Record Finder / 26-001663-TT
Michigan
Troy Tech Sf Owner LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Troy Respondent
- Petitioner
- Troy Tech Sf Owner LLC
- Respondent
- City Of Troy
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-001663-TT
- Status
- Ready Schedule
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Oakland
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | Order Setting Aside R Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/12/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 11 | Amended Answer | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/27/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 10 | Documentation | RESP | 2 | 07/20/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 9 | Order of Default of Respondent | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/21/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | Amended Answer | RESP | Not recorded | 07/20/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Order Vacating | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/21/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Order of Default of Respondent | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/21/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/21/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 08/21/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Proof of service of petition was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/22/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 07/14/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/28/2026 | $600.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
Order_Setting_Aside_R_Default.2026-10-12_15-16-16.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Troy Tech SF Owner LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 26-001663 City Of Troy, Respondent. ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Respondent was held in default on August 21, 2026, and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and clicking on the document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: October 12, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Troy Tech SF Owner LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 26-001663 City Of Troy, Respondent. ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Respondent was held in default on August 21, 2026, and the default has been timely cured. The documents curing the default can be reviewed through the docket search function on the Tribunal’s website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib by inputting the docket number and clicking on the document link next to the line item entry for the documents. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Default is SET ASIDE. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: October 12, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Executed Answer and Affirmative Defenses.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL TROY TECH SF OWNER, LLC, Petitioner, MTT Docket: 26-001663 Vv Parcel ID 88-20-35-226-087 CITY OF TROY, Respondent. / JOHN-PAUL WOLFE LORI GRIGG BLUHM (P46908) FRIEDMAN REAL ESTATE JULIE QUINLAN DUFRANE (P59000) Representative for Petitioner TROY CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 34975 W. Twelve Mile Road Attorneys for Respondent Farmington Hills, MI 48331 500 W. Big Beaver Road (248) 848-4154 Troy, MI 48084 TaxAppeals@FREG.com (248) 524-3320 BLUHMLG@TROYMI.GOV i RESPONDENT'S EXECUTED ANSWER TO PETITION AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES NOW COMES, Respondent, CITY OF TROY, by and through its attorney, Lori Grigg Bluhm, and for its Answer to Petitioner's Petition, states as follows: 1. As to Paragraph 1, Respondent admits the allegation 2. As to Paragraph 2, Respondent admits the allegation. 3. As to Paragraph 3, no answer is required. 4. As to Paragraph 4, no answer is required.
Page 2
8. As to Paragraph 8, no answer is required. 9. As to Paragraph 9, no answer is required. 10. As to Paragraph 10, Respondent admits the allegation. 11. As to Paragraph 11, Respondent admits the allegation. 12. As to Paragraph 12, Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegation, lacking knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations and therefore and leaves Petitioners to the proofs. 13. As to Paragraph 13, Respondent denies that there are any issues concerning the valuation, assessment, taxable value, due process, equal protection and/or uniformity. 14. As to Paragraph 14, Respondent admits. 15. As to Paragraph 15, no answer is required. 16. As to Paragraph 16, Respondent admits that the Respondent's true cash value, assessed value, and taxable values for the subject property are accurately reflected. 17. As to Paragraph 17, Respondent denies that Petitioner's allegations as to true cash value, state equalized value, and taxable value for the subject property are correct, or that there is any support for these values. 18. As to Paragraph 18, Respondent admits that Petitioner has properly calculated the difference between Petitioner's alleged and Respondent's true cash value, state equalized value, and taxable values for the subject property. Respondent denies that Petitioner's alleged values are correct and can be supported.
