Record Finder / 25-001974-TT
Michigan
Nda Auburn II LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Auburn Hills, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Nda Auburn II LLC
- Respondent
- City Of Auburn Hills
Case overview
- Docket number
- 25-001974-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Oakland
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | Consent Judgment | Not recorded | 14 | 03/18/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 18 | Granted | PET | 14 | 03/18/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 17 | Granted | PET | 11 | 03/18/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 16 | Order granting Motion. | Not recorded | 11 | 03/18/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 15 | Order removing case from abeyance. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 03/18/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 14 | A Stipulation has been received. | PET | Not recorded | 03/17/2026 | $50.00 | Download |
| 13 | A response to motion was filed. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 03/11/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 12 | Proof of Service of Misc Documents was received. | PET | Not recorded | 03/10/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 11 | Motion to Amend Subsequent Year was received. | PET | Not recorded | 03/10/2026 | $300.00 | Download |
| 10 | Granted | PET | 8 | 10/15/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 9 | Order granting Motion. | Not recorded | 8 | 10/15/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | Motion for Abeyance was received. | PET | Not recorded | 10/14/2025 | $50.00 | Download |
| 7 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/02/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | ET Case Info Sheet | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/02/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Proof of service of petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 09/02/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Petition has been verified | PET | 2 | 08/05/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/05/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/30/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | ET Case Info Sheet | Not recorded | Not recorded | 05/30/2025 | $600.00 | Download |
Documents
25-001974 Consent Judgment_subtaxyear_mtn_abey.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NDA Auburn II LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-001974 City of Auburn Hills, Presiding Judge Respondent. Jason C. Grinnell ORDER REMOVING CASE FROM ABEYANCE ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND TO ADD THE 2026 TAX YEAR ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the stipulation and finds that it comports with the mandates of State law.1 Further, a motion has been filed requesting that the Tribunal permit Petitioner to amend the petition filed in this case to include the subject property’s true cash and taxable values for the subsequent 2026 tax year. More importantly, the motion is timely under MCL 205.737 and 205.735a and Petitioner has shown good cause to justify the granting of the motion. As a result, the Tribunal shall remove the case from abeyance, grant Petitioner’s motion, and enter the parties’ stipulation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this case is REMOVED FROM ABEYANCE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Amend to Add 2026 Tax Year is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all attachments, terms and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise indicated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be corrected to reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values as provided in this Consent Judgment within 20 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment.2 1 See MCL 211.27a. 2 See MCL 205.755.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-001974 Page 2 of 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund as required by the Consent Judgment within 28 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall, unless otherwise indicated, include a proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and of penalty and interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also, unless otherwise indicated, separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being refunded. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall, unless otherwise indicated, bear interest from the date of payment to the date of judgment and the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any time period prior to 28 days after the issuance of this Consent Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2013, through June 30, 2016, at the rate of 4.25%, (ii) after June 30, 2016, through December
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
NDA Auburn II LLC - Auburn Hills 25-001974 2025 & 2026 Stip for Entry of Consent Judgment 3-17-2026 Fully Executed.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL NDA Auburn II LLC, MTT Docket No. 25-001974-TT Petitioner, Parcel No(s). 02-14-14-176-013 v City of Auburn Hills, Respondent. ______________________________/ Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Alex Morse DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Representatives for Petitioner 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (917) 488-7825 (317) 689-6467 msilvey@dmainc.com amorse@dmainc.com Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) Seth A. O’Loughlin (P80257) Kelsea M. Melcher (P85821) Hallahan & Associates, PC Attorneys for Respondent 1750 S Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 (248) 731-3089 lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com soloughlin@hallahanlaw.com kmelcher@hallahanlaw.com ______________________________/ STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT IN THE FULL TRIBUNAL 1. This case is pending in the Entire Tribunal. 2. The subject property is located in Oakland County. 3. The values for the property at issue in this appeal as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year Parcel(s) True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 02-14-14-176-013 $18,577,760 $9,288,880 $7,084,870 2026 02-14-14-176-013 $16,425,180 $8,212,590 $7,276,160
Page 2
