Record Finder / 26-001551-TT
Michigan

The Kroger Co Of Michigan Petitioner Vs. Township Of Shelby Respondent

Petitioner
The Kroger Co Of Michigan
Respondent
Township Of Shelby

Case overview

Docket number
26-001551-TT
Status
Ready Schedule
CaseType
ET Property
Division
ET
County
Macomb
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
5Answer was receivedRESPNot recorded09/16/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
4Proof of service of petition was received.PETNot recorded09/08/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
3Petition has been verifiedPET108/18/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
2Notice of Docket Number ETNot recordedNot recorded08/18/2026Not recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded05/27/2026$600.00Download
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload

Documents

Answer Aff. Defs. & POS.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

KIRK , HUTH , LANGE & BADALAMENTI , P . L . C . 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

THE KROGER CO. OF MICHIGAN, 

 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-001551-TT 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Parcel No. 23-07-13-400-070 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF SHELBY, 

 

Respondent. 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

DuCHARME, McMILLEN & 

 ASSOCIATES, INC. 

MICHELLE (Mikki) M. SILVEY (P69494) 

ALEX MORSE 

CAMERON BECKNER 

Representatives for Petitioner 

9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 

Indianapolis, IN 46240 

(317) 689-6467 – Ofc, 

(917) 488-7825 (Mobile) 

msilvey@dmainc.com 

amorse@dmainc.com 

cbckner@dmainc.com 

KIRK, HUTH, LANGE & BADALAMENTI, PLC 

ROSEMARY V. DAVIS (P47336) 

ROBERT S. HUTH, JR. (P42531) 

Attorneys for Respondent 

19500 Hall Road, Suite 100 

Clinton Township, MI 48038 

(586) 412-4900 

rdavis@kirkhuthlaw.com 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITION 

 

 

NOW COMES the Respondent, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF SHELBY, by and through 

its attorneys, KIRK, HUTH, LANGE & BADALAMENTI, PLC, and for its Answer to Petition, 

states as follows: 

1. 

Answering Paragraph 1, Respondent admits the allegations contained therein. 

2. 

Answering Paragraph 2, Respondent admits the allegations contained therein. 

3. 

Answering Paragraph 3, Respondent admits the allegations contained therein. 

4. 

Answering Paragraph 4, Respondent admits the allegations contained therein.

Page 2

2 

S:\S\Shelby\Tax Tribunals\Kroger Co. of Michigan 2026\Answer Aff. Defs. & POS.docx 

KIRK , HUTH , LANGE & BADALAMENTI , P . L . C . 

5. 

Answering Paragraph 5, Respondent admits the allegations contained therein. 

6. 

Answering Paragraph 6, Respondent admits the allegations contained therein. 

7. 

Answering Paragraph 7, Respondent admits the allegations contained therein. 

8. 

Answering Paragraph 8, Respondent admits the allegations contained therein. 

9. 

Answering Paragraph 9, Respondent admits the allegations contained therein. 

10. 

Answering Paragraph 10, Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to 

form a belief as to the truth of the allegations set forth therein and therefore leaves Petitioner to its 

strict proofs. 

11. 

Answering Paragraph 11, Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to 

form a belief as to the truth of the allegations set forth therein and therefore leaves Petitioner to its 

strict proofs. 

12. 

Answering Paragraph 12, Respondent admits the allegations contained therein. 

13. 

Answering Paragraph 13, Respondent admits the allegations contained therein. 

14. 

Answering Paragraph 14, Respondent denies the allegations contained therein for the 

reason they are untrue. 

15. 

Answering Paragraph 15, Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to 

form a belief as to the truth of the allegations set forth therein and therefore leaves Petitioner to its 

strict proofs. 

16. 

Answering Paragraph 16, Respondent denies the allegations contained therein for the 

reason they are untrue, inclusive of paragraphs (a) through (d). 

