William P Fox, Petitioner Vs. City Of Roseville, Respondent

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

William P Fox, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003560 

 

City of Roseville, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Petitioner was placed in 

default on September 27, 2024, because Petitioner did not fully complete the petition or 

pay the required petition filing fee. On November 4, 2024, the Tribunal extended the 

time for Petitioner to cure the default by an additional 14 days and they have failed to 

respond. Petitioner has not complied with either order, and the latter stated that “failure 

to comply with this Order shall result in the dismissal of the case . . .” and referenced 

Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury.1 In Grimm, the Michigan Court of Appeals summarized 

factors that the Tribunal should consider before imposing the sanction of dismissal. 

Those factors are: 

 

(1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of 

refusing to comply with previous court orders; (3) the prejudice to the 

opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) 

the degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) 

attempts to cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better 

serve the interests of justice.2 

 

Here, Petitioner’s failure to comply with multiple orders has established a history of 

deliberate delay. As a result, giving careful consideration to the factors involved and 

considering all options in determining what sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal 

finds that dismissal is appropriate, and a lesser sanction would not be appropriate in 

light of Petitioner’s history of noncompliance in this case. 

 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 

 

This Order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. 

 

 

1 Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

2 Id. at 149.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003560 

Page 2 of 2 

 

APPEAL RIGHTS 

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for 

reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of 

Appeals. 

 

A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee 

within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision 

closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing 

system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such 

motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless 

the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a 

principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the 

decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, 

if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the 

opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to 

electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the 

motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral 

arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. 

 

Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the 

claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If 

the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal 

by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the 

record on appeal. There is no certification fee. 

 

 

Entered: December 5, 2024 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

bw/jcr 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

William P Fox,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003560

City Of Roseville,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. 

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between 

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a 

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a 

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003560

Page 2 of 6

If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or 

email taxtrib@michigan.gov.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: November 4, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

William P Fox,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003560

City Of Roseville,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF FILING

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the 

answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. 

Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small 

Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will 

receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email 

address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of 

the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be 

conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important 

information.

EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy 

to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents 

had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of 

Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the 

opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the 

Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the 

opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail.

Alternate Dispute Resolution Options

INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this 

case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference 

is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a 

case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with 

a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information.

MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. 

Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between 

the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a 

mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a 

judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more

Page 4

MTT

Page 5

STATE

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

William P Fox, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003560 

City Of Roseville,

Respondent.

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT 

The Tribunal has considered the file in the above-captioned case and finds that it 

entered an order holding Petitioner in default on September 27, 2024.1 Petitioner was 

required to cure the default within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet 

has failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an 

extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with 

Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of 

deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply with 

this Order.2 Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is EXTENDED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the 

default: (1) file the documentation required by the September 27, 2024default order, (2) 

file a Motion to Set Aside Default, and (3) file proof the Motion and a copy of the 

documentation were served on Respondent. The foregoing must be filed with the 

Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this Order.

Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the case, as provided by 

TTR 231.3 

By:___________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: November 4, 2024

1 The Order further stated, “Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being 

required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 

2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

3 See also MCL 205.732.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003560

Page 2 of 4

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

William P Fox, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003560 

City Of Roseville,

Respondent.

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT 

The Tribunal has considered the file in the above-captioned case and finds that it 

entered an order holding Petitioner in default on September 27, 2024.4 Petitioner was 

required to cure the default within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet 

has failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an 

extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with 

Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of 

deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply with 

this Order.5 Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is EXTENDED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the 

default: (1) file the documentation required by the September 27, 2024default order, (2) 

file a Motion to Set Aside Default, and (3) file proof the Motion and a copy of the 

documentation were served on Respondent. The foregoing must be filed with the 

Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this Order.

Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the case, as provided by 

TTR 231.6 

By:___________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: November 4, 2024

4 The Order further stated, “Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being 

required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 

5 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

6 See also MCL 205.732.

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 24-003560

Page 4 of 4

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

William P Fox, 

Petitioner, 

\) 

MTT Docket No. 24-003560 

Parcel No. 08-14-17-252-002 

City of Roseville, 

Respondent 

/ 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

I, Brook Openshaw an employee for the City of Roseville, hereby certify 

that on October 07, 2024 

| served a copy of the Property Tax Appeal Answer 

Form to the following party by first class mail addressed as follows: 

Petitioner: 

William P Fox 

17824 Biehl 

Roseville, Ml 48066 

| declare that this proof of service has been examined by me and that the 

contents thereof are true to the best of my information, knowledge and belief. 

Prod. cpio 

Brook Openshaw

Page 2

2024 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION 

FROM 

CITY OF ROSEVILLE 

ASSESSORS OFFICE 

29777 GRATIOT 

ROSEVILLE MI 48066 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL 

PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: (Parcel Code required. Property address and 

legal description optional.): 

08-14-17-252-002 

17824 BIEHL 

FOX, WILLIAM P 

17824 BIEHL 

ROSEVILLE MI 48066 

THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED 

401 

(RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) 

Thank you for attending this years March Board of Review. The Board has reviewed the information you supplied and the 

data necessary to compute your assessment and taxable value. 

The Board has completed their review of parcel number: 

 (8-14-17-252-002 

They have made the following determination based on the information you supplied. 

Board of Review Comments: 

THE MARCH BOARD OF REVIEW DETERMINED THAT THE 2024 ASSESSMENT IS FAIR AND EQUITABLE. 

[2024 ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE 

82.500 

] 

[2024 "BOARD OF REVIEW" ASSESSED VALUE 

82,500 

(If the above amounts are the same, no revisions have occured) 

[ 2024 ORIGINAL TAXABLE VALUE 

73,500 

1 

[ 2024 "BOARD OF REVIEW" TAXABLE VALUE 

73,500 

| 

[2024 PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION % 

100.0000 

| 

If you disagree with the Board of Review's decision, further appeal may be made to the Michigan Tax Tribunal. 

Residential properties must be appealed by July 31,2024. Commercial, Industrial or Business/Utility Personal Property 

must be appealed by May 31,2024. To appeal this decision you will need to timely file a petition with the Michigan Tax 

Tribunal. The petition must be a Michigan Tax Tribunal form or a form approved by the Michigan Tax Tribunal. 

Michigan Tax Tribunal forms are available at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. You can print the petition that applies to your 

appeal and mail the completed form to the Michigan Tax Tribunal at P.O. Box 30232, Lansing, Michigan 48909 or 

complete the form online and submit it electronically. 

In order to appeal your property classification you must send an appeal to the State Tax Commission at the address below: 

State Tax Commission 

Classification Appeals 

P.0.Box 30471 

Lansing MI 48909

Page 3

Parcel Number: 

08-14-17-252-002 

Jurisdiction: 

CITY OF ROSEVILLE 

County: 

MACOMB 

Printed on 

10/07/2024 

[Grantor ~~ [Grantee 

| 

~ [Terms of sale 

[Liber 

[Verified ~~ 

|[Prent. 

| 

| 

& 

Page 

By 

| Trans. 

PURCHIARONI, 

DAVID 

FOX, WILLIAM 

P 

[09-FAMILY 

[286457291 

[PEED 

210040 

T 

+ 

ENE 

CACEIN, 

— 

ciety 

~+ S—— 

Sa 

Ee 

fn SAT 

| Eh 

EIN CEPT 

det 

AE 

ae, 

al 

Ee 

is 

| 

| 

| 

| 

H 

: 

Cr Cd 

Hi 

+I 

1 

1] 

TORRES 

L 

1 

[Class: RESIDENTIAL-IMPRO |Zoning: 

Building Permit (s) 

Date 

Number 

tatus 

School: ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS 

Plumbing 

| 08/26/2019 

|PP190303 

INALED 

P.R.E. 

