Record Finder / 26-001087-TT
Michigan

North Troy Timberland Office II Petitioner Vs. City Of Troy Respondent

Petitioner
North Troy Timberland Office II
Respondent
City Of Troy

Case overview

Docket number
26-001087-TT
Status
Ready Sched Prehearing Date Certain
CaseType
ET Property
Division
ET
County
Oakland
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
6Prehearing General CallNot recordedNot recorded10/16/2026Not recordedDownload
5Proof of service of petition was received.PETNot recorded07/13/2026Not recordedDownload
4Petition has been verifiedPET107/16/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
3Notice of Docket Number ETNot recordedNot recorded07/16/2026Not recordedDownload
2Answer was receivedNot recordedNot recorded07/15/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded05/18/2026$600.00Download
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload

Documents

Prehearing_General_Call.2026-10-16_13-22-04.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906

NOTICE OF SEPTEMBER 16- 30, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND 

ORDER OF PROCEDURE

North Troy Timberland Office II,

Petitioner,

v

 

 

City Of Troy,

Respondent.

 MTT Docket No. 26-001087

Please be advised that 26-001087 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General 

Call commencing September 16, 2027. Unless ordered otherwise, parties will be 

notified at least 28 days before they are scheduled to appear. Scheduling will not 

necessarily occur in the order in which the cases are listed below.

Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no 

valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” 

is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a 

party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the 

subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and 

data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning. See TTR 203 and TTR 241.

Users who file documents with the Tribunal are advised that filed documents are 

public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tribunal’s Tax Docket 

Lookup. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Tribunal and 

prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for 

Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents 

covered by the order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a 

Protective Order will be published.

In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9) and TTR 209, the responsibility for excluding or 

redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to 

the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not 

responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing 

for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested 

person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII 

contained in a previously filed document by submitting a Request for Redactions. The 

Request for Redactions form is available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages 

of the Tribunal’s website. 

Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on the Tribunal’s 

website for more information.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26-001087

Page 2 of 3

IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall:

a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties 

in writing within 21 days of entry of this order that no valuation disclosure is being 

filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure 

is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.).

b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures 

by May 20, 2027. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless 

disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though admissible) 

except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their Prehearing 

Statements by May 20, 2027. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal witnesses, will 

not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the 

Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this order except upon a finding 

of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement may result in 

holding a party or parties in default. See TTR 237. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on 

May 20, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel 

have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that 

date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of litigating 

this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not permitted 

during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on 

September 16, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to 

Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged 

by that date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is limited to the opposing party’s 

valuation disclosure, the opposing party’s valuation expert, and the witnesses identified 

on the opposing party’s Prehearing Statement.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if this case is not scheduled for a date certain 

prehearing conference during the time frame indicated it may be scheduled for a date 

certain prehearing conference at any time subsequent to the completion date for this 

Prehearing General Call. Parties will, however, be notified in writing approximately one 

week before they are scheduled to appear. 

By:_____________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: October 16, 2026

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 26-001087

Page 3 of 3

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provide by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906

NOTICE OF SEPTEMBER 16- 30, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND

Page 5

MTT

Page 6

MTT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

101 West Big Beaver, Suite 945 

Troy, Michigan 48084 

Tel. (313) 230-0104 

Fax (313) 230-0114 

RECEIVED 

JUL 152026 

July 13, 2026 

State of Michigan Treasurer 

Treasury Building, 430 West Allegan Street 

Lansing, MI 48922 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Re: North Troy Timberland Office IT v City of Troy 

MTT Docket No.: 26-001087 

Dear Chief Clerk: 

Petitioner hereby serves all parties provided for in Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule 221 with its petition in 

this matter. Pursuant to the rule, the petition notes the docket number assigned by the Tribunal and is 

served within 45-days of the issuance of the notice of docket number. 

If you have any questions regarding the enclosed pleading, please do not hesitate to contact our office 

directly at (313) 230-0104. 

Respectfully, 

Sarah R. Belloli 

, 

Ryan, LLC 

. 

cc: 

State of Michigan Treasurer 

Troy School District 

Oakland County Equalization Director 

Oakland County Clerk 

City of Troy Assessor 

City of Troy Clerk 

Enclosures

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN OFFICE OIF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

North Troy Timberland Office II, 

MTT Docket No.: 26-001087 

Petitioner, 

v 

City of Troy, 

Respondent. 

