Robert Edwards, Jean Edwards, Petitioners Vs. Township Of Schoolcraft, Respondent

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Robert Edwards and Jean Edwards, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioners, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-003075 

 

Schoolcraft Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER DENYING PETITIONERS’ MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT 

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

 

On September 16, 2025, Petitioners filed a motion and paid the applicable motion fee, 

requesting that the Tribunal set aside the default entered on August 1, 2025.1 

Respondent did not respond to the motion. 

 

On October 30, 2025, the Tribunal issued an order placing Petitioners’ motion in 

abeyance and extending the time for Petitioners to cure the default by an additional 14 

days, stating that while Petitioners partially complied with Tribunal rules by filing a 

Motion to Set Aside Default and paying the fee required for the filing of the motion,2 

Petitioners failed to pay the fee required for the filing of the petition. Though Petitioners 

timely responded by paying the required petition filing fee on November 8, 2025, the 

Tribunal issued a third order extending the time for Petitioners to cure the default. In 

that order the Tribunal clarified that although Petitioners had satisfied the requirements 

of the initial default, Petitioners had failed to file proper proof evidencing the service of 

the petition.3 Petitioners were allowed an additional 14 days to respond, have had 

ample time to reply, yet have failed to respond or submit the requested filings. As such, 

granting the motion is not warranted. 

 

Furthermore, the Tribunal finds that Petitioners have not complied with the orders 

extending default, which stated that “failure to comply with this order may result in the 

dismissal of the case” and referenced Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury.4 In Grimm, the 

Michigan Court of Appeals summarized factors that the Tribunal should consider before 

imposing the sanction of dismissal. Those factors are: 

 

(1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of 

refusing to comply with previous court orders; (3) the prejudice to the 

 

1 Petitioner failed to respond to the order of default and the Tribunal issued an order extending the default 

on September 9, 2025, allowing Petitioner an additional 14 days to respond to the default. 

2 A list of Tribunal rules can be found online at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

3 TTR 227. 

4 Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-003075 

Page 2 of 3 

 

opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) the 

degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) attempts to 

cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better serve the 

interests of justice.5 

 

Here, Petitioners’ failure to comply with multiple orders has established a history of 

deliberate delay. As a result, giving careful consideration to the factors involved and 

considering all options in determining what sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal 

finds that dismissal is appropriate, and a lesser sanction would not be appropriate in 

light of Petitioners’ history of noncompliance in this case. Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioners’ Motion to Set Aside Default is DENIED. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 

 

This order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. 

 

APPEAL RIGHTS 

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for 

reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of 

Appeals. 

 

A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee 

within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision 

closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing 

system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such 

motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless

Page 3

MTT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

ocr. 03 2025 

Tranlnfo:4606 

 26060374-1 

10/02/25 

er, 

Chki: 

2682 

Ant: $60.00 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

peg 

ID: 

ROBERT EDWARDS 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

Robert sean Edwards, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

f 

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-0307 

Sehaoleratt-Counpy Board of feview 

Respondent(s) 

MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT 

1. 

A default was entered against me on August | 202% 

and, if applicable, the default 

was extended on Set. 5 2025. 

2. 

Good cause exists to set aside the default because: 

we do pot have a computer; nor refrable miernet access: 

Yheretore we did not receive the defn 

lr notice unis ater 

the time 

had expired 7o respond. 

3. 

| ask this Tribunal to set aside the default. 

| 

Gon Epes 

Payfy/Representative (sign here) 

ean 

LL. Edwards 

[Print/type name of person signing] 

| certify that on this date 

| served a copy of this Motion, and any additional documentation, on the 

opposing party or their representative.

