Record Finder / 26-001315-TT
Michigan

Woodward Brown Ventures LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Birmingham Respondent

Petitioner
Woodward Brown Ventures LLC
Respondent
City Of Birmingham

Case overview

Docket number
26-001315-TT
Status
Answer Due
CaseType
ET Property
Division
ET
County
Oakland
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
5Answer was receivedRESPNot recorded10/15/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
4Proof of service of petition was received.Not recordedNot recorded09/17/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
3Petition has been verifiedPET108/06/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
2Notice of Docket Number ETNot recordedNot recorded08/06/2026Not recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded05/23/2026$600.00Download
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload

Documents

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

WOODWARD BROWN VENTURES LLC, 

 

 

 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

 

CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, 

 

 

 

Respondent. 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-001315 

 

Parcel No. 08-19-36-202-019 

 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

ANSWER TO PETITION 

 

Respondent City of Birmingham, through its attorneys, Beier Howlett, P.C., responds to 

the allegations made in the Petition as follows: 

1. Admitted. 

2. Not applicable. 

3. Admitted. 

4. Admitted. 

5. Neither admit nor deny as Respondent is without sufficient information and therefore, 

Respondent leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

6. Neither admit nor deny as Respondent is without sufficient information and therefore, 

Respondent leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

7. Neither admit nor deny as Respondent is without sufficient information and therefore, 

Respondent leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

8. Admitted. 

9. It is admitted that Petitioner seeks the values stated in this paragraph. Respondent 

denies that the requested values are appropriate or accurate.

Page 2

10. Respondent admits that the amounts recited reflect Petitioner’s position as to the values 

in dispute, but denies Petitioner’s value contentions and therefore denies those are 

appropriate or accurate. 

11. Respondent denies all of the allegations in this paragraph. 

 

 

WHEREFORE, Respondent City of Birmingham requests that the Tribunal dismiss the 

Petition, affirm Respondent’s assessed and taxable values, subject to county and state equalization, 

and award Respondent its costs and attorney fees. 

Respectfully submitted, 

BEIER HOWLETT, P.C. 

/s/ Michael C. Gibbons 

 

Michael C. Gibbons (P51304) 

Attorneys for Respondent 

3001 W. Big Beaver Rd., Ste. 600 

Troy, MI 48084 

Date: October 15, 2026 

 

 

248-282-1069/ mgibbons@bhlaw.us.com

Page 3

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

Respondent, City of Birmingham, through its attorneys, Beier Howlett, P.C., submits the 

following Affirmative Defenses to the Petition: 

1. Petitioner has failed to establish that it is entitled to the relief requested in the 

Petition, including any reduction in the property's true cash value, assessed value, state equalized 

value, or taxable value. 

2. 

Petitioner bears the burden of establishing the true cash value of the subject 

property pursuant to MCL 205.737(3), and Respondent denies that the values alleged in the 

Petition accurately reflect the property's true cash value. 

3. 

To the extent applicable, Petitioner's claims are barred, in whole or in part, by 

failure to comply with statutory jurisdictional prerequisites, including applicable filing deadlines, 

protest requirements, and requirements concerning standing. 

4. 

To the extent applicable, Petitioner's claims are barred, in whole or in part, by 

waiver, estoppel, release, settlement, or other binding agreement. 

5. 

Respondent reserves the right to seek leave to amend its Answer to assert 

additional defenses as may be warranted by discovery or further proceedings. 

Respectfully submitted, 

BEIER HOWLETT, P.C. 

/s/ Michael C. Gibbons 

 

Michael C. Gibbons (P51304) 

Attorneys for Respondent 

3001 W. Big Beaver Rd., Ste. 600 

Troy, MI 48084 

Date: October 15, 2026 

 

 

248-282-1069/ mgibbons@bhlaw.us.com

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

WOODWARD BROWN VENTURES LLC, 

 

 

 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

 

CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, 

 

 

 

Respondent. 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-001315 

 

Parcel No. 08-19-36-202-019 

 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

On the date below I sent a copy of this Answer to: 

LAURA M. HALLAHAN 

Hallahan & Associates, P.C. 

