Record Finder / 26-000783-TT
Michigan

Tc Bay Resort LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of East Bay Respondent

Petitioner
Tc Bay Resort LLC
Respondent
Township Of East Bay

Case overview

Docket number
26-000783-TT
Status
Ready Sched Prehearing Date Certain
CaseType
ET Property
Division
ET
County
Grand Traverse
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
8Prehearing General CallNot recordedNot recorded08/17/2026Not recordedDownload
7Proof of Service of Misc Documents was received.RESPNot recorded07/20/2026Not recordedDownload
6AppearanceRESPNot recorded07/20/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
5Answer was receivedRESPNot recorded07/20/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
4Proof of service of petition was received.Not recordedNot recorded06/26/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
3Petition has been verifiedPET106/10/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
2Notice of Docket Number ETNot recordedNot recorded06/10/2026Not recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded05/07/2026$600.00Download
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload

Documents

Prehearing_General_Call.2026-08-17_10-50-30.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906

NOTICE OF JULY 16- 30, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF 

PROCEDURE

TC Bay Resort LLC,

Petitioner,

v

 

 

Township Of East Bay,

Respondent.

 MTT Docket No. 26-000783

Please be advised that 26-000783 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General 

Call commencing July 16, 2027. Unless ordered otherwise, parties will be notified at 

least 28 days before they are scheduled to appear. Scheduling will not necessarily 

occur in the order in which the cases are listed below.

Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no 

valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” 

is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a 

party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the 

subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and 

data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning. See TTR 203 and TTR 241.

Users who file documents with the Tribunal are advised that filed documents are 

public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tribunal’s Tax Docket 

Lookup. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Tribunal and 

prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for 

Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents 

covered by the order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a 

Protective Order will be published.

In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9) and TTR 209, the responsibility for excluding or 

redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to 

the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not 

responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing 

for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested 

person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII 

contained in a previously filed document by submitting a Request for Redactions. The 

Request for Redactions form is available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages 

of the Tribunal’s website. 

Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on the Tribunal’s 

website for more information.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-000783

Page 2 of 3

IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall:

a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties 

in writing within 21 days of entry of this order that no valuation disclosure is being 

filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure 

is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.).

b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures 

by March 19, 2027. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence 

unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though 

admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their Prehearing 

Statements by March 19, 2027. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal witnesses, will 

not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the 

Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this order except upon a finding 

of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement may result in 

holding a party or parties in default. See TTR 237. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on 

March 19, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel 

have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that 

date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of litigating 

this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not permitted 

during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on 

July 16, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel 

have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that 

date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is

Page 3

MTT

Page 4

S

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

26-000783 POS09923120260720091754.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

TC BAY RESORT LLC, 

Petitioner, 

MTT Docket No. 26-000783 

\% 

EAST BAY CHARTER TOWNSHIP, 

Respondent. 

Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) 

Robert E. Thall (P46421) 

Attorney for Petitioner 

Bauckham, Thall, Seeber, Kaufman 

1750 S. Telegraph Rd., Ste. 202 

& Koches, P.C. 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0179 

Attorney for Respondent 

(248) 731-3089 

470 W. Centre Ave., Ste. A 

lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com 

Portage, MI 49024 

(269) 382-4500 

thall@michigantownshiplaw.com 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Sandra Bosse states that on July 20, 2026, she served a copy of an Appearance, Answer 

and Proof of Service in this matter by first-class mail, postage fully prepaid, upon attorney for the 

Petitioner at the addresses as listed above. 

ye, 

L 

bonis 

Sf OAL 

Sandra Bosse

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

26-000783 APP09923020260720091723.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

TC BAY RESORT LLC, 

Petitioner, 

\% 

EAST BAY CHARTER TOWNSHIP, 

Respondent. 

MTT Docket No. 26-000783 

Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) 

Attorney for Petitioner 

1750 S. Telegraph Rd., Ste. 202 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0179 

(248) 731-3089 

lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com 

Robert E. Thall (P46421) 

Bauckham, Thall, Seeber, Kaufman 

& Koches, P.C. 

