Record Finder / 26-001477-TT
Michigan

Np Clintonvilla Mhc LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Independence Respondent

Petitioner
Np Clintonvilla Mhc LLC
Respondent
Township Of Independence

Case overview

Docket number
26-001477-TT
Status
Default Respondent
CaseType
ET Property
Division
ET
County
Oakland
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
7AppearanceNot recordedNot recorded09/30/2026Not recordedDownload
6DocumentationNot recordedNot recorded09/30/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
5Order Holding Party in DefaultNot recordedNot recorded09/30/2026Not recordedDownload
4Proof of service of petition was received.PETNot recorded07/15/2026Not recordedDownload
3Petition has been verifiedPET108/13/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
2Notice of Docket Number ETNot recordedNot recorded08/13/2026Not recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded05/26/2026$400.00Download
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload

Documents

Appearance Learman MTT 26-001477 2026.09.30.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

NP CLINTONVILLA MHC, LLC, 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

 

 

Case No. 26-001477-TT 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Parcel ID: J-08-35-426-008 

v. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF INDEPENDENCE, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Respondent. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sarah R. Belloli 

Representative for Petitioner 

101 West Big Beaver, Suite 945 

Troy, MI 48084 

(313) 230-0104 

Sarah.Belloli@Ryan.com 

THE KELLY FIRM, PLC 

Daniel J. Kelly (P41315) 

Zachary Learman (P71005) 

Attorneys for Respondent 

512 E. 11 Mile Road 

Royal Oak, MI 48067 

(248) 655-7025 

dan@kellyfirmpc.com 

zack@kellyfirmpc.com 

 

 

 

APPEARANCE 

 

 

The undersigned hereby enters their appearance as attorney for the Township of 

Independence in the above-entitled cause. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE KELLY FIRM, PLC 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attorneys for Respondent 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Zachary Learman 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Zachary Learman (P71005) 

The Kelly Firm, PLC 

Attorneys for the Township of Orion 

512 E. 11 Mile Road 

Royal Oak, MI 48067 

Dated: September 30, 2026 

 

 

 

(248) 655-7025

Page 2

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

 

The undersigned states that on September 30, 2026, she electronically filed Respondent's 

Appearance, and this Proof of Service with the Michigan Tax Tribunal via the Tribunal's E-filing 

System and served a copy upon Representative for Petitioner via electronic mail to Petitioner’s 

address at Sarah.Belloli@Ryan.com. 

 

/s/ Julian Slavsky 

 

 

Julian Slavsky

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Answer Affirmative Defense & POS MTT 26-001477 2026.09.30.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

NP CLINTONVILLA MHC, LLC, 

 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

 

 

Case No. 26-001477-TT 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Parcel ID: J-08-35-426-008 

v. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF INDEPENDENCE, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Respondent. 

 

 

Sarah R. Belloli 

Representative for Petitioner 

101 West Big Beaver, Suite 945 

Troy, MI 48084 

(313) 230-0104 

Sarah.Belloli@Ryan.com 

THE KELLY FIRM, PLC 

Daniel J. Kelly (P41315) 

Zachary Learman (P71005) 

Attorneys for Respondent 

512 E. 11 Mile Road 

Royal Oak, MI 48067 

(248) 655-7025 

dan@kellyfirmpc.com 

zack@kellyfirmpc.com 

 

 

 

RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITION, 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, AND PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

 

NOW COMES the Respondent, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF INDEPENDENCE, by its 

attorneys, THE KELLY FIRM, PLC, and for its answer to the Entire Tribunal Property Tax 

Petition, states as follows: 

1. In response to paragraph 1, Respondent neither admits nor denies same for lack of 

sufficient information and leave Petitioner to its proofs. 

2. In response to paragraph 2, Respondent admits the allegations contained therein. 

3. In response to paragraph 3, Respondent neither admits nor denies same for lack of 

sufficient information and leave Petitioner to its proofs.

