Record Finder / 24-003649-TT
Michigan

William Crawford, Lori Crawford, Petitioners V Township Of Horton, Respondent

Petitioner
William Crawford, Lori Crawford
Respondent
Township Of Horton

Case overview

Docket number
24-003649-TT
Status
Disposed
CaseType
SC Property
Division
Small Claims Division
County
Ogemaw
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
9DeniedPET712/18/2024Not recordedDownload
8Order Denying MotionNot recorded712/18/2024Not recordedDownload
7Motion for Reconsideration was received.PETNot recorded12/05/2024$25.00Download
6Order of DismissalNot recordedNot recorded12/05/2024Not recordedDownload
5Order extending defaultNot recordedNot recorded11/06/2024Not recordedDownload
4Order of Default of PetitionerNot recordedNot recorded10/04/2024Not recordedDownload
3Petition has been verifiedPET110/04/2024Not recordedDownload
2Notice of Docket Number SCNot recordedNot recorded10/04/2024Not recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded07/03/2024$25.00Download

Documents

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

5 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

L/W 

2 prepa 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket Noi. EN 

Shoe dn J08/0,0. 

, 

Traninfo: 

4606 

258504611 

19/00; 

Respondent(s) 

ik 

ike 

$25.00 

HLLLAN 

DRAEFUKD 

MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT 

1. 

A default was entered against me on 

/é Na 22 24 

and, if applicable, the default 

was extended on //- 4.223 

2. 

Good cause exists to set aside the default because: 

nobce oF Jefe 

VneeelS 

LW hedest So Sonn 

huh pecdololoted Yor 

Thoesbm 208 42250 Lepewe Dnee Edere Cttde Leg) 

Fy AAA 

3. 

| ask this Tribunal to set aside the default. 

yp? s/ mY, a” 

we 

J 

Slgesl dl 

a 

(sign here 

Si 

William Q. yn] 

[Print/type name of person signing] 

| certify that on this date 

| served a copy of this Motion, and any additional documentation, on the 

opposing party or their representative. 

le

Page 2

ov Sb 2039 

Ie) wf of poviecd Lomested EX erptsN 

e 79%. 

Ao Torn Pid 2024 S/mrER Bret Kerree7s 

pomested eienp. 

48 07% 

(Pease WoT Geeen fightted @eead.) 

Je hh fo Gomes This 

Sswe.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION / QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTION 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. 

Notice of Denial or Board of Review Decision) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this 

document, you may be placed in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First, lame 

. 

. 

ML 

Last NamelCompany Name 

; 

Within ¢ Lori 

CRA FZE0 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. 

or Rural Route) 

J7p0 Copia) Lone Pe. Poy $55 

iu Er Bennth 

mi | Jeb! 

Te- 20. (5b 

E-mail Address (do not enter unle== «=—--yant MITT 

to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

[CXR 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter tmiess you want MTT to send all correspondence via e<nail)

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Parcel denkification Number: 

O7 ye ~po/ ~/10 

How many 

it you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or ardioining? 

parcelsareyou | [| vest 

[] No= 

appealing? 

*If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels. 

/ 

*4f no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous ar non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted. 

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) 

{tf multiple, list first property’s address] 

70D Lenirrer] Lone 

Tasing Rulfority (Cty or Township) 

Coutty 

W777 Yr 

agli 

assification 

of Property: 

Agricultural 

Comunercial 

{ndustial 

Residential 

Timber-Gulover 

Sevelopmenizl B 

{check ene) 

= 

0 

0 

Section 4: Check which of the following 

you are appealing 

jal Principal Residence Exemption 

[m] Qualified Agricuttural Exemption 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

_ 

LpeTon Tokoshio Kes Distlbad 

Dione. HomEstead TA% Exemp7 ion, #70 

Based i727 0 %- 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

List the tax year(s) 7 

0.24 

indicate who denied the exemption under appeal:

Page 5

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Fee Information 

A fee of $25.00 is required for the filing of this appeal unless you possess a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of 

the filing of this petition. 