100% 05/20/2022 

Rental Registration 

06/27/2019 

|PR191176 

FINALED 

Owner's Name/Address 

MAP #: 

PEAT 

Rental Registration 

06/27/2019 

|PR191175 

[FINALED 

dutta hs 

2024 Est TCV 164,906 TCV/TFA: 109.06|Rental Registration 

06/24/2016 

|PR161032 

“[FNaED 

ROSEVILLE MI 48066 

X [Improved 

| 

[Vacant 

Land Value Estimates 

for Land Table 00073.00073 

N OF MARTIN, 

W OF GRATIOT 

EN 

Public 

* 

Factors 

* 

Improvements 

Description 

Frontage 

Depth 

Front 

Depth 

Rate 

%Adj. 

Reason 

Value 

el 

———— 

birt Road 

STANDARD LOT 

50.00 132.00 1.0000 1.0139 

360 

100 

18,250 

Tax Description 

whet eis 1 

LT 

|Gravel Road 

50 Actual 

Front 

Feet, 

0.15 

Total Acres 

Total 

Est. 

Land Value 

= 

18,250 

POMANTES SUB LOT 

2 

| 

Eeinents/ Tnflieaces 

=X: [haved Road 

Work Description for Permit PP190303, 

Issued 08/26/2019: WATER HEATER 

|Storm Sewer 

Work Description for Permit PE130724, 

Issued 09/13/2013: 

1 FURNACE WIRING 

Sidewalk 

RE-CONNECT, 

2 100-AMP SERVICES 

(LOWER AND UPPER) 

X 

[Water 

Work Description for Permit PM130541, 

Issued 08/02/2013: 

0-100K BTU FURNACE, 

X 

|Sewer 

LINER 

pti 

10/21/13 ADD 

1 HUMIDIFIER 

as 

Curb 

Street Lights 

Standard Utilities 

|Underground Utils. 

Topography 

of 

Site 

Level 

Rolling 

Low 

High 

Landscaped 

Swamp 

Wooded 

i 

Pond 

Waterfront 

| 

Ravine 

1 

Wetland 

alii 

I 

Flood 

Plain 

Year 

Land] 

Building] 

Assessed 

Board 

of| 

Tribunal/ 

Taxable 

| 

value| 

Value 

Review 

Other 

Value 

| 

When 

What 

2024 

82,500 

82,500M 

73,500C 

| 

= 

M 07/28/2022 VERIFIED 

§ |2023 

76,500 

70, 000M 

70,0008 

|The Equa 

Copyright 

(c) 

1999 

- 

2009. 

12/06/2016 UPDATED 

PI [5555 1 

a 

—— 

f 

+t 

Tv: 

|Licensed To: 

City of Roseville, 

County of 

2022 = 

: 

1 545.56:300 SELECT ae 

[RR 

i 

Ria 

Macomb, 

Michigan 

atl us 

[2021 

61,000 

36,902C 

*** 

Information herein deemed reliable 

but 

not guaranteed***

Page 4

Residential Building 

1 

of 

1 

Parcel Number: 

08-14-17-252-002 

Printed 

on 

10/07/2024 

Building 

Type 

(3) 

Roof 

(cont.) 

(11) 

Heating/Cooling 

(15) 

Built-ins 

(15) 

Fireplaces 

(16) 

Porches/Decks | 

(17) 

Garage 

X 

|Single 

Family 

Eavestrough 

X 

|Gas 

0il 

Elec. 

Appliance Allow. 

Interior 

1 

Story | Area Type 

Year Built: 

Mobile Home 

Insulation 

Wood 

Coal 

Steam 

Cook Top 

Interior 

2 

Story 

colic 

Car Capacity: 

Town Home 

0|Front Overhang 

Forced Aiz w/o Ducts 

Dishwasher 

2nd/Same 

Stack 

Class: 

C 

Duplex 

0/Other Overhang 

x 

|Forced Air 

w/ 

Duct 

Garbage Disposal 

Two Sided 

Exterior: 

Siding 

A-Frame 

a 

Her Ng 

s 

Bath Heater 

Exterior 

1 

Story 

Brick Ven.: 

0 

i 

Vent 

F 

Exterior 

2 

St 

St. 

Ven. 

: 

X 

|Wood 

Frame 

$4) 

Interior

Page 5

Parce

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 24-003560

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City Of Roseville (MACOMB)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Brook

M.I.