Page 2

4. In response to paragraph 4, Respondent neither admits nor denies same for lack of 

sufficient information and leave Petitioner to its proofs. 

5. In response to paragraph 5, Respondent neither admits nor denies same for lack of 

sufficient information and leave Petitioner to its proofs. 

6. In response to paragraph 6, Respondent neither admits nor denies same for lack of 

sufficient information and leave Petitioner to its proofs. 

7. In response to paragraph 7, Respondent neither admits nor denies same for lack of 

sufficient information and leave Petitioner to its proofs. 

8. In response to paragraph 8, Respondent neither admits nor denies same for lack of 

sufficient information and leave Petitioner to its proofs. 

9. In response to paragraph 9, Respondent neither admits nor denies same for lack of 

sufficient information and leave Petitioner to its proofs. 

10. In response to paragraph 10, Respondent admits the allegations contained therein. 

11. In response to paragraph 11, Respondent admits the allegations contained therein. 

12. In response to paragraph 12, Respondent neither admits nor denies same for lack of 

sufficient information and leave Petitioner to its proofs. 

13. In response to paragraph 13, Respondent neither admits nor denies same for lack of 

sufficient information and leave Petitioner to its proofs. 

14. In response to paragraph 14, Respondent admits the allegations contained therein. 

15. In response to paragraph 15, Respondent neither admits nor denies same for lack of 

sufficient information and leave Petitioner to its proofs. 

16. In response to paragraph 16, Respondent neither admits nor denies same for lack of 

sufficient information and leave Petitioner to its proofs.

Page 3

17. In response to paragraph 17, Respondent neither admits nor denies same for lack of 

sufficient information and leave Petitioner to its proofs. 

18. In response to paragraph 18, Respondent neither admits nor denies same for lack of 

sufficient information and leave Petitioner to its proofs. 

19. In response to paragraph 19, Respondent neither admits nor denies same for lack of 

sufficient information and leave Petitioner to its proofs. 

20. In response to paragraph 20, Respondent neither admits nor denies same for lack of 

sufficient information and leave Petitioner to its proofs. 

 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

 

NOW COMES the Respondent, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF INDEPENDENCE, by its 

attorneys, THE KELLY FIRM, PLC, and files the following Affirmative Defenses in support of 

its Answer to the Petition: 

1. The facts as alleged by the Petitioner do not establish mutual mistake of fact. 

2. Petitioner has failed to allege specific and sufficient facts upon which the mode and 

method of appraising property fails to conform with mode and method applied to all 

other properties in the community. 

3. Petitioner has failed to show that any fact other than fifty percent (50%) was applied 

to the true cash value of the property. 

4. Petitioner’s claim, if prevailed upon, would create a windfall for Petitioner and create 

a burden upon the Township, schools, County taxes, and other property owners in the 

community.

Page 4

5. Petitioner is asking this Honorable Tribunal to make an underassessment based upon 

an arbitrary basis. 

6. A levy of all taxes is required to be made based upon the assessment of fifty percent 

(50%) of true cash value as ultimately determined by the process of County and State 

equalization. 

7. Respondent reserves the right to file additional Affirmative Defenses as may become 

apparent in this case. 

 

Dated: September 30, 2026 

 

 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Zachary Learman 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Zachary Learman (P71005) 

The Kelly Firm, PLC 

Attorneys for the Township of Independence 

512 E. 11 Mile Road 

Royal Oak, MI 48067 

(248) 655-7025 

 

 

 

 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

 

 

The undersigned states that on September 30, 2026, she electronically filed Respondent's 

Answer to Petition, Affirmative Defenses, and this Proof of Service with the Michigan Tax 

Tribunal via the Tribunal's E-filing System and served a copy upon Representative for Petitioner 

via electronic mail to Petitioner’s address at Sarah.Belloli@Ryan.com. 

