding tentative assessed value, you may appeal that decision by filing a petition with the Michigan Tax Tribunal at P.O. Box 30232, Lansing, MI 48909. Commercial Real, Industrial Real, Developmental Real, Commercial Personal, Industrial Personal and Utility Personal Property may be appealed by May 31. Agricultural Real, Residential Real, Timber-Cutover Real and Agricultura) Personal Property may be appealed by July 31. The petition must be filed on a Michigan Tax Tribunal form or a form approved by the Michigan Tax Tribunal. Michigan Tax Tribunal forms are available at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 2. TENTATIVE TAXABLE VALUE Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review must state the reason for its action below. [Denied [] Tentative Taxable Value Changed From to Record of vote - Board or three member committee of board Chairperson: [_] Yes [ | No Member: [| Yes [| No Member: [| Yes [| No Initials Initials Initials Reason for board action If you disagree with the decision of the Board of Review regarding tentative taxable value, you may appeal that decision by filing a petition with the Michigan Tax Tribunal at P.O. Box 30232, Lansing, Ml 48909. Commercial Real, Industrial Real, Developmental Real, Commercial Personal, Industrial Personal and Utility Personal Property may be appealed by May 31. Agricultural Real, Residential Real, Timber-Cutover Real and Agricultural Personal Property may be appealed by July 31. The petition must be filed on a Michigan Tax Tribunal form or a form approved by the Michigan Tax Tribunal. Michigan Tax Tribunal forms are available at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 3. CLASSIFICATION Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review must state the reason for its action below. [J] Denied [] Classification Changed From to Record of vote - Board or three member committee of board Chairperson: [_] Yes [ | No Reason for board action Initials Member: L] Yes Ll No Initials Member: LJ Yes L] No initials If you disagree with the decision of the Board of Review regarding classification, you may appeal by sending Form 2167 to the State. Tax Commission at P.O. Box 30471, Lansing, MI 48909 by June 30. 4. QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY EXEMPTION Disposition by Board of Review. The Board of Review must state the reason for its action below. [] Exemption Request Denied ] Exemption percent modified from % to % Record of vote - Board or three member committee of board
Page 9
Tax Assessment Appeal 419 Harbor PI, Frankfort Parcel Number: 10-51-010-156-01 1) Appeal Issue e The Assessed Value and State Equalized Value (SEV) for this property is incorrect and has been since the 2021 when an addition was completed on the residence. * Remedy Requested: We ask that the errors be reviewed and corrected to ensure that the Assessed Value and State Equalized Value (SEV) accurately reflect the property and the improvements made to the building. 2) Supporting Documentation o Exhibit 1: Parcel location for 419 Harbor Place o Exhibit 2: Property Record Card for Parcel Number 10-51-010-156-01 (2024) » Exhibit 3: As-built drawings from Portland Construction Company (Honor, MI) ¢ Exhibit 4: Summary of Floor Area from the as-built drawings to highlight original floor area. e Exhibit 5: History of Floor Area from Property Record Cards (2018-2024) e Exhibit 6: History of Taxable, Assessed and State Equalized Values (2018-2024)
Page 10
|
|
|
3)
Narrative
3.1
— The floor area reported in Property Record Card is incorrect based on the as-built
plans. The Property Record Card shows 3,326 SF Floor Area (Exhibit 2).
3.2 — Portland Construction built the original residence {2010 completion) as well as the
addition to match the original construction (2021 completion). The drawing shows interior
floor area for the original construction as well as the addition. Exhibit 4 shows that the
original residence (1,492 SF) and new addition (994 SF) now total 2,486 SF which overstates
the floor area by 840 SF.
e
The property record card includes a reference to a 1 story space that has a Crawl
Space for 650 SF. This space does not exist in this home — there is no 1 story
portion, and there is no crawl space anywhere in the original or new
construction.
3.3 ~The over-stated floor area is used to estimate the cost to build the home new and its
true cash value (TCV). These are estimates are inflated due to the incorrect floor area
estimates used.
3.4 — In addition, the Property Record Card shows the Other Additions / Adjustments for
various built-ins and noteworthy additional fixtures. There are several errors in this section
that overstate the estimate cost and TCV:
*
The Garage is counted as 448 SF, which is incorrect — the actual garage floor area
is 315 SF.
¢
The sauna (master bath) is valued at $10,388 in 2024 which is 103% increase
over value assigned in 2021 ($5,128).
o
The property Record Card also lists Public improvements of 1) sidewalk and 2)
curb; neither are not present at any point along Harbor Place.
