Record Finder / 26-001441-TT
Michigan

Topvalco Inc Petitioner Vs. Township Of Brighton Respondent

Petitioner
Topvalco Inc
Respondent
Township Of Brighton

Case overview

Docket number
26-001441-TT
Status
Answer Due
CaseType
ET Property
Division
ET
County
Livingston
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
7Answer was receivedRESPNot recorded10/12/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
6Proof of Service of Misc Documents was received.Not recordedNot recorded10/01/2026Not recordedDownload
5AppearanceNot recordedNot recorded10/01/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
4Proof of service of petition was received.Not recordedNot recorded09/14/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
3Petition has been verifiedPET108/13/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
2Notice of Docket Number ETNot recordedNot recorded08/13/2026Not recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded05/26/2026$600.00Download
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload

Documents

Answer Aff Def & POS - 26-001441.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

TOPVALCO INC., 

 

 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

TOWNSHIP OF BRIGHTON, 

 

 

Respondent. 

MTT DOCKET No. 26-001441 

 

PARCEL NO. 4712-32-300-075 

 

 

______________________________________/ 

 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Alex Morse 

Cameron Beckner 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 

Indianapolis, IN 46240 

(317) 596-3260 

msilvey@dmainc.com 

amorse@dmainc.com 

cbeckner@dmainc.com 

Ross K. Bower II (P70574) 

Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC 

Attorneys for Respondent 

4151 Okemos Road 

Okemos, Michigan 48864 

(517) 381-0100 

Rbower@fsbrlaw.com 

 

______________________________________/ 

 

ANSWER TO ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

 

 

1. Property Parcel No.: 4712-32-300-075 

 

 

ANSWER: Respondent admits the allegation contained in the above paragraph. 

 

2. The property identified above is real 

. 

 

ANSWER: Respondent admits the allegation contained in the above paragraph. 

 

3. Only one parcel of property is the subject of this appeal. 

 

ANSWER: Respondent admits the allegation contained in the above paragraph.

Page 2

4. Petitioner owns and/or otherwise holds an interest in the parcel of property that is the 

subject of this appeal. 

 

ANSWER: Respondent states that it is without sufficient knowledge or information 

upon which to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in the above 

paragraph, which are therefore deemed denied, leaving Petitioner to its proofs. 

 

5. The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial-Improved 

. 

 

ANSWER: Respondent admits the allegation contained in the above paragraph. 

 

6. The assessment(s) at issue were not protested to Respondent’s March, July, or December 

Board of Review as a protest was not required. 

 

ANSWER: Respondent states that the legal conclusions require no answer, and to the 

extent that an answer may be required, neither admits nor denies the allegations 

contained in the above paragraph and leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

7. The property or properties at issue are in Livingston County. 

ANSWER: Respondent admits the allegation contained in the above paragraph. 

 

8. The property or properties’ address is: 

9968 E Grand River Ave, Brighton, MI 48116. 

 

ANSWER: Respondent admits the allegation contained in the above paragraph. 

 

9. The assessment(s) at issue were established by the: Brighton Township 

. 

 

ANSWER: Respondent admits the allegation contained in the above paragraph. 

 

10. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 

1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH 45202 

 

ANSWER: Respondent states that it is without sufficient knowledge or information 

upon which to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation contained in the above 

paragraph, which are therefore deemed denied, leaving Petitioner to its proofs. 

 

11. This appeal involves issues relating to the property or properties’ true cash and taxable 

values and uniformity. 

ANSWER: Respondent states that the legal conclusions require no answer, and to the 

extent that an answer may be required, neither admits nor denies the allegations 

contained in the above paragraph, leaving Petitioner to its proofs.

Page 3

12. The tax year at issue is: 2026. 

 

ANSWER: Respondent admits that Petitioner purports to contest the subject 

property’s true cash and taxable values and the uniformity of the assessment for the 

2026 tax year. 

 

13. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 2026 Board of 

Review are: 

 

Tax 

Year 

True 

Cash 

Value 

Assessed 

Value 

Taxable 

Value 

2026 

$10,146,400 

$5,073,200 

$4,585,411 

 

ANSWER: Respondent admits the allegations contained in the above paragraph. 