Page 3
20. As to Paragraph 20, Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations, since it is without sufficient knowledge, and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. WHEREFORE, Respondent, CITY OF TROY, requests the Tribunal dismiss the Petition, affirm or increase the subject property's assessed and taxable values, subject to county and state equalization, and award Respondent its costs and attorney fees. Dated: August 27, 2026 CITY OF TROY HL LORI GRIGG BLUHM (P46908) Attorney for Respondent 500 W. Big Beaver Road Troy, MI 48084 (248) 524-3320 BLUHMLG@TROYMI.GOV
Page 4
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES For its further Answer to Petitioners’ Petition, Respondent relies on the following Affirmative Defenses: 1. Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action against Respondent and to support its claim for relief. Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, error of law, discrimination, application of wrong principles or illegality on the part of the Respondent or its agents. Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts
Page 5
af
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
SubsequentFiling.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-001663 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Respondent Files Document Type: Amended Answer Attachment File Name: Executed Answer and Affirmative Defenses Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
26-001663.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVEL! JUL 2 0 2026 STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL TROY TECH SF OWNER, LLC, Petitioner, MTT Docket: 26-001663 \ Parcel ID 88-20-35-226-087 CITY OF TROY, Respondent. / JOHN-PAUL WOLFE LORI GRIGG BLUHM (P46908) FRIEDMAN REAL ESTATE JULIE QUINLAN DUFRANE (P59000) Representative for Petitioner TROY CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 34975 W. Twelve Mile Road Attorneys for Respondent Farmington Hills, MI 48331 500 W. Big Beaver Road (248) 848-4154 Troy, MI 48084 TaxAppeals@FREG.com (248) 524-3320 BLUHMLG@TROYMI.GOV / RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITION AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES NOW COMES, Respondent, CITY OF TROY, by and through its attorney, Lori Grigg Bluhm, and for its Answer to Petitioner's Petition, states as follows: 1. As to Paragraph 1, Respondent admits the allegation 2. As to Paragraph 2, Respondent admits the allegation. 3. As to Paragraph 3, no answer is required. 4. As to Paragraph 4, no answer is required.
Page 2
8. As to Paragraph 8, no answer is required. 9. As to Paragraph 9, no answer is required. 10. As to Paragraph 10, Respondent admits the allegation. 11. As to Paragraph 11, Respondent admits the allegation. 12. As to Paragraph 12, Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegation, lacking knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations and therefore and leaves Petitioners to the proofs. 13. As to Paragraph 13, Respondent denies that there are any issues concerning the valuation, assessment, taxable value, due process, equal protection and/or uniformity. 14. As to Paragraph 14, Respondent admits. 15. As to Paragraph 15, no answer is required. 16. As to Paragraph 16, Respondent admits that the Respondent's true cash value, assessed value, and taxable values for the subject property are accurately reflected. 17. As to Paragraph 17, Respondent denies that Petitioner's allegations as to true cash value, state equalized value, and taxable value for the subject property are correct, or that there is any support for these values. 18. As to Paragraph 18, Respondent admits that Petitioner has properly calculated the difference between Petitioner's alleged and Respondent's true cash value, state equalized value, and taxable values for the subject property. Respondent denies that Petitioner's alleged values are correct and can be supported.
Page 3
20. As to Paragraph 20, Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations, since it is without sufficient knowledge, and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. WHEREFORE, Respondent, CITY OF TROY, requests the Tribunal dismiss the Petition, affirm or increase the subject property's assessed and taxable values, subject to county and state equalization, and award Respondent its costs and attorney fees. Dated: July 14, 2026 CITY OF TROY LORI GRIGG BLUHM (P46908) Attorney for Respondent 500 W. Big Beaver Road Troy, MI 48084 (248) 524-3320 BLUHMLG@TROYMI.GOV
Page 4
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES For its further Answer to Petitioners’ Petition, Respondent relies on the following Affirmative Defenses: 1. Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action against Respondent and to support its claim for relief. Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, error of law, discrimination, application of wrong principles or illegality on the part of the Respondent or its agents. Petitioners fail to
Page 5
affirme
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Order_of_Default_of_Answer.2026-08-21_10-09-09.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Troy Tech SF Owner LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 26-001663 City Of Troy, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Respondent failed to sign the answer. As such, Respondent must file and serve a signed answer and file proof demonstrating service of the signed answer within 14 days of the entry of this order. See TTR 235. Tribunal rules and information on Entire Tribunal answers can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: August 21, 2026 1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-001663 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Troy Tech SF Owner LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 26-001663 City Of Troy, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Respondent failed to sign the answer. As such, Respondent must file and serve a signed answer and file proof demonstrating service of the signed answer within 14 days of the entry of this order. See TTR 235. Tribunal rules and information on Entire Tribunal answers can be found on our website at
Page 4
MTT Docket
Page 5
STA
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
26-001663.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVEL! JUL 2 0 2026 STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL TROY TECH SF OWNER, LLC, Petitioner, MTT Docket: 26-001663 \ Parcel ID 88-20-35-226-087 CITY OF TROY, Respondent. / JOHN-PAUL WOLFE LORI GRIGG BLUHM (P46908) FRIEDMAN REAL ESTATE JULIE QUINLAN DUFRANE (P59000) Representative for Petitioner TROY CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 34975 W. Twelve Mile Road Attorneys for Respondent Farmington Hills, MI 48331 500 W. Big Beaver Road (248) 848-4154 Troy, MI 48084 TaxAppeals@FREG.com (248) 524-3320 BLUHMLG@TROYMI.GOV / RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITION AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES NOW COMES, Respondent, CITY OF TROY, by and through its attorney, Lori Grigg Bluhm, and for its Answer to Petitioner's Petition, states as follows: 1. As to Paragraph 1, Respondent admits the allegation 2. As to Paragraph 2, Respondent admits the allegation. 3. As to Paragraph 3, no answer is required. 4. As to Paragraph 4, no answer is required.