Attorney for Respondent 

470 W. Centre Ave., Ste. A 

Portage, MI 49024 

(269) 382-4500 

thall@michigantownshiplaw.com 

APPEARANCE 

Attorney Robert E. Thall of the law firm of Bauckham, Thall, Seeber, Kaufman & Koches, 

P.C., enters this appearance for and on behalf of Respondent, East Bay Charter Township, in this 

matter. 

Date: July 20, 2026 

Respectfully submitted, 

BAUCKHAM, THALL, SEEBER, 

KAUFMAN & KOCHES, P.C 

, 

/ 

o A

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 26-000783

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No

Party Filing Document 

Respondent

Files

Document Type: Appearance

Attachment File Name: 26-000783 APP09923020260720091723

Document Type: Proof of Service: Misc Documents

Attachment File Name: 26-000783 POS09923120260720091754

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 0.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 0.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

26-000783 ANSWER09922920260720091650.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

TC BAY RESORT LLC, 

Petitioner, 

Vv 

EAST BAY CHARTER TOWNSHIP, 

Respondent. 

MTT Docket No. 26-000783 

Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) 

Attorney for Petitioner 

1750 S. Telegraph Rd., Ste. 202 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0179 

(248) 731-3089 

Robert E. Thall (P46421) 

Bauckham, Thall, Seeber, Kaufman 

& Koches, P.C. 

Attorney for Respondent 

470 W. Centre Ave., Ste. A 

lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com 

Portage, MI 49024 

(269) 382-4500 

thall@michigantownshiplaw.com 

ANSWER TO PETITION WITH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

Respondent, East Bay Charter Township, states the following in response to the respective 

paragraphs of the Petition filed in this matter: 

1. 

In answer to paragraph 

1 

of the Petition, Respondent admits the allegations 

contained therein. 

2. 

In answer to paragraph 2 of the Petition, no answer is required. 

3. 

In answer to paragraph 3 of the Petition, Respondent admits the allegations therein. 

4. 

In answer to paragraph 4 of the Petition, Respondent neither admits nor denies and

Page 2

6. 

In answer to paragraph 6 of the Petition, Respondent admits the allegations therein. 

7. 

In answer to paragraph 7 of the Petition, Respondent admits the allegation therein. 

8. 

In answer to paragraph 8 of the Petition, Respondent admits the allegations therein. 

9. 

In answer to paragraph 9 of the Petition, Respondent denies the allegations therein 

as untrue. 

10. 

In answer to paragraph 10 of the Petition, Respondent admits the values in dispute. 

11. 

In answer to paragraph 11, including (a) through (d), of the Petition, Respondent 

denies the allegations therein as untrue. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent respectfully request that the Tribunal enter an Order denying 

the relief requested by Petitioner and uphold and affirm the valuation as established by the 

Respondent and require Petitioner to pay Respondent’s costs and attorney fees. 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

Please take notice that Respondent may rely on one or more of the following affirmative 

defenses: 

1. 

Petitioner has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 

2. 

The Tribunal lacks jurisdiction over Petitioner and/or the subject property. 

3. 

The service of process was insufficient. 

4. 

The subject property is under assessed and/or the taxable value and/or state equalized value 

of the subject property is too low, and should therefore be appropriately increased to comply with 

the mandate of the applicable provisions of law.

Page 3

WHEREFORE Respondent requests that the Tribunal enter a determination of no cause in 

its favor, and such other and further relief as is appropriate including costs and attorney fees. 

Date: July 20, 2026 

Respectfully submitted, 

BAUCKHAM, SPARKS, THALL, SEEBER, 

& KAUFMAN, 

P.C. 

~ 

- 

ZM/ 

By: 

| 

/Robert E. THall 

Attorney for Respondent

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISAnswer.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-000783

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: 

Local Unit of Government

Local Unit of Government

Township Of East Bay (GRAND TRAVERSE)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Robert

M.I.