Page 2

wu please Se 

re 

JE

Page 3

KINGSFORD MI 

498 A 

Edwards 

16 SEP 2025 

PM1 

L 

1775 

52340 Mink Farm Rd. 

Lake Linden, MI 49945 

¥ 

Michypar Jae Tribunal 

P.0. Box 50285" 

lansing, MI 45909 

SESE 

TFEEEE 

THRU CUTE ART 

To 

TA

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Robert Edwards and Jean Edwards, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioners, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-003075 

 

Schoolcraft Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER DENYING PETITIONERS’ MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT 

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

 

On September 16, 2025, Petitioners filed a motion and paid the applicable motion fee, 

requesting that the Tribunal set aside the default entered on August 1, 2025.1 

Respondent did not respond to the motion. 

 

On October 30, 2025, the Tribunal issued an order placing Petitioners’ motion in 

abeyance and extending the time for Petitioners to cure the default by an additional 14 

days, stating that while Petitioners partially complied with Tribunal rules by filing a 

Motion to Set Aside Default and paying the fee required for the filing of the motion,2 

Petitioners failed to pay the fee required for the filing of the petition. Though Petitioners 

timely responded by paying the required petition filing fee on November 8, 2025, the 

Tribunal issued a third order extending the time for Petitioners to cure the default. In 

that order the Tribunal clarified that although Petitioners had satisfied the requirements 

of the initial default, Petitioners had failed to file proper proof evidencing the service of 

the petition.3 Petitioners were allowed an additional 14 days to respond, have had 

ample time to reply, yet have failed to respond or submit the requested filings. As such, 

granting the motion is not warranted. 

 

Furthermore, the Tribunal finds that Petitioners have not complied with the orders 

extending default, which stated that “failure to comply with this order may result in the 

dismissal of the case” and referenced Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury.4 In Grimm, the 

Michigan Court of Appeals summarized factors that the Tribunal should consider before 

imposing the sanction of dismissal. Those factors are: 

 

(1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of 

refusing to comply with previous court orders; (3) the prejudice to the 

 

1 Petitioner failed to respond to the order of default and the Tribunal issued an order extending the default 

on September 9, 2025, allowing Petitioner an additional 14 days to respond to the default. 

2 A list of Tribunal rules can be found online at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

3 TTR 227. 

4 Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-003075 

Page 2 of 3 

 

opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) the 

degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) attempts to 

cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better serve the 

interests of justice.5 

 

Here, Petitioners’ failure to comply with multiple orders has established a history of 

deliberate delay. As a result, giving careful consideration to the factors involved and 

considering all options in determining what sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal 

finds that dismissal is appropriate, and a lesser sanction would not be appropriate in 

light of Petitioners’ history of noncompliance in this case. Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioners’ Motion to Set Aside Default is DENIED. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 

 

This order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. 

 

APPEAL RIGHTS 

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for 

reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of 

Appeals. 

 

A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee 

within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision 

closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing 

system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such 

motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless

Page 3

MTT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Robert Edwards & Jean Edwards, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioners, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-003075 

 

Schoolcraft Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONERS TO CURE DEFAULT 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that it entered an order 

holding Petitioners’ Motion to Set Aside Default in abeyance on October 30, 2025, and 

an Order Extending Time for Petitioners to Cure Default. Pursuant to the order, 

Petitioners were required to pay the fee required for the filing of the petition within 14 

days. Though Petitioners timely responded and submitted the required filing fee, and 

thus have cured the initial default, they have not filed a proper proof evidencing service 

of the petition, as required by TTR 227.1 

 

Petitioners opted to file their appeal in the Entire Tribunal, which utilizes a formal 

hearing process to resolve disputes, and they are therefore required to serve the 

petition with “noted docket number” on all six of the following parties-in-interest: (1) the 

certified assessor or board of assessors, (2) the township supervisor or clerk, (3) the 

county equalization director, (4) the county clerk, (5) the secretary of the local school 

board, and (6) the treasurer of this state. The assessor and township supervisor or 

clerk must be served by certified mail or personal service; all other parties may be 

served by first class mail or personal service. The proof of service filed with the petition 

was filed prior to the Tribunal assigning a docket number, and it indicates that only two 

of the parties-in-interest were served with the undocketed petition. As such, and 

inasmuch as Petitioners are subject to default for proper proof of service, the Tribunal 

finds an extension of the current default appropriate. 

