Record Finder / 25-001983-TT
Michigan

Volkswagen Group Of America Inc, Petitioner Vs. City Of Auburn Hills, Respondent

Petitioner
Volkswagen Group Of America Inc
Respondent
City Of Auburn Hills

Case overview

Docket number
25-001983-TT
Status
Disposed
CaseType
ET Property
Division
ET
County
Oakland
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
12Order of DismissalNot recordedNot recorded12/17/2025Not recordedDownload
11Motion to Withdraw Appeal was received.PETNot recorded12/17/2025$0.00Download
10GrantedPET810/15/2025Not recordedDownload
9Order granting Motion.Not recorded810/15/2025Not recordedDownload
8Motion for Abeyance was received.PETNot recorded10/14/2025$50.00Download
7Answer was receivedNot recordedNot recorded10/07/2025Not recordedDownload
6ET Case Info SheetNot recordedNot recorded10/07/2025Not recordedDownload
5Proof of service of petition was received.PETNot recorded09/09/2025Not recordedDownload
4Petition has been verifiedPET208/05/2025Not recordedDownload
3Notice of Docket Number ETNot recordedNot recorded08/05/2025Not recordedDownload
2A petition was received.PETNot recorded05/30/2025Not recordedDownload
1ET Case Info SheetNot recordedNot recorded05/30/2025$600.00Download

Documents

Order_of_Dismissal-Joint_Withdraw.2025-12-17_13-22-54.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Volkswagen Group of America Inc, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v 

 MTT Docket No. 25-001983

City Of Auburn Hills,

Respondent.

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that the parties 

have filed a Joint Motion to Withdraw the appeal. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 

This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case.

By:_____________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: December 17, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Volkswagen Group of America Inc, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v 

 MTT Docket No. 25-001983

City Of Auburn Hills,

Respondent.

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that the parties 

have filed a Joint Motion to Withdraw the appeal. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 

This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case.

By:_____________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: December 17, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Volkswagen-Auburn Hills Joint Stip to Dismiss 12-17-2025 Fully Executed.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Volkswagen Group of America, 

MTT Docket No. 25-001983-TT 

Petitioner, 

Parcel No(s). 02-14-25-226-011 

v 

City of Auburn Hills, 

Respondent. 

______________________________/ 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Derik Edwards 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 

Indianapolis, IN 46240 

(917) 488-7825

(317) 596-3260, ext. 2404

msilvey@dmainc.com

dedwards@dmainc.com

Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) 

Seth A. O’Loughlin (P80257) 

Kelsea M. Melcher (P85821) 

Hallahan & Associates, PC 

Attorneys for Respondent 

1750 S Telegraph Road, Suite 202 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 

(248) 731-3089

lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com

soloughlin@hallahanlaw.com

kmelcher@hallahanlaw.com

______________________________/ 

JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS 

Petitioner and Respondent stipulate to the dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and 

without costs or fees to either party. 

_____________________________ 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

Dated: November 25, 2025 

_____________________________ 

Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) 

Hallahan & Associates, PC 

Attorneys for Respondent 

 Dated: December 17, 2025 

/s/ Laura M. Hallahan -w/permission MS

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Joint Motion for Abeyance.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., 

 

 

 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

City of Auburn Hills, 

 

 

 

Respondent. 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-001983 

Parcel No. 02-14-25-226-011 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

MICHELLE (MIKKI) M. SILVEY (P69494) 

ALEX MORSE 

DUCHARME, MCMILLEN, 

& ASSOCIATES, INC. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 

Indianapolis, IN 46240 

(317) 689-6467 

LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) 

SETH A. O’LOUGHLIN (P80257) 

KELSEA M. MELCHER (P85821) 

HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

Attorneys for Respondent 

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 

(248) 731-3089 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

JOINT MOTION TO HOLD APPEAL IN ABEYANCE 

PENDING MTT DOCKET NO. 24-002142 

 

The parties by and through their respective counsel state the following in support of the 

above captioned Motion: 

1. 