3.5 - Remedy Requested: We ask that the errors be reviewed and corrected to ensure that
the Assessed Value and State Equalized Value (SEV) accurately reflect the property and the
improvements made to the building which we estimate to be $670,000Page 11
Exhibit 1: 419 Harbor Place, Frankfort
Page 12
Exhibit 2: Property Record Card for Parcel Number 10-51-010-156-01 (2024)
Page 13
Parcel Number:
10-51-010-156-01
Jurisdiction:
CITY OF FRANKFORT
County:
BENZIE
Printed on
03/11/2024
Grantor
Grantee
Sale|
Sale
|Inst.
[Terms
of sale
|Liber
[Verified
I Prent.
|
{
price
Date
| Type
|
|&
Page
|By
| Trans. |
|
|
HOWLEY,
GERALD
J
& VICKI
DOMBKOWSKI,
KEVIN
J
&
|
325,000] 08/31/2017
|WD
[03-2RM'S LENGTH
|2017R-03783
{OTHER
|
100.0]
1
=
:
JOHNSON,
BRIAN
&
SUSAN
HOWLEY,
GERALD
J
& VICKI
|
75,000] 07/16/2007
|WD
|03-ARM'S LENGTH
|2007R-03913
OTHER
|
100.0
|VAVRR,
DAVID
S
JOHNSON,
BRIAN
& SUSAN
|
160,000{
07/01/2005
[wp
[03-2RM"S
LENGTH
|2005R-04481
OTHER
|
100.0
| JOHNSON,
GERHART
H
& KATH
|[VAVRA,
DAVID
S
|
75,000]
11/21/1994
|W
|16-1C
PAYOFF
[288/998
OTHER
|
0.0
Property Address
|Class:
RESIDENTIAL-IMPRO Zoning:
R2
(*
|Building
Permit (s)
|
Date
| Number
Status
419 HARBOR
PL
School:
FRANKFORT AREA SCHOOLS
RES-ADD
[
09/21/2020
PB20-0288
COMPLETE
I
P.R.E.
100%
08/09/2021
RES-NEW
HSE
|
12/17/2008
|PB08-0437
NO WORK
ST
Owner's Name/hddress
MAP
#:
[08/21/2000
[35387
[NO WORK 57
|
DOMBROWSKL KEVIN
J
’
[2024 Est TCV 912,449 TCV/TFA: 274.34
i
T
SOHUMBKER: JULIE.
3
IBA
a
|
|v
t
Tand Value
Estimates
for Land Table
01014.BLK 14
:
1
419 HARBOR PL
LX] mproved
|
|
acan
|
a
ue
Es
a
a;
e
o
FRANKFORT MI
49635
|
Public
|
*
Factors
*
|
Improvements
| Description
Frontage
Depth
Front
Depth
Rate
$Adj.
Reason
Value
|
Tapayer's Name/Address
Bice Read
| HARBOUR PL
100.00
75.00 1.0000 1.0000
1365
100
136,500
|Gravel Road
|
100 Actual
Front
Feet,
0.17
Total Acres
Total
Est.
Land Value
=
136,500
DOMBKOWSKI KEVIN
J
|
|
419 HARBOR
PL
X
|Paved Road
FRANKFORT MI 49635
|
Storm Sewer
| Land Improvement Cost Estimates
|
|X
|sidewalk
Description
Rate
Size
% Good
Cash Value
2 ids
Fencing: Vnyl,
Slat,
4-5'
43.99
192
81
6,841
—
|Sewer
D/W/P:
4in Concrete
8.27
1521
85
Tax Description
X
|Electric
| Sauna
10,493.48
;
9
10,692
COM AT NW COR BLK
14
E 200.56
FT
TO NW
X
|Gas
|
Total Estimated Land Improvements True Cash Value
=
=rEe
COR LOT
4
S
75
FT
TO POB
E 100.31
FT
S
x
|cuzb
.
|
!
76.36
FT TO SE COR LOT
3
W 100.34
FT TO
|
[Street Lights
I
SW COR LOT
4
N 76.36 FT TO POB PRT LOTS
|
|standard Utilities
|
|
3
§
4 BLK 14 TOWN
& HARBOR FRANKFORT
|
|underground Utils.
|
|
SPLIT FROM 010-156-00
FOR 1995
[Topography
of
l
DESC CORR FOR 2018
(100.28 TO 100.31)
|
site
|
|
P.A.