Page 2
8. As to Paragraph 8, no answer is required. 9. As to Paragraph 9, no answer is required. 10. As to Paragraph 10, Respondent admits the allegation. 11. As to Paragraph 11, Respondent admits the allegation. 12. As to Paragraph 12, Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegation, lacking knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations and therefore and leaves Petitioners to the proofs. 13. As to Paragraph 13, Respondent denies that there are any issues concerning the valuation, assessment, taxable value, due process, equal protection and/or uniformity. 14. As to Paragraph 14, Respondent admits. 15. As to Paragraph 15, no answer is required. 16. As to Paragraph 16, Respondent admits that the Respondent's true cash value, assessed value, and taxable values for the subject property are accurately reflected. 17. As to Paragraph 17, Respondent denies that Petitioner's allegations as to true cash value, state equalized value, and taxable value for the subject property are correct, or that there is any support for these values. 18. As to Paragraph 18, Respondent admits that Petitioner has properly calculated the difference between Petitioner's alleged and Respondent's true cash value, state equalized value, and taxable values for the subject property. Respondent denies that Petitioner's alleged values are correct and can be supported.
Page 3
20. As to Paragraph 20, Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations, since it is without sufficient knowledge, and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. WHEREFORE, Respondent, CITY OF TROY, requests the Tribunal dismiss the Petition, affirm or increase the subject property's assessed and taxable values, subject to county and state equalization, and award Respondent its costs and attorney fees. Dated: July 14, 2026 CITY OF TROY LORI GRIGG BLUHM (P46908) Attorney for Respondent 500 W. Big Beaver Road Troy, MI 48084 (248) 524-3320 BLUHMLG@TROYMI.GOV
Page 4
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES For its further Answer to Petitioners’ Petition, Respondent relies on the following Affirmative Defenses: 1. Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action against Respondent and to support its claim for relief. Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, error of law, discrimination, application of wrong principles or illegality on the part of the Respondent or its agents. Petitioners fail to
Page 5
affirme
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Default_Order_Vacate.2026-08-21_10-03-28.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Troy Tech SF Owner LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 26-001663 City Of Troy, Respondent. ORDER VACATING DEFAULT ORDER The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that the Tribunal entered an order on August 21, 2026, holding Respondent in default. The Tribunal erred in the entry of that order. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Order of Default is VACATED. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: August 21, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Troy Tech SF Owner LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 26-001663 City Of Troy, Respondent. ORDER VACATING DEFAULT ORDER The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that the Tribunal entered an order on August 21, 2026, holding Respondent in default. The Tribunal erred in the entry of that order. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Order of Default is VACATED. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: August 21, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Troy Tech SF Owner LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 26-001663 City Of Troy, Respondent. ORDER VACATING DEFAULT ORDER The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that the Tribunal entered an order on August 21, 2026, holding Respondent in default. The Tribunal erred in the entry of that order. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Order of Default is VACATED. By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: August 21, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
ET_Order_of_Default_of_Answer.2026-08-21_07-40-07.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Troy Tech SF Owner LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 26-001663 City Of Troy, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Respondent failed to sign the answer. As such, Respondent must file and serve a signed answer and file proof demonstrating service of the signed answer within 14 days of the entry of this order. See TTR 235. Tribunal rules and information on Entire Tribunal answers can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: August 21, 2026 1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-001663 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Troy Tech SF Owner LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 26-001663 City Of Troy, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Respondent failed to sign the answer. As such, Respondent must file and serve a signed answer and file proof demonstrating service of the signed answer within 14 days of the entry of this order. See TTR 235. Tribunal rules and information on Entire Tribunal answers can be found on our website at
Page 4
MTT Docket
Page 5
STA
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-08-21_07-36-38.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Troy Tech SF Owner LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-001663 City Of Troy, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: August 21, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Troy Tech SF Owner LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-001663 City Of Troy, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