The above captioned appeal concerns the 2025 valuation of commercial property 

located in Oakland County—parcel no. 02-14-25-226-011. 

2. 

With the exception of the tax year at issue, the parties, property, and issues raised 

in the above captioned appeal are, based on the pleadings, in essence identical to those at issue in 

MTT docket no. 24-002142—an appeal concerning the 2024 tax year. 

3. 

The above captioned 2025 appeal is ready to be placed on a Prehearing General 

Call and Order of Procedure.

Page 2

2 

 

4. 

However, as of the filing of the above captioned Motion, the 2024 reiteration 

(MTT docket no. 24-002142) has not yet been resolved. The 2024 reiteration is proceeding in 

accordance with the February 17-27, 2026 Prehearing General Call with valuation disclosures 

and prehearing statements due October 21, 2025. Accordingly, the 2024 reiteration will likely 

not proceed to hearing until the spring of next year and a Final Opinion and Judgment will likely 

not be rendered until Spring 2026 at the earliest. 

5. 

A Final Opinion and Judgment from the Tribunal regarding MTT docket no. 24-

002142 could impact this 2025 appeal and the parties’ desire to proceed with this appeal. Thus, it 

could potentially be a waste of time and resources for the parties and the Tribunal to proceed 

with the above captioned appeal when the prior 2024 appeal remains pending. 

6. 

To proceed with this case before a resolution regarding MTT docket no. 24-

002142 has been reached would likely not constitute an efficient administration of justice. 

7. 

Proceeding with the above captioned appeal will require the parties and the 

Tribunal to expend substantial resources which may ultimately be unnecessary. Placing the 

above captioned appeal in abeyance at this juncture before substantial time and resources have 

been spent—including, but not limited to, the preparation of prehearing statements and valuation 

disclosures—is in the interest of efficiency to all parties involved and judicial economy. 

8. 

As evidenced above, there is good cause for granting this joint Motion to hold the 

above captioned appeal in abeyance pending the resolution of its 2024 iteration, MTT docket no. 

24-002142. 

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request the Tribunal enter an Order holding the 

above captioned appeal in abeyance pending the resolution of MTT docket no. 24-002142. 

Respectfully submitted,

Page 3

3 

 

/s/Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (w/permission) /s/Laura M. Hallahan 

 

 

MICHELLE (MIKKI) M. SILVEY (P69494) 

ALEX MORSE 

DUCHARME, MCMILLEN, 

& ASSOCIATES, INC. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

 

Dated: October 14, 2025 

 

LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) 

SETH A. O’LOUGHLIN (P80257) 

KELSEA M. MELCHER (P85821) 

HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

Attorneys for Respondent 

 

Dated: October 14, 2025

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

25-001983 Grant Abeyance.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Volkswagen Group of America Inc, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-001983 

 

City of Auburn Hills, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO HOLD CASE IN ABEYANCE 

 

On October 14, 2025, the parties filed a joint motion requesting that the Tribunal hold 

this case in abeyance pending resolution of MTT Docket No. 24-002142 Volkswagen 

Group of America, Inc. v City of Auburn Hills, which is currently pending before the 

Tribunal. In the motion, the parties state that but for the tax year at issue, the parties, 

property, and issues raised in the present matter are essentially identical to those in the 

above-mentioned appeal. Proceeding in the present matter while MTT Docket No. 24-

002142 is still pending could potentially waste the time and resources of both the parties 

and the Tribunal. 

 

The Tribunal has considered the motion and the case file and finds that placing this 

case in abeyance pending resolution of MTT Docket No. MTT Docket No. 24-002142 

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. v City of Auburn Hills will facilitate the efficient 

administration of justice, as that resolution may have a direct bearing on the outcome of 

the instant appeal. Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance is GRANTED. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall notify the Tribunal in writing within 28 

days of the resolution of MTT Docket No. 24-002142 Volkswagen Group of America, 

Inc. v City of Auburn Hills as to the need for further proceedings in this matter. 