 

14. Petitioner contends the values for tax year 2026 are no more than the following: 

 

Tax 

Year 

True Cash 

Value 

State Equalized 

Value 

Taxable 

Value 

2026 

$5,036,400 

$2,518,200 

$2,518,200 

 

ANSWER: Respondent admits only that Petitioner purports to make the indicated 

contentions of value but denies that Petitioner’s contentions have merit and asserts 

that the Petition should be dismissed, incorporating its additional answers and 

affirmative defenses. 

 

15. The values in contention for tax year 2026 are: 

 

Tax 

Year 

True 

Cash 

Value 

State Equalized 

Value 

Taxable 

Value 

2026 

$5,110,000 

$2,555,000 

$2,067,211 

 

ANSWER: Respondent admits only that Petitioner purports to make the indicated 

contentions of value but denies that Petitioner’s contentions have merit and asserts 

that the Petition should be dismissed, incorporating its additional answers and 

affirmative defenses.

Page 4

16. The 2026 assessments imposed on the subject property and the taxes to be levied and 

collected are invalid because: 

 

(a) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount 

permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

 

(b) The

Page 5

STATE OF

Page 6

2

Page 7

3

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISAnswer.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001441

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: 

Local Unit of Government

Local Unit of Government

Township Of Brighton (LIVINGSTON)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

R

M.I.

K

Last Name

Bower II

Firm Name (if any)

Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

4151 Okemos Road

City or Town

Okemos

State

 Michigan

ZIP Code

48864

Telephone Number

517-381-0100

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

rbower@fsbrlaw.com

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: 

Ross K. Bower II

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Proof of Service 26-001441.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

TOPVALCO INC., 

 

 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

TOWNSHIP OF BRIGHTON, 

 

 

Respondent. 

MTT DOCKET No. 26-001441 

 

PARCEL NO. 4712-32-300-075 

 

 

______________________________________/ 

 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Alex Morse 

Cameron Beckner 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 

Indianapolis, IN 46240 

(317) 596-3260 

msilvey@dmainc.com 

amorse@dmainc.com 

cbeckner@dmainc.com 

Ross K. Bower II (P70574) 

Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC 

Attorneys for Respondent 

4151 Okemos Road 

Okemos, Michigan 48864 

(517) 381-0100 

Rbower@fsbrlaw.com 

 

______________________________________/ 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Jamy A. Staffeld states that on October 1, 2026 she served a copy of Appearance and this 

Proof of Service, upon the following via first class mail: 

 

 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey 

Alex Morse 

Cameron Beckner 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 

Indianapolis, IN 46240 

 

I declare that the statements above are true to the best of my information, knowledge, and 

 

belief. 

/s/ Jamy A Staffeld 

 

Jamy A. Staffeld

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Appearance 26-001441.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

TOPVALCO INC., 

 

 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

TOWNSHIP OF BRIGHTON, 

 

 

Respondent. 

MTT DOCKET No. 26-001441 

 

PARCEL NO. 4712-32-300-075 

 

 

______________________________________/ 

 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Alex Morse 

Cameron Beckner 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 

Indianapolis, IN 46240 

(317) 596-3260 

msilvey@dmainc.com 

amorse@dmainc.com 

cbeckner@dmainc.com 

Ross K. Bower II (P70574) 

Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC 

Attorneys for Respondent 

4151 Okemos Road 

Okemos, Michigan 48864 

(517) 381-0100 

Rbower@fsbrlaw.com 

 

______________________________________/ 

 

APPEARANCE 

 

FAHEY SCHULTZ BURZYCH RHODES PLC, hereby enters its Appearance on behalf 

of Respondent, TOWNSHIP OF BRIGHTON, in the above-entitled matter. 