Last Name

Openshaw

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

29777 Gratiot

PO Box 290

City or Town

Roseville

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48066

Telephone Number

586-445-5430

Fax Number

586-445-5402

E-mail Address

bopenshaw@roseville-mi.gov

Section 3: Subject Property Information

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

Yes

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another.

N/A 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this 

document, you may be held in default.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

The 2024 assessment represents 50% true cash value as of 12/31/2023.

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? March*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer.

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? 

If yes, cite the Board’s authority.

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No

If yes, explain.

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

If so, what is the issue date?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued?

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption:

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS

Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended:

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Tax Year(s) denied:

List the date the exemption was denied:

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.

Parcel Identification Number:

08-14-17-252-002

Classification of Property:

Real 

Residential

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:

82,500

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:

73,500

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

$165,000

Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.

82,500

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Brook Openshaw

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

William P Fox,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003560

City Of Roseville,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner failed to properly complete the petition and may have failed to pay the full 

required fee for the filing of the petition. See TTR 277 and 267. As such, the appeal is 

not properly pending. Petitioner must complete the petition by providing all information 

required by each applicable section, return the completed petition, and pay the 

additional fee amount required for the filing of the petition, if any, within 14 days of the 

entry of this Order. The petition shall note the docket number assigned by the Tribunal. 

Small Claims petition forms and a filing fee calculator can be found on our website at 

www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, the payment may not be made via e-filing. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this Order.i 

Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: September 27, 2024

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003560

Page 2 of 4

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 219(5)

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

William P Fox,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003560

City Of Roseville,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner failed to properly complete the petition and may have failed to pay the full 

required fee for the filing of the petition. See TTR 277 and 267. As such, the appeal is 

not properly pending. Petitioner must complete the petition by providing all information 

required by each applicable section, return the completed petition, and pay the 

additional fee amount required for the filing of the petition, if any, within 14 days of the 

entry of this Order. The petition shall note the docket number assigned by the Tribunal. 

Small Claims petition forms and a filing fee calculator can be found on our website at 

www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, the payment may not be made via e-filing. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this Order.ii 

Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: September 27, 2024

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 24-003560

Page 4 of 4

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

ii “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUN 24 2024 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricuitural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information 

First Name 

"Pp 

Last Name/Company Name 

UL) 

1AM 

FOX 

TE B VEHL - 

State 

ZIP Cqd 

OCEVILLE 

Mm 

"92060-2775 

Cex) ae 

Fax Number 

(536) 

306-0534 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you Want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Leup fox 00.9 gmail. Com 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

Ml. 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

‘Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail} 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many 

if you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjolning? 

parcels are you | [} Yes* 

7] No 

#if yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels. 

 will be defaulted.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information Use the muitipte parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel idgntification "7 

14-17 

- 25 

Q-00R 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

B® 

Aare! 

Gompsretel 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one} 

ET 

sed o 0 known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

Current Tw 

a 

PE Ce 

F133 560 

¥q 

do iy ZA 

is te fair market value (also known as True Cash Vater? 

“Le 25. 

5 Cash 

O00 

Yel) "5 and enter here. This is your Contention of Assessed Value. 

if you phan 

the 

As Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

Section 8: Classification Information -ony the wl Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal* 

Parcel identification Number: 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

{check one} 

What do you believe Is the property's classification? 

Real 

Personal 

{check one) 

[m] 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

If improved property, how is the property currently being used? 

Tf improved property, for ‘what use was the property designed? 

I—

Page 3

l 

E-RECORDED RECEIVED 

REGISTER OF DEEDS 

MACOMB COUNTY, Mi 

2022 JUN 03 3:54 PM 

E-Recorded 

This is the cerifiy that according to the County 

Treasurer's records that there are no tax liens- 

on this property and that the taxes are paid 

for five years prior to the date on this instrument 

except ___ NO: 42206, LAWRENCE ROCCA 

Macomb County Treasurer BY CT 

This certification does not include current taxes now 

being collected, Date: 06/06/2022 

Drafted By: 

David C. Purchiaroni 

17824 Biehl 

Roseville, MI 48066 

202200072773 

L.: 28645 P: 291 

Pages: 2 

== 3 

. 