 

 

 

Entered: October 15, 2025 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

cs 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Joint Motion for Abeyance.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., 

 

 

 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

City of Auburn Hills, 

 

 

 

Respondent. 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-001983 

Parcel No. 02-14-25-226-011 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

MICHELLE (MIKKI) M. SILVEY (P69494) 

ALEX MORSE 

DUCHARME, MCMILLEN, 

& ASSOCIATES, INC. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 

Indianapolis, IN 46240 

(317) 689-6467 

LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) 

SETH A. O’LOUGHLIN (P80257) 

KELSEA M. MELCHER (P85821) 

HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

Attorneys for Respondent 

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 

(248) 731-3089 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

JOINT MOTION TO HOLD APPEAL IN ABEYANCE 

PENDING MTT DOCKET NO. 24-002142 

 

The parties by and through their respective counsel state the following in support of the 

above captioned Motion: 

1. 

The above captioned appeal concerns the 2025 valuation of commercial property 

located in Oakland County—parcel no. 02-14-25-226-011. 

2. 

With the exception of the tax year at issue, the parties, property, and issues raised 

in the above captioned appeal are, based on the pleadings, in essence identical to those at issue in 

MTT docket no. 24-002142—an appeal concerning the 2024 tax year. 

3. 

The above captioned 2025 appeal is ready to be placed on a Prehearing General 

Call and Order of Procedure.

Page 2

2 

 

4. 

However, as of the filing of the above captioned Motion, the 2024 reiteration 

(MTT docket no. 24-002142) has not yet been resolved. The 2024 reiteration is proceeding in 

accordance with the February 17-27, 2026 Prehearing General Call with valuation disclosures 

and prehearing statements due October 21, 2025. Accordingly, the 2024 reiteration will likely 

not proceed to hearing until the spring of next year and a Final Opinion and Judgment will likely 

not be rendered until Spring 2026 at the earliest. 

5. 

A Final Opinion and Judgment from the Tribunal regarding MTT docket no. 24-

002142 could impact this 2025 appeal and the parties’ desire to proceed with this appeal. Thus, it 

could potentially be a waste of time and resources for the parties and the Tribunal to proceed 

with the above captioned appeal when the prior 2024 appeal remains pending. 

6. 

To proceed with this case before a resolution regarding MTT docket no. 24-

002142 has been reached would likely not constitute an efficient administration of justice. 

7. 

Proceeding with the above captioned appeal will require the parties and the 

Tribunal to expend substantial resources which may ultimately be unnecessary. Placing the 

above captioned appeal in abeyance at this juncture before substantial time and resources have 

been spent—including, but not limited to, the preparation of prehearing statements and valuation 

disclosures—is in the interest of efficiency to all parties involved and judicial economy. 

8. 

As evidenced above, there is good cause for granting this joint Motion to hold the 

above captioned appeal in abeyance pending the resolution of its 2024 iteration, MTT docket no. 

24-002142. 

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request the Tribunal enter an Order holding the 

above captioned appeal in abeyance pending the resolution of MTT docket no. 24-002142. 

Respectfully submitted,

Page 3

3 

 

/s/Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (w/permission) /s/Laura M. Hallahan 

 

 

MICHELLE (MIKKI) M. SILVEY (P69494) 

ALEX MORSE 

DUCHARME, MCMILLEN, 

& ASSOCIATES, INC. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

 

Dated: October 14, 2025 

 

LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) 

SETH A. O’LOUGHLIN (P80257) 

KELSEA M. MELCHER (P85821) 

HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

Attorneys for Respondent 

 

Dated: October 14, 2025

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Answer_Volkswagen 25_FINAL.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., 

 

 

 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

City of Auburn Hills, 

 

 

 

Respondent. 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-001983 

Parcel No. 02-14-25-226-011 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

