05._Property_Tax_Appeal_Answer_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.64bcce97-c88e-449b-9623-13b4072871a3.pdf
Lauren C Crane, Petitioner V Township Of Putnam, Respondent · 24-004188-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MOAHR DOCKET NO. 24-004188 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Township Of Putnam (LIVINGSTON) First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Alexandria M.I. Last Name Wilkinson Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 3280 W M-36 City or Town Pinckney State Michigan ZIP Code 48169 Telephone Number 734-878-3131 Fax Number E-mail Address awilkinson@wcaassessing.com Section 3: Subject Property Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? Yes Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. N/A Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Respondent has reviewed the Judgement of 23-000691 and properly changed the 2023 SEV and Taxable Value. The 2024 taxable value was corrected to reflect the 2023 judgement and the CPI of 1.05 for the 2024 tax year. (2023 taxable value of 175,515 x CPI 1.05 = 2024 taxable value of 184,290) The 2024 SEV was based on the 2021 through 2023 market study done by the assessing department. The SEV does not/did not increase by the CPI. Therefore, the 2024 SEV was determined to be 50% of true cash value or market value for the property. Respondent holds clear that all numbers for 2024 are correct as stated. 2024 SEV: 213,400 2024 Taxable Value: 184,290 Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? March*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, cite the Board’s authority. Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, explain. Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? If so, what is the issue date? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: Tax Year(s) denied: List the date the exemption was denied: What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY What do you believe the classification should be: Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 4714-22-405-008 Classification of Property: Real Residential Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 2024 - 213,400 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 2024 - 184,290 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 426,800 Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 213,400 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 184,290 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Alexandria Wilkinson Representing Putnam Township, WCA Assessing