Respondent requests that the Tribunal deny the relief requested and uphold the assessment 

issued.

Page 3

3 

S:\S\Shelby\Tax Tribunals\Kroger Co. of Michigan 2026\Answer Aff. Defs. & POS.docx 

KIRK , HUTH , LANGE & BADALAMENTI , P . L . C . 

Respondent reserves the right to amend this Answer to include any additional defenses or 

information that may become known to Respondent during the course of this proceeding. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent respectfully requests that this Honorable Tribunal dismiss 

Petitioner’s Petition and grant any further relief that this Tribunal deems appropriate and just. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Respectfully Submitted, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

KIRK, HUTH, LANGE & BADALAMENTI, PLC 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Rosemary V. Davis 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ROSEMARY V. DAVIS (P47336) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attorneys for Respondent 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19500 Hall Road, Ste. 100 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clinton Township, MI 48038 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(586) 412-4900 

 

Dated: September 16, 2026

Page 4

4 

S:\S\Shelby\Tax Tribunals\Kroger Co. of Michigan 2026\Answer Aff. Defs. & POS.docx 

KIRK , HUTH , LANGE & BADALAMENTI , P . L . C . 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

 

 

Respondent, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF SHELBY, through its attorneys, KIRK, HUTH, 

LANGE & BADALAMENTI, PLC, files the following Affirmative Defenses: 

1. 

Petitioner has failed to allege specific and sufficient facts upon which the mode and 

method of appraising property fail to conform with mode and method applied to all other properties 

in the community. 

2. 

Petitioner has failed to show that any fact other than 50 percent was applied to the true 

cash value of the property. 

3. 

Petitioner is asking this Honorable Tribunal to make an underassessment based upon 

an arbitrary basis. 

4. 

A levy of all taxes are required to be made based upon the assessment of 50 percent 

of true cash value as ultimately determined by the process of county and state equalization. 

5. 

Respondent reserves the right to file additional affirmative defenses as may become 

apparent in this case. 

 

 

 

 

 

Respectfully Submitted, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

KIRK, HUTH, LANGE & BADALAMENTI, PLC 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Rosemary V. Davis 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ROSEMARY V. DAVIS (P47336) 

 

 

 

 

 

Attorneys for Respondent 

 

 

 

 

 

19500 Hall Road, Ste. 100 

 

 

 

 

 

Clinton Township, MI 48038 

 

 

 

 

 

(586) 412-4900 

 

Dated: September 16, 2026

Page 5

5 

S:\S\Shelby\Tax Tribunals\Kroger Co. of Michigan 2026\Answer Aff. Defs. & POS.docx 

KIRK , HUTH , LANGE & BADALAMENTI , P . L . C . 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

THE KROGER CO. OF MICHIGAN, 

 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-001551-TT 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Parcel No. 23-07-13-400-070 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF SHELBY, 

 

Respondent. 

 

 

 

 

 

/ 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

 

The undersigned certifies

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISAnswer.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001551

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: 

Local Unit of Government

Local Unit of Government

Township Of Shelby (MACOMB)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Rosemary

M.I.

V.

Last Name

Davis

Firm Name (if any)

Kirk, Huth, Lange & Badalamenti, PLC

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

19500 Hall Road

Ste. 100

City or Town

Clinton Township

State

 Michigan

ZIP Code

48038

Telephone Number

586-412-4900

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

rdavis@kirkhuthlaw.com

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: 

Rosemary V. Davis

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

SCANNED KROGER SHELBY CHARTER TOWNSHIP 26-001551 POS.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

THE KROGER CO OF MICHIGAN 

Petitioner, 

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001551-TT 

Shelby Charter Township, 

Respondent. 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 8% day of 

September 2026 she served a copy of the Petition upon the following persons by placing 

same in an envelope properly addressed to each via USPS first class thereon: 