MICHELLE (MIKKI) M. SILVEY (P69494) 

ALEX MORSE 

DUCHARME, MCMILLEN, 

& ASSOCIATES, INC. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 

Indianapolis, IN 46240 

(317) 689-6467 

LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) 

SETH A. O’LOUGHLIN (P80257) 

KELSEA M. MELCHER (P85821) 

HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

Attorneys for Respondent 

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 

(248) 731-3089 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

ANSWER TO PETITION 

AND 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

 

ANSWER 

 

Respondent, City of Auburn Hills, by and through its attorneys, Hallahan & Associates, 

P.C., responds to the allegations made in Petitioner’s Petition as follows: 

1. 

Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 1. 

 

2. 

Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 2. 

 

3. 

Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 3. 

4. 

Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the 

truth of the allegations set forth in Paragraph 4 and, therefore, leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

5. 

Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 5.

Page 2

2

6. 

Respondent admits no protest was made but neither admits nor denies the necessity 

of such a protest as the General Property Tax Act speaks for itself 

7. 

Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 7. 

8. 

Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 8. 

9. 

Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 9. 

10. 

Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the 

truth of the allegations set forth in Paragraph 10 and, therefore, leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

11. 

Respondent acknowledges the issues raised by Petitioner in Paragraph 11 but denies 

that those issues have merit and further denies that Petitioner is entitled to any relief. 

12. 

Respondent acknowledges Petitioner’s identification of the 2025 tax year as being 

at issue but denies an issue with the identified tax year. 

13. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board 

of Review: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

$33,369,000 

$16,684,500 

$16,684,500 

14. 

Respondent contends that the values for the property identified above are as 

follows: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

$33,369,000 

$16,684,500 

$16,684,500 

15. 

The values in dispute are as follows: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

$0 

$0 

$0 

16. 

Respondent denies the allegations in Paragraph 16, including subparagraphs (a)-

(d), for the reason that the same are untrue. In further answer, the assessed, state equalized and/or 

taxable values do not exceed permitted amounts, do not exceed the percentage of true cash value

Page 3

3

permitted by law, were correctly determined and are based upon correct application of proper 

principles, and the values and Respondent’s mode of assessment are non-discriminatory and 

constitutional. 

17. 

Respondent acknowledges the relief requested by Petitioner in the final paragraph 

of the Petition but denies that Petitioner is entitled to the requested relief due to the statements in 

the above Paragraphs. 

 

WHEREFORE, Respondent, City of Auburn Hills, requests the Tribunal dismiss the 

Petition, affirm Respondent’s assessed and taxable values, subject to county and state equalization, 

and award Respondent its costs and attorney fees. 

 

HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

 

/s/Laura M. Hallahan______________ 

LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) 

SETH A. O’LOUGHLIN (P80257) 

KELSEA M. MELCHER (P85821) 

Attorneys for Respondent 

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 

Dated: October 7, 2025 

 

 

 

(258) 731-3089 

 

 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

 

Respondent, City of Auburn Hills, asserts the following affirmative defenses: 

1. 

Petitioner fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action 

against Respondent and to support its claim for relief. 

2. 

The Tribunal is charged with finding a property’s true cash value to determine the 

property’s lawful assessment. Alhi Development Co v Orion Twp, 110 Mich App 764, 767 (1981). 

3. 

Petitioner has the burden of establishing the property’s true cash value. See 

MCL 205.737(3) and Kern v Pontiac Twp, 93 Mich App 612 (1974).

Page 4

4

4. 

Petitioner has failed to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, error 

of law, discrimination, application of wrong principles, or illegality on the part of Respondent or 

its agents. 

5. 

Petitioner has failed to allege that the mode and method of assessing the subject 

property fails to conform to the mode and method applied in the case of all other properties in

Page 5

5

13.

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

10._Entire_Tribunal_Case_Information_Sheet_Must_Upload_Answer_.37dfcbce-6a19-428f-aac0-ad77417e0efd.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-001983

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Local Unit of Government

City Of Auburn Hills (OAKLAND)

Local Unit of Government/First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Laura

M.I.

