Mbh Nnn Investments LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Hastings Respondent
- Petitioner
- Mbh Nnn Investments LLC
- Respondent
- City Of Hastings
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-001189-TT
- Status
- Ready Sched Prehearing Date Certain
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Barry
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Prehearing General Call | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/16/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Appearance | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/17/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 08/17/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Proof of service of petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 07/28/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | Not recorded | 1 | 07/27/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/27/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 05/20/2026 | $600.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF SEPTEMBER 16- 30, 2027 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF PROCEDURE MBH NNN Investments LLC, Petitioner, v City Of Hastings, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 26-001189 Please be advised that 26-001189 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General Call commencing September 16, 2027. Unless ordered otherwise, parties will be notified at least 28 days before they are scheduled to appear. Scheduling will not necessarily occur in the order in which the cases are listed below. Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning. See TTR 203 and TTR 241. Users who file documents with the Tribunal are advised that filed documents are public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tribunal’s Tax Docket Lookup. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Tribunal and prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents covered by the order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a Protective Order will be published. In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9) and TTR 209, the responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII contained in a previously filed document by submitting a Request for Redactions. The Request for Redactions form is available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages of the Tribunal’s website. Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on the Tribunal’s website for more information.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-001189 Page 2 of 3 IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall: a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties in writing within 21 days of entry of this order that no valuation disclosure is being filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.). b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures by May 20, 2027. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their Prehearing Statements by May 20, 2027. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal witnesses, will not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this order except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement may result in holding a party or parties in default. See TTR 237. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on May 20, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of litigating this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not permitted during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on September 16, 2027, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is limited to the opposing party’s valuation disclosure, the opposing party’s valuation expert, and the witnesses identified on the opposing party’s Prehearing Statement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if this case is not scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference during the time frame indicated it may be scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference at any time
Page 3
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MBH NNN Investments, LLC, Petitioner, v CITY OF HASTINGS Respondent. MTT Docket No. 26-001189 Parcel No. 08-55-140-012-00 / Brian Thomas Representative for Petitioner 6615 Brotherhood Way Fort Wayne, IN 46825 (260) 637-8899 bthomas@integritytax.com Toby Koenig (P72367) BLOOM SLUGGETT, PC Attorneys for Respondent 161 Ottawa Ave NW, Suite 400 Grand Rapids, MI 49503 (616) 965-9340 toby@bloomsluggett.com / RESPONDENT’S APPEARANCE NOW COMES attorney Toby Koenig, of the law firm of Bloom Sluggett, PC, and hereby enters his appearance on behalf of Respondent City of Hastings in this matter. Dated: August 17, 2026 Respectfully submitted by, BLOOM SLUGGETT, PC /s/ Toby Koenig Toby Koenig (P72367) Attorneys for Respondent City of Hastings
Page 2
{06982-001-00161464.1}
2
4920-7559-9303, v. 1
PROOF OF SERVICE
Tonya Voakes, being duly sworn, deposes and says that she is employed by Bloom
Sluggett, PC, and that on August 12, 2026, she served a copy of Respondent’s Appearance of Toby
Koenig by e-mail upon Brian Thomas at bthomas@integritytax.com and by First Class Mail upon:
Brian Thomas
6615 Brotherhood Way
Fort Wayne, IN 46825
/s/ Tonya Voakes
Tonya VoakesThese are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-001189 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Respondent Files Document Type: Appearance Attachment File Name: Hastings - MBH NNN Investments LLC 26-001189 Respondent's Appearance 8-17-26 final Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MBH NNN Investments, LLC, Petitioner, v CITY OF HASTINGS, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 26-001189 Parcel No. 08-55-140-012-00 / Brian Thomas Representative For Petitioner 6615 Brotherhood Way Fort Wayne, IN 46825 (260) 637-8899 bthomas@integritytax.com Toby Koenig (P72367) BLOOM SLUGGETT, PC Attorneys for Respondent 161 Ottawa Ave NW, Suite 400 Grand Rapids, MI 49503 (616) 965-9340 toby@bloomsluggett.com / RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITION AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Respondent, City of Hastings, through its attorneys hereby submits this Answer to Petitioner’s Petition filed in this matter. (1) Respondent denies the property parcel number as alleged by Petitioner in Paragraph 1 as the correct property parcel number is 08-55-140-012-00. (2) Respondent admits that the subject property is real property. (3) There are no allegations in Paragraph 3 of the Petition and therefore no response is required. (4) There are no allegations in Paragraph 4 of the Petition and therefore no response is required. (5) There are no allegations in Paragraph 5 of the Petition and therefore no response is required. (6) Admitted.