Anthony Forlini 

Utica Community Schools 

Macomb County Clerk 

Kelli Rankin, School Board Secretary 

40 N. Main St., 1st Floor 

11303 Greendale 

Mt Clemens, MI 48043 

Sterling Heights, MI 48312 

Kristen Sieloff 

Michigan State Treasurer 

Macomb County Equalization Director 

Department of Treasury 

1 S Main, 6 Floor 

Treasury Building 

Mount Clemens, MI 48043 

430 West Allegan 

Lansing, MI 48922 

, 

a 

Mice (0 

oe) 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Authorized Agent

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

THE KROGER CO OF MICHIGAN 

Petitioner, 

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001551-TT 

Shelby Charter Township, 

Respondent. 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 8th day of 

September 2026 she served a copy of the Petition upon the following persons by placing 

same in an envelope properly addressed to each via certified mail thereon: 

Matthew Schmidt 

Rick Stathakis 

Shelby Township Assessor 

Shelby Township Supervisor 

Township Hall Lower Level 

Township Hall Upper Level 

52700 Van Dyke Ave. 

52700 Van Dyke Ave. 

Shelby Township, MI 48316 

Shelby Township, MI 48316 

Stanley Grot 

Shelby Township Clerk 

Township Hall, Upper Level 

52700 Van Dyke Ave. 

Shelby Township, MI 48316 

Mic (0 ve) 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Authorized Agent

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

THE KROGER CO OF MICHIGAN 

, 

MTT Docket No. 26-001551-TT 

Petitioner. 

v 

Shelby Charter Township 

Respondent. 

/ 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Alex Morse 

Cameron Beckner 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 

Indianapolis, IN 46240 

(317) 596-3260 

msilvey@dmainc.com 

amorse@dmainc.com 

cbeckner@dmainc.com 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No.: 23-07-13-400-070 

2. 

The property identified above is real 

3. 

Only one parcel of property is the subject of this appeal. 

4. 

Petitioner owns and/or otherwise holds an interest in the parcel of property that is the 

subject of this appeal. 

5. 

The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial-Improved

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 26-001551-TT 

Page 2 of 3 

6. 

The assessment(s) at issue were not protested to Respondent’s March, July, or December 

Board of Review as a protest was not required. 

7. 

The property or properties at issue are in Macomb 

County. 

8. 

The property or properties’ address is: 

14945 23 Mile Road, Shelby Township, MI 48315 

9. 

The assessment(s) at issue were established by the: Shelby Charter Township 

10. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 

1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH 45202 

11. This appeal involves issues relating to the property or properties’ true cash and taxable 

values and uniformity. 

12. The tax year at issue is: 2026. 

13. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 2026 Board 

of Review are: 

Tax 

True Cash 

Assessed 

Taxable 

Year 

Value 

Value 

Value 

2026 

$15,886,000 

$7,943,000 

$4,630,901 

14. Petitioner contends the values for tax year 2026 are no more than the following: 

Tax 

True Cash 

State Equalized 

Taxable 

Year 

Value 

Value 

Value 

2026 

$5,429,610 

$2,714,805 

$2,714,805 

15. The values in contention for tax year 2026 are: 

Tax 

True Cash 

State Equalized 

Taxable 

Year 

Value 

Value 

Value 

2026 

$10,456,390 

$5,228,195 

$1,916,096

Page 5

MTT Docket No. 26-001551-TT 

Page 3 of 3 

16. The 2026 assessments imposed on the subject property and the taxes to be levied and 

collected are invalid because: 

(a) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount 

permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

(b) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, is at a higher 

percentage of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and 

applicable statutes; 

(c) The assessment is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and 

(d) The assessment otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights. 

WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests this honorable Tribunal hear this case and 

enter an order reducing the 2026 true cash, state equalized and taxable values and direct 

Respondent to refund to Petitioner any excess taxes, fees, and penalties paid, plus interest and 

costs, and all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan law and as is appropriate under 

the circumstances. 