M

Last Name

Hallahan

Firm Name (if any)

Hallahan & Associates, P.C.

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202

City or Town

Bloomfield Hills

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48302

Telephone Number

248-731-3087

Fax Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

MTT@hallahanlaw.com

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: 

Kelsea M. Melcher

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. City of Auburn Hills 25-001983.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. 

Petitioner, 

MTT DOCKET NO. 25-001983-TT 

City of Auburn Hills, 

Respondent. 

PROOF 

OF SERVICE 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 9t" day of 

September 2025 she served a copy of the Petition upon the following persons by placing 

same in an envelope properly addressed to each via USPS first class thereon: 

Lisa Brown 

Avondale School District 

Oakland County Clerk 

Kelly Brault, School Board Secretary 

1200 N. Telegraph Road 

2940 Waukegan Street 

Pontiac, MI 48341 

Auburn Hills, MI 48326 

Michigan State Treasurer 

Oakland County Equalization Director 

Department of Treasury 

1200 N. Telegraph Road 

Treasury Building 

Pontiac, MI 48341 

430 West Allegan 

Lansing, MI 48922 

97 

Sl 

(2, (0 

o) 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Authorized Agent

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. 

Petitioner, 

MTT DOCKET NO. 25-001983-TT 

City of Auburn Hills, 

Respondent. 

PROOF 

OF SERVICE 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 9t" day of 

September 2025 she served a copy of the Petition upon the following persons by placing 

same in an envelope properly addressed to each via certified mail thereon: 

Bill Griffin 

City of Auburn Hills Assessor 

1827 N. Squirrel Road 

Auburn Hills, Michigan 48326 

Laura M. Pierce 

City of Auburn Hills Clerk 

1827 N. Squirrel Road 

Auburn Hills, Michigan 48326 

Mics ((@ So) 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Authorized Agent

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. 

, 

Petitioner, 

v 

City of Auburn Hills 

Respondent. 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Alex Morse 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 

Indianapolis, IN 46240 

(317) 689-6467-ofc 

(917) 488-7825-mobile 

msilvey@dmainc.com 

amorse@dmainc.com 

MTT Docket No. 25-001983 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No.: 02-14-25-226-011 

2. 

The property identified above is real 

. 

3. 

Only one parcel of property is the subject of this appeal. 

4. 

Petitioner owns and/or otherwise holds an interest in the parcel of property that is the 

subject of this appeal. 

-TT

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 25-001983 

 _TT 

Page 2 of 3 

5. 

The property identified above is classified as 301 Industrial-Improved 

10. 

11 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

The assessment(s) at issue were not protested to Respondent’s March, July, or December 

Board of Review as a protest was not required. 

The property or properties at issue are in Oakland 

County. 

The property or properties’ address is: 

3800 Hamlin Road, Auburn Hills, MI 48326 

The assessment(s) at issue were established by the: City of Auburn Hills 

Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 

3800 Hamlin Road, Auburn Hills, MI 48326 

. This appeal involves issues relating to the property or properties’ true cash and taxable 

values and uniformity. 

The tax year at issue is: 2025. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 2025 Board 

of Review are: 

Tax 

True Cash 

Assessed 

Taxable 

Year 

Value 

Value 

Value 

2025 

| 

$33,369,000 

$16,684,500 

$16,684,500 

Petitioner contends the values for tax year 2025 are no more than the following: 

Tax 

True Cash 

State Equalized 

Taxable 

Year 

Value 

Value 

Value 

2025 

$23,000,000 

$11,500,000 

$11,500,000 

The values in contention for tax year 2025 are: 

Tax 

True Cash 

State Equalized 

Taxable 

Year 

Value 

Value 

Value 

2025 

$10,369,000 

$5,184,500 

$5,184,500

Page 5

MTT Docket No. 25-001983 

TT 

Page 3 of 3 

16. The 2025 asscssments imposed on the subject property and the taxes to be levied and 

collected are invalid because: 

(a) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount 

permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

(b) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, is at a higher 

percentage of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and 

applicable statutes; 

(c) The assessment is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and 

(d) The assessment otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights. 

WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests this honorable Tribunal hear this case 

and enter an order reducing the 2025 true cash, state equalized and taxable values and direct 

Respondent to refund to Petitioner any excess taxes, fees, and penalties paid, plus interest and 

costs, and all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan law and as is appropriate under 

the circumstances. 

Respectfully submitted, 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Mica (0 a) 

Dated: May 30 , 2025 

By: 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Petitioner’s Representative

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. - City of Auburn Hills.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. 

| 

MTT Docket No. 25- 

Petitioner, 

v 

City of Auburn Hills 

R 

Respondent. 

/ 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Alex Morse 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 

Indianapolis, IN 46240 

(317) 689-6467-ofc 

(917) 488-7825-mobile 

msilvey@dmainc.com 

amorse@dmainc.com 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No.: 02-14-25-226-011 

2. 

The property identified above is real 

. 

3. 

Only one parcel of property is the subject of this appeal. 

4. 

Petitioner owns and/or otherwise holds an interest in the parcel of property that is the 

subject of this appeal.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25- 

-TT 

Page 2 of 3 

S. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

The property identified above is classified as 301 Industrial-Improved 

The assessment(s) at issue were not protested to Respondent’s March, July, or December 

Board of Review as a protest was not required. 

The property or properties at issue are in Oakland 

County. 

The property or properties’ address is: 

3800 Hamlin Road, Auburn Hills, MI 48326 

The assessment(s) at issue were established by the: City of Auburn Hills 

Petitioners legal residence or principal office address is: 

3800 Hamlin Road, Auburn Hills, MI 48326 

This appeal involves issues relating to the property or properties’ true cash and taxable 

values and uniformity. 

The tax year at issue is: 2025. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 2025 Board 

of Review are: 

Tax 

True Cash 

Assessed 

Taxable 

Year 

Value 

Value 

Value 

2025 

$33,369,000 

$16,684,500 

$16,684,500 

Petitioner contends the values for tax year 2025 are no more than the following: 

Tax 

True Cash 

State Equalized 

Taxable 

Year 

Value 

Value 

Value 

2025 

$23,000,000 

$11,500,000 

$11,500,000 

The values in contention for tax year 2025 are: 

Tax 

True Cash 

State Equalized 

Taxable 

Year 

Value 

Value 

Value 

2025 

$10,369,000 

$5,184,500 

$5,184,500

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 2-___BBB___-TT 

Page 3 of 3 

 The 202assessments imposed on the subject property and the taxes to be levied and

collected are invalid because:

D The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount

permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes;

E The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, is at a higher

percentage of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and

applicable statutes;

F The assessment is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and

G The assessment otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights.

WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests this honorable Tribunal hear this case 

and enter an order reducing the 202true cash, state equalized and taxable values and direct 

Respondent to refund to Petitioner any excess taxes, fees, and penalties paid, plus interest and 

costs, and all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan law and as is appropriate under 

the circumstances. 

Respectfully submitted, 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Dated: May ___, 202

By: 

______________________________ 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Petitioner’s Representative 

30

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2025-08-05_08-44-44.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Volkswagen Group of America Inc, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 25-001983

City Of Auburn Hills, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: __Tribunal Clerk________

Entered: August 5, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. - City of Auburn Hills.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. 

| 

MTT Docket No. 25- 

Petitioner, 

v 

City of Auburn Hills 

R 

Respondent. 

/ 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Alex Morse 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 

Indianapolis, IN 46240 

(317) 689-6467-ofc 

(917) 488-7825-mobile 

msilvey@dmainc.com 

amorse@dmainc.com 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No.: 02-14-25-226-011 

2. 