 

/s/ Julian Slavsky 

 

 

Julian Slavsky

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 26-001477

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No

Party Filing Document 

Respondent

Files

Document Type: Documentation

Attachment File Name: Answer Affirmative Defense & POS MTT 26-001477 2026.09.30

Document Type: Appearance

Attachment File Name: Appearance Learman MTT 26-001477 2026.09.30

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 0.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 0.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Order_Holding_Party_in_Default.2026-09-30_08-57-59.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

NP Clintonvilla MHC LLC,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-001477

Township Of Independence,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Respondent has failed to file an answer. As such, Respondent must file and serve an 

answer to the petition and file proof demonstrating service of the answer within 14 days 

of the entry of this order. See TTR 235 and 227. Tribunal rules and information on 

Entire Tribunal answers can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 

Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

Entered: September 30, 2026

1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-001477

Page 2 of 2

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

NP Clintonvilla MHC LLC,

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

 

MTT Docket No. 26-001477

Township Of Independence,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DEFAULT

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

Respondent has failed to file an answer. As such, Respondent must file and serve an 

answer to the petition and file proof demonstrating service of the answer within 14 days 

of the entry of this order. See TTR 235 and 227. Tribunal rules and information on 

Entire Tribunal answers can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated 

above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.2 

Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a 

motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).

By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm

Entered: September 30, 2026

2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service 

postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible 

postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by 

commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial 

service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the 

submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. 

A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on 

that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal 

act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 26-001477

Page 2 of 2

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

101 West Big Beaver, Suite 945 

Troy, Michigan 48084 

Tel. (313) 230-0104 

Fax (313) 230-0114 

RECEIVED 

July 13, 2026 

JUL 15 

State of Michigan Treasurer 

2026 

Treasury Building, 430 West Allegan Street 

MICH 

Lansing, MI 48922 

IGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Re: NP Clintonvilla MHC, LLC. v Independence Charter Township 

MTT Docket No.: 26-001477 

Dear Chief Clerk: 

Petitioner hereby serves all parties provided for in Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule 221 with its petition in 

this matter: Pursuant to the rule, the petition notes the docket number assigned by the Tribunal and is 

served within 45-days of the issuance of the notice of docket number, 

If you have any questions regarding the enclosed pleading, please do not hesitate to contact our office 

directly at (313) 230-0104. 

Respectfully, 

Sarah R. Belloli 

Ryan, LLC 

ce: State of Michigan Treasurer 

Clarkston Community School District 

Oakland County Equalization Director 

Oakland County Clerk 

Independence Charter Township Assessor 

Independence Charter Township Clerk 

Enclosures

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

NP Clintonvilla MHC, LLC., 

MTT Docket No.: 26-001477 

Petitioner, 

v 

Independence Charter Township, 

Respondent. 

Proof of Service 

Joan Kleiner, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on July 13, 2026, she served a copy of the Petition with noted 

docket number relative to the above-captioned matter upon the following parties as required by the Tribunal’s 

service rules: 

ViA CERTIFIED MAIL. 

Independence Charter Township Assessor: 

Independence Charter Township Assessor, 6483 Waldon Center Dr, Clarkston, MI 48346 

Independence Charter Township Clerk: 

Independence Charter Township Clerk , 6483 Waldon Center Dr, Clarkston, MI 48346 

VIA FIRST-CLASS MAIL 

Oakland County Equalization Director: 

Oakland County Equalization Division, 250 Elizabeth Lake Rd, Ste 1200W, Pontiac, MI 48341 

Oakland County Clerk: 

Oakland County Clerk, 1200 N Telegraph Rd, Pontiac, MI 48341 

Clarkston Community School District — School Board Secretary: 

Clarkston Community School District, 6389 Clarkston Rd, Clarkston, MI 48346-1613 

Treasurer of the State of Michigan: 

State of Michigan Treasurer, Treasury Building, 430 West Allegan Street, Lansing, MI 48922 

With proper postage affixed thereto. Proof of service submitted within 45 days after issuance of the notice of docket number as 

required by the Tribunal’s service rules. 