Proof of Service 

Joan Kleiner, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on July 13, 2026, she served a copy of the Petition with noted 

docket number relative to the above-captioned matter upon the following parties as required by the Tribunal’s 

service rules: 

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL 

City of Troy Assessor: 

City of Troy Assessor, 500 West Big Beaver, Troy, MI 48084 

City of Troy Clerk: 

Troy City Clerk, 500 West Big Beaver, Troy, MI 48084 

VIA FIRST-CLASS MAIL 

Oakland County Equalization Director: 

Oakland County Equalization Division, 250 Elizabeth Lake Rd, Ste 1200W, Pontiac, MI 48341 

Oakland County Clerk: 

Oakland County Clerk, 1200 N Telegraph Rd, Pontiac, MI 48341 

Troy School District — School Board Secretary: 

‘Troy Public School, 4400 Livernois Rd., Troy, MI 48098 

Treasurer of the State of Michigan: 

State of Michigan Treasurer, Treasury Building, 430 West Allegan Sireet, Lansing, MI 48922 

With proper postage affixed thereto. Proof of service submitted within 45 days after issuance of the notice of docket number as 

required by the Tribunal’s service rules. 

/s/ Joan Kleiner 

Joan Kleiner 

July 13, 2026

Page 3

101 West Big Beaver Road 

Suite 945 

Ryan )) 

Troy, Michigan 48084 

Michigan Tax Tribunal 

PO Box 30232 

Lansing, MI 48909 

R €Ceiveq 

JL 15 ggg 

LAR

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

MTT_ET_Petition_North Troy Timberland II Off_TY2026.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND 

REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

North Troy Timberland Office II, 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

City of Troy, 

Respondent(s) 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

MTT Docket No. 

26- 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

 

1. Property Parcel No: 88-20-08-451-014 

2. The property identified above is ☑ real ☐ personal. 

3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? ☑ Yes ☐ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each noncontiguous parcel.) 

N/A 

4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal? ☐ Yes ☐ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not 

located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 

N/A 

5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by 

parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

6. The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial-Improved 

7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to 

Respondent’s ☐ March ☐ July ☐ December Board of Review. 

No protest to the Board of Review was required. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26- 

Page 2 of 4 

8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach 

additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or 

classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate 

and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

10. The property or properties at issue are located in Oakland County. The property’s address is: 

5435 CORPORATE, Troy, MI 

11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): 

City of Troy 

12. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 

2340 COLLINS AVE STE 700 MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 

13. This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

☑ the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

☐ the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or 

loss? ☐ Yes ☑ No 

☐ uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment 

☐ the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______ 

14. The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 26- 

Page 3 of 4 

15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page 

if necessary): 

N/A 

16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

$6,173,020 

$3,086,510 

$2,575,530 

17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

$2,950,000 

$1,475,000 

$1,475,000 

18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

$3,223,020 

$1,611,510 

$1,100,530 

19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

Petitioner respectfully requests that the Michigan Tax Tribunal enter an order: (a) reducing the 2026 

True Cash Value, State Equalized Value, and Taxable Value of the subject property to the values set 

forth in paragraph 17 above; (b) directing Respondent to refund to Petitioner all taxes paid in excess 

of those properly owed, plus statutory interest; and (c) granting such other and further relief as is just 

and equitable. 

20. List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the relief requested (attach 

additional page if necessary): 

A. The equalized assessment thus imposed on the subject property is more than 50% of its true cash 

value in violation of the applicable statutory and constitutional limitations. 

B. The assessment is based on improper or inaccurate valuation methodology, including but not 

limited to the use of non-representative data, failure to account for relevant property characteristics, 

and/or application of incorrect assumptions. As a result, the assessment is not uniform with 

comparable properties and results in an excessive and unlawful tax burden.

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 26- 

Page 4 of 4 

Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

/s/ Sarah R. Belloli 

Printed Name of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Sarah R. Belloli 

Email Address: 

Sarah.Belloli@Ryan.com 

Matthew.Dingman@Ryan.com 

Joan.Kleiner@Ryan.com 

Mailing Address: 

101 West Big Beaver, Suite 945 

Troy, Michigan 48084 

Telephone Number: 

(313) 230-0104 

Date: 

2026-05-18

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

North Troy Timberland Office II

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

101 W. Big Beaver

Suite 945

City or Town

Troy

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48048

Telephone Number

3132300104

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

sarah.belloli@ryan.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Sarah

M.I.