Signature *required 

, 

.g 

pal] 

Petifionsr 

oy; 

tAutho; 

Re, 

s Sif 

3 

~ 

A 

TJ 

IZ

Page 6

03/15/2024 

08:39 

pM 

2024 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION 

FROM 

HORTON TOWNSHIP 

HORTONASSESSOR@Y AHOO.COM 

5671 REILLY RD 

HOUGHTON LAKE, MI 48629 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSRIENT ROLL: 

PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: (Parcel Code required. Property address 

and legal description optional.): 

007-016-001-10 

4094 S M-76 (1700 CRA 

#HR-16 01 

1-75 263% DIVISION OF 007-0016-004-40 ADDED 

Err WILLIAM A & LORLJ 

TO 007-016-00-07 SEC 16 T2IN R2E. 166.86 AC M/L NE 1/4 

0 BOX 

485 

EX THAT PART OF NE 144 OF NE 1/4 LYING E OF HWY M-76 

WEST BRANCH MI 48661-0485 

AND PART NW % OF SECTION, DESC AS: BEG AT N % 

CORNER OF SAID SEC: TH S88°46'26™W 337.71 FT ALONG N 

SECTION LINE: TH S00°54°12"W 2326.51 FT PARALLEL 

WITH N-S ¥ LINE TO NORTHEASTERLY ROW LINE OF 1-75: 

THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED 

401 

(RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) 

is years March Board of Review. The Board has reviewed 

the information you supplied and the data necessary 

Thank you for attendin 

"to compute your assessment and taxable value. 

The Board has completed their review of parcel number 

007-016-001-10 

They have made the following determination based on the information you supplied. 

Board of Review Comments 

pe I 

a 

- 

CORRECTED PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES; ASSESSOR WILL CORRECT PRE - MBOR DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION PRE WILL BE SET AT THE VALUE 

3 

OF THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY VS COMMERCIAL. 484 

Bis 

[ 

k 

[2024 ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE 

535,000 

] 

2024 "BOARD OF REVIEW" ASSESSED VALUE 

535,000 

BH 

(If the above amounts are the same, no revisions have occured) 

2024 ORIGINAL TAXABLE VALUE 

445,332 

2024 "BOARD OF REVIEW" TAXABLE VALUE 

445,332 

— 

Please feel free to contact the assessor at the address listed above or call if you have any questions. 

“Effective March 

1, 2013, the Tribunal is no longer able to accept Small Claims letter appeals. 

Rather, you are required to file a petition to 

initiate a new Small Claims appeal. 

Petition forms are available on this website.”

Page 7

HORTON TOWNSHIP TREASURER HORTON TOWNSHIP 

PAIGE

Page 8

TEEPLES

Page 9

Po.

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

William & Lori Crawford, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioners, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003649 

 

Horton Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Marcus L. Abood 

 

ORDER DENYING PETITIONERS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 

 

On December 5, 2024, Petitioners filed a motion requesting that the Tribunal 

reconsider the Order of Dismissal entered in this case the same day.1 In the motion, 

Petitioners state that the Tribunal’s default orders were sent to spam and auto deleted, 

and Petitioners were therefore unaware that they were in default. 

 

The Tribunal has considered the motion and the case file and finds that Petitioners have 

failed to demonstrate a palpable error relative to the Order of Dismissal that misled the 

Tribunal and the parties and that would have resulted in a different disposition if the 

error was corrected.2 The case was dismissed because Petitioners failed to provide a 

copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal, as required by TTR 277, or timely respond 

to the default orders entered on October 4, 2024 and November 6, 2024. Though 

Petitioners have now responded and provided a copy of the March Board of Review 

(BOR) decision, that decision, along with the other documentation on file, establishes 

that the Tribunal has no authority over Petitioners’ appeal. 

 

Petitioners are seeking a principal residence exemption (“PRE”) for the 2024 tax year. 

Petitioners are not appealing the denial of a PRE by the local taxing authority or other 

authorized agency, however, but rather are attempting to apply directly to the Tribunal 

for the exemption. The BOR decision provided by Petitioners states: “Corrected 

physical attributes; assessor will correct PRE - MBOR does not have jurisdiction PRE 

will be set at the value of the residential property vs commercial. 484,529 VS 132,393 = 

79%.”3 The BOR correctly noted that it lacked authority over the property’s PRE, and 

pursuant to MCL 205.731, the Tribunal’s authority is limited to “a proceeding for direct 

review of a final decision, finding, ruling, determination, or order of an agency relating to 

assessment, valuation, rates, special assessments, allocation, or equalization, under 

the property tax laws of this state.”4 If there is no final decision, finding, ruling, 

determination or order, the Tribunal has no jurisdiction or authority, and “a court which 

 

1 The Tribunal has construed Petitioners’ motion to set aside default as a motion for reconsideration 

because it was postmarked the same day the Order of Dismissal was entered. 