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 

 

I declare that the statements above are true and to the best of my information, knowledge and 

belief. 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Erin Miller 

 

 

 

Erin Miller 

Dated: October 15, 2026

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISAnswer.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001315

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: 

Local Unit of Government

Local Unit of Government

City Of Birmingham (OAKLAND)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Michael

M.I.

C.

Last Name

Gibbons

Firm Name (if any)

Beier Howlett P.C.

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

3001 W. Big Beaver Rd.

Suite 600

City or Town

Troy

State

 Michigan

ZIP Code

48084

Telephone Number

2482821069

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

mgibbons@bhlaw.us.com

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: 

Michael C. Gibbons

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

 

Woodward Brown Ventures LLC 

 

Petitioner, 

 

vs. 

 

City of Birmingham, 

Respondent.

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-001315 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

(Property Tax Petition) 

 

On the date below I sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, a copy of the Petition to: 

 

City Assessor 

City of Birmingham 

151 Martin Street 

P.O. Box 3001 

Birmingham, MI 48012

City Clerk 

City of Birmingham 

151 Martin Street 

P.O. Box 3001 

Birmingham, MI 48012

 

On the date below I sent by first class mail a copy of the Petition to: 

 

Equalization Director 

Oakland County 

250 Elizabeth Lake Road, Suite 1000W 

Pontiac, MI 48341 

County Clerk 

Oakland County 

1200 N. Telegraph Rd, Bldg 12E 

Pontiac, MI 48341 

Secretary, Board of Education 

Birmingham Public Schools 

31301 Evergreen Rd 

Beverly Hills, MI 48025

State Treasurer 

Department of Treasury 

430 W. Allegan Street 

Lansing, MI 48922

 

I declare that the statements above are true to the best of my information, knowledge and belief. 

 

 

 

/s/ Laura M. Hallahan 

 

Dated: September 17, 2026

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

Woodward Brown Ventures LLC, 

 

Petitioner, 

v 

City of Birmingham, 

 

Respondent. 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Docket No. 26-001315_______ 

Parcel No. 08-19-36-202-019 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

(Entire Tribunal, 2026 Tax Year) 

Petitioner, by and through its attorneys, Hallahan & Associates, P.C., contends: 

1.

☒ The property that is the subject of this appeal is one real property parcel:

Parcel Number 

08-19-36-202-019

Address 

298 S. Old Woodward 

Classification 

201 COMM IMP 

Use 

Hotel 

County 

Oakland 

Sch Dist Birmingham 

2.

☒ N/A. If the assessment at issue was protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s:

☐March, ☐ July, ☐ December Board of Review.

3.

Respondent, identified above, assesses and collects taxes on the subject property.

4.

Petitioner is a taxpayer/party-in-interest with respect to property taxes on the subject

property.

5.

The Petitioner’s principal office/legal residence address is: 390 Park Street, Suite 201,

Birmingham, MI 48009-3400.

6.

This appeal involves issues related to:

☒

the subject property’s true cash and taxable values

☐

the subject property’s taxable value only

there is a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss: ☐ Yes ☐ No

☐

uniformity of the subject property’s assessment

☐

the subject property’s exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______

7.

The tax year at issue is 2026.

Page 3

Petition 

2 

8. 

The values1 established by Respondent’s Board of Review for the subject property are: 

 

 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

 

08-19-36-202-019 

31,051,540 

15,525,770 

14,121,250 

9. 

Petitioner contends that the values1 for the subject property are: 

 

 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

 

08-19-36-202-019 

24,000,000 

12,000,000 

12,000,000 

10. 

The values1 in dispute are: 

 

 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

 

08-19-36-202-019 

7,051,540 

3,525,770 

2,121,250 

11. 

Petitioner relies upon the following to support the relief requested: 

The 2026 values imposed on Petitioner’s property, and the taxes to be levied and collected 

thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons 

that: 

(a) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values exceed the amounts permitted 

by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

(b) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are at higher percentages of true 

cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable 

statutes; 

(c) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are based upon an erroneous 

determination of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner’s property that is 

taxable under Michigan law and are based upon the application of wrong principles; 

and 

(d) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values, and the mode of assessment 

adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its 

constitutional rights of uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. 