Page 2 of 2 MTT Docket No. 25-001974 Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment 2025 & 2026 PIN: 02-14-14-176-013 4. The values for the property at issue in this appeal as agreed upon by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax Year Parcel(s) True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 02-14-14-176-013 $13,500,000 $6,750,000 $6,750,000 2026 02-14-14-176-013 $13,500,000 $6,750,000 $6,750,000 5. This stipulation addresses the 2025 and 2026 tax years. 6. Refunds (as warranted) should be made payable to “Martinrea International US Inc.” and mailed to the attention of: Martinrea International US Inc. c/o Mikki Silvey 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 7. Any refund shall be without interest. Respectfully submitted, ______________________________ Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Representatives for Petitioner March 11, 2026 ______________________________ Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) Hallahan & Associates, PC Attorneys for Respondent March 11, 2026 /s/ Laura M. Hallahan (w/permission-MS)
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
NDA Auburn II LLC - City of Auburn Hills 3-10-2026 Ready for Filing.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL NDA Auburn II LLC, MTT Docket No. 25-001974-TT Petitioner, Parcel No(s). 02-14-14-176-013 v City of Auburn Hills, Respondent. ______________________________/ Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Alex Morse DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Representatives for Petitioner 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (917) 488-7825 (317) 689-6467 msilvey@dmainc.com amorse@dmainc.com Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) Seth A. O’Loughlin (P80257) Kelsea M. Melcher (P85821) Hallahan & Associates, PC Attorneys for Respondent 1750 S Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 (248) 731-3089 lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com soloughlin@hallahanlaw.com kmelcher@hallahanlaw.com ______________________________/ MOTION TO AMEND TO ADD SUBSEQUENT YEAR Petitioner, NDA Auburn II LLC, through its representatives, DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc., submits its Motion to Amend Petition to Add 2026 Tax Year as follows: 1. Petitioner filed its appeal on May 30, 2025 for the 2025 tax year. 2. One parcel of real property was included in the original Petition filed on May 30, 2025 and the same parcel is included in this Motion to Amend. 3. The real property parcel is identified as Parcel No.: 02-14-14-176-013 4. The real property parcel is classified as 301 Industrial.
Page 2
Motion to Amend to Add Subsequent Year-2026 MTT Docket No. 25-001974 NDA Auburn II LLC v City of Auburn Hills Page 2 of 3 5. The values for each parcel as established by Respondent’s 2026 Board of Review are: Tax Year Parcel(s) True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 02-14-14-176-013 $16,425,180 $8,212,590 $7,276,160 6. Petitioner contends the values for tax year 2026 are no more than the following: Tax Year Parcel(s) True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 02-14-14-176-013 $13,500,000 $6,750,000 $6,750,000 7. The values in contention for tax year 2026 are: Tax Year Parcel(s) True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 02-14-14-176-013 $2,925,180 $1,462,590 $526,160 8. The 2026 assessments imposed on the subject property and the taxes to be levied and collected are invalid because: (a) The assessed value(s) and equalized assessment(s) imposed on the subject property are more than 50% of its true cash value in violation of the applicable statutory and constitutional limitations; (b) The assessment is based on erroneous principles and information; (c) The assessment is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and (d) The assessment otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights.
Page 3
Motion to Amend to Add Subsequent Year-2026 MTT Docket No. 25-001974 NDA Auburn II LLC v City of Auburn Hills Page 3 of 3 WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests this honorable Tribunal enter an order granting its motion and adding the 2026 tax year to this appeal and grant Petitioner all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan law and as is appropriate under the circumstances.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
25-001974 Consent Judgment_subtaxyear_mtn_abey.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NDA Auburn II LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-001974 City of Auburn Hills, Presiding Judge Respondent. Jason C. Grinnell ORDER REMOVING CASE FROM ABEYANCE ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND TO ADD THE 2026 TAX YEAR ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the stipulation and finds that it comports with the mandates of State law.1 Further, a motion has been filed requesting that the Tribunal permit Petitioner to amend the petition filed in this case to include the subject property’s true cash and taxable values for the subsequent 2026 tax year. More importantly, the motion is timely under MCL 205.737 and 205.735a and Petitioner has shown good cause to justify the granting of the motion. As a result, the Tribunal shall remove the case from abeyance, grant Petitioner’s motion, and enter the parties’ stipulation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this case is REMOVED FROM ABEYANCE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Amend to Add 2026 Tax Year is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all attachments, terms and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise indicated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be corrected to reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values as provided in this Consent Judgment within 20 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment.2 1 See MCL 211.27a. 2 See MCL 205.755.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-001974 Page 2 of 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund as required by the Consent Judgment within 28 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall, unless otherwise indicated, include a proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and of penalty and interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also, unless otherwise indicated, separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being refunded. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall, unless otherwise indicated, bear interest from the date of payment to the date of judgment and the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any time period prior to 28 days after the issuance of this Consent Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2013, through June 30, 2016, at the rate of 4.25%, (ii) after June 30, 2016, through December
