William P Brushaber, Petitioner V Township Of Tobacco, Respondent
- Petitioner
- William P Brushaber
- Respondent
- Township Of Tobacco
Case overview
- Docket number
- 25-003648-TT
- Status
- Ready Schedule
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Gladwin
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Order Setting Aside R Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 12/12/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Notice of Filing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 12/12/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Attachments to the Answer were filed | Not recorded | Not recorded | 12/08/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 12/08/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Order Holding Party in Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 12/04/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 10/23/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/23/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 08/15/2025 | $0.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 William P Brushaber, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003648 Township Of Tobacco, Respondent. ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Respondent was held in default on December 4, 2025, and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and clicking on the document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE. By_________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: December 12, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 William P Brushaber, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003648 Township Of Tobacco, Respondent. ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that Respondent was held in default on December 4, 2025, and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and clicking on the document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE. By_________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: December 12, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 William P Brushaber, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003648 Township Of Tobacco, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Users who file documents with the Michigan Tax Tribunal are advised that filed documents are public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tax Docket Lookup. Users who file documents are responsible for ensuring sensitive or personal identifying information is withheld or redacted. See TTR 209. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Michigan Tax Tribunal and prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents covered by the Order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a Protective Order will be published. The responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII contained in a previously-filed document by
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-003648 Page 2 of 6 submitting a Request for Redactions. The Request for Redactions form will be available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages of our website. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied by either the Michigan Department of Treasury or a County. Also, state taxes levied by the Michigan Department of Treasury, such as income taxes, are not subject to the informal settlement conference process. MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or email taxtrib@michigan.gov. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: December 12, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 William P Brushaber, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003648 Township Of Tobacco, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your
Page 4
MTT
Page 5
ST
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
(Gone STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL William P Brushaber, Petitioner \ MOAHR Docket No. 25-003648 Township of Tobacco, Respondent PROOF OF SERVICE On the date listed below, | served via First Class Mail a copy of the Respondents completed answer form to the above-mentioned docket number. Sent to: William P. Brushaber 5754 S. Dundas Road Beaverton, Ml 48612 | hereby declare that the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. November 19, 2025 (tes Thonursen Allison Thompson Tobacco Township Assessor
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. 25-003648 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information First Name M.1 Last Name Allison N. Thompson Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 121 Wooden Key Dr. City or Town State ZIP Code Houghton Lake Mi 48629 Telephone Number (989) 31 2-301 2 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) tobaccoassessor@yahoo.com Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Last Name Allison N. Thompson rman Tobacco Township Assessor Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 121 Wooden Key Dr. City or Town State ZIP Code Houghton Lake Mi 48629 Telephone Number (989) 31 2-301 2 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) tobaccoassessor@yahoo.com Section 3: Subject Property Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? Yes O No Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. O Yes O No Not Applicable
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Petitioners purchased this parcel on 8-23-2023 for $525,000, creating an uncapping of taxable value for year 2024. Petitioners appealed their 2025 valuation to March Board of Review and the March Board of Review upheld the assessment and no change was approved. Through discussion between myself and the petitioners, it was discovered that an error of story height was present in the calculation of the petitioners assessment, this error was taken to the July Board of Review 2025 for clerical error correction. The record card incorrectly reflected part of the home as 2 story rather than a vaulted 1 story. July Board of Review corrected this story height error and issued corrections for year 2024 and 2025. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes [J] No If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: March July O December If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? O Yes O No *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? Yes OJ No If yes, cite the Board’s authority. MeL 211.531 (b)A Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? Yes [0] No If yes, explain (orreetion 40 Story Height of Park of Subjeer Po perty . Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? pd O ves No If so, what is the issue date? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? Od Yes Od No If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: [] March [] July [J December List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS Did Petitioner request the exemption at a BOR? O Yes OJ No If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: O March = July O December Tax Year(s) denied: List the date the exemption was denied: What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY What do you believe the classification should be: Real Personal (check one) a Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residential Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) Section 6: Valuation Information ‘use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 150-036-202-002-01 Classification of Property: Real Personal (check one) Agricultural Commercial Industrial Residntial Timber-Cutover Developmental Utility (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as A Value) as established by the BOR: 324,600 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 320,557 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 649,200 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 324,600 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Signature + *Required Responden! Jin; orized Re TiN Isl
Page 5
Mich of Ti eo Som reasury Assessment July/December Board of Review Affidavit TLR hh Issued under authority of P.A. 206 of 1893. Filing is mandatory.