/s/ Joan Kleiner 

Joan Kleiner 

July 13, 2026

Page 3

101 West Big Beaver Road 

Suite 945 

Ryan )) 

Troy, Michigan 48084 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

PO Box 30232 

Lansing, MI 48909 

R €Ceiveq 

JL 15 ggg 

LAR

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

MTT_ET_Petition_NP Clintonvilla MHC_ LLC__TY2026.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND 

REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

NP Clintonvilla MHC, LLC., 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

Independence Charter Township, 

Respondent(s) 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

MTT Docket No. 

 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

 

1. Property Parcel No: J -08-35-426-008 

2. The property identified above is ☑ real ☐ personal. 

3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? ☐ Yes ☐ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each noncontiguous parcel.) 

N/A 

4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal? ☐ Yes ☐ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not 

located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 

N/A 

5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by 

parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

6. The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial-Improved 

7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to 

Respondent’s ☐ March ☐ July ☐ December Board of Review. 

No protest to the Board of Review was required. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Page 2

MTT Docket No. ____________________ 

Page 2 of 4 

8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach 

additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or 

classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate 

and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

10. The property or properties at issue are located in Oakland County. The property’s address is: 

4851 Clintonville Rd, Clarkston, MI 48348 

11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): 

Independence Charter Township 

12. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 

38505 WOODWARD AVE, STE 275, BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304 

13. This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

☑ the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

☐ the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or 

loss? ☐ Yes ☑ No 

☐ uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment 

☐ the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______ 

14. The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026

Page 3

MTT Docket No. ____________________ 

Page 3 of 4 

15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page 

if necessary): 

N/A 

16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

$10,445,800 

$5,222,900 

$5,222,900 

17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

$9,500,000 

$4,750,000 

$4,750,000 

18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

$945,800 

$472,900 

$472,900 

19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

Petitioner respectfully requests that the Michigan Tax Tribunal enter an order: (a) reducing the 2026 

True Cash Value, State Equalized Value, and Taxable Value of the subject property to the values set 

forth in paragraph 17 above; (b) directing Respondent to refund to Petitioner all taxes paid in excess 

of those properly owed, plus statutory interest; and (c) granting such other and further relief as is just 

and equitable. 

20. List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the relief requested (attach 

additional page if necessary): 

A. The equalized assessment thus imposed on the subject property is more than 50% of its true cash 

value in violation of the applicable statutory and constitutional limitations. 

B. The assessment is based on improper or inaccurate valuation methodology, including but not 

limited to the use of non-representative data, failure to account for relevant property characteristics, 

and/or application of incorrect assumptions. As a result, the assessment is not uniform with 

comparable properties and results in an excessive and unlawful tax burden.

Page 4

MTT Docket No. ____________________ 

Page 4 of 4 

Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

/s/ Sarah R. Belloli 

Printed Name of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Sarah R. Belloli 

Email Address: 

Sarah.Belloli@Ryan.com 

Matthew.Dingman@Ryan.com 

Joan.Kleiner@Ryan.com 

Mailing Address: 

101 West Big Beaver, Suite 945 

Troy, Michigan 48084 

Telephone Number: 

(313) 230-0104 

Date: 

2026-05-26

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

NP Clintonvilla MHC, LLC.

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

101 W. Big Beaver

Suite 945

City or Town

Troy

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48048

Telephone Number

3132300104

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

sarah.belloli@ryan.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Sarah

M.I.