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
25-001974 Consent Judgment_subtaxyear_mtn_abey.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NDA Auburn II LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-001974 City of Auburn Hills, Presiding Judge Respondent. Jason C. Grinnell ORDER REMOVING CASE FROM ABEYANCE ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND TO ADD THE 2026 TAX YEAR ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the stipulation and finds that it comports with the mandates of State law.1 Further, a motion has been filed requesting that the Tribunal permit Petitioner to amend the petition filed in this case to include the subject property’s true cash and taxable values for the subsequent 2026 tax year. More importantly, the motion is timely under MCL 205.737 and 205.735a and Petitioner has shown good cause to justify the granting of the motion. As a result, the Tribunal shall remove the case from abeyance, grant Petitioner’s motion, and enter the parties’ stipulation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this case is REMOVED FROM ABEYANCE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Amend to Add 2026 Tax Year is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all attachments, terms and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise indicated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be corrected to reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values as provided in this Consent Judgment within 20 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment.2 1 See MCL 211.27a. 2 See MCL 205.755.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-001974 Page 2 of 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund as required by the Consent Judgment within 28 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall, unless otherwise indicated, include a proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and of penalty and interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also, unless otherwise indicated, separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being refunded. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall, unless otherwise indicated, bear interest from the date of payment to the date of judgment and the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any time period prior to 28 days after the issuance of this Consent Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2013, through June 30, 2016, at the rate of 4.25%, (ii) after June 30, 2016, through December
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
NDA Auburn II LLC - Auburn Hills 25-001974 2025 & 2026 Stip for Entry of Consent Judgment 3-17-2026 Fully Executed.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL NDA Auburn II LLC, MTT Docket No. 25-001974-TT Petitioner, Parcel No(s). 02-14-14-176-013 v City of Auburn Hills, Respondent. ______________________________/ Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Alex Morse DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Representatives for Petitioner 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (917) 488-7825 (317) 689-6467 msilvey@dmainc.com amorse@dmainc.com Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) Seth A. O’Loughlin (P80257) Kelsea M. Melcher (P85821) Hallahan & Associates, PC Attorneys for Respondent 1750 S Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 (248) 731-3089 lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com soloughlin@hallahanlaw.com kmelcher@hallahanlaw.com ______________________________/ STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT IN THE FULL TRIBUNAL 1. This case is pending in the Entire Tribunal. 2. The subject property is located in Oakland County. 3. The values for the property at issue in this appeal as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year Parcel(s) True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 02-14-14-176-013 $18,577,760 $9,288,880 $7,084,870 2026 02-14-14-176-013 $16,425,180 $8,212,590 $7,276,160
Page 2
Page 2 of 2 MTT Docket No. 25-001974 Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment 2025 & 2026 PIN: 02-14-14-176-013 4. The values for the property at issue in this appeal as agreed upon by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax Year Parcel(s) True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 02-14-14-176-013 $13,500,000 $6,750,000 $6,750,000 2026 02-14-14-176-013 $13,500,000 $6,750,000 $6,750,000 5. This stipulation addresses the 2025 and 2026 tax years. 6. Refunds (as warranted) should be made payable to “Martinrea International US Inc.” and mailed to the attention of: Martinrea International US Inc. c/o Mikki Silvey 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 7. Any refund shall be without interest. Respectfully submitted, ______________________________ Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Representatives for Petitioner March 11, 2026 ______________________________ Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) Hallahan & Associates, PC Attorneys for Respondent March 11, 2026 /s/ Laura M. Hallahan (w/permission-MS)
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
R's Response to P's Motion to Amend 2026.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL NDA Auburn II LLC, Petitioner, v City of Auburn Hills, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 25-001974 _____________________________________________________________________________/ MICHELLE (MIKKI) M. SILVEY (P69494) ALEX MORSE DUCHARME, MCMILLEN, & ASSOCIATES, INC. Representatives for Petitioner 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (317) 689-6467 LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) SETH A. O’LOUGHLIN (P80257) KELSEA M. MELCHER (P85821) HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Attorneys for Respondent 1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 (248) 731-3089 _____________________________________________________________________________/ RESPONDENT’S RESPONSE TO PETITIONER’S MOTION TO AMEND PETITION TO CONTEST 2026 ASSESSED AND TAXABLE VALUES Respondent, City of Auburn Hills, by and through its attorneys, Hallahan & Associates, P.C., responds to the allegations made in Petitioner’s Motion to Amend as follows: 1. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 1. 2. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 2. 3. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 3. 4. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 4. 5. For the 2026 tax year, Respondent established the Subject Property’s assessment for property taxes as follows: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 $16,425,180 $8,212,590 $7,276,160