Respectfully submitted, 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Mics (0 Dose 

Dated: May 

27 2026 

By: 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Petitioner's Representative

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 26-001551

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No

Party Filing Document 

Petitioner

Files

Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition

Attachment File Name: SCANNED KROGER SHELBY CHARTER TOWNSHIP 26-001551 POS

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 0.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 0.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Kroger - Shelby Charter Township.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

__________________________________________, 

MTT Docket No. 26-_____BBB_-TT

Petitioner, 

v 

__________________________________________, 

Respondent. 

______________________________/ 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Alex Morse 

Cameron Beckner 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 

Indianapolis, IN 46240 

(317) 596-3260

msilvey@dmainc.com

amorse@dmainc.com

cbeckner@dmainc.com

______________________________/ 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. Property Parcel No.: ________________________________

2. The property identified above is _________________.

3. Only one parcel of property is the subject of this appeal.

4. Petitioner owns and/or otherwise holds an interest in the parcel of property that is the

subject of this appeal.

5. The property identified above is classified as ___________________________________.

THE KROGER CO OF MICHIGAN

Shelby Charter Township

23-07-13-400-070

real

201 Commercial-Improved

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-______BBB-TT

Page 2 of 3 

6. The assessment(s) at issue were not protested to Respondent’s March, July, or December

Board of Review as a protest was not required.

7. The property or properties at issue are in ________________ County.

8. The property or properties’ address is:

______________________________________________________________________.

9. The assessment(s) at issue were established by the: _____________________________.

10. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is:

______________________________________________________________________.

11. This appeal involves issues relating to the property or properties’ true cash and taxable

values and uniformity.

12. The tax year at issue is: 2026.

13. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 2026 Board

of Review are:

Tax 

Year 

True Cash 

Value 

Assessed 

Value 

Taxable 

Value 

2026 

14. Petitioner contends the values for tax year 2026 are no more than the following:

Tax 

Year 

True Cash 

Value 

State Equalized 

Value 

Taxable 

Value 

2026 

15. The values in contention for tax year 2026 are:

Tax 

Year 

True Cash 

Value 

State Equalized 

Value 

Taxable 

Value 

2026 

 Macomb 

 14945 23 Mile Road, Shelby Township, MI 48315

Shelby Charter Township

 1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH 45202

$15,886,000

$7,943,000

$4,630,901

$5,429,610

$2,714,805

$2,714,805

$10,456,390

$5,228,195

$1,916,096

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 26-_____BBB_-TT 

Page 3 of 3 

16. The 2026 assessments imposed on the subject property and the taxes to be levied and

collected are invalid because:

(a) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount

permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes;

(b) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, is at a higher

percentage of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and

applicable statutes;

(c) The assessment is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and

(d) The assessment otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights.

WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests this honorable Tribunal hear this case and 

enter an order reducing the 2026 true cash, state equalized and taxable values and direct 

Respondent to refund to Petitioner any excess taxes, fees, and penalties paid, plus interest and 

costs, and all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan law and as is appropriate under 

the circumstances. 

Respectfully submitted, 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Dated: __________ ___, 2026

By: 

______________________________

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494)

Petitioner’s Representative

May

27

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

THE KROGER CO OF MICHIGAN

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

1014 Vine Street

City or Town

Cincinnati

State

Ohio

ZIP Code

45202

Telephone Number

9174887825

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

msilvey@dmainc.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Michelle (Mikki)

M.I.

M

Last Name

Silvey

Firm Name (if any)

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

9229 Delegates Row, Ste 375

City or Town

Indianapolis

State

Indiana

ZIP Code

46240

Telephone Number

917-488-7825

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

msilvey@dmainc.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

14945 23 Mile Road

Shelby Township

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

48315

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Township Of Shelby (MACOMB) 

County

Macomb

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

23-07-13-400-070

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

7943000

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

4630901

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

5429610

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

2714805

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

2714805

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey

Payment Information

Amount: 600

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26052787079580

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-08-18_07-10-04.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

The Kroger Co of Michigan, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 26-001551

Township Of Shelby, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: August 18, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Kroger - Shelby Charter Township.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

__________________________________________, 

MTT Docket No. 26-_____BBB_-TT

Petitioner, 

v 

__________________________________________, 

Respondent. 