 

 

 

 

 

Dated: October 1, 2026 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

Fahey Schultz Burzych Rhodes PLC 

Attorneys for Respondent 

 

 

By: __________________________________ 

 Ross K. Bower II (P70574) 

 4151 Okemos Road 

 Okemos, MI 48864 

 (517) 381-0100

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 26-001441

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No

Party Filing Document 

Respondent

Files

Document Type: Appearance

Attachment File Name: Appearance 26-001441

Document Type: Proof of Service: Misc Documents

Attachment File Name: Proof of Service 26-001441

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 0.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 0.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SCANNED MCDONALDS CORP 210304 - CASCADE TOWNSHIP POS 26-001694.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

MCDONALD'S CORP #210304. 

Petitioner, 

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001694-TT 

Cascade Township, 

Respondent. 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 14 day of 

September 2026 she served a copy of the Petition upon the following persons by placing 

same in an envelope properly addressed to each via USPS first class thereon: 

Lisa Posthumus Lyons 

Forest Hills Public Schools 

Kent County Clerk 

Malorie Ninemeier, School Board Secretary 

300 Monroe Avenue NW 

620 Forest Hill Ave, SE 

Grand Rapids, MI 49503 

Grand Rapids, MI 49546 

Megan VanHoose 

Michigan State Treasurer 

Kent County Equalization Director 

Department of Treasury 

300 Monroe Avenue NW 

Treasury Building 

Grand Rapids, MI 49503 

430 West Allegan 

Lansing, MI 48922 

j 

i. 

Micke ((@ 

cy 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Authorized Agent

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

MCDONALD'S CORP #210304. 

Petitioner, 

Cascade Township, 

Respondent. 

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001694-TT 

PROOF 

OF SERVICE 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 14% day of 

September 2026 she served a copy of the Petition upon the following persons by placing 

same in an envelope properly addressed to each via certified mail thereon: 

Cascade Township Assessor 

5920 Tahoe Dr. SE 

Grand Rapids, MI 49546-7123 

Susan Slater 

Cascade Township Clerk 

5920 Tahoe Dr. SE 

Grand Rapids, MI 49546-7123 

Grace Lesperance 

Cascade Township Supervisor 

5920 Tahoe Dr. SE 

Grand Rapids, MI 49546-7123 

Mics (0 re) 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Authorized Agent

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

) 

MCDONALD'S CORP #210304 

MTT Docket No. 26-001694 

TT 

Petitioner, 

v 

Cascade Township 

Respondent. 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Alex Morse 

Cameron Beckner 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 

Indianapolis, IN 46240 

(317) 596-3260 

msilvey@dmainc.com 

amorse@dmainc.com 

cbeckner@dmainc.com 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No.: 41-19-07-376-043 

2. 

The property identified above is real 

3. 

Only one parcel of property is the subject of this appeal. 

4. 

Petitioner owns and/or otherwise holds an interest in the parcel of property that is the 

subject of this appeal. 

5. 

The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial-Improved

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 26-001694 

 _TT 

Page 2 of 3 

6. 

Thc assessment(s) at issue were not protested to Respondent’s March, July, or December 

Board of Review as a protest was not required. 

Kent 

7. 

The property or properties at issue are in 

County. 

8. 

The property or properties’ address is: 

5105 28th St SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49512 

9. 

The assessment(s) at issue were established by the: Cascade Township 

10. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 

110 N. Carpenter St., Chicago, IL 60607 

11. This appeal involves issues relating to the property or properties’ true cash and taxable 

values and uniformity. 

12. The tax year at issue is: 2026. 

13. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 2026 Board 

of Review are: 

Tax 

True Cash 

Assessed 

Taxable 

Year 

Value 

Value 

Value 

2026 

$1,822,200 

$911,100 

$854,373 

14. Petitioner contends the values for tax year 2026 are no more than the following: 

Tax 

True Cash 

State Equalized 

Taxable 

Year 

Value 

Value 

Value 

2026 

$1,022,400 

$511,200 

$511,200 

15. The values in contention for tax year 2026 are: 

Tax 

True Cash 

State Equalized 

Taxable 

Year 

Value 

Value 

Value 

2026 

$799,800 

$399,900 

$343,173

Page 5

MTT Docket No. 26-001694 

TT 

Page 3 of 3 

16. The 2026 assessments imposed on the subject property and the taxes to be levied and 

collected are invalid because: 

(a) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount 

permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

(b) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, is at a higher 

percentage of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and 

applicable statutes; 

(c) The assessment is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and 

(d) The assessment otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights. 

WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests this honorable Tribunal hear this case and 

enter an order reducing the 2026 true cash, state equalized and taxable values and direct 

Respondent to refund to Petitioner any excess taxes, fees, and penalties paid, plus interest and 

costs, and all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan law and as is appropriate under 

the circumstances. 

Respectfully submitted, 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Micke ((0 Oo 

Dated: May 

28 2026 

By: 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Petitioner's Representative

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 26-001441

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No

Party Filing Document 

Petitioner

Files

Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition

Attachment File Name: SCANNED MCDONALDS CORP 210304 - CASCADE TOWNSHIP POS 

26-001694

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 0.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 0.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Topvalco Inc - Brighton Township.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

__________________________________________, 

MTT Docket No. 26-_____BBB_-TT

Petitioner, 

v 

__________________________________________, 

Respondent. 

______________________________/ 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Alex Morse 

Cameron Beckner 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 

Indianapolis, IN 46240 

(317) 596-3260

msilvey@dmainc.com

amorse@dmainc.com

cbeckner@dmainc.com

______________________________/ 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. Property Parcel No.: ________________________________

2. The property identified above is _________________.

3. Only one parcel of property is the subject of this appeal.

4. Petitioner owns and/or otherwise holds an interest in the parcel of property that is the

subject of this appeal.

5. The property identified above is classified as ___________________________________.

Topvalco, Inc.

Brighton Township

4712-32-300-075

real

201 Commercial-Improved

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-______BBB-TT

Page 2 of 3 

6. The assessment(s) at issue were not protested to Respondent’s March, July, or December

Board of Review as a protest was not required.

7. The property or properties at issue are in ________________ County.

8. The property or properties’ address is:

______________________________________________________________________.

9. The assessment(s) at issue were established by the: _____________________________.

10. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is:

______________________________________________________________________.

11. This appeal involves issues relating to the property or properties’ true cash and taxable

values and uniformity.

12. The tax year at issue is: 2026.

13. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 2026 Board

of Review are:

Tax 

Year 

True Cash 

Value 

Assessed 

Value 

Taxable 

Value 

2026 

14. Petitioner contends the values for tax year 2026 are no more than the following:

Tax 

Year 

True Cash 

Value 

State Equalized 

Value 

Taxable 

Value 

2026 

15. The values in contention for tax year 2026 are:

Tax 

Year 

True Cash 

Value 

State Equalized 

Value 

Taxable 

Value 

2026 

 Livingston 

 9968 E Grand River Ave, Brighton, MI 48116

Brighton Township

 1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH 45202

$10,146,400

$5,073,200

$4,585,411

$5,036,400

$2,518,200

$2,518,200

$5,110,000

$2,555,000

$2,067,211

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 26-_____BBB_-TT 

Page 3 of 3 

16. The 2026 assessments imposed on the subject property and the taxes to be levied and

collected are invalid because:

(a) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount

permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes;

(b) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, is at a higher

percentage of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and

applicable statutes;

(c) The assessment is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and

(d) The assessment otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights.

WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests this honorable Tribunal hear this case and 

enter an order reducing the 2026 true cash, state equalized and taxable values and direct 

Respondent to refund to Petitioner any excess taxes, fees, and penalties paid, plus interest and 

costs, and all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan law and as is appropriate under 

the circumstances. 

Respectfully submitted, 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Dated: __________ ___, 2026

By: 

______________________________

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494)

Petitioner’s Representative

May

26

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

Topvalco, Inc.

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

1014 Vine Street,

City or Town

Cincinnati

State

Ohio

ZIP Code

45202

Telephone Number

9174887825

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

msilvey@dmainc.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Michelle (Mikki)

M.I.