Last Name

Belloli

Firm Name (if any)

Ryan LLC

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

101 W. Big Beaver

Suite 945

City or Town

Troy

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48048

Telephone Number

3132300104

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

sarah.belloli@ryan.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

5435 CORPORATE

Troy

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

48098

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Troy (OAKLAND) 

County

Oakland

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

88-20-08-451-014

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

3086510

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

2575530

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

2950000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

1475000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Sarah R. Belloli

Payment Information

Amount: 600

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26051885993403

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-07-16_06-26-52.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

North Troy Timberland Office II, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 26-001087

City Of Troy, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: July 16, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Answer and Affirmative Defenses.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

NORTH TROY TIMERLAND OFFICE II, 

Petitioner, 

MTT Docket: 26-001087 

\% 

Parcel ID 88-20-08-451-014 

CITY OF TROY, 

Respondent. 

/ 

SARAH R. BELLOLI 

LORI GRIGG BLUHM (P46908) 

RYAN 

JULIE QUINLAN DUFRANE (P59000) 

Petitioner Representative 

TROY CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 

101 W. Big Beaver Road 

Attorneys for Respondent 

Suite 945 

500 W. Big Beaver Road 

Troy, MI 48084 

Troy, MI 48084 

(313) 230-0104 

(248) 524-3320 

Sarah.Belloli@Ryan.com 

BluhmLG@TroyMi.gov 

/ 

RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITION AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

NOW COMES, Respondent, CITY OF TROY, by and through its attorney, Lori Grigg 

Bluhm, and for its Answer to Petitioner's Petition, states as follows: 

1. 

2. 

As to Paragraph 1, Respondent admits the allegation. 

As to Paragraph 2, Respondent admits the allegation. 

As to Paragraph 3, No answer is required. 

As to Paragraph 4, No answer is required.

Page 2

7. 

As to Paragraph 7, Respondent admits no board of review protest was 

submitted. 

8. 

As to Paragraph 8, No answer is required. 

9. 

As to Paragraph 9, No answer is required. 

10. 

As to Paragraph 10, Respondent admits the allegation. 

11. 

As to Paragraph 11, Respondent admits the allegation. 

12. 

As to Paragraph 12, Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegation, and 

leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 

13. 

As to Paragraph 13, Respondent denies that Petitioner has any support for its 

challenge to the subject property's true cash, assessed and taxable values. 

14. 

As to Paragraph 14, Respondent admits the allegation. 

15. 

As to Paragraph 15, No answer is required. 

16. 

As to Paragraph 16, Respondent admits the allegation. 

17. 

As to Paragraph 17, Respondent denies that Petitioner has any support or basis 

for its contention of the true cash, assessed and taxable values for the subject property. 

18. 

As to Paragraph 18, Respondent does not contest the Petitioner's math 

calculations, but denies that Petitioner has any support or basis for its contention of the true 

cash, assessed and taxable values for the subject property. 

19. 

As to Paragraph 19, Respondent denies that Petitioner is entitled to its 

requested relief.

Page 3

WHEREFORE, Respondent, CITY OF TROY, requests the Tribunal dismiss the Petition, 

affirm or increase the subject property's assessed and taxable values, subject to county and 

state equalization, and award Respondent its costs 

gnd Cel 

fees. 

Dated: July 15, 2026 

Lori Grigg Ae 

SLL 

City of Troy Attorney's Office 

Attorney for Defendant 

500 W. Big Beaver Road 

Troy, MI 48084 

(248) 524-3320 

BluhmLG@troymi.gov

Page 4

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

For its further Answer to Petitioners’ Petition, Respondent relies on the following 

Affirmative Defenses: 

1. 

Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action 

against Respondent and to support its claim for relief. 

Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, error of law, 

discrimination, application of wrong principles or illegality on the part of the 

Respondent or its agents. 

Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish the true cash value, 

assessed value, and taxable value of its property. 

Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegations that the 

property's taxable value is improper, or failed to conform with the mode and method 

applied in the case of all properties in the City of Troy for 2026. 

Any decrease in the value of Petitioner's properties was a result of its own intentional 

acts and/or negligence and cannot be allowed to reduce Petitioner's otherwise 

equitable tax burden. 

Respondent has properly and lawfully assessed Petitioner's property and established 

its assessed and taxable values in accordance with statutory and constitutional 

requirements. 

Respondent reserves the right to argue additional Affirmative Defenses during the

Page 5

affirmed or increased, that Petitioners’ Petition be dismissed with prejudice, and that 

Respondent be granted costs and attorney fees so wrongfully sustained. 

Dated: July 15, 2026 

Sd $A 

Lori Grigg Bluhm (P46908) 

City of Troy Attorney’s Office 

Attorney for Defendant 

500 W. Big Beaver Road 

Troy, MI 48084 

(248) 524-3320 

BluhmLG@troymi.gov 

Certificate of Service 

| hereby certify that on July 15, 2026, 

| served a copy of this Answer and Affirmative 

Defenses via email to Petitioner's representative Sarah R. Belloli at Sarah.Belloli@Ryan.com 

and to the following via first class mail: Michigan Department of Treasury, State Treasurer, 

430 W. Allegan, Lansing, MI 49822; Secretary of School Board, Troy Public Schools, 4400 

Livernois Road, Troy, MI 48098; Director of Equalization; Oakland Pointe Office Building, 250 

Elizabeth Lake Road Suite 1000; Pontiac, MI 48341; and Clerk, Oakland County; 1200 N. 