 

Petitioners’ appeal qualifies for the Small Claims Division, which utilizes an informal 

hearing process to resolve disputes, based on the classification of the property at issue 

and amount in dispute. Petitioners may therefore file a written motion requesting to 

have the case transferred to the Small Claims Division in lieu of the required proof of 

service discussed above. The motion must be accompanied by a completed Small 

Claims petition form and the required $50.00 motion fee. 

 

 

1 The Notice of Docket Number issued on August 1, 2025 stated: “This docket number shall be noted on 

the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by 

TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition as served when filed. A proof of service shall also be 

filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition.”

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-003075 

Page 2 of 2 

 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioners to cure the default is EXTENDED. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners must complete the following to cure the 

default: File proof evidencing service of the Entire Tribunal petition on all six parties-in-

interest in the manner required by TTR 227. Alternatively, Petitioners may file a motion 

requesting to transfer the case to the Small Claims division with Small Claims petition 

form and $50.00 motion fee. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 

days of entry of this order.2 

 

Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of the case, as provided by 

TTR 237.3 

 

Entered: November 26, 2025 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

ejg 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

 

2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

NOV 17 2025 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY FEE CALCULATOR 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Enter State Equalized Value (SEV) of single parcel of parcel having highest value: 

Enter what you pelieve this parcel would sell for (True Cash Value). 

Amount in dispute: 

$0.00 

Filing fee due: 

$250.00 

Number of contiguous parcels 

Filing fee for contiguous parcels 

$0.00 

Total filing fee due: 

$250.00 

USE THIS CALCULATOR |F ONLY TAXABLE VALUE (TV) 1S AT |SSUE 

Enter TV of single parce! Of parcel having highest TV: 

Enter what you pelieve the TV should be: 

Amount in dispute: 

$0.00 

Filing fee due: 

$250.00 

Number of contiguous parcels 

Filing fee for contiguous parcels 

$0.00 

Total filing fee due: 

$250.00 

Disclaimer: 

Every effort has been made to ensure accuracy between the Tax Tribunal's Calculator and the Tax 

Tribunal's Rules. However, the MTT makes nO guarantee that the fee calculated bY using this 

calculator will agree with the MTT Rules. \f there is @ discrepancy: the Tax Tribunal's Rules will 

supersede.

Page 2

Edwards 

52340 Mink Farm Rd 

iE 

KINGSFORD MI 498 

ond 

a. 

Lake Linden, M1 49945-9618 

| XX Kk kkk 

8 NOV 2025 PM1 

L 

Michigan Tax Tnbunal 

61! 

WwW. Otfawa OF 

Lansing, MI 48933 

iiijidn 

ARSEE-1OTF0LL 

Help 

shld beaded

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Robert Edwards & Jean Edwards, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioners, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-003075 

 

Schoolcraft Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER PLACING PETITIONERS’ MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT IN ABEYANCE 

 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONERS TO CURE DEFAULT 

 

On September 16, 2025, Petitioner filed a Motion to Set Aside Default. Respondent has 

not filed a response to the motion. 

 

The Tribunal has considered the motion and the case file in this case and finds that 

Petitioners were held in default on August 1, 2025, for failing to pay the required petition 

filing fee. Petitioners failed to respond, and the Tribunal entered an order extending the 

time to cure on September 9, 2025. Having now filed a Motion to Set Aside Default and 

having paid the $50.00 motion filing fee, Petitioners have partially complied with the 

Tribunal’s orders. Petitioners failed, however, to pay the petition filing fee. Though the 

Tribunal finds one final extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioners’ 

failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has 

established a history of deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for 

failure to timely comply with this order.1 Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioners’ Motion to Set Aside Default is held in ABEYANCE. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time for Petitioners to cure the default is 

EXTENDED. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners must pay the petition filing fee to cure the 

default. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of entry of this 

order.2 A filing fee calculator can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

 

1 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. 