2 See MCR 2.119. 

3 Id. Emphasis added. 

4 MCL 205.731(a).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003649 

Page 2 of 2 

 

has determined that it has no jurisdiction should not proceed further except to dismiss 

the action.”5 Petitioners were required, rather, to file a PRE affidavit with the assessor 

of the local tax collecting unit.6 Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioners’ Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. 

 

This Order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. 

 

APPEAL RIGHTS 

 

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a claim of appeal with 

the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final 

decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry 

of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be 

filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By 

 

 

Entered: December 18, 2024 

ejg 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

 

5 Fox v Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, 375 Mich 238, 243; 134 NW2d 146 (1985). 

66 MCL 211.7cc(19) was amended July 11, 2022 to grant assessors sole authority over the processing of 

PRE affidavits “for the current calendar year or the immediately preceding 3 calendar years.” Id.

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

5 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

L/W 

2 prepa 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket Noi. EN 

Shoe dn J08/0,0. 

, 

Traninfo: 

4606 

258504611 

19/00; 

Respondent(s) 

ik 

ike 

$25.00 

HLLLAN 

DRAEFUKD 

MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT 

1. 

A default was entered against me on 

/é Na 22 24 

and, if applicable, the default 

was extended on //- 4.223 

2. 

Good cause exists to set aside the default because: 

nobce oF Jefe 

VneeelS 

LW hedest So Sonn 

huh pecdololoted Yor 

Thoesbm 208 42250 Lepewe Dnee Edere Cttde Leg) 

Fy AAA 

3. 

| ask this Tribunal to set aside the default. 

yp? s/ mY, a” 

we 

J 

Slgesl dl 

a 

(sign here 

Si 

William Q. yn] 

[Print/type name of person signing] 

| certify that on this date 

| served a copy of this Motion, and any additional documentation, on the 

opposing party or their representative. 

le

Page 2

ov Sb 2039 

Ie) wf of poviecd Lomested EX erptsN 

e 79%. 

Ao Torn Pid 2024 S/mrER Bret Kerree7s 

pomested eienp. 

48 07% 

(Pease WoT Geeen fightted @eead.) 

Je hh fo Gomes This 

Sswe.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION / QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTION 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. 

Notice of Denial or Board of Review Decision) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this 

document, you may be placed in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First, lame 

. 

. 

ML 

Last NamelCompany Name 

; 

Within ¢ Lori 

CRA FZE0 

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. 

or Rural Route) 

J7p0 Copia) Lone Pe. Poy $55 

iu Er Bennth 

mi | Jeb! 

Te- 20. (5b 

E-mail Address (do not enter unle== «=—--yant MITT 

to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

[CXR 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter tmiess you want MTT to send all correspondence via e<nail)

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Parcel denkification Number: 

O7 ye ~po/ ~/10 

How many 

it you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or ardioining? 

parcelsareyou | [| vest 

[] No= 

appealing? 

*If yes, use a multiple parcel form for information regarding any contiguous parcels. 

/ 

*4f no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous ar non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted. 

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) 

{tf multiple, list first property’s address] 

70D Lenirrer] Lone 

Tasing Rulfority (Cty or Township) 

Coutty 

W777 Yr 

agli 

assification 

of Property: 

Agricultural 

Comunercial 

{ndustial 

Residential 

Timber-Gulover 

Sevelopmenizl B 

{check ene) 

= 

0 

0 

Section 4: Check which of the following 

you are appealing 

jal Principal Residence Exemption 

[m] Qualified Agricuttural Exemption 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

_ 

LpeTon Tokoshio Kes Distlbad 

Dione. HomEstead TA% Exemp7 ion, #70 

Based i727 0 %- 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

List the tax year(s) 7 

0.24 

indicate who denied the exemption under appeal:

Page 5

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 1. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Fee Information 

A fee of $25.00 is required for the filing of this appeal unless you possess a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of 

the filing of this petition. 