06/07/2022 08:41 AM 

Fees: $35.00 

4) 

\ 

Sl 

! 

Anthony G. Forni, Clerk/Reglster of Deeds 

Macomb County, Mi 

WARRANTY DEED 

Return To: 

Willlam P. Fox 

17824 Bieht 

Roseville, MI 48068) 

Rid 

(Platted/Cardominlum) 

Send Tax Bills To: 

William P. Fox 

“17824 Biehl 

seville, MI 48066 

Recording Fee: $35.00 

File Number: 966566 

$937.50 

State Transfer Tax: 

County Transfer Tax: 

$137.50 

hi Parcel No.: 08-14-17-252-002 

Know All Persons by These Presents: That David C, Purchiaroni A A. Purchiaroni, husband and wife 

whose address Is 17824 Biehl, Roseville, M1 48066 

Convey(s) and Warrant(s) to William P. Fox, a single man 

whose address Is 17824 Biehl, Rosevifle, MI 48066 

the following described premises situated In the City of Roseville, County of Macomb, State of Michigan, 

to wit: 

Lot(s) 2 of POMANTE'S SUBDIVISION according to the plat thereof recorded in Liber 8 of Plats, Page 87 of Macomb 

County Records. 

More commonly known as: 17824 Biehl, Roseville, MI 48066 

For the full consideration of: one hundred twenty five thousand Dollars ($125,000.00) 

Subject To: 

Existing building and use restrictions, easements of record, and zoning ordinances, If any.

Page 4

oo 

2024 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION 

FROM 

CITY OF ROSEVILLE 

ASSESSORS OFFICE 

29777 GRATIOT 

ROSEVILLE MI 48066 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: (Parcel Code required. Property address and 

fegal description optional): 

08-14-17-252-002 

17824 BIEHL 

FOX, WILLIAM P 

17824 BIEHL 

ROSEVILLE MI 48066 

THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED 

401 

(RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) 

Thank you for attending this years March Board of Review. The Board has reviewed the information you supplied and the 

data necessary to compute your assessment and taxable value. 

The Board has completed their review of parcel number: 

 08-14-17-252-002 

They have made the following determination based on the information you supplied. 

Board of Review Comments: 

THE MARCH BOARD OF REVIEW DETERMINED THAT THE 2024 ASSESSMENT IS FAIR AND EQUITABLE. 

[2024 ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE 

82.500 

| 

[ 2024 "BOARD OF REVIEW" ASSESSED VALUE 

$2,500 

| 

(If the above amounts are the same, no revisions have occured) 

2024 ORIGINAL TAXABLE VALUE 

73,500 

2024 "BOARD OF REVIEW" TAXABLE VALUE 

73,500 

2024 PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION % 

100.0000

Page 5

2023

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

William P Fox,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003560

City Of Roseville,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: September 27, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

William P Fox,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003560

City Of Roseville,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: September 27, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUN 24 2024 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL 

Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricuitural Exemption, Special Assessment, or 

Non-Property tax disputes. 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal 

(e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not 

submit this document, you may be held in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information 

First Name 

"Pp 

Last Name/Company Name 

UL) 

1AM 

FOX 

TE B VEHL - 

State 

ZIP Cqd 

OCEVILLE 

Mm 

"92060-2775 

Cex) ae 

Fax Number 

(536) 

306-0534 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you Want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Leup fox 00.9 gmail. Com 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

Ml. 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

‘Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail} 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

How many 

if you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjolning? 

parcels are you | [} Yes* 

7] No 

#if yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels. 

 will be defaulted.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 7: Valuation Information Use the muitipte parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. 

Parcel idgntification "7 

14-17 

- 25 

Q-00R 

Classification of Property: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

B® 

Aare! 

Gompsretel 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one} 

ET 

sed o 0 known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 

Current Tw 

a 

PE Ce 

F133 560 

¥q 

do iy ZA 

is te fair market value (also known as True Cash Vater? 