Page 2
2 6. Respondent contends that the values for tax year 2026 are as follows: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 $16,425,180 $8,212,590 $7,276,160 7. The values in dispute are as follows: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 $0 $0 $0 8. Respondent denies the allegations in Paragraph 8, including subparagraphs (a)-(d), for the reason that the same are untrue. In further answer, the assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values do not exceed permitted amounts, do not exceed the percentage of true cash value permitted by law, were correctly determined and are based upon correct application of proper principles, and the values and Respondent’s mode of assessment are non-discriminatory and constitutional. WHEREFORE, Respondent, City of Auburn Hills, requests the Tribunal deny the Motion, dismiss the Petition, affirm Respondent’s assessed and taxable values, subject to county and state equalization, and award Respondent its costs and attorney fees. HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. /s/Laura M. Hallahan______________ LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) SETH A. O’LOUGHLIN (P80257) KELSEA M. MELCHER (P85821) Attorneys for Respondent 1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 Dated: March 11, 2026 (248) 731-3089
Page 3
3 PROOF OF SERVICE On the date below I sent by electronic mail a copy of the foregoing Respondent’s Response to Petitioner’s Motion to Amend to: Michelle M. Silvey, Esq. msilvey@dmainc.com Alex Morse amorse@dmainc.com I declare that the statement above is true to the best of my information, knowledge and
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
NDA Auburn II LLC - City of Auburn Hills 3-10-2026 POS.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL NDA Auburn II LLC, MTT Docket No. 25-001974-TT Petitioner, Parcel No(s). 02-14-14-176-013 v City of Auburn Hills, Respondent. ______________________________/ Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Alex Morse DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Representatives for Petitioner 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (917) 488-7825 (317) 689-6467 msilvey@dmainc.com amorse@dmainc.com Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) Seth A. O’Loughlin (P80257) Kelsea M. Melcher (P85821) Hallahan & Associates, PC Attorneys for Respondent 1750 S Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 (248) 731-3089 lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com soloughlin@hallahanlaw.com kmelcher@hallahanlaw.com ______________________________/ PROOF OF SERVICE Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey states that on March 10, 2026 she served a copy of Petitioner’s Motion to Amend to Add Subsequent Year relative to the above-captioned matter upon: Laura M. Hallahan via email: lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com _____________________________ Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
NDA Auburn II LLC - City of Auburn Hills 3-10-2026 Ready for Filing.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL NDA Auburn II LLC, MTT Docket No. 25-001974-TT Petitioner, Parcel No(s). 02-14-14-176-013 v City of Auburn Hills, Respondent. ______________________________/ Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Alex Morse DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Representatives for Petitioner 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (917) 488-7825 (317) 689-6467 msilvey@dmainc.com amorse@dmainc.com Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) Seth A. O’Loughlin (P80257) Kelsea M. Melcher (P85821) Hallahan & Associates, PC Attorneys for Respondent 1750 S Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 (248) 731-3089 lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com soloughlin@hallahanlaw.com kmelcher@hallahanlaw.com ______________________________/ MOTION TO AMEND TO ADD SUBSEQUENT YEAR Petitioner, NDA Auburn II LLC, through its representatives, DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc., submits its Motion to Amend Petition to Add 2026 Tax Year as follows: 1. Petitioner filed its appeal on May 30, 2025 for the 2025 tax year. 2. One parcel of real property was included in the original Petition filed on May 30, 2025 and the same parcel is included in this Motion to Amend. 3. The real property parcel is identified as Parcel No.: 02-14-14-176-013 4. The real property parcel is classified as 301 Industrial.
Page 2
Motion to Amend to Add Subsequent Year-2026 MTT Docket No. 25-001974 NDA Auburn II LLC v City of Auburn Hills Page 2 of 3 5. The values for each parcel as established by Respondent’s 2026 Board of Review are: Tax Year Parcel(s) True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 02-14-14-176-013 $16,425,180 $8,212,590 $7,276,160 6. Petitioner contends the values for tax year 2026 are no more than the following: Tax Year Parcel(s) True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 02-14-14-176-013 $13,500,000 $6,750,000 $6,750,000 7. The values in contention for tax year 2026 are: Tax Year Parcel(s) True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 02-14-14-176-013 $2,925,180 $1,462,590 $526,160 8. The 2026 assessments imposed on the subject property and the taxes to be levied and collected are invalid because: (a) The assessed value(s) and equalized assessment(s) imposed on the subject property are more than 50% of its true cash value in violation of the applicable statutory and constitutional limitations; (b) The assessment is based on erroneous principles and information; (c) The assessment is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and (d) The assessment otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights.