A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission 

through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business 

day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-003075 

Page 2 of 2 

 

Unfortunately, the payment may not be made via e-filing. 

 

Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this case, as provided by 

TTR 237.3 

 

 

Entered: October 30, 2025 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

sw/jcr 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

 

day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is 

considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 

205.735a.” TTR 225(5). 

3 See also MCL 205.732.

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

ocr. 03 2025 

Tranlnfo:4606 

 26060374-1 

10/02/25 

er, 

Chki: 

2682 

Ant: $60.00 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

peg 

ID: 

ROBERT EDWARDS 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

Robert sean Edwards, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

f 

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-0307 

Sehaoleratt-Counpy Board of feview 

Respondent(s) 

MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT 

1. 

A default was entered against me on August | 202% 

and, if applicable, the default 

was extended on Set. 5 2025. 

2. 

Good cause exists to set aside the default because: 

we do pot have a computer; nor refrable miernet access: 

Yheretore we did not receive the defn 

lr notice unis ater 

the time 

had expired 7o respond. 

3. 

| ask this Tribunal to set aside the default. 

| 

Gon Epes 

Payfy/Representative (sign here) 

ean 

LL. Edwards 

[Print/type name of person signing] 

| certify that on this date 

| served a copy of this Motion, and any additional documentation, on the 

opposing party or their representative.

Page 2

wu please Se 

re 

JE

Page 3

KINGSFORD MI 

498 A 

Edwards 

16 SEP 2025 

PM1 

L 

1775 

52340 Mink Farm Rd. 

Lake Linden, MI 49945 

¥ 

Michypar Jae Tribunal 

P.0. Box 50285" 

lansing, MI 45909 

SESE 

TFEEEE 

THRU CUTE ART 

To 

TA

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Robert Edwards & Jean Edwards, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioners, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-003075 

 

Schoolcraft Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER PLACING PETITIONERS’ MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT IN ABEYANCE 

 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONERS TO CURE DEFAULT 

 

On September 16, 2025, Petitioner filed a Motion to Set Aside Default. Respondent has 

not filed a response to the motion. 

 

The Tribunal has considered the motion and the case file in this case and finds that 

Petitioners were held in default on August 1, 2025, for failing to pay the required petition 

filing fee. Petitioners failed to respond, and the Tribunal entered an order extending the 

time to cure on September 9, 2025. Having now filed a Motion to Set Aside Default and 

having paid the $50.00 motion filing fee, Petitioners have partially complied with the 

Tribunal’s orders. Petitioners failed, however, to pay the petition filing fee. Though the 

Tribunal finds one final extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioners’ 

failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has 

established a history of deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for 

failure to timely comply with this order.1 Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioners’ Motion to Set Aside Default is held in ABEYANCE. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time for Petitioners to cure the default is 

EXTENDED. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners must pay the petition filing fee to cure the 

default. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of entry of this 

order.2 A filing fee calculator can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

 

1 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 

2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. 

A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission 

through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business 

day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-003075 

Page 2 of 2 

 

Unfortunately, the payment may not be made via e-filing. 

 

Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this case, as provided by 

TTR 237.3 

 

 

Entered: October 30, 2025 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

sw/jcr 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

 

day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is 

considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 

205.735a.” TTR 225(5). 

3 See also MCL 205.732.

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

ocr. 03 2025 

Tranlnfo:4606 

 26060374-1 

10/02/25 

er, 

Chki: 

2682 

Ant: $60.00 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

peg 

ID: 

ROBERT EDWARDS 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

Robert sean Edwards, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

f 

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-0307 

Sehaoleratt-Counpy Board of feview 

Respondent(s) 

MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT 

1. 

A default was entered against me on August | 202% 

and, if applicable, the default 

was extended on Set. 5 2025. 

2. 