E

Last Name

Thall

Firm Name (if any)

Bauckham, Thall, et al

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

470 W Centre Ave Suite A

City or Town

Kalamazoo

State

 Michigan

ZIP Code

49024

Telephone Number

2693824500

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

thall@michigantownshiplaw.com

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: 

Robert E Thall

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

 

TC Bay Resort LLC, 

 

Petitioner, 

 

vs. 

 

East Bay Charter Township, 

Respondent.

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 26-000783 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

(Property Tax Petition) 

 

On the date below I sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, a copy of the Petition to: 

 

Township Assessor 

East Bay Charter Township 

1965 N. Three Mile Rd. 

Traverse City, MI 49696 

Township Clerk 

East Bay Charter Township 

1965 N. Three Mile Rd. 

Traverse City, MI 49696 

 

On the date below I sent by first class mail a copy of the Petition to: 

 

Equalization Director 

Grand Traverse County 

400 Boardman Ave, Suite 103 

Traverse City, MI 49684 

County Clerk 

Grand Traverse County 

400 Boardman Ave, Suite 101 

Traverse City, MI 49684 

Secretary, Board of Education 

Traverse City Area Public Schools 

1009 S. Oak Street 

Traverse City, MI 49684

State Treasurer 

Department of Treasury 

430 W. Allegan Street 

Lansing, MI 48922

 

 

I declare that the statements above are true to the best of my information, knowledge and belief. 

 

 

 

/s/ Laura M. Hallahan 

 

Dated: June 26, 2026

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

TC Bay Resort LLC, 

Petitioner, 

v 

East Bay Charter Township, 

Respondent. 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Docket No. 26-000783

Parcel No. 03-208-062-00 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

PETITION 

(Entire Tribunal, 2026 Tax Year) 

Petitioner, by and through its attorneys, Hallahan & Associates, P.C., contends: 

1.

☒ The property that is the subject of this appeal is one real property parcel:

Parcel Number 

03-208-062-00

Address 

1942 US 31 North 

Classification 

201 Commercial 

Use 

Hotel 

County 

Grand Traverse 

Sch Dist Traverse City Area Public 

Schools 

2.

☒ N/A. If the assessment at issue was protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s:

☐March, ☐ July, ☐ December Board of Review.

3.

Respondent, identified above, assesses and collects taxes on the subject property.

4.

Petitioner is a taxpayer/party-in-interest with respect to property taxes on the subject

property.

5.

The Petitioner’s principal office/legal residence address is: 469 Enterprise Court,

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302.

6.

This appeal involves issues related to:

☒

the subject property’s true cash and taxable values

☐

the subject property’s taxable value only

there is a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss: ☐ Yes ☐ No

☐

uniformity of the subject property’s assessment

☐

the subject property’s exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______

7.

The tax year at issue is 2026.

Page 3

Petition 

2 

8. 

The values1 established by Respondent’s Board of Review for the subject property are: 

 

 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

 

03-208-062-00 

10,611,000 

5,305,500 

4,676,484 

9. 

Petitioner contends that the values1 for the subject property are: 

 

 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

 

03-208-062-00 

5,520,000 

2,760,000 

2,760,000 

10. 

The values1 in dispute are: 

 

 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

 

03-208-062-00 

5,091,000 

2,545,500 

1,916,484 

11. 

Petitioner relies upon the following to support the relief requested: 

The 2026 values imposed on Petitioner’s property, and the taxes to be levied and collected 

thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons 

that: 

(a) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values exceed the amounts permitted 

by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

(b) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are at higher percentages of true 

cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable 

statutes; 

(c) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are based upon an erroneous 

determination of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner’s property that is 

taxable under Michigan law and are based upon the application of wrong principles; 

and 

(d) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values, and the mode of assessment 

adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its 

constitutional rights of uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. 

Petitioner requests that the Tribunal enter an order reducing the 2026 values from those established 

by Respondent’s Board of Review to those contended by Petitioner, and order refunds attributable 

to the reductions, with interest, as provided by the Tax Tribunal Act. 