Page 3
Motion to Amend to Add Subsequent Year-2026 MTT Docket No. 25-001974 NDA Auburn II LLC v City of Auburn Hills Page 3 of 3 WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests this honorable Tribunal enter an order granting its motion and adding the 2026 tax year to this appeal and grant Petitioner all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan law and as is appropriate under the circumstances.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Joint Motion for Abeyance.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL NDA Auburn II LLC, Petitioner, v City of Auburn Hills, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 25-001974 _____________________________________________________________________________/ MICHELLE (MIKKI) M. SILVEY (P69494) ALEX MORSE DUCHARME, MCMILLEN, & ASSOCIATES, INC. Representatives for Petitioner 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (317) 689-6467 LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) SETH A. O’LOUGHLIN (P80257) KELSEA M. MELCHER (P85821) HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Attorneys for Respondent 1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 (248) 731-3089 _____________________________________________________________________________/ JOINT MOTION TO HOLD APPEAL IN ABEYANCE PENDING MTT DOCKET NO. 24-002035 The parties by and through their respective counsel state the following in support of the above captioned Motion: 1. The above captioned appeal concerns the 2025 valuation of commercial property located in Oakland County—parcel no. 02-14-14-176-013. 2. With the exception of the tax year at issue, the parties, property, and issues raised in the above captioned appeal are, based on the pleadings, in essence identical to those at issue in MTT docket no. 24-002035—an appeal concerning the 2024 tax year. 3. The above captioned 2025 appeal is ready to be placed on a Prehearing General Call and Order of Procedure.
Page 2
2 4. However, as of the filing of the above captioned Motion, the 2024 reiteration (MTT docket no. 24-002035) has not yet been resolved. The 2024 reiteration is proceeding in accordance with the June 16-30, 2026 Prehearing General Call with valuation disclosures and prehearing statements due February 17, 2026. Accordingly, the 2024 reiteration will likely not proceed to hearing until the spring of next year and a Final Opinion and Judgment will likely not be rendered until Fall 2026 at the earliest. 5. A Final Opinion and Judgment from the Tribunal regarding MTT docket no. 24- 002035 could impact this 2025 appeal and the parties’ desire to proceed with this appeal. Thus, it could potentially be a waste of time and resources for the parties and the Tribunal to proceed with the above captioned appeal when the prior 2024 appeal remains pending. 6. To proceed with this case before a resolution regarding MTT docket no. 24- 002035 has been reached would likely not constitute an efficient administration of justice. 7. Proceeding with the above captioned appeal will require the parties and the Tribunal to expend substantial resources which may ultimately be unnecessary. Placing the above captioned appeal in abeyance at this juncture before substantial time and resources have been spent—including, but not limited to, the preparation of prehearing statements and valuation disclosures—is in the interest of efficiency to all parties involved and judicial economy. 8. As evidenced above, there is good cause for granting this joint Motion to hold the above captioned appeal in abeyance pending the resolution of its 2024 iteration,
Page 3
3
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
25-001974 Grant Abeyance.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 NDA Auburn II LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-001974 City of Auburn Hills, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO HOLD CASE IN ABEYANCE On October 14, 2025, the parties filed a joint motion requesting that the Tribunal hold this case in abeyance pending resolution of MTT Docket No. 24-002035 NDA Auburn II LLC v City of Auburn Hills, which is currently pending before the Tribunal. In the motion, the parties state that but for the tax year at issue, the parties, property, and issues raised in the present matter are essentially identical to those in the above- mentioned appeal. Proceeding in the present matter while MTT Docket No. 24-002035 is still pending could potentially waste the time and resources of both the parties and the Tribunal. The Tribunal has considered the motion and the case file and finds that placing this case in abeyance pending resolution of MTT Docket No. 24-002035 NDA Auburn II LLC v City of Auburn Hills will facilitate the efficient administration of justice, as that resolution may have a direct bearing on the outcome of the instant appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall notify the Tribunal in writing within 28 days of the resolution of MTT Docket No. 24-002035 NDA Auburn II LLC v City of Auburn Hills as to the need for further proceedings in this matter. Entered: October 15, 2025 By _____________________________ cs PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Joint Motion for Abeyance.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL NDA Auburn II LLC, Petitioner, v City of Auburn Hills, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 25-001974 _____________________________________________________________________________/ MICHELLE (MIKKI) M. SILVEY (P69494) ALEX MORSE DUCHARME, MCMILLEN, & ASSOCIATES, INC. Representatives for Petitioner 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (317) 689-6467 LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) SETH A. O’LOUGHLIN (P80257) KELSEA M. MELCHER (P85821) HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Attorneys for Respondent 1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 (248) 731-3089 _____________________________________________________________________________/ JOINT MOTION TO HOLD APPEAL IN ABEYANCE PENDING MTT DOCKET NO. 24-002035 The parties by and through their respective counsel state the following in support of the above captioned Motion: 1. The above captioned appeal concerns the 2025 valuation of commercial property located in Oakland County—parcel no. 02-14-14-176-013. 2. With the exception of the tax year at issue, the parties, property, and issues raised in the above captioned appeal are, based on the pleadings, in essence identical to those at issue in MTT docket no. 24-002035—an appeal concerning the 2024 tax year. 3. The above captioned 2025 appeal is ready to be placed on a Prehearing General Call and Order of Procedure.