1919-1975 Technology - Troy Tech (HIJ) - 2026 Petition - FINAL SIGNED.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
J. bed STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR TROY TECH SF OWNER LLC ‘ MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. City of Troy . Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: 88-20-35-226-087 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is X real ___ personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? Yes __ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as COMMERCIAL-IMPROVED 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent's March July December Board of Review. MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): The property or properties at issue are located in Oakland County. The property or properties’ address is: 1919 Technology -1975, Troy, MI 48083 The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): City of Troy Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: Friedman Real Estate Management Company 34975 W Twelve Mile Road Farmington Hills, MI 48331 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): X the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes No X uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable
Page 4
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Troy Tech SF Owner LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 34975 W 12 Mile Road City or Town Farmington Hills State Michigan ZIP Code 48331 Telephone Number 248-848-4154 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) taxappeals@freg.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name John Paul M.I. Last Name Wolfe Firm Name (if any) Friedman Real Estate Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 34975 W 12 Mile Road City or Town Farmington Hills State Michigan ZIP Code 48331 Telephone Number 248-848-4154 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) taxappeals@freg.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 1919 Technology- 1975 Troy
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Michigan 48083 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Troy (OAKLAND) County Oakland If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 88-20-35-226-087 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 5902600 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 5902600 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 5200000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 2600000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
SubsequentFiling.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-001663 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Petitioner Files Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition Attachment File Name: Proof of Service Petition - Troy Tech HIJ 2026 Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Proof of Service Petition - Troy Tech HIJ 2026.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 _____________________________, Petitioner(s), v MOAHR Docket No. _____________________________, Respondent(s). PROOF OF SERVICE FOR PROPERTY TAX PETITION *To be filed after the Tribunal issues the Notice of Docket Number* ___________________________________ states that on ___________________ he/she [Name of person serving/mailing petition] [date of service] served a copy of the Petition relative to the above-captioned matter upon: [Provide name and address of the following entities] 1. Assessor (via certified mail): ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ 2. City Clerk or Township Supervisor/Clerk (via certified mail): ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ 3. County Equalization Director (via first class mail or personal service): ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ 4. County Clerk (via first class mail or personal service): ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ 5. Secretary of the local school board (via first class mail or personal service): ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ 6. State Treasurer (via first class mail): Michigan Department of Treasury, State Treasurer 430 W. Allegan Lansing, MI 48922 _______________________________ _______________________________ [Signature of person who is serving/mailing copy] [Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy] Troy Tech SF Owner 26-001663 City of Troy Laura Clark 6/18/2026 City of Troy Assessor 500 W. Big Beaver Road, Troy, MI 48084 City of Troy Clerk 500 W. Big Beaver Road, Troy, MI 48084 Oakland County Equalization Director 250 Elizabeth Lake Road, #1000W, Pontiac, MI 48341 Oakland County Clerk 1200 Telegraph Road, Building #12E, Pontiac, MI 48341 Troy Public School District, Secretary of School Board, Administration Building 4400 Livernois Road, Troy, MI 48098 /s/Laura Clark Laura Clark
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Respondent's Answer and Affirmative Defenses.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL TROY TECH SF OWNER, LLC, Petitioner, MTT Docket: 26-001663 \Y Parcel ID 88-20-35-226-087 CITY OF TROY, Respondent. / JOHN-PAUL WOLFE LORI GRIGG BLUHM (P46908) FRIEDMAN REAL ESTATE JULIE QUINLAN DUFRANE (P59000) Representative for Petitioner TROY CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 34975 W. Twelve Mile Road Attorneys for Respondent Farmington Hills, MI 48331 500 W. Big Beaver Road (248) 848-4154 Troy, MI 48084 TaxAppeals@FREG.com (248) 524-3320 BLUHMLG@TROYMI.GOV / RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITION AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES NOW COMES, Respondent, CITY OF TROY, by and through its attorney, Lori Grigg Bluhm, and for its Answer to Petitioner's Petition, states as follows: 1. As to Paragraph 1, Respondent admits the allegation 2. As to Paragraph 2, Respondent admits the allegation. 3 As to Paragraph 3, no answer is required. 4. As to Paragraph 4, no answer is required.