 

1TCV=true cash value, SEV=state equalized value, TV=taxable value.

Page 4

Petit

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 26-000783

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No

Party Filing Document 

Petitioner

Files

Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition

Attachment File Name: Petition - POS

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 0.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 0.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Petition 2026 - TC Bay Resort.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

 

TC Bay Resort LLC, 

 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

East Bay Charter Township, 

 

Respondent. 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Docket No. 

Parcel No. 03-208-062-00 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

PETITION 

(Entire Tribunal, 2026 Tax Year) 

 

Petitioner, by and through its attorneys, Hallahan & Associates, P.C., contends: 

1. 

☒ The property that is the subject of this appeal is one real property parcel: 

Parcel Number 

03-208-062-00 

Address 

1942 US 31 North 

Classification 

201 Commercial 

Use 

Hotel 

County 

Grand Traverse 

Sch Dist Traverse City Area Public 

Schools 

 

2. 

☒ N/A. If the assessment at issue was protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s: 

☐ March, ☐ July, ☐ December Board of Review. 

3. 

Respondent, identified above, assesses and collects taxes on the subject property. 

4. 

Petitioner is a taxpayer/party-in-interest with respect to property taxes on the subject 

property. 

5. 

The Petitioner’s principal office/legal residence address is: 469 Enterprise Court, 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302. 

6. 

This appeal involves issues related to: 

☒ 

the subject property’s true cash and taxable values 

☐ 

the subject property’s taxable value only 

 

there is a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss: ☐ Yes ☐ No 

☐ 

uniformity of the subject property’s assessment 

☐ 

the subject property’s exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______ 

7. 

The tax year at issue is 2026.

Page 2

Petition 

2 

8. 

The values1 established by Respondent’s Board of Review for the subject property are: 

 

 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

 

03-208-062-00 

10,611,000 

5,305,500 

4,676,484 

9. 

Petitioner contends that the values1 for the subject property are: 

 

 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

 

03-208-062-00 

5,520,000 

2,760,000 

2,760,000 

10. 

The values1 in dispute are: 

 

 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

 

03-208-062-00 

5,091,000 

2,545,500 

1,916,484 

11. 

Petitioner relies upon the following to support the relief requested: 

The 2026 values imposed on Petitioner’s property, and the taxes to be levied and collected 

thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons 

that: 

(a) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values exceed the amounts permitted 

by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

(b) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are at higher percentages of true 

cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable 

statutes; 

(c) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are based upon an erroneous 

determination of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner’s property that is 

taxable under Michigan law and are based upon the application of wrong principles; 

and 

(d) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values, and the mode of assessment 

adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its 

constitutional rights of uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. 

Petitioner requests that the Tribunal enter an order reducing the 2026 values from those established 

by Respondent’s Board of Review to those contended by Petitioner, and order refunds attributable 

to the reductions, with interest, as provided by the Tax Tribunal Act. 

 

1TCV=true cash value, SEV=state equalized value, TV=taxable value.

Page 3

Petition 

3 

 

HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

 

 

/s/ Laura M. Hallahan 

 

Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) 

Attorney for Petitioner 

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0179 

(248) 731-3089 

Dated: May 7, 2026 

lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com 

 

Filing Fee: $600

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

MITATEntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

TC Bay Resort LLC

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

469 Enterprise Court

City or Town

Bloomfield Hills

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48302

Telephone Number

(248) 731-3090

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

MTT@hallahanlaw.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Laura

M.I.

Last Name

Hallahan

Firm Name (if any)

Hallahan & Associates PC

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202

City or Town

Bloomfield Hills

State

22

ZIP Code

48302

Telephone Number

248-731-3089

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

mtt@hallahanlaw.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

1942 US 31 North

Traverse City

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Michigan

49686

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Township Of East Bay (GRAND TRAVERSE) 

County

Grand Traverse

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

03-208-062-00

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

5305500

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

4676484

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

5520000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

2760000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Laura M. Hallahan

Payment Information

Amount: 600

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26050784416741

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-06-10_17-52-03.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

TC Bay Resort LLC, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 26-000783

Township Of East Bay, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: __Tribunal Clerk________

Entered: June 10, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Petition 2026 - TC Bay Resort.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

 

TC Bay Resort LLC, 

 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

East Bay Charter Township, 

 

Respondent. 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Docket No. 