Page 2
{06982-001-00161464.1}
2
4897-9520-8647, v. 1
(7) There are no allegations in Paragraph 7 of the Petition and therefore no response is
required.
(8) There are no allegations in Paragraph 8 of the Petition and therefore no response is
required.
(9) There are no allegations in Paragraph 9 of the Petition and therefore no response is
required.
(10) Respondent admits that the subject property is located in Barry County and further
admits the address as alleged by Petitioner.
(11) Respondent admits that the City of Hastings established the assessment at issue.
(12) Respondent lacks sufficient information and/or knowledge to form a belief as to the
truthfulness of the allegations with respect to Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address
and leaves Petitioner to its proofs.
(13) The allegations in paragraph 13 of Petitioner’s petition merely restate Petitioner’s
claim and therefore no response is required.
(14) Respondent admits that the tax year at issue is 2026.
(15) There are no allegations in Paragraph 15 of the Petition and therefore no response is
required.
(16) Respondent admits the values alleged in Paragraph 16 of the Petition reflect the 2026
ad valorem assessment for the subject property.
(17) Denied as untrue.
(18) Respondent admits that Petitioner contends the values in dispute based on the
allegations in paragraph 17; however, Respondent denies as untrue that the subject property is
improperly assessed and denies that Petitioner is entitled to any relief.
(19) Paragraph 19 contains a request for relief to which no response is required;
Respondent denies that Petitioner is entitled to any relief, requested or otherwise.
(20) Respondent admits that the subject property contains an improvement that is used as
a car wash. Respondent denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 20 and further denies that
Petitioner is entitled to any relief.
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
1.
Petitioner has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.Page 3
{06982-001-00161464.1}
3
4897-9520-8647, v. 1
2.
Petitioner’s claims against Respondent are barred because the valuation methods
used by Respondent comply with the Constitution, state law, and prevailing Michigan State Tax
Commission procedures.
3.
Respondent’s assessment reflects 50% of the subject property’s true cash value and
the values on the roll, including the taxable value, comply with MCL 211.27a.
4.
Petitioner may not be a party in interest capable of bringing this appeal as to the
parcel at issue in this matter.
5.
Petitioner’s claims may be barred in whole or in part for failing to allege sufficient
facts to invoke the Tax Tribunal’s jurisdiction.
6.
Respondent reserves the right to identify further affirmative defenses as may
become known through discovery.
WHEREFORE, Respondent requests that the Tribunal dismiss Petitioner’s appeal with
prejudice and award Respondent its costs, attorney fees, and all such further and additional relief
as this Tribunal may deem appropriate.
Dated: August 17, 2026
Respectfully submitted by,
BLOOM SLUGGETT, PC
/s/ Toby Koenig
Toby Koenig (P72367)
Attorneys for Respondent
PROOF OF SERVICE
Tonya Voakes, being duly sworn, deposes and says that she is employed by Bloom
Sluggett, PC, and that on August 17, 2026, she served a copy of Respondent’s Appearance and
Answer to Petition and Affirmative Defenses with Proof of Service by E-mail and U.S. First Class
mail upon:
Brian Thomas
6615 Brotherhood Way
Fort Wayne, IN 46825
bthomas@integritytax.com
/s/ Tonya VoakesThese are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001189 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government City Of Hastings (BARRY) First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Toby M.I. Last Name Koenig Firm Name (if any) Bloom Sluggett PC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 161 Ottawa Ave NW Suite 400 City or Town Grand Rapids State Michigan ZIP Code 49503 Telephone Number (616) 965-9343 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) toby@bloomsluggett.com Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: Toby Koenig /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON [. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
MBH NNN Investments LLC
,
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
Petitioner(s)
v
MTT Docket No.26-001189
City of Hastings
,
Respondent(s)
PROOF OF SERVICE FOR PROPERTY TAX PETITION
*To be filed affer the Tribunal issues the Notice of Docket Number*
Teresa Beerman, on behalf of Brian Thomas,
states that on July 28, 2026
he/she
[Name of person serving/mailing petition]
[date of service]
served a copy of the Petition relative to the above-captioned matter upon:
[Provide name and address of the following entities]
1. Assessor (via certified mail):
City of Hastings, Assessor, 201 E. State Street, Hastings, MI 49058
2.