Signature *required 

, 

.g 

pal] 

Petifionsr 

oy; 

tAutho; 

Re, 

s Sif 

3 

~ 

A 

TJ 

IZ

Page 6

03/15/2024 

08:39 

pM 

2024 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION 

FROM 

HORTON TOWNSHIP 

HORTONASSESSOR@Y AHOO.COM 

5671 REILLY RD 

HOUGHTON LAKE, MI 48629 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSRIENT ROLL: 

PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: (Parcel Code required. Property address 

and legal description optional.): 

007-016-001-10 

4094 S M-76 (1700 CRA 

#HR-16 01 

1-75 263% DIVISION OF 007-0016-004-40 ADDED 

Err WILLIAM A & LORLJ 

TO 007-016-00-07 SEC 16 T2IN R2E. 166.86 AC M/L NE 1/4 

0 BOX 

485 

EX THAT PART OF NE 144 OF NE 1/4 LYING E OF HWY M-76 

WEST BRANCH MI 48661-0485 

AND PART NW % OF SECTION, DESC AS: BEG AT N % 

CORNER OF SAID SEC: TH S88°46'26™W 337.71 FT ALONG N 

SECTION LINE: TH S00°54°12"W 2326.51 FT PARALLEL 

WITH N-S ¥ LINE TO NORTHEASTERLY ROW LINE OF 1-75: 

THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED 

401 

(RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) 

is years March Board of Review. The Board has reviewed 

the information you supplied and the data necessary 

Thank you for attendin 

"to compute your assessment and taxable value. 

The Board has completed their review of parcel number 

007-016-001-10 

They have made the following determination based on the information you supplied. 

Board of Review Comments 

pe I 

a 

- 

CORRECTED PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES; ASSESSOR WILL CORRECT PRE - MBOR DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION PRE WILL BE SET AT THE VALUE 

3 

OF THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY VS COMMERCIAL. 484 

Bis 

[ 

k 

[2024 ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE 

535,000 

] 

2024 "BOARD OF REVIEW" ASSESSED VALUE 

535,000 

BH 

(If the above amounts are the same, no revisions have occured) 

2024 ORIGINAL TAXABLE VALUE 

445,332 

2024 "BOARD OF REVIEW" TAXABLE VALUE 

445,332 

— 

Please feel free to contact the assessor at the address listed above or call if you have any questions. 

“Effective March 

1, 2013, the Tribunal is no longer able to accept Small Claims letter appeals. 

Rather, you are required to file a petition to 

initiate a new Small Claims appeal. 

Petition forms are available on this website.”

Page 7

HORTON TOWNSHIP TREASURER HORTON TOWNSHIP 

PAIGE

Page 8

TEEPLES

Page 9

Po.

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

24-003649 Dismiss.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

William Crawford, Lori Crawford, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioners, 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003649 

 

Horton Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Petitioners were placed 

in default on October 4, 2024, because Petitioners did not file a copy of the notice giving 

rise to the appeal. On November 6, 2024, the Tribunal extended the time for Petitioners 

to cure the default by an additional 14 days and they have failed to respond. Petitioners 

have not complied with either order, and the latter stated that “failure to comply with this 

Order shall result in the dismissal of the case . . .” and referenced Grimm v Dep’t of 

Treasury.1 In Grimm, the Michigan Court of Appeals summarized factors that the 

Tribunal should consider before imposing the sanction of dismissal. Those factors are: 

 

(1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of 

refusing to comply with previous court orders; (3) the prejudice to the 

opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) 

the degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) 

attempts to cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better 

serve the interests of justice.2 

 

Here, Petitioners’ failure to comply with multiple orders has established a history of 

deliberate delay. As a result, giving careful consideration to the factors involved and 

considering all options in determining what sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal 

finds that dismissal is appropriate, and a lesser sanction would not be appropriate in 

light of Petitioners’ history of noncompliance in this case. 

 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 

 

This Order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. 

 

 

 

1 Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

2 Id. at 149.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003649 

Page 2 of 2 

 

APPEAL RIGHTS 

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for 

reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of 

Appeals. 

 

A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee 

within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision 

closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing 

system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such 

motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless 

the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a 

principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the 

decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, 

if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the 

opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to 

electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the 

motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral 

arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. 

 

Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the 

claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If 

the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal 

by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the 

record on appeal. There is no certification fee. 