The property identified above is real 

. 

3. 

Only one parcel of property is the subject of this appeal. 

4. 

Petitioner owns and/or otherwise holds an interest in the parcel of property that is the 

subject of this appeal.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25- 

-TT 

Page 2 of 3 

S. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

The property identified above is classified as 301 Industrial-Improved 

The assessment(s) at issue were not protested to Respondent’s March, July, or December 

Board of Review as a protest was not required. 

The property or properties at issue are in Oakland 

County. 

The property or properties’ address is: 

3800 Hamlin Road, Auburn Hills, MI 48326 

The assessment(s) at issue were established by the: City of Auburn Hills 

Petitioners legal residence or principal office address is: 

3800 Hamlin Road, Auburn Hills, MI 48326 

This appeal involves issues relating to the property or properties’ true cash and taxable 

values and uniformity. 

The tax year at issue is: 2025. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 2025 Board 

of Review are: 

Tax 

True Cash 

Assessed 

Taxable 

Year 

Value 

Value 

Value 

2025 

$33,369,000 

$16,684,500 

$16,684,500 

Petitioner contends the values for tax year 2025 are no more than the following: 

Tax 

True Cash 

State Equalized 

Taxable 

Year 

Value 

Value 

Value 

2025 

$23,000,000 

$11,500,000 

$11,500,000 

The values in contention for tax year 2025 are: 

Tax 

True Cash 

State Equalized 

Taxable 

Year 

Value 

Value 

Value 

2025 

$10,369,000 

$5,184,500 

$5,184,500

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 2-___BBB___-TT 

Page 3 of 3 

 The 202assessments imposed on the subject property and the taxes to be levied and

collected are invalid because:

D The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount

permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes;

E The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, is at a higher

percentage of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and

applicable statutes;

F The assessment is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and

G The assessment otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights.

WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests this honorable Tribunal hear this case 

and enter an order reducing the 202true cash, state equalized and taxable values and direct 

Respondent to refund to Petitioner any excess taxes, fees, and penalties paid, plus interest and 

costs, and all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan law and as is appropriate under 

the circumstances. 

Respectfully submitted, 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Dated: May ___, 202

By: 

______________________________ 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Petitioner’s Representative 

30

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

09._Entire_Tribunal_Case_Information_Sheet_Must_Upload_Petition_.a9ef52f3-2264-4112-aa62-b79e665993a3.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: Organization

First Name/Company Name

M.I.

Last Name

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. 

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

3800 Hamlin Road

City or Town

Auburn Hills

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48326

Telephone Number

917-488-7825

Fax Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

msilvey@dmainc.com

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Michelle (Mikki)

M.I.

M

Last Name

Silvey

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

9229 Delegates Row, Ste 375

City or Town

Indianapolis

State

Indiana

ZIP Code

46240

Telephone Number

317-596-3260

Fax Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

msilvey@dmainc.com

Section 5: Issue

Please designate one: 

Valuation – Fill out Sections 4, 5, & 6 below

Section 6: Subject Property Information

How many parcels are you 

appealing?1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

3800 Hamlin Road

Michigan

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Auburn Hills (OAKLAND)

County

Oakland

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Section 7: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply)

True Cash and Taxable Values

Section 8: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

02-14-25-226-011

Classification of Property: Real 

Industrial

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

16684500

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

16684500

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

23000000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

11500000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Section 9: Assessment Information

Type of Tax Assessment(s):

Assessment Number(s):

Check all that is being appealed: 

Check what action prompted this appeal:

If “other,” please explain:

Section 10: Special Assessment Information

Type of Special Assessment:

Did you protest the special assessment at the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? 

If Yes, what was the date of the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll?

If No, please explain:

Section 11: Classification Information

Parcel Number:

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

What do you believe is the property’s classification?

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

If improved property, how is the property currently being used?

If improved property, for what use was the property designed?

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest 

State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.