419 HARBOR PLACE
be Fear
|
|
[[11/91 254/995; 08/00 BP; 07/05
wi
|
2005R-04481 WD; 07/07 2007R-03913 WD;
[Ro 30g
|
’
;
i
wi
{sign
|
Landscaped
1
Swamp
|
[Aeedes
|
|
Pond
|
|
{Waterfront
|
|Ravine
[
Wetland
|
Flood Plain
Year
Land
Building]
Assessed
Board
of|
Tribunal/
Taxable
Value
Value
Value
Review
Other
Value
Who
When
What
2024
68,300
387,900
456,200
349, 168C
"CMB 10/25/2021 INSPECTED
|2023
8,300]
284,700
353,000]
332,541C
The Equalizer.
Copyright
(c)
1999
- 2009.icMB 12/21/2020 INSPECTED
[5G33
|
28,300
320,100
208,400
T
|
Licensed To:
City of Frankfort,
County of
|MC
09/19/1992 INSPECTED
[202
|
4
’
08,400
|
316, 706C,
Benzie, Michigan
[2021]
68,500
114,900
183,400]
183, 400m
147, 731C]
+++ Information herein deemed reliable
but
not guaranteed***Page 14
Residential Building
1
of
1
Parcel Number:
10-51-010-156-01
Printed on
03/11/2024
Building Type
(3)
Roof
(cont.)
(11)
Heating/Cooling
(15)
Built-ins
(15)
Fireplaces
(16)
Porches/Decks |
(17)
Garage
X
[Single
Family
Eavestrough
X
|Gas
0il
Elec.
Appliance Allow.
Interior
1
Story
[Area|Type
Year Built:
2009
gq!
yp
Mobile Home
X[Insulation
Wood
Coal
Steam
Cook
Top
Interior
2
Story
74]cce
(1 Story)
ar Capacity:
Town Home
0|Front Overhang
o
1
Dishwasher
2nd/Same
Stack
Class:
BC
Duplex
olother overhang
Forced Air w/o Ducts |
|
Garbage Disposal
Two Sided
240|Wood Baleony
lpiieriors
Siding
A-Frame
X
|Forced Air
w/
Ducts
Bath Heater
Exterior
1 Story
Brick Ven.:
0
(4)
Interior
Forced. Hot Water
Vent
Fan
Exterior
2
Story
Stone Ven.:
0
X|Wood
Frame
Electric Baseboard
Hot Tub
1
|Prefab
1 Story
Common Wall:
1 Wall
X
[Drywall
Plaster
Elec.
Ceil.
Radiant
Unvented Hood
Prefab
2
Story
Foundation:
42
Inch
Building Style:
Paneled |
[Wood T&G |
[Radiant
(in-floor)
Vented Hood
Heat Circulator
Finished ?: Yes
1970 TO CURRENT
:
:
Electric Wall Heat
Intercom
Raised Hearth
Auto. Doors:
0
>
FEM
& pecoration
Space Heater
Jacuzzi Tub
Wood Stove
Mech.
Doors:
0
¥r Built
[Remodeled
[Ex
[¥ [oxd
[
[rin
Wall/Floor Furnace
1
|Jacuzzi repl.Tub
Direct-Vented Ga
Area:
448
2009
2020
_
Forced Heat
&
Cool
oven
$
Good:
0
Condition:
Good
Size
of Glosets
Heat
Pump
.
1
|[Microwave
Class:
BC
Storage Area:
0
Lg
|X
|Ord
Small
No Heating/Cooling
Standard Range
Effec.
Age:
15
No Conc.
Floor:
0
-
Central Air
Self Clean Range
Floor Area:
3,326
Room List
Doors
X [solid]
[#-c-
Wood Burnace
Sans
Total Base New
:
525,897
E.C.F.
[Bsmnt Garage:
Basement
{5)
Floors
Trash Compactor
Total
Depr Cost:
498,685
X
1.500
5
i
i
.
Carport
Area:
slise Frsow
3
(12)
Electric
Central Vacuum
Estimated T.C.V:
748,028
Sei
7|2nd Floor
ie Sasi Harduoed
200]Amps Service
Security System
=
Other:
Ceramic
Tile
_
3|Bedrooms
thes
No./Qual.
of Fixtures
[cost Est.
for Res. Bldg:
1
Single Family
1970 TO CURRENT Cls BC
Blt 2009
(1)
Exterior
X [Ex
[Joe
I
[rin
(11)
Heating System:
Forced Air w/ Ducts
Wood/Shingle
(6)
Ceilings
7
I
Ground Area
=
1860
SF
Floor Area
=
3326
SF.