Page 6
Re
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-003648 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Township Of Tobacco (GLADWIN) First Name Allison M.I. N. Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government Thompson Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 121 Wooden Key Dr. City or Town Houghton Lake State Michigan ZIP Code 48629 Telephone Number 989-312-3012 Fax Number E-mail Address tobaccoassessor@yahoo.com Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Allison M.I. N. Last Name Thompson Firm Name (if any) Assessor for Tobacco Township Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 121 Wooden Key Dr. City or Town Houghton Lake State Michigan ZIP Code 48629 Telephone Number 989-312-3012 Fax Number E-mail Address tobaccoassessor@yahoo.com Section 3: Subject Property Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? Yes Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another. N/A Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Petitioners purchased this parcel on 8-23-2023 for $525,000, creating an uncapping of taxable value for year 2024. Petitioners appealed their 2025 valuation to March Board of Review and the March Board of Review upheld the assessment and no change was approved. Through discussion between myself and the petitioners, it was discovered that an error of story height was present in the calculation of the petitioners assessment, this error was taken to the July Board of Review 2025 for clerical error correction. The record card incorrectly reflected part of the home as a 2 story rather than a vaulted 1 story. July Board of Review corrected this story height error and issued corrections for year 2024 and 2025. Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: July If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? July*Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? Yes If yes, cite the Board’s authority. MCL 211.53b (6) d Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? Yes If yes, explain. Correction to story height of part of subject property. Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? If so, what is the issue date? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued? Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR? If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: Tax Year(s) denied: List the date the exemption was denied: What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY What do you believe the classification should be: Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 150-036-202-002-01 Classification of Property: Real Residential Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 324,600 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 320,557 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 649,200 Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 324,600 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Allison Thompson
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 William P Brushaber, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003648 Township Of Tobacco, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Respondent has failed to file an answer. See TTR 281. Respondent must file an answer within 14 days of the entry of this order. Small Claims answer forms can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.i Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By:_______________________________ Entered: December 4, 2025 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-003648 Page 2 of 6 that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 William P Brushaber, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003648 Township Of Tobacco, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Respondent has failed to file an answer. See TTR 281. Respondent must file an answer within 14 days of the entry of this order. Small Claims answer forms can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.ii Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By:_______________________________ Entered: December 4, 2025 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk ii “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 25-003648 Page 4 of 6 that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 William P Brushaber, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003648 Township Of Tobacco, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Respondent has failed to file an answer. See TTR 281. Respondent must file an answer within 14 days of the entry of this order. Small Claims answer forms can be found on our website at
Page 6
MTT Docket No.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED
AUG 1:9 2025
.
STATE OF MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON |. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
DIRECTOR
LANSING
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL
Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or
Non-Property tax disputes.
Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal
{e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not
submit this document, you may be held in default.
Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information
First Name
M.E
Last Name/Company Name
William
P
Brushaber
Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
5754 S. Dundas Road
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Beaverton
MI
48612
Telephone Number 989-404-008 1
E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)
b_brushaber@hotmail.com
Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information
First Name
M.L
Last Name
Firm Name (if any)
Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Telephone Number
Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email)
Section 3: Subject Property Information
How many
If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?
parcelsareyou | [7] vest
[_] No™
appealing?
*If yes, use a multiple parcel form for informalion regarding any contiguous parcels.
1
**If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted.
Property Address {No., Street, City, ST, ZIP)
[If multiple, list first property's address)
5754 S. Dundas RoadPage 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply)
True Cash and Taxable Value
[3 Poverty Exemption
[1 Taxable Value Only (calcutation)
[J Disabled Veterans Exemption
{1 Uncapping of Taxable Value
Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA)
[_] Exemption from Taxation {other than the denial of a
J Classification
Principal Residence or Qualified Agricuitural Exemption)
Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
Petitioner believes the calculations to achieve TCV value of the property are in error.
Protest was made to BOR and appeal denied. Petitioner then contacted assessor for
the township and through discussions it was discovered that an error in the square
footage calculations (500 sq. feet) has been erroneously applied in all of the annual
assessments for the property since it was first sold for a homestead.
Assessor filed
a Measurement/Calculation error with the BOR in July to fix the
2024/2025 assessed capped and taxable value of the property however; little to no relief
has been gained as the TCV of the homestead is still higher than 2023 sale price and
2023 appraisal.
Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
Year(s) you are appealing:
2024, 2025
Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [7] Yes
[1] No
If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision:
March
a July
O December
If No, check the applicable reason(s):
[7 Not required to attend
[| Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner
|] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact {if yes, include explanation in Section §)
0 Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order
Appeating within 35 days of receipt of Nolice of UncappingPage 3
‘erens®
.
\
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 7: Valuation Information suse te muitipte parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.
Parcel Identification Number:
150-036-202-002-01
Classification of Property:
Real
Personal
(checkone}
4
Agriculiural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
{check one)
Current Assessed Value (also known as Stale Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:
324,600.00
Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:
320,557.00
What do you befieve is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?
570,115.00
Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.
285,057.50
If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.
35,499.50
Section 8: Classification Information «only the Mi Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal*
Parcel Identification Number:
Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review:
Real
Personal
{check one)
0
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
What do you believe is the property’s classification?
Real
Personal
{check one)
O
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
If improved property, how is the property currently being used?
If improved property, for what use was the property designed?Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON 1, BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Fee Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? ves [J No Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? 0 ves No If you answered yes to either or both of the above quastions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. The filing fee Is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are
Page 5
03/16/202
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 William P Brushaber, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003648 Township Of Tobacco, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: October 23, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 William P Brushaber, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-003648 Township Of Tobacco, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: October 23, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED
AUG 1:9 2025
.
STATE OF MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON |. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
DIRECTOR
LANSING
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL
Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or
Non-Property tax disputes.
Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal
{e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not
submit this document, you may be held in default.
Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information
First Name
M.E
Last Name/Company Name
William
P
Brushaber
Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
5754 S. Dundas Road
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Beaverton
MI
48612
Telephone Number 989-404-008 1
E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)
b_brushaber@hotmail.com
Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information
First Name
M.L
Last Name
Firm Name (if any)
Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Telephone Number
Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email)
Section 3: Subject Property Information
How many
If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?
parcelsareyou | [7] vest
[_] No™
appealing?
*If yes, use a multiple parcel form for informalion regarding any contiguous parcels.
1
**If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted.
Property Address {No., Street, City, ST, ZIP)
[If multiple, list first property's address)
5754 S. Dundas RoadPage 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply)
True Cash and Taxable Value
[3 Poverty Exemption
[1 Taxable Value Only (calcutation)
[J Disabled Veterans Exemption
{1 Uncapping of Taxable Value
Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (ESA)
[_] Exemption from Taxation {other than the denial of a
J Classification
Principal Residence or Qualified Agricuitural Exemption)
Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
Petitioner believes the calculations to achieve TCV value of the property are in error.
Protest was made to BOR and appeal denied. Petitioner then contacted assessor for
the township and through discussions it was discovered that an error in the square
footage calculations (500 sq. feet) has been erroneously applied in all of the annual
assessments for the property since it was first sold for a homestead.
Assessor filed
a Measurement/Calculation error with the BOR in July to fix the
2024/2025 assessed capped and taxable value of the property however; little to no relief
has been gained as the TCV of the homestead is still higher than 2023 sale price and
2023 appraisal.
Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
Year(s) you are appealing:
2024, 2025
Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [7] Yes
[1] No
If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND attach the BOR decision:
March
a July
O December
If No, check the applicable reason(s):
[7 Not required to attend
[| Assessment Change Notice was not received by Petitioner
|] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact {if yes, include explanation in Section §)
0 Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order
Appeating within 35 days of receipt of Nolice of UncappingPage 3
‘erens®
.
\
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 7: Valuation Information suse te muitipte parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.
Parcel Identification Number:
150-036-202-002-01
Classification of Property:
Real
Personal
(checkone}
4
Agriculiural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
{check one)
Current Assessed Value (also known as Stale Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:
324,600.00
Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:
320,557.00
What do you befieve is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?
570,115.00
Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.
285,057.50
If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.
35,499.50
Section 8: Classification Information «only the Mi Dep't of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal*
Parcel Identification Number:
Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review:
Real
Personal
{check one)
0
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
What do you believe is the property’s classification?
Real
Personal
{check one)
O
Agricultural
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Timber-Cutover
Developmental
Utility
(check one)
If improved property, how is the property currently being used?
If improved property, for what use was the property designed?Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON 1, BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Fee Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? ves [J No Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption or Disabled Veterans Exemption? 0 ves No If you answered yes to either or both of the above quastions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. The filing fee Is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are
Page 5
03/16/202
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.