 

 

Entered: December 5, 2024 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

bw/jcr 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Order_Extending_P_Default_fee.2024-11-06_09-42-35.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

William Crawford,Lori Crawford, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003649 

Township Of Horton,

Respondent.

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT 

The Tribunal has considered the file in the above-captioned case and finds that it 

entered an order holding Petitioner in default on October 04, 2024.1 Petitioner was 

required to cure the default within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet 

has failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an 

extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with 

Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of 

deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply with 

this Order.2 Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is EXTENDED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the 

default: (1) file the documentation and/or petition filing fee required by the October 04, 

2024 default order, (2) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, (3) pay the $25.00 Motion fee, 

and (4) file proof the Motion and a copy of the documentation and/or petition filing fee 

were served on Respondent. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 

days of the entry of this Order.

Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the case, as provided by 

TTR 231.3 

By:___________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: November 6, 2024

1 The Order further stated, “Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being 

required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 

2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

3 See also MCL 205.732.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003649

Page 2 of 6

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

William Crawford,Lori Crawford, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003649 

Township Of Horton,

Respondent.

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT 

The Tribunal has considered the file in the above-captioned case and finds that it 

entered an order holding Petitioner in default on October 04, 2024.4 Petitioner was 

required to cure the default within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet 

has failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an 

extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with 

Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of 

deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply with 

this Order.5 Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is EXTENDED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the 

default: (1) file the documentation and/or petition filing fee required by the October 04, 

2024 default order, (2) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, (3) pay the $25.00 Motion fee, 

and (4) file proof the Motion and a copy of the documentation and/or petition filing fee 

were served on Respondent. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 

days of the entry of this Order.

Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the case, as provided by 

TTR 231.6 

By:___________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: November 6, 2024

4 The Order further stated, “Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being 

required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 

5 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

6 See also MCL 205.732.

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 24-003649

Page 4 of 6

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 5

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

William Crawford,Lori Crawford, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003649 

Township Of Horton,

Respondent.

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT 

The Tribunal has considered the file in the above-captioned case and finds that it 

entered an order holding Petitioner in default on October 04, 2024.7 Petitioner was 

required to cure the default within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet 

has failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an 

extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with 

Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice

Page 6

MTT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC_Order_of_Default_of_Petition.2024-10-04_14-12-25.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

William Crawford,Lori Crawford,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003649

Township Of Horton,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of 

action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment 

notice, etc.), as required by TTR 277. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 

14 days of the entry of this Order.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this Order.i 

Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: October 4, 2024

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 24-003649

Page 2 of 6

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 219(5)

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

William Crawford,Lori Crawford,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003649

Township Of Horton,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of 

action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment 

notice, etc.), as required by TTR 277. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 

14 days of the entry of this Order.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this Order.ii 

Failure to comply with this Order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: October 4, 2024

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 24-003649

Page 4 of 6

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

ii “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 219(5)

Page 5

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

William Crawford,Lori Crawford,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v

 

MTT Docket No. 24-003649

Township Of Horton,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and

Page 6

MTT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JL 2024 

0 

5 

MICHIGAN TAXT RIBUNA! 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION / QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTION 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. 

Notice of Denial or Board of Review Decision) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this 

document, you may be placed in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First 

Name 

. 

. 

M.I. 

Last Name/Company Name 

Williaen iL at ox or Rural Route) 

Cldrter 

10pm] {ene Po. Poy ¥55 

State 

ZIP Code 

UES Benncl 

ml. | seb! 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

5-205 - pS 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

“fl 

Af 

2 

' 

Lr iCRUDPOEIL 369000 Lod 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

M.I 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

Page 2

RE er 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Parcel ldentification Number: o-oo -po ~/0 

How many 

if you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

parcelsareyou | [] ves* 

[] No* 

appealing? 

*If yes, use a multiple parce$ form for information regarding any contiguous parcels. 

/ 

if no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted. 

Property Address (No, Street, City, ST, ZIP), 

[If multiple, list first property’s address] 

/ 700 (onwrver] (srs 

Taxing Authority (City or Township) 

County 

LIRTPN TNT 

DY 

Classification of Property: 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Section 4: Check which of the following 

you are appealing 

jr} Principai Residence Exemption 

[] Qualified Agricultural Exemption 

| 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

ppron Tekno #9 Diss tbwed 

Dero HomEstead TPL Exemp7 

ian, #20 

Rosed iT ar OP. 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

List the tax year(s) denied: 

of 

Indicate who denied the exemption under appeal:

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Fee Information 

A fee of $25.00 is required for the filing of this appeal unless you possess a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of 

the fiting of this petition. 