Good cause exists to set aside the default because: 

we do pot have a computer; nor refrable miernet access: 

Yheretore we did not receive the defn 

lr notice unis ater 

the time 

had expired 7o respond. 

3. 

| ask this Tribunal to set aside the default. 

| 

Gon Epes 

Payfy/Representative (sign here) 

ean 

LL. Edwards 

[Print/type name of person signing] 

| certify that on this date 

| served a copy of this Motion, and any additional documentation, on the 

opposing party or their representative.

Page 2

wu please Se 

re 

JE

Page 3

KINGSFORD MI 

498 A 

Edwards 

16 SEP 2025 

PM1 

L 

1775 

52340 Mink Farm Rd. 

Lake Linden, MI 49945 

¥ 

Michypar Jae Tribunal 

P.0. Box 50285" 

lansing, MI 45909 

SESE 

TFEEEE 

THRU CUTE ART 

To 

TA

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Robert Edwards and Jean Edwards, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioners, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-003075 

 

Schoolcraft Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Patricia L. Halm 

 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONERS TO CURE DEFAULT 

 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that it entered an order 

holding Petitioners in default on August 1, 2025, because Petitioners failed to pay the 

requisite Entire Tribunal petition filing fee.1 The order further indicated that if the 

intention was to file in the Small Claims division, Petitioners shall file a Small Claims 

petition and a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of action taken by 

Board of Review). Information on Tribunal rules, filing fees and Small Claims petition 

forms can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

 

Petitioners were required to cure the default within 14 days; they have had ample time 

to comply and have failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal 

finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioners’ failure to comply 

with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history 

of deliberate delay that would justify the dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply 

with this order.2 

 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioners to cure the default is EXTENDED. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Petitioners wish to remain in the Entire Tribunal 

Division, Petitioners must complete the following to cure the default: 

 

(1) pay the required filing fee for the filing of the Entire Tribunal petition, (2) file a Motion 

to Set Aside Default, (3) pay the $50.00 fee required for the filing of the motion. 

Unfortunately, the payment of the required filing fee may not be made via e-filing. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Petitioners intended to file in the Small Claims 

Division, Petitioners must complete the following to cure the default: 

 

 

1 The order further stated: “Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being 

required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 

2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-003075 

Page 2 of 2 

 

(1) file a Small Claims Petition for Valuation Appeal, (2) file a Motion to Set Aside 

Default; and (3) pay the $50.00 fee required for the filing of the motions and the $125.00 

filing fee for the filing of the petition, if applicable.3 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition shall note the docket number assigned by 

the Tribunal and if filed utilizing the Tribunal’s e-filing system, must be filed on the 

assigned docket number as an “Amended Petition.” 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon entry of the amended Small Claims petition, if 

any, the Tribunal shall issue a Small Claims Notice of Docket. 

 

The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of entry of this order. 

Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of the case, as provided by 

TTR 237.4 

 

 

Entered: September 9, 2025 

 

 

By _____________________________ 

kac/jcr 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

 

 

 

3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Robert Edwards,Jean Edwards,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-003075

Township Of Schoolcraft,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner did not pay the required fee for the filing of the Entire Tribunal petition. See 

TTR 223. Because of this, the appeal is not properly pending. Petitioner must pay the 

required fee for the filing of the petition within 14 days of the entry of this order. A filing 

fee calculator can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, 

the payment may not be made via e-filing.

If you intended to file in the Small Claims division, please file a Small Claims petition 

and a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of action taken by Board of 

Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment notice, etc.). The 

petition shall note the docket number assigned by the Tribunal and if filed utilizing the 

Tribunal’s e-filing system, must be filed on the assigned docket number as an “amended 

petition.” Small Claims petition forms can be found on our website at 

www.michigan.gov/taxtrib.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.i 

Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By:_______________________________

Entered: August 1, 2025

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-003075

Page 2 of 4

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Robert Edwards,Jean Edwards,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

 

MTT Docket No. 25-003075

Township Of Schoolcraft,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Petitioner did not pay the required fee for the filing of the Entire Tribunal petition. See 

TTR 223. Because of this, the appeal is not properly pending. Petitioner must pay the 

required fee for the filing of the petition within 14 days of the entry of this order. A filing 

fee calculator can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, 

the

Page 4

MTT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUL 25-2025 

J 

; 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 

|. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Robert § Jean Edwards 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

\' 

MTT Docket No. 