“Le 25. 

5 Cash 

O00 

Yel) "5 and enter here. This is your Contention of Assessed Value. 

if you phan 

the 

As Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

Section 8: Classification Information -ony the wl Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal* 

Parcel identification Number: 

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

Real 

Personal 

(check one) 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

{check one} 

What do you believe Is the property's classification? 

Real 

Personal 

{check one) 

[m] 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

If improved property, how is the property currently being used? 

Tf improved property, for ‘what use was the property designed? 

I—

Page 3

l 

E-RECORDED RECEIVED 

REGISTER OF DEEDS 

MACOMB COUNTY, Mi 

2022 JUN 03 3:54 PM 

E-Recorded 

This is the cerifiy that according to the County 

Treasurer's records that there are no tax liens- 

on this property and that the taxes are paid 

for five years prior to the date on this instrument 

except ___ NO: 42206, LAWRENCE ROCCA 

Macomb County Treasurer BY CT 

This certification does not include current taxes now 

being collected, Date: 06/06/2022 

Drafted By: 

David C. Purchiaroni 

17824 Biehl 

Roseville, MI 48066 

202200072773 

L.: 28645 P: 291 

Pages: 2 

== 3 

. 

06/07/2022 08:41 AM 

Fees: $35.00 

4) 

\ 

Sl 

! 

Anthony G. Forni, Clerk/Reglster of Deeds 

Macomb County, Mi 

WARRANTY DEED 

Return To: 

Willlam P. Fox 

17824 Bieht 

Roseville, MI 48068) 

Rid 

(Platted/Cardominlum) 

Send Tax Bills To: 

William P. Fox 

“17824 Biehl 

seville, MI 48066 

Recording Fee: $35.00 

File Number: 966566 

$937.50 

State Transfer Tax: 

County Transfer Tax: 

$137.50 

hi Parcel No.: 08-14-17-252-002 

Know All Persons by These Presents: That David C, Purchiaroni A A. Purchiaroni, husband and wife 

whose address Is 17824 Biehl, Roseville, M1 48066 

Convey(s) and Warrant(s) to William P. Fox, a single man 

whose address Is 17824 Biehl, Rosevifle, MI 48066 

the following described premises situated In the City of Roseville, County of Macomb, State of Michigan, 

to wit: 

Lot(s) 2 of POMANTE'S SUBDIVISION according to the plat thereof recorded in Liber 8 of Plats, Page 87 of Macomb 

County Records. 

More commonly known as: 17824 Biehl, Roseville, MI 48066 

For the full consideration of: one hundred twenty five thousand Dollars ($125,000.00) 

Subject To: 

Existing building and use restrictions, easements of record, and zoning ordinances, If any.

Page 4

oo 

2024 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION 

FROM 

CITY OF ROSEVILLE 

ASSESSORS OFFICE 

29777 GRATIOT 

ROSEVILLE MI 48066 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: 

PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: (Parcel Code required. Property address and 

fegal description optional): 

08-14-17-252-002 

17824 BIEHL 

FOX, WILLIAM P 

17824 BIEHL 

ROSEVILLE MI 48066 

THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED 

401 

(RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) 

Thank you for attending this years March Board of Review. The Board has reviewed the information you supplied and the 

data necessary to compute your assessment and taxable value. 

The Board has completed their review of parcel number: 

 08-14-17-252-002 

They have made the following determination based on the information you supplied. 

Board of Review Comments: 

THE MARCH BOARD OF REVIEW DETERMINED THAT THE 2024 ASSESSMENT IS FAIR AND EQUITABLE. 

[2024 ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE 

82.500 

| 

[ 2024 "BOARD OF REVIEW" ASSESSED VALUE 

$2,500 

| 

(If the above amounts are the same, no revisions have occured) 

2024 ORIGINAL TAXABLE VALUE 

73,500 

2024 "BOARD OF REVIEW" TAXABLE VALUE 

73,500 

2024 PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION % 

100.0000

Page 5

2023

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.