Parcel No. 03-208-062-00 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

PETITION 

(Entire Tribunal, 2026 Tax Year) 

 

Petitioner, by and through its attorneys, Hallahan & Associates, P.C., contends: 

1. 

☒ The property that is the subject of this appeal is one real property parcel: 

Parcel Number 

03-208-062-00 

Address 

1942 US 31 North 

Classification 

201 Commercial 

Use 

Hotel 

County 

Grand Traverse 

Sch Dist Traverse City Area Public 

Schools 

 

2. 

☒ N/A. If the assessment at issue was protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s: 

☐ March, ☐ July, ☐ December Board of Review. 

3. 

Respondent, identified above, assesses and collects taxes on the subject property. 

4. 

Petitioner is a taxpayer/party-in-interest with respect to property taxes on the subject 

property. 

5. 

The Petitioner’s principal office/legal residence address is: 469 Enterprise Court, 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302. 

6. 

This appeal involves issues related to: 

☒ 

the subject property’s true cash and taxable values 

☐ 

the subject property’s taxable value only 

 

there is a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss: ☐ Yes ☐ No 

☐ 

uniformity of the subject property’s assessment 

☐ 

the subject property’s exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______ 

7. 

The tax year at issue is 2026.

Page 2

Petition 

2 

8. 

The values1 established by Respondent’s Board of Review for the subject property are: 

 

 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

 

03-208-062-00 

10,611,000 

5,305,500 

4,676,484 

9. 

Petitioner contends that the values1 for the subject property are: 

 

 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

 

03-208-062-00 

5,520,000 

2,760,000 

2,760,000 

10. 

The values1 in dispute are: 

 

 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

 

03-208-062-00 

5,091,000 

2,545,500 

1,916,484 

11. 

Petitioner relies upon the following to support the relief requested: 

The 2026 values imposed on Petitioner’s property, and the taxes to be levied and collected 

thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons 

that: 

(a) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values exceed the amounts permitted 

by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

(b) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are at higher percentages of true 

cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable 

statutes; 

(c) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are based upon an erroneous 

determination of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner’s property that is 

taxable under Michigan law and are based upon the application of wrong principles; 

and 

(d) 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values, and the mode of assessment 

adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its 

constitutional rights of uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. 

Petitioner requests that the Tribunal enter an order reducing the 2026 values from those established 

by Respondent’s Board of Review to those contended by Petitioner, and order refunds attributable 

to the reductions, with interest, as provided by the Tax Tribunal Act. 

 

1TCV=true cash value, SEV=state equalized value, TV=taxable value.

Page 3

Petition 

3 

 

HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

 

 

/s/ Laura M. Hallahan 

 

Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) 

Attorney for Petitioner 

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0179 

(248) 731-3089 

Dated: May 7, 2026 

lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com 

 

Filing Fee: $600

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

MITATEntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

TC Bay Resort LLC

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

469 Enterprise Court

City or Town

Bloomfield Hills

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48302

Telephone Number

(248) 731-3090

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

MTT@hallahanlaw.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Laura

M.I.

Last Name

Hallahan

Firm Name (if any)

Hallahan & Associates PC

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202

City or Town

Bloomfield Hills

State

22

ZIP Code

48302

Telephone Number

248-731-3089

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

mtt@hallahanlaw.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

1942 US 31 North

Traverse City

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Michigan

49686

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Township Of East Bay (GRAND TRAVERSE) 

County

Grand Traverse

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

03-208-062-00

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

5305500

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

4676484

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

5520000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

2760000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Laura M. Hallahan

Payment Information

Amount: 600

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26050784416741

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.