Signature *required 

, 

Sonar 

or 

AflorneyiAuthoy 

ded Reprofbniaie’s 

Signatursl 

25 

-, 

NY a 

9 BSE Ae A tein Zs 

4 

7

Page 4

HORTON TOWNSHIP TREASURER HORTON TOWNSHIP 

2024 Summer 

Tax Bill 

007-016-001-10 

PAIGE REINHARDT 

sill: 

PO BOX 44 

. 

CRAWFORD WILLIAM A & LORI J 

WEST BRANCH MI. 48661 

Properly Address: 

4094 S M-76 (1700 CRAWFORD) 

Bill Date 

07/01/ 2024 

Bill Due Date 

09/14/2024 

Total Amount Due 

5,432.40 

ros 

Check Number 

Make Check Payable To: 

HORTON TOWNSHIP TREASURER 

kk hk 

RX ARGTOF*5-DIGIT 48627 

CRAWFORD WILLIAM 

A 

& LORI 

J 

PO BOX 485 

oi 

WEST BRANCH, 

MI 48661-0485 

duly ibgiteb li pple 

oe ffl 

07-016-001-10 

Amount Remitted: 

$ 

TREASURER'S COPY 

(Please return top portion with payment) 

~ 2024 Summer Tax Bill Taxpayer Copy (please retain for your records) 

HORTON TOWNSHIP 

Parcel Nbr. 007-016-001-10 

DESCRIPTION 

MILLAGE 

AMOUNT 

SEED IX 

6.00000 

2,671.99 

Property Assessed To: 

6.07780 

2,706.63 

CRAWFORD WILLIAM A & LORI J 

PO BOX 485 

WEST BRANCH, Mi 48661-0485 

Property Address: 

4094 S M-76 (1700 CRAWFORD) 

WEST BRANCH, M1 48661 

Property Class: 401 

School District: 65045 

Taxes are based upon Taxable Value. 1 mill equals $1.00 per $1000 of 

Taxable Value. 

Amounts with no millage are either Special Assessments or other 

charges added to this bill. 

—— 

= 

= 

= 

. 

BERR 

7-074 1:11 Bt ea 

<7 £4: 7A 

Ry 

Tax Base Values 

Administration Fee 

53.78 

Taxable Value: 

445.332 

State Equalized Value: 

535,000 

TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 

5432.40 

Assessed: 

535,000 

PRE/MBT %: 

0.0000 

Operating Fiscal Years 

Description of Lands or Personal Property

Page 5

poor 

[MINI =~ 2 

WEST 

err glu, 

19589 0710 5270 1170 4L57 

88 

2; 

I Yshl 

WY 

SY 

Po.bBX 30232 

235° wo & 

Sez3 

&% 

¢ 

al ) MT - 46909 

NS FFRAZET 

nL 

TY Er rE YY rs pil 

HEEE 

.

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SC_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2024-10-04_14-11-15.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

William Crawford,Lori Crawford,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003649

Township Of Horton,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: October 4, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

William Crawford,Lori Crawford,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003649

Township Of Horton,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: October 4, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

William Crawford,Lori Crawford,

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION

v 

MTT Docket No. 24-003649

Township Of Horton,

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket 

number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does 

not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies 

with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents 

submitted in this case.

Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a 

copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our 

website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer 

form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the 

placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 279. Further, an electronic 

copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the 

Tribunal’s website.

By: __Tribunal Clerk_____

Entered: October 4, 2024

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JL 2024 

0 

5 

MICHIGAN TAXT RIBUNA! 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM 

PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION / QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTION 

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. 

Notice of Denial or Board of Review Decision) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this 

document, you may be placed in default. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information 

First 

Name 

. 

. 

M.I. 