Page 2
2 4. However, as of the filing of the above captioned Motion, the 2024 reiteration (MTT docket no. 24-002035) has not yet been resolved. The 2024 reiteration is proceeding in accordance with the June 16-30, 2026 Prehearing General Call with valuation disclosures and prehearing statements due February 17, 2026. Accordingly, the 2024 reiteration will likely not proceed to hearing until the spring of next year and a Final Opinion and Judgment will likely not be rendered until Fall 2026 at the earliest. 5. A Final Opinion and Judgment from the Tribunal regarding MTT docket no. 24- 002035 could impact this 2025 appeal and the parties’ desire to proceed with this appeal. Thus, it could potentially be a waste of time and resources for the parties and the Tribunal to proceed with the above captioned appeal when the prior 2024 appeal remains pending. 6. To proceed with this case before a resolution regarding MTT docket no. 24- 002035 has been reached would likely not constitute an efficient administration of justice. 7. Proceeding with the above captioned appeal will require the parties and the Tribunal to expend substantial resources which may ultimately be unnecessary. Placing the above captioned appeal in abeyance at this juncture before substantial time and resources have been spent—including, but not limited to, the preparation of prehearing statements and valuation disclosures—is in the interest of efficiency to all parties involved and judicial economy. 8. As evidenced above, there is good cause for granting this joint Motion to hold the above captioned appeal in abeyance pending the resolution of its 2024 iteration,
Page 3
3
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Answer.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL NDA Auburn II LLC, Petitioner, v City of Auburn Hills, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 25-001974 _____________________________________________________________________________/ MICHELLE (MIKKI) M. SILVEY (P69494) ALEX MORSE DUCHARME, MCMILLEN, & ASSOCIATES, INC. Representatives for Petitioner 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (317) 689-6467 LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) SETH A. O’LOUGHLIN (P80257) KELSEA M. MELCHER (P85821) HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Attorneys for Respondent 1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 (248) 731-3089 _____________________________________________________________________________/ ANSWER TO PETITION AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES ANSWER Respondent, City of Auburn Hills, by and through its attorneys, Hallahan & Associates, P.C., responds to the allegations made in Petitioner’s Petition as follows: 1. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 1. 2. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 2. 3. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 3. 4. Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 4 and, therefore, leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 5. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 5.
Page 2
2 6. Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations in Paragraph 6 for the reason that the General Property Tax Act speaks for itself 7. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 7. 8. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 8. 9. Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 9. 10. Respondent lacks knowledge or information sufficient to for a belief as to the truth of the allegations therein and, therefore leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 11. Respondent acknowledges the issues raised by Petitioner in Paragraph 11 but denies that those issues have merit and further denies that Petitioner is entitled to any relief. 12. Respondent acknowledges Petitioner’s identification of the 2025 tax year as being at issue but denies an issue with the identified tax year. 13. For the 2025 tax year, Respondent established the Subject Property’s assessment for property taxes as follows: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 $18,577,760 $9,288,880 $7,084,870 14. Respondent contends that the values for tax year 2025 are as follows: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 $18,577,760 $9,288,880 $7,084,870 15. The values in dispute are as follows: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 $0 $0 $0 16. Respondent denies the allegations in Paragraph 16, including subparagraphs (a) – (d), for the reason that the same are untrue. In further answer, the assessed, state equalized and/or
Page 3
3 taxable values do not exceed permitted amounts, do not exceed the percentage of true cash value permitted by law, were correctly determined and are based upon correct application of proper principles, and the values and
Page 4
4 3.