Petitioner requests that the Tribunal enter an order reducing the 2026 values from those established 

by Respondent’s Board of Review to those contended by Petitioner, and order refunds attributable 

to the reductions, with interest, as provided by the Tax Tribunal Act. 

 

1TCV=true cash value, SEV=state equalized value, TV=taxable value.

Page 4

Petition 

3 

 

HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

 

 

/s/ Laura M. Hallahan 

 

Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) 

Attorney for Petitioner 

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0179 

(248) 731-3089 

Dated: May 23, 2026 

lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com, (248) 731-3090 

 

Filing Fee: $600

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 26-001315

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No

Party Filing Document 

Petitioner

Files

Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition

Attachment File Name: Petition - POS

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 0.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 0.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Woodward Brown Ventures - Petition 2026.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

 

Woodward Brown Ventures LLC, 

 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

City of Birmingham, 

 

Respondent. 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Docket No. 26-_____________ 

 

Parcel No. 08-19-36-202-019 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

 

PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

(Entire Tribunal, 2026 Tax Year) 

 

Petitioner, by and through its attorneys, Hallahan & Associates, P.C., contends: 

1. 

☒ The property that is the subject of this appeal is one real property parcel: 

Parcel Number 

08-19-36-202-019 

Address 

298 S. Old Woodward 

Classification 

201 COMM IMP 

Use 

Hotel 

County 

Oakland 

Sch Dist Birmingham 

 

2. 

☒ N/A. If the assessment at issue was protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s: 

☐ March, ☐ July, ☐ December Board of Review. 

3. 

Respondent, identified above, assesses and collects taxes on the subject property. 

4. 

Petitioner is a taxpayer/party-in-interest with respect to property taxes on the subject 

property. 

5. 

The Petitioner’s principal office/legal residence address is: 390 Park Street, Suite 201, 

Birmingham, MI 48009-3400. 

6. 

This appeal involves issues related to: 

☒ 

the subject property’s true cash and taxable values 

☐ 

the subject property’s taxable value only 

 

there is a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss: ☐ Yes ☐ No 

☐ 

uniformity of the subject property’s assessment 

☐ 

the subject property’s exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______ 

7. 

The tax year at issue is 2026.

Page 2

Petition 

2 

8. 

The values1 established by Respondent’s Board of Review for the subject property are: 

 

 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

 

08-19-36-202-019 

31,051,540 

15,525,770 

14,121,250 

9. 

Petitioner contends that the values1 for the subject property are: 

 

 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

 

08-19-36-202-019 

24,000,000 

12,000,000 

12,000,000 

10. 

The values1 in dispute are: 

 

 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

 

08-19-36-202-019 

7,051,540 

3,525,770 

2,121,250 

11. 

Petitioner relies upon the following to support the relief requested: 

The 2026 values imposed on Petitioner’s property, and the taxes to be levied and collected 

thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons 

that: 

(a) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values exceed the amounts permitted 

by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

(b) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are at higher percentages of true 

cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable 

statutes; 

(c) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are based upon an erroneous 

determination of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner’s property that is 

taxable under Michigan law and are based upon the application of wrong principles; 

and 

(d) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values, and the mode of assessment 

adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its 

constitutional rights of uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. 

Petitioner requests that the Tribunal enter an order reducing the 2026 values from those established 

by Respondent’s Board of Review to those contended by Petitioner, and order refunds attributable 

to the reductions, with interest, as provided by the Tax Tribunal Act. 

 

1TCV=true cash value, SEV=state equalized value, TV=taxable value.

Page 3

Petition 

3 

 

HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

 

 

/s/ Laura M. Hallahan 

 

Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) 

Attorney for Petitioner 

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0179 

(248) 731-3089 

Dated: May 23, 2026 

lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com, (248) 731-3090 

 

Filing Fee: $600

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

Woodward Brown Ventures LLC

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

390 Park Street, Suite 201

City or Town

Birmingham

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48009-3400

Telephone Number

(248)731-3090

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Laura

M.I.