______________________________/ 

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) 

Alex Morse 

Cameron Beckner 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 

Indianapolis, IN 46240 

(317) 596-3260

msilvey@dmainc.com

amorse@dmainc.com

cbeckner@dmainc.com

______________________________/ 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. Property Parcel No.: ________________________________

2. The property identified above is _________________.

3. Only one parcel of property is the subject of this appeal.

4. Petitioner owns and/or otherwise holds an interest in the parcel of property that is the

subject of this appeal.

5. The property identified above is classified as ___________________________________.

THE KROGER CO OF MICHIGAN

Shelby Charter Township

23-07-13-400-070

real

201 Commercial-Improved

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-______BBB-TT

Page 2 of 3 

6. The assessment(s) at issue were not protested to Respondent’s March, July, or December

Board of Review as a protest was not required.

7. The property or properties at issue are in ________________ County.

8. The property or properties’ address is:

______________________________________________________________________.

9. The assessment(s) at issue were established by the: _____________________________.

10. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is:

______________________________________________________________________.

11. This appeal involves issues relating to the property or properties’ true cash and taxable

values and uniformity.

12. The tax year at issue is: 2026.

13. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 2026 Board

of Review are:

Tax 

Year 

True Cash 

Value 

Assessed 

Value 

Taxable 

Value 

2026 

14. Petitioner contends the values for tax year 2026 are no more than the following:

Tax 

Year 

True Cash 

Value 

State Equalized 

Value 

Taxable 

Value 

2026 

15. The values in contention for tax year 2026 are:

Tax 

Year 

True Cash 

Value 

State Equalized 

Value 

Taxable 

Value 

2026 

 Macomb 

 14945 23 Mile Road, Shelby Township, MI 48315

Shelby Charter Township

 1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH 45202

$15,886,000

$7,943,000

$4,630,901

$5,429,610

$2,714,805

$2,714,805

$10,456,390

$5,228,195

$1,916,096

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 26-_____BBB_-TT 

Page 3 of 3 

16. The 2026 assessments imposed on the subject property and the taxes to be levied and

collected are invalid because:

(a) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount

permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes;

(b) The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, is at a higher

percentage of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and

applicable statutes;

(c) The assessment is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and

(d) The assessment otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights.

WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests this honorable Tribunal hear this case and 

enter an order reducing the 2026 true cash, state equalized and taxable values and direct 

Respondent to refund to Petitioner any excess taxes, fees, and penalties paid, plus interest and 

costs, and all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan law and as is appropriate under 

the circumstances. 

Respectfully submitted, 

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. 

Dated: __________ ___, 2026

By: 

______________________________

Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494)

Petitioner’s Representative

May

27

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

THE KROGER CO OF MICHIGAN

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

1014 Vine Street

City or Town

Cincinnati

State

Ohio

ZIP Code

45202

Telephone Number

9174887825

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

msilvey@dmainc.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Michelle (Mikki)

M.I.

M

Last Name

Silvey

Firm Name (if any)

DuCharme, McMillen & Associates

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

9229 Delegates Row, Ste 375

City or Town

Indianapolis

State

Indiana

ZIP Code

46240

Telephone Number

917-488-7825

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

msilvey@dmainc.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

14945 23 Mile Road

Shelby Township

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

48315

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Township Of Shelby (MACOMB) 

County

Macomb

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

23-07-13-400-070

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

7943000

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

4630901

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

5429610

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

2714805

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

2714805

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey

Payment Information

Amount: 600

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26052787079580

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.