Page 5
5 12.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
10._Entire_Tribunal_Case_Information_Sheet_Must_Upload_Answer_.18c1c16a-93d1-455d-8dd4-b774643aed2a.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-001974 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City Of Auburn Hills (OAKLAND) Local Unit of Government/First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Laura M.I. M Last Name Hallahan Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 City or Town Bloomfield Hills State Michigan ZIP Code 48302 Telephone Number 248-731-3087 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) MTT@hallahanlaw.com Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: Laura M Hallahan /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
NDA Auburn II LLC - City of Auburn Hills 25-001974 POS.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL NDA Auburn IT LLC, Petitioner, MTT DOCKET NO. 25-001974-TT City of Auburn Hills Respondent. PROOF OF SERVICE Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 2" day of September 2025 she served a copy of the Petition upon the following persons by placing same in an envelope properly addressed to each via USPS first class thereon: Lisa Brown Pontiac City School District Oakland County Clerk ShaQuana Davis-Smith 1200 N Telegraph Rd School Board Secretary Building 12E 47200 Woodward Avenue Pontiac, MI 48341 Pontiac MI 48342 Micheal R. Lohmeier Michigan State Treasurer Oakland County Equalization Director Department of Treasury 250 Elizabeth Lake RD Treasury Building Suite 1000 W 430 West Allegan Pontiac, MI 48341 Lansing, MI 48922 Micke (( re) Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Authorized Agent
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL NDA Auburn IT LLC, Petitioner, MTT DOCKET NO. 25-001974-TT City of Auburn Hills Respondent. PROOF OF SERVICE Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 2" day of September 2025 she served a copy of the Petition upon the following persons by placing same in an envelope properly addressed to each via certified mail thereon: Bill Griffen City of Auburn Hills Assessor 1827 N. Squirrell Road Auburn Hills, MI 48326 Laura M. Pierce City of Auburn Hills Clerk 1827 N. Squirrell Road Auburn Hills, MI 48326 , a Mica (0 a) Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Authorized Agent
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL NDA Auburn II LLC Petitioner, v City of Auburn Hills Respondent. Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Alex Morse DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Representatives for Petitioner 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (317) 689-6467-ofc (917) 488-7825-mobile msilvey@dmainc.com amorse@dmainc.com MTT Docket No. 25-001974 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No.: 02-14-14-176-013 2. The property identified above is real . 3. Only one parcel of property is the subject of this appeal. 4. Petitioner owns and/or otherwise holds an interest in the parcel of property that is the subject of this appeal. -TT
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 25-001974 TT Page 2 of 3 5. The property identified above is classified as 301 Industrial-Improved 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. The assessments) at issue were not protested to Respondent’s March, July, or December Board of Review as a protest was not required. The property or properties at issue are in Oakland County. The property or properties’ address is: 2100 N Opdyke Rd, Auburn Hills, MI 48326 The assessment(s) at issue were established by the: City of Auburn Hills Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 2100 N Opdyke Rd, Auburn Hills, MI 48326 This appeal involves issues relating to the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values and uniformity. The tax year at issue is: 2025. The values for the property identified above as established by
Page 5
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
NDA Auburn II LLC - City of Auburn Hills.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL NDA Auburn II LLC R MTT Docket No. 25- Petitioner, v City of Auburn Hills R Respondent. / Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Alex Morse DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Representatives for Petitioner 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (317) 689-6467-ofc (917) 488-7825-mobile msilvey@dmainc.com amorse@dmainc.com ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No.: 02-14-14-176-013 2. The property identified above is real . 3. Only one parcel of property is the subject of this appeal. 4. Petitioner owns and/or otherwise holds an interest in the parcel of property that is the subject of this appeal.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25- -TT Page 2 of 3 S. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. The property identified above is classified as 301 Industrial-Improved The assessment(s) at issue were not protested to Respondent’s March, July, or December Board of Review as a protest was not required. The property or properties at issue are in Oakland County. The property or properties’ address is: 2100 N Opdyke Rd, Auburn Hills, MI 48326 The assessment(s) at issue were established by the: City of Auburn Hills Petitioners legal residence or principal office address is: 2100 N Opdyke Rd, Auburn Hills, MI 48326 This appeal involves issues relating to the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values and uniformity. The tax year at issue is: 2025. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 2025 Board of Review are: Tax True Cash Assessed Taxable Year Value Value Value 2025 | $18,577,760 $9,288,880 $7,084,870 Petitioner contends the values for tax year 2025 are no more than the following: Tax True Cash State Equalized Taxable Year Value Value Value 2025 | $10,730,000 $5,365,000 $5,365,000 The values in contention for tax year 2025 are: Tax True Cash State Equalized Taxable Year Value Value Value 2025 $7,847,760 $3,923,880 $1,719,870