M

Last Name

Silvey

Firm Name (if any)

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

9229 Delegates Row, Ste 375

City or Town

Indianapolis

State

Indiana

ZIP Code

46240

Telephone Number

917-488-7825

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

msilvey@dmainc.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

9968 E Grand River Ave

Brighton

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

48116

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Township Of Brighton (LIVINGSTON) 

County

Livingston

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

4712-32-300-075

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

5073200

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

4585411

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

5036400

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

2518200

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

2518200

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey

Payment Information

Amount: 600

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26052686957544

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-08-13_14-49-51.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Topvalco Inc, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 26-001441

Township Of Brighton, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: August 13, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Topvalco Inc - Brighton Township.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

__________________________________________, 

MTT Docket No. 26-_____BBB_-TT

Petitioner, 

v 

__________________________________________, 

Respondent. 

______________________________/ 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Alex Morse 

Cameron Beckner 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 

Indianapolis, IN 46240 

(317) 596-3260

msilvey@dmainc.com

amorse@dmainc.com

cbeckner@dmainc.com

______________________________/ 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. Property Parcel No.: ________________________________

2. The property identified above is _________________.

3. Only one parcel of property is the subject of this appeal.

4. Petitioner owns and/or otherwise holds an interest in the parcel of property that is the

subject of this appeal.

5. The property identified above is classified as ___________________________________.

Topvalco, Inc.

Brighton Township

4712-32-300-075

real

201 Commercial-Improved

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-______BBB-TT

Page 2 of 3 

6. The assessment(s) at issue were not protested to Respondent’s March, July, or December

Board of Review as a protest was not required.

7. The property or properties at issue are in ________________ County.

8. The property or properties’ address is:

______________________________________________________________________.

9. The assessment(s) at issue were established by the: _____________________________.

10. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is:

______________________________________________________________________.

11. This appeal involves issues relating to the property or properties’ true cash and taxable

values and uniformity.

12. The tax year at issue is: 2026.

13. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 2026 Board

of Review are:

Tax 

Year 

True Cash 

Value 

Assessed 

Value 

Taxable 

Value 

2026 

14. Petitioner contends the values for tax year 2026 are no more than the following:

Tax 

Year 

True Cash 

Value 

State Equalized 

Value 

Taxable 

Value 

2026 

15. The values in contention for tax year 2026 are:

Tax 

Year 

True Cash 

Value 

State Equalized 

Value 

Taxable 

Value 

2026 

 Livingston 

 9968 E Grand River Ave, Brighton, MI 48116

Brighton Township

 1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH 45202

$10,146,400

$5,073,200

$4,585,411

$5,036,400

$2,518,200

$2,518,200

$5,110,000

$2,555,000

$2,067,211

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 26-_____BBB_-TT 

Page 3 of 3 

16. The 2026 assessments imposed on the subject property and the taxes to be levied and

collected are invalid because:

(a) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount

permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes;

(b) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, is at a higher

percentage of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and

applicable statutes;

(c) The assessment is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and

(d) The assessment otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights.

WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests this honorable Tribunal hear this case and 

enter an order reducing the 2026 true cash, state equalized and taxable values and direct 

Respondent to refund to Petitioner any excess taxes, fees, and penalties paid, plus interest and 

costs, and all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan law and as is appropriate under 

the circumstances. 

Respectfully submitted, 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Dated: __________ ___, 2026

By: 

______________________________

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494)

Petitioner’s Representative

May

26

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

Topvalco, Inc.

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

1014 Vine Street,

City or Town

Cincinnati

State

Ohio

ZIP Code

45202

Telephone Number

9174887825

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

msilvey@dmainc.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Michelle (Mikki)

M.I.

M

Last Name

Silvey

Firm Name (if any)

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

9229 Delegates Row, Ste 375

City or Town

Indianapolis

State

Indiana

ZIP Code

46240

Telephone Number

917-488-7825

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

msilvey@dmainc.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

9968 E Grand River Ave

Brighton

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

48116

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Township Of Brighton (LIVINGSTON) 

County

Livingston

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

4712-32-300-075

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

5073200

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

4585411

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

5036400

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

2518200

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

2518200

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey

Payment Information

Amount: 600

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26052686957544

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.