Last Name/Company Name 

Williaen iL at ox or Rural Route) 

Cldrter 

10pm] {ene Po. Poy ¥55 

State 

ZIP Code 

UES Benncl 

ml. | seb! 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

5-205 - pS 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) 

“fl 

Af 

2 

' 

Lr iCRUDPOEIL 369000 Lod 

Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information 

First Name 

M.I 

Last Name 

Firm Name (if any) 

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 

City or Town 

State 

ZIP Code 

Telephone Number 

Fax Number 

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

Page 2

RE er 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Section 3: Subject Property Information 

Parcel ldentification Number: o-oo -po ~/0 

How many 

if you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

parcelsareyou | [] ves* 

[] No* 

appealing? 

*If yes, use a multiple parce$ form for information regarding any contiguous parcels. 

/ 

if no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel or you will be defaulted. 

Property Address (No, Street, City, ST, ZIP), 

[If multiple, list first property’s address] 

/ 700 (onwrver] (srs 

Taxing Authority (City or Township) 

County 

LIRTPN TNT 

DY 

Classification of Property: 

Agricultural 

Commercial 

Industrial 

Residential 

Timber-Cutover 

Developmental 

Utility 

(check one) 

Section 4: Check which of the following 

you are appealing 

jr} Principai Residence Exemption 

[] Qualified Agricultural Exemption 

| 

Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal 

ppron Tekno #9 Diss tbwed 

Dero HomEstead TPL Exemp7 

ian, #20 

Rosed iT ar OP. 

Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues 

List the tax year(s) denied: 

of 

Indicate who denied the exemption under appeal:

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Fee Information 

A fee of $25.00 is required for the filing of this appeal unless you possess a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of 

the fiting of this petition. 

Signature *required 

, 

Sonar 

or 

AflorneyiAuthoy 

ded Reprofbniaie’s 

Signatursl 

25 

-, 

NY a 

9 BSE Ae A tein Zs 

4 

7

Page 4

HORTON TOWNSHIP TREASURER HORTON TOWNSHIP 

2024 Summer 

Tax Bill 

007-016-001-10 

PAIGE REINHARDT 

sill: 

PO BOX 44 

. 

CRAWFORD WILLIAM A & LORI J 

WEST BRANCH MI. 48661 

Properly Address: 

4094 S M-76 (1700 CRAWFORD) 

Bill Date 

07/01/ 2024 

Bill Due Date 

09/14/2024 

Total Amount Due 

5,432.40 

ros 

Check Number 

Make Check Payable To: 

HORTON TOWNSHIP TREASURER 

kk hk 

RX ARGTOF*5-DIGIT 48627 

CRAWFORD WILLIAM 

A 

& LORI 

J 

PO BOX 485 

oi 

WEST BRANCH, 

MI 48661-0485 

duly ibgiteb li pple 

oe ffl 

07-016-001-10 

Amount Remitted: 

$ 

TREASURER'S COPY 

(Please return top portion with payment) 

~ 2024 Summer Tax Bill Taxpayer Copy (please retain for your records) 

HORTON TOWNSHIP 

Parcel Nbr. 007-016-001-10 

DESCRIPTION 

MILLAGE 

AMOUNT 

SEED IX 

6.00000 

2,671.99 

Property Assessed To: 

6.07780 

2,706.63 

CRAWFORD WILLIAM A & LORI J 

PO BOX 485 

WEST BRANCH, Mi 48661-0485 

Property Address: 

4094 S M-76 (1700 CRAWFORD) 

WEST BRANCH, M1 48661 

Property Class: 401 

School District: 65045 

Taxes are based upon Taxable Value. 1 mill equals $1.00 per $1000 of 

Taxable Value. 

Amounts with no millage are either Special Assessments or other 

charges added to this bill. 

—— 

= 

= 

= 

. 

BERR 

7-074 1:11 Bt ea 

<7 £4: 7A 

Ry 

Tax Base Values 

Administration Fee 

53.78 

Taxable Value: 

445.332 

State Equalized Value: 

535,000 

TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 

5432.40 

Assessed: 

535,000 

PRE/MBT %: 

0.0000 

Operating Fiscal Years 

Description of Lands or Personal Property

Page 5

poor 

[MINI =~ 2 

WEST 

err glu, 

19589 0710 5270 1170 4L57 

88 

2; 

I Yshl 

WY 

SY 

Po.bBX 30232 

235° wo & 

Sez3 

&% 

¢ 

al ) MT - 46909 

NS FFRAZET 

nL 

TY Er rE YY rs pil 

HEEE 

.

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.