Telegraph, Building 12 East, Pontiac, MI 48341. 

1 

> 

Dated: July 15, 2026 

( 

J 

(ic 

Clara Reid 

Legal Administrative Coordinator 

City of Troy Attorney’s Office 

500 W. Big Beaver Road 

Troy, MI 48084

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISAnswer.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent

MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001087

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: 

Local Unit of Government

Local Unit of Government

City Of Troy (OAKLAND)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Lori

M.I.

Grigg

Last Name

Bluhm

Firm Name (if any)

City of Troy City Attorney Office

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

500 W. Big Beaver Road

City or Town

Troy

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48084

Telephone Number

2485243320

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

Bluhmlg@TroyMI.gov

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: 

Lori Grigg Bluhm

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

MTT_ET_Petition_North Troy Timberland II Off_TY2026.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND 

REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

North Troy Timberland Office II, 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

City of Troy, 

Respondent(s) 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

MTT Docket No. 

26- 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

 

1. Property Parcel No: 88-20-08-451-014 

2. The property identified above is ☑ real ☐ personal. 

3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? ☑ Yes ☐ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each noncontiguous parcel.) 

N/A 

4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal? ☐ Yes ☐ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not 

located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 

N/A 

5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by 

parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

6. The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial-Improved 

7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to 

Respondent’s ☐ March ☐ July ☐ December Board of Review. 

No protest to the Board of Review was required. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 26- 

Page 2 of 4 

8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach 

additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or 

classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate 

and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

10. The property or properties at issue are located in Oakland County. The property’s address is: 

5435 CORPORATE, Troy, MI 

11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): 

City of Troy 

12. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 

2340 COLLINS AVE STE 700 MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 

13. This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

☑ the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

☐ the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or 

loss? ☐ Yes ☑ No 

☐ uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment 

☐ the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______ 

14. The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 26- 

Page 3 of 4 

15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page 

if necessary): 

N/A 

16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

$6,173,020 

$3,086,510 

$2,575,530 

17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

$2,950,000 

$1,475,000 

$1,475,000 

18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

$3,223,020 

$1,611,510 

$1,100,530 

19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

Petitioner respectfully requests that the Michigan Tax Tribunal enter an order: (a) reducing the 2026 

True Cash Value, State Equalized Value, and Taxable Value of the subject property to the values set 

forth in paragraph 17 above; (b) directing Respondent to refund to Petitioner all taxes paid in excess 

of those properly owed, plus statutory interest; and (c) granting such other and further relief as is just 

and equitable. 

20. List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the relief requested (attach 

additional page if necessary): 

A. The equalized assessment thus imposed on the subject property is more than 50% of its true cash 

value in violation of the applicable statutory and constitutional limitations. 

B. The assessment is based on improper or inaccurate valuation methodology, including but not 

limited to the use of non-representative data, failure to account for relevant property characteristics, 

and/or application of incorrect assumptions. As a result, the assessment is not uniform with 

comparable properties and results in an excessive and unlawful tax burden.

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 26- 

Page 4 of 4 

Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

/s/ Sarah R. Belloli 

Printed Name of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Sarah R. Belloli 

Email Address: 

Sarah.Belloli@Ryan.com 

Matthew.Dingman@Ryan.com 

Joan.Kleiner@Ryan.com 

Mailing Address: 

101 West Big Beaver, Suite 945 

Troy, Michigan 48084 

Telephone Number: 

(313) 230-0104 

Date: 

2026-05-18

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

North Troy Timberland Office II

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

101 W. Big Beaver

Suite 945

City or Town

Troy

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48048

Telephone Number

3132300104

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

sarah.belloli@ryan.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Sarah

M.I.

Last Name

Belloli

Firm Name (if any)

Ryan LLC

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

101 W. Big Beaver

Suite 945

City or Town

Troy

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48048

Telephone Number

3132300104

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

sarah.belloli@ryan.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

5435 CORPORATE

Troy

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

48098

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Troy (OAKLAND) 

County

Oakland

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

88-20-08-451-014

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

3086510

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

2575530

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

2950000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

1475000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Sarah R. Belloli

Payment Information

Amount: 600

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26051885993403

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.