Aluminum/ Vinyl
No.
of Elec. Outlets
Phy/Ab.Phy/Func/Econ/Comb.
% Good=85/100/100/100/85
Brick
X [Drywall
[Many [x [pve.
[
[Few
Building Areas
X
[Composition
(13)
Plumbing
Srories
EE
foundation
ae
Cost
New
Depr.
Cost
i
ory
iding
a
¥|Insulaticn
,
Average Fixture
(s)
*
(2)
Windows
(7)
Excavation
3|3 Fixture Bath
1.75 Story
ng
Slab
*
Many
Large
| Basement:
0
S.F.
2 Fixture Bath
2 story
Siding
Slab
650
X
[Avg.
X
|Avg.
Crawl:
650
S.F.
Softener,
Auto
0.75 Story
Siding
Overhang
192
Few
Smal
Slab:
1210
S.F.
Softener,
Manual
1 story
Siding
Overhang
192
ood Sach
Height to Joists:
0.0
Solar Water Heat
Total:
445,866
420,676
Metal Sash
No Plumbing
Other Additions/Adjustments
N
as
(8)
Basement
Extra Toilet
i
X
|Vinyl Sash
;
Bluwbing
os
ge
TTT
rT
Extra Sink
3 Fixture Bath
2
13,857
13,441
Srind
ia
p
od pea
1|Separate Shower
Separate Shower
1
2,806
2,722
X
|Horiz.
Slide
oure:
onc.
Ceramic
Tile
Floor
Vent
Fan
3
1.102
1.060
Casement
Stone
Ceramic Tile Wains | porches
Double Glass
Treated Wood
Ceramic Tub Alcove
CCP
(1
Story)
44
1,743
1,691
.
Patio Doors
Concrete
Floor
3|vent
Fan
Balcony
river & Screens |
(9) Basement Finish
(14) Water/Sewer
Wood Balcony
240
12,108
11,745
(3)
Roo
Recreation
SF
Garages
X
[Gable
Gambrel
Living
SF
~
cates fares
Class:
BC Exterior:
Siding Foundation:
42 Inch
(Finished)
Hip
Mansard
Walkout Doors
(B)
Water Well
Base Cost
32,256
31,288
Flat
Shed
No Floor
SF
5
Common Wall:
1 Wall
1
-3,161
-2,687
L
Walkout
Doors
(A)
10
cet oi
Water/Sewer
X |asphalt Shingle
(10)
Floor Support
P
Public Water
1
1,941
1,883
ETT
Lump Sum Items:
Public Sewer
1
1,941
1,883
Chimney:
Brick
tne A Len:
BUiIE Jas
.
a
-
<<<<< Calculations too long.
See Valuation printout
for complete pricing.
>>>>>
*** Information herein deemed reliable
but not guaranteed***Page 15
Parcel Number: 10-51-010-156-01, Residential Building 1 Printed on 03/11/2024 BALCONY a 240.0 of 20° 18 aT 2020 ES 380.0 of E] 25705 340.0 of b= 12x18 F ass > Uy. 15 Lv OMG B - 649 5 uf 17RsERS GREER 2 325.0 f eee 3 16" 12" € coe . u coucRETE “a. 1ST af 40° Sketch by Apex Sketch +*+ Information herein deemed reliable but not guaranteed***
Page 16
03/11/2024
Valuation Report
DB:
Frankfort 2024
10:03
AM
10-51~010-156-01
20624
Est.
T.C.V.
DOMBKOWSKI
KEVIN
J
Property Class:
401
419
HARBOR
PL
Map
#:
CITY
OF FRANKFORT
FRANKFORT,
MI
49635
Land Value Estimates
for Land Table 01014.BLK
14
*
Factors
*
|
Description
Frontage
Depth
Front
Depth
Rate
$Adj.
Reason
Value
HARBOUR
PL
100.00
75.00 1.0000
1.0000
1365
100
136,500
100 Actual Front
Feet,
0.17 Total Acres
Total
Est.
Land Value
=
136,500
Land
Improvement
Cost
Estimates
Description
Rate
Size
% Good
Cash Value
Pencing:
Vnyl,
Slat,
4-5'
43.99
192
81
6,841
D/W/P:
din Concrete
8.27
1521
85
10,692
Sauna
10,493.48
1
99
10,388
Total
Estimated Land
Improvements True
Cash Value
=
27,921
Cost
Est.
for Res.