Schooleraf? County Beard of Review 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No: 

B1-018-000-008-70 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

2. 

The property identified above is _¢ 

real 

_v personal. 

3. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? ___ Yes ___ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- 

contiguous parcel.) 

4. 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? __ Yes No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal.) 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

6. 

The property identified above is classified as 

7esideniial

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 4 

8. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

The property or properties at issue are located in toughton 

County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

52340 Mint fzem Ld. 

Lake Linden, AN] 40945 

The assessment or assessments at 

igsue were established by the (applicable 

local governmental unit): Shooters Coy 

8 

Board oF Ley ew) 

Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 

52340 

Anak Farm Ld. 

Cake Linden, Al 4794S 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

v~___the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? _v~ Yes ___No 

uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment 

the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 

Page 3 of 4 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior 

tax vear or years (attach additional page if necessary): 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

155, 965 

56,090 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

AE, 949 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

56, 020 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

7,14 

reduction i taxable value

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 

Page 4 of 4 

Signature of P, Te. 

d Represgntative or, 

if none, Petitioner: 

don 2 

dont aids 

Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Rebpert MN. Edwards i Jean [Edwards 

Email Address: 

feanedweards 3 (@ potmar) pom 

Mailing Address: 

, 

S2340 Ark Farm LA. 

Late inden, 

MI 49945 

Telephone Number: __ 906-204-- 082¢ 

Date: 

0/30/: (=a

Page 5

RECEIVED 

JUL 2572025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

Robert 5 Jean Edwards 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

\ 

MTT

Page 6

Edw

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Robert Edwards,Jean Edwards, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 25-003075

Township Of Schoolcraft, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: __Tribunal Clerk________

Entered: August 1, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Robert Edwards,Jean Edwards, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 25-003075

Township Of Schoolcraft, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: __Tribunal Clerk________

Entered: August 1, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUL 25-2025 

J 

; 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON 

|. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Robert § Jean Edwards 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

\' 

MTT Docket No. 

Schooleraf? County Beard of Review 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No: 

B1-018-000-008-70 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

2. 

The property identified above is _¢ 

real 

_v personal. 

3. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? ___ Yes ___ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- 

contiguous parcel.) 

4. 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? __ Yes No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal.) 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

6. 

The property identified above is classified as 

7esideniial

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 4 

8. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

The property or properties at issue are located in toughton 

County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

52340 Mint fzem Ld. 

Lake Linden, AN] 40945 

The assessment or assessments at 

igsue were established by the (applicable 

local governmental unit): Shooters Coy 

8 

Board oF Ley ew) 

Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 

52340 

Anak Farm Ld. 

Cake Linden, Al 4794S 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

v~___the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? _v~ Yes ___No 

uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment 

the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 

Page 3 of 4 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior 

tax vear or years (attach additional page if necessary): 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

155, 965 

56,090 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

AE, 949 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2025 

56, 020 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

7,14 

reduction i taxable value

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 

Page 4 of 4 

Signature of P, Te. 

d Represgntative or, 

if none, Petitioner: 

don 2 

dont aids 

Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Rebpert MN. Edwards i Jean [Edwards 

Email Address: 

feanedweards 3 (@ potmar) pom 

Mailing Address: 

, 

S2340 Ark Farm LA. 

Late inden, 

MI 49945 

Telephone Number: __ 906-204-- 082¢ 

Date: 

0/30/: (=a

Page 5

RECEIVED 

JUL 2572025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

DIRECTOR 

Robert 5 Jean Edwards 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

\ 

MTT

Page 6

Edw

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.