Last Name

Hallahan

Firm Name (if any)

Hallahan & Associates PC

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202

City or Town

Bloomfield Hills

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48302

Telephone Number

(248)731-3089

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

mtt@hallahanlaw.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

298 S. Old Woodward

Birmingham

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

48009

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Birmingham (OAKLAND) 

County

Oakland

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

08-19-36-202-019

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

15525770

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

14121250

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

24000000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

11999999

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

12000000

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Laura M. Hallahan

Payment Information

Amount: 600

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26052386682372

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-08-06_17-07-27.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Woodward Brown Ventures LLC, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 26-001315

City Of Birmingham, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: August 6, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Woodward Brown Ventures - Petition 2026.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

 

Woodward Brown Ventures LLC, 

 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

City of Birmingham, 

 

Respondent. 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Docket No. 26-_____________ 

 

Parcel No. 08-19-36-202-019 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

 

PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

(Entire Tribunal, 2026 Tax Year) 

 

Petitioner, by and through its attorneys, Hallahan & Associates, P.C., contends: 

1. 

☒ The property that is the subject of this appeal is one real property parcel: 

Parcel Number 

08-19-36-202-019 

Address 

298 S. Old Woodward 

Classification 

201 COMM IMP 

Use 

Hotel 

County 

Oakland 

Sch Dist Birmingham 

 

2. 

☒ N/A. If the assessment at issue was protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s: 

☐ March, ☐ July, ☐ December Board of Review. 

3. 

Respondent, identified above, assesses and collects taxes on the subject property. 

4. 

Petitioner is a taxpayer/party-in-interest with respect to property taxes on the subject 

property. 

5. 

The Petitioner’s principal office/legal residence address is: 390 Park Street, Suite 201, 

Birmingham, MI 48009-3400. 

6. 

This appeal involves issues related to: 

☒ 

the subject property’s true cash and taxable values 

☐ 

the subject property’s taxable value only 

 

there is a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss: ☐ Yes ☐ No 

☐ 

uniformity of the subject property’s assessment 

☐ 

the subject property’s exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______ 

7. 

The tax year at issue is 2026.

Page 2

Petition 

2 

8. 

The values1 established by Respondent’s Board of Review for the subject property are: 

 

 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

 

08-19-36-202-019 

31,051,540 

15,525,770 

14,121,250 

9. 

Petitioner contends that the values1 for the subject property are: 

 

 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

 

08-19-36-202-019 

24,000,000 

12,000,000 

12,000,000 

10. 

The values1 in dispute are: 

 

 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

 

08-19-36-202-019 

7,051,540 

3,525,770 

2,121,250 

11. 

Petitioner relies upon the following to support the relief requested: 

The 2026 values imposed on Petitioner’s property, and the taxes to be levied and collected 

thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons 

that: 

(a) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values exceed the amounts permitted 

by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

(b) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are at higher percentages of true 

cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable 

statutes; 

(c) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are based upon an erroneous 

determination of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner’s property that is 

taxable under Michigan law and are based upon the application of wrong principles; 

and 

(d) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values, and the mode of assessment 

adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its 

constitutional rights of uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. 

Petitioner requests that the Tribunal enter an order reducing the 2026 values from those established 

by Respondent’s Board of Review to those contended by Petitioner, and order refunds attributable 

to the reductions, with interest, as provided by the Tax Tribunal Act. 

 

1TCV=true cash value, SEV=state equalized value, TV=taxable value.

Page 3

Petition 

3 

 

HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

 

 

/s/ Laura M. Hallahan 

 

Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) 

Attorney for Petitioner 

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0179 

(248) 731-3089 

Dated: May 23, 2026 

lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com, (248) 731-3090 

 

Filing Fee: $600

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

Woodward Brown Ventures LLC

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

390 Park Street, Suite 201

City or Town

Birmingham

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48009-3400

Telephone Number

(248)731-3090

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Laura

M.I.

Last Name

Hallahan

Firm Name (if any)

Hallahan & Associates PC

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202

City or Town

Bloomfield Hills

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48302

Telephone Number

(248)731-3089

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

mtt@hallahanlaw.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

298 S. Old Woodward

Birmingham

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

48009

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Birmingham (OAKLAND) 

County

Oakland

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

08-19-36-202-019

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

15525770

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

14121250

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

24000000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

11999999

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

12000000

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Laura M. Hallahan

Payment Information

Amount: 600

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26052386682372

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.