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 2-___BBB___-TT Page 3 of 3 The 202assessments imposed on the subject property and the taxes to be levied and collected are invalid because: D The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; E The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, is at a higher percentage of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; F The assessment is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and G The assessment otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests this honorable Tribunal hear this case and enter an order reducing the 202true cash, state equalized and taxable values and direct Respondent to refund to Petitioner any excess taxes, fees, and penalties paid, plus interest and costs, and all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan law and as is appropriate under the circumstances. Respectfully submitted, DuCharme, McMillen &
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2025-08-05_08-17-47.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 NDA Auburn II LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 25-001974 City Of Auburn Hills, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: __Tribunal Clerk________ Entered: August 5, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
NDA Auburn II LLC - City of Auburn Hills.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL NDA Auburn II LLC R MTT Docket No. 25- Petitioner, v City of Auburn Hills R Respondent. / Michelle (Mikki) M. Silvey (P69494) Alex Morse DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc. Representatives for Petitioner 9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (317) 689-6467-ofc (917) 488-7825-mobile msilvey@dmainc.com amorse@dmainc.com ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No.: 02-14-14-176-013 2. The property identified above is real . 3. Only one parcel of property is the subject of this appeal. 4. Petitioner owns and/or otherwise holds an interest in the parcel of property that is the subject of this appeal.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25- -TT Page 2 of 3 S. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. The property identified above is classified as 301 Industrial-Improved The assessment(s) at issue were not protested to Respondent’s March, July, or December Board of Review as a protest was not required. The property or properties at issue are in Oakland County. The property or properties’ address is: 2100 N Opdyke Rd, Auburn Hills, MI 48326 The assessment(s) at issue were established by the: City of Auburn Hills Petitioners legal residence or principal office address is: 2100 N Opdyke Rd, Auburn Hills, MI 48326 This appeal involves issues relating to the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values and uniformity. The tax year at issue is: 2025. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 2025 Board of Review are: Tax True Cash Assessed Taxable Year Value Value Value 2025 | $18,577,760 $9,288,880 $7,084,870 Petitioner contends the values for tax year 2025 are no more than the following: Tax True Cash State Equalized Taxable Year Value Value Value 2025 | $10,730,000 $5,365,000 $5,365,000 The values in contention for tax year 2025 are: Tax True Cash State Equalized Taxable Year Value Value Value 2025 $7,847,760 $3,923,880 $1,719,870
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 2-___BBB___-TT Page 3 of 3 The 202assessments imposed on the subject property and the taxes to be levied and collected are invalid because: D The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; E The assessment, including state equalized and/or taxable value, is at a higher percentage of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; F The assessment is based on the misapplication of valuation principles, and G The assessment otherwise violates Petitioner’s rights. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests this honorable Tribunal hear this case and enter an order reducing the 202true cash, state equalized and taxable values and direct Respondent to refund to Petitioner any excess taxes, fees, and penalties paid, plus interest and costs, and all other relief to which it is entitled under Michigan law and as is appropriate under the circumstances. Respectfully submitted, DuCharme, McMillen &
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
09._Entire_Tribunal_Case_Information_Sheet_Must_Upload_Petition_.975e7501-8a55-4ac9-8c16-8712343b7865.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MOAHR DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization First Name/Company Name M.I. Last Name NDA Auburn II LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 2100 N Opdyke Rd City or Town Auburn Hills State Michigan ZIP Code 48326 Telephone Number 917-488-7825 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) msilvey@dmainc.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Michelle (Mikki) M.I. M Last Name Silvey Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 9229 Delegates Row, Ste 375 City or Town Indianapolis State Indiana ZIP Code 46240 Telephone Number 317-596-3260 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) msilvey@dmainc.com Section 5: Issue Please designate one: Valuation – Fill out Sections 4, 5, & 6 below Section 6: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing?1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 2100 N Opdyke Rd Michigan Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Auburn Hills (OAKLAND) County Oakland If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Section 7: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values Section 8: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 02-14-14-176-013 Classification of Property: Real Industrial Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 9288880 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 7084870 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 10730000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 5365000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Section 9: Assessment Information Type of Tax Assessment(s): Assessment Number(s): Check all that is being appealed: Check what action prompted this appeal: If “other,” please explain: Section 10: Special Assessment Information Type of Special Assessment: Did you protest the special assessment at the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? If Yes, what was the date of the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? If No, please explain: Section 11: Classification Information Parcel Number: Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: What do you believe is the property’s classification?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.