Page 2
8. As to Paragraph 8, no answer is required. 9. As to Paragraph 9, no answer is required. 10. As to Paragraph 10, Respondent admits the allegation. 11. As to Paragraph 11, Respondent admits the allegation. 12. As to Paragraph 12, Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegation, lacking knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations and therefore and leaves Petitioners to the proofs. 13. As to Paragraph 13, Respondent denies that there are any issues concerning the valuation, assessment, taxable value, due process, equal protection and/or uniformity. 14. As to Paragraph 14, Respondent admits. 15. As to Paragraph 15, no answer is required. 16. As to Paragraph 16, Respondent admits that the Respondent's true cash value, assessed value, and taxable values for the subject property are accurately reflected. 17. As to Paragraph 17, Respondent denies that Petitioner's allegations as to true cash value, state equalized value, and taxable value for the subject property are correct, or that there is any support for these values. 18. As to Paragraph 18, Respondent admits that Petitioner has properly calculated the difference between Petitioner's alleged and Respondent's true cash value, state equalized value, and taxable values for the subject property. Respondent denies that Petitioner's alleged values are correct and can be supported.
Page 3
20. As to Paragraph 20, Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations, since it is without sufficient knowledge, and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. WHEREFORE, Respondent, CITY OF TROY, requests the Tribunal dismiss the Petition, affirm or increase the subject property's assessed and taxable values, subject to county and state equalization, and award Respondent its costs and attorney fees. Dated: July 14, 2026 CITY OF TROY LORI GRIGG BLUHM (P46908) Attorney for Respondent 500 W. Big Beaver Road Troy, MI 48084 (248) 524-3320 BLUHMLG@TROYMI.GOV
Page 4
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES For its further Answer to Petitioners’ Petition, Respondent relies on the following Affirmative Defenses: 1. Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action against Respondent and to support its claim for relief. Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, error of law, discrimination, application of wrong principles or illegality on the part of the Respondent or its agents. Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish the
Page 5
a
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
EntireTribunalCaseISAnswer.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001663 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government City Of Troy (OAKLAND) First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Lori M.I. Grigg Last Name Bluhm Firm Name (if any) City of Troy City Attorney Office Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 500 W. Big Beaver Road City or Town Troy State Michigan ZIP Code 48084 Telephone Number 2485243320 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Bluhmlg@TroyMI.gov Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: Lori Grigg Bluhm /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
1919-1975 Technology - Troy Tech (HIJ) - 2026 Petition - FINAL SIGNED.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
J. bed STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR TROY TECH SF OWNER LLC ‘ MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. City of Troy . Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: 88-20-35-226-087 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is X real ___ personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? Yes __ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as COMMERCIAL-IMPROVED 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent's March July December Board of Review. MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): The property or properties at issue are located in Oakland County. The property or properties’ address is: 1919 Technology -1975, Troy, MI 48083 The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): City of Troy Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: Friedman Real Estate Management Company 34975 W Twelve Mile Road Farmington Hills, MI 48331 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): X the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes No X uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable
Page 4
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Troy Tech SF Owner LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 34975 W 12 Mile Road City or Town Farmington Hills State Michigan ZIP Code 48331 Telephone Number 248-848-4154 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) taxappeals@freg.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name John Paul M.I. Last Name Wolfe Firm Name (if any) Friedman Real Estate Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 34975 W 12 Mile Road City or Town Farmington Hills State Michigan ZIP Code 48331 Telephone Number 248-848-4154 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) taxappeals@freg.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 1919 Technology- 1975 Troy
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Michigan 48083 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Troy (OAKLAND) County Oakland If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 88-20-35-226-087 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 5902600 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 5902600 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 5200000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 2600000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.