Bldg:
1
Single
Family
1970
TO CURRENT
Cls
BC
Blt
2008
(11)
Heating System:
Forced Air
w/ Ducts
Ground
Area
=
1860
SF
Floor Area
=
3326
SF.
Phy/Ab, Phy/Func/Econ/Comb.
% Good=85/100/100/100/85
Building Areas
Stories
Exterior
Foundation
Size
Cost.
New
Depr.
Cost
2 Story
Siding
Slab
240
1
Story
siding
Crawl Space
650
*97%
Good
1.75 Story
Siding
Slab
320
*97% Good
2 Story
Siding
Slab
650
*97% Good
0.75 Story
Siding
Overhang
192
1
Story
Siding
Overhang
192
Total:
445,866
420,676
Other Additions/Adjustments
Plumbing
3
Fixture Bath
2
13,857
13,441
Separate Shower
1
2,806
2,722
Vent
Fan
3
1,102
1,069
Porches
Cccp
{1
Story)
44
1,743
1,691
*97% Good
Balcony
Wood Balcony
240
12,108
11,745
Garages
Class:
BC Bxterior:
Siding
Foundation:
42
Inch
(Finished)
Base
Cost
448
32,256
31,288
Common Wall:
1
Wall
1
-3,161
~2,687
Water/Sewer
Public Water
1
1,941
1,883
Public Sewer
1
1,941
1,883
Built-Ins
Dishwasher
1
1,192
1,156
Garbage Disposal
1
368
357
Jacuzzi
repl.Tub
1
9,336
9,056
Microwave
1
824
199
FireplacesPage 17
Exhibit 3: As-built drawings from Portland Construction Company (Honor, Ml)
Page 18
c
1
FIRST FLOOR
A
SCALE: 1/4"=1-0"
D
E
F
Exhibit 3: As-built drawings from Portland Construction Company (Honor, Ml)
wer
sora
se
ri
:
—
=
i
-
;
i
Te
F
i
T
|
\ ose
3
SAUNA
5
|
{
3)
o
a
(E1ExISTING
i)
!
J
|
2
=
KITCHEN
[E] EXISTING
[E} EXISTING
Kd
Siro
ie
;
5
EH
+
7
{£1 EXISTING
Kl
8
de
dose
EG
24 (2%
LAO)
Loe
NF
—
SE
|
=
pre
3
A
[Doe
4
Je
5
=|
-_
i
El
8
or
Sx
E] EXISTING
ji
2
a3)
~~
{rane oon.
Room
2
°
5
i
KEE
wren
[EE
Jo
BEDROOM
bi
r
J
=
5
:
Na
1730
L%,
|
ps
-
_
i
i
jl
t
8-434
|
1a
|
B-43u
|
t=
=
:
-
.
:
er
seo
s
18'-51/2"
.
2
SECOND-FLOOR
-
on
’
:
TA
SCALE: 4's
.
E
*
;
=a
i
LJ
v
B
w
is
19-00
:
L
1
|
1
”
”
|
_
~
I
(
SE
5|
XT
meee
=|
B
he
BATHROOM
1
@
de
-
&
oo
u
—
7
sTorace
]
5
2
wie
gs H
-_
g
&
hil
5
Ly
@®
Ld
i
I
=
CAR PORT
z
_
/
pr)
( =r
18612
|
pe
rap—
gens
sxe
.
p
i
ny noon
rer
i
¢
acoroon's
’
3
5
5
<
1 3
\
]
=
og
§
224
~
i
:
PRP | IE
g
[3
a
;
P
i
£
|
a
o
|
@
H
i.
FOYER
H
EH
we
i
H
i
-
|
2
2%
=
i
z
.
|
3
b
=
2
50x40
2)
=
5)
0
|
slider
4
wo
5)
£
6
ki
py GE |
2-4
[}
H
“|
5
3.
4
a
l
y
—
H
;
H
.
g
“
£
EHPage 19
Exhibit 5: History of Floor Area from Property Record Cards 419 Harbor Place Floor Area Square Feet (SF) New constuction completed 2021 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 === Home Floor Area (Square Feet) w= Property Record Card Total Exhibit 6: History of Taxable, Assessed and State Equalized Values 419 Harbor Place Assessment and Tax Valuation $500,000 Assessed Value and SEV increase 149% $450,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 Value ($) Taxable value $200,000
Page 20
ata et gg OO oy OE) EE Kevin Dombkowski | . - = 419 Harbor PI Frankfort, MI 49635 7017 1450 0002 2k?5 L955 Michiga PO EOX Lansing,