Big Vakue Center LLC.pdf
Big Value Center LLC, Petitioner V Mecosta County Drain Commissioner, Respondent · 25-002537-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
RECEIVED MAY 2:8 2025 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name BY: MARK BAKER, MEMBER Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 921 36TH ST SW STE 100 City or Town State ZIP Code WYOMING Mi 49509 Telephone Nomber 4 6-299-41 46 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) MBAKER@MICHIGANCOMMERCIALPROPERTIES.COM Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name M.I. Last Name Firm Name (if any) Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) Section 3: Subject Property Information How many If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? parcelsareyou | [7] vest [] No* [] NA appealing? *If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels. 1 **1f no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted. Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 14235 NORTHLAND DR BIG RAPIDS MI 49307 Parcel Identification Number(s): 5405022013500
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Explain the Reason for this Appeal | do not agree my property will gain value from the special assessment. The acreage amount was wrong. The extremely complex assessment methodology is not equitable. The multipliers are excessive and punitive and maxed out on this property. The benefiting municipalities are not paying an equitable share. Costs to correct MDOT Roadway and Mecosta County property illicit water dumping onto this property without any rights to do so should be their sole cost and not part of this project. The public, landowners in the Tonkin Drain District and this property owner were deprived a basic right of due process and discovery of the project scope, growth in cost, and funding apportionment methodology that changed drastically from the original Determination of Need. What was estimated in 2019 to be a $16,000 cost was suddenly surprise billed at roughly $53,000 with no details. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues Did you protest the special assessment at the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? Yes [a] No |€ Yes, what was the date of the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? 05-13-25 If No, explain: Fee Information: A fee of $100.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. Signature wees RL VALWE CENTER LLC Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: ! Ja A wBY! Pa fo Ma mber €
Page 3
E Recycle