Last Name

Belloli

Firm Name (if any)

Ryan LLC

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

101 W. Big Beaver

Suite 945

City or Town

Troy

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48048

Telephone Number

3132300104

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

sarah.belloli@ryan.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

4851 Clintonville Rd

Clarkston

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

48348

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Township Of Independence (OAKLAND) 

County

Oakland

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

J -08-35-426-008

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

5222900

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

5222900

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

9500000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

4750000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Sarah R. Belloli

Payment Information

Amount: 400

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26052686978453

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-08-13_17-42-41.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

NP Clintonvilla MHC LLC, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 26-001477

Township Of Independence, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: August 13, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

NP Clintonvilla MHC LLC, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 26-001477

Township Of Independence, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: August 13, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

MTT_ET_Petition_NP Clintonvilla MHC_ LLC__TY2026.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND 

REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

NP Clintonvilla MHC, LLC., 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

Independence Charter Township, 

Respondent(s) 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

MTT Docket No. 

 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

 

1. Property Parcel No: J -08-35-426-008 

2. The property identified above is ☑ real ☐ personal. 

3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? ☐ Yes ☐ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each noncontiguous parcel.) 

N/A 

4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal? ☐ Yes ☐ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not 

located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 

N/A 

5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by 

parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

6. The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial-Improved 

7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to 

Respondent’s ☐ March ☐ July ☐ December Board of Review. 

No protest to the Board of Review was required. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Page 2

MTT Docket No. ____________________ 

Page 2 of 4 

8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach 

additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or 

classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate 

and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

10. The property or properties at issue are located in Oakland County. The property’s address is: 

4851 Clintonville Rd, Clarkston, MI 48348 

11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): 

Independence Charter Township 

12. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 

38505 WOODWARD AVE, STE 275, BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304 

13. This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

☑ the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

☐ the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or 

loss? ☐ Yes ☑ No 

☐ uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment 

☐ the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______ 

14. The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026

Page 3

MTT Docket No. ____________________ 

Page 3 of 4 

15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page 

if necessary): 

N/A 

16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

$10,445,800 

$5,222,900 

$5,222,900 

17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

$9,500,000 

$4,750,000 

$4,750,000 

18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

$945,800 

$472,900 

$472,900 

19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

Petitioner respectfully requests that the Michigan Tax Tribunal enter an order: (a) reducing the 2026 

True Cash Value, State Equalized Value, and Taxable Value of the subject property to the values set 

forth in paragraph 17 above; (b) directing Respondent to refund to Petitioner all taxes paid in excess 

of those properly owed, plus statutory interest; and (c) granting such other and further relief as is just 

and equitable. 

20. List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the relief requested (attach 

additional page if necessary): 

A. The equalized assessment thus imposed on the subject property is more than 50% of its true cash 

value in violation of the applicable statutory and constitutional limitations. 

B. The assessment is based on improper or inaccurate valuation methodology, including but not 

limited to the use of non-representative data, failure to account for relevant property characteristics, 

and/or application of incorrect assumptions. As a result, the assessment is not uniform with 

comparable properties and results in an excessive and unlawful tax burden.

Page 4

MTT Docket No. ____________________ 

Page 4 of 4 

Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

/s/ Sarah R. Belloli 

Printed Name of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Sarah R. Belloli 

Email Address: 

Sarah.Belloli@Ryan.com 

Matthew.Dingman@Ryan.com 

Joan.Kleiner@Ryan.com 

Mailing Address: 

101 West Big Beaver, Suite 945 

Troy, Michigan 48084 

Telephone Number: 

(313) 230-0104 

Date: 

2026-05-26

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

NP Clintonvilla MHC, LLC.

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

101 W. Big Beaver

Suite 945

City or Town

Troy

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48048

Telephone Number

3132300104

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

sarah.belloli@ryan.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Sarah

M.I.

Last Name

Belloli

Firm Name (if any)

Ryan LLC

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

101 W. Big Beaver

Suite 945

City or Town

Troy

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48048

Telephone Number

3132300104

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

sarah.belloli@ryan.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

4851 Clintonville Rd

Clarkston

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

48348

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Township Of Independence (OAKLAND) 

County

Oakland

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

J -08-35-426-008

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

5222900

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

5222900

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

9500000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

4750000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Sarah R. Belloli

Payment Information

Amount: 400

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26052686978453

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.