City Clerk or Township Supervisor/Clerk (via certified mail):
City of Hastings, Clerk, 201 E. State Street, Hastings, MI 49058
3.
County Equalization Director (via first class mail or personal service):
Director, Barry County Equalization, 220 W State St., Hastings, MI 49058
4.
County Clerk (via first class mail or personal service):
Clerk, Barry County, 220 W. State St., Hastings, MI 49058
5. Secretary of the local school board (via first class mail or personal service):
Secretary, Hastings Area School District, 232 Grand St., Hastings,
MI 49058
6.
State Treasurer (via first class mail):
Michigan Department of Treasury, State Treasurer
430 W. Allegan
Lansing, MI 48922
7
"ey
{ Deer en) pa
Teresa Beerman, on behalf of Brian Thomas
[Signature of person who is servirig/mailing copy]
[Print/type name of person serving/mailing copy]
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
- 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933
- 517-335-9760
PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909
- Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETGHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON |. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR MBH NNN Investments LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-001189 City Of Hastings, Respondent. docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shalt also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[f]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal's rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: July 27, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE | certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 + 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48908
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR MBH NNN Investments LLC , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) Vv MTT Docket Nop J6-00/18 City of Hastings | —— Respondent(s)-— —-.. - .— I J — — ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: 55-140-012-00 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is _v' real ___personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? __ Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4, Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___Yes No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional
Page 4
MTT-D
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-001189 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Petitioner Files Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition Attachment File Name: 26-001189_POS AND NOTICE OF DOCKET Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 _____________________________, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. _____________________________, Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: _____________________________________________ (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is ___real ___personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as _________________________ 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s ___ March ___ July ___December Board of Review. n/a City of Hastings MBH NNN Investments LLC 55-140-012-00 201 Commercial - Improved
Page 2
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 2 of 4 8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 10. The property or properties at issue are located in _______________County. The property or properties’ address is: 11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): ________________________________________ 12. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 13. This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): ________the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values ________the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes ___No ________uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment ________the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______ 14. The tax year(s) at issue are: _______________________________________ n/a Barry 1105 W State St Hastings MI 49058-9711 City of Hastings MBH NNN INVESTMENTS LLC 17002 SHEFFIELD PARK DR CYPRESS, TX 77433 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 20. List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the relief requested (attach additional page if necessary): n/a 2026 4778200 2389100 2389100 2026 1700000 850000 850000 2026 3078200 1539100 1539100 We respectfully request that the taxable value and assessed value be corrected to $850000 with the true cash value $1700000. The subject property is a car wash building. Review of this type building as well as an appraisal supports a much lower valuation. We would respectfully request the assessment be adjusted to more appropriately represent the value of the subject property.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 4 of 4 Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Integrity Tax Consulting Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 6615 Brotherhood Way City or Town Fort Wayne State Indiana ZIP Code 46825-4226 Telephone Number 2606378899 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) tbeerman@integritytax.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Brian M.I. Last Name Thomas Firm Name (if any) Integrity Tax Consulting Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 6615 Brotherhood Way City or Town Fort Wayne State Indiana ZIP Code 46815 Telephone Number 2606378899 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) bthomas@integritytax.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 1105 W State St Hastings
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Michigan 49058 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Hastings (BARRY) County Barry If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 55-140-012-00 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 2389100 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 2389100 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 1700000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 850000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Brian Thomas Payment Information Amount: 600 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26052086311232 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MBH NNN Investments LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-001189 City Of Hastings, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: July 27, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 _____________________________, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. _____________________________, Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: _____________________________________________ (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is ___real ___personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as _________________________ 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s ___ March ___ July ___December Board of Review. n/a City of Hastings MBH NNN Investments LLC 55-140-012-00 201 Commercial - Improved
Page 2
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 2 of 4 8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 10. The property or properties at issue are located in _______________County. The property or properties’ address is: 11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): ________________________________________ 12. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 13. This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): ________the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values ________the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes ___No ________uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment ________the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______ 14. The tax year(s) at issue are: _______________________________________ n/a Barry 1105 W State St Hastings MI 49058-9711 City of Hastings MBH NNN INVESTMENTS LLC 17002 SHEFFIELD PARK DR CYPRESS, TX 77433 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 20. List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the relief requested (attach additional page if necessary): n/a 2026 4778200 2389100 2389100 2026 1700000 850000 850000 2026 3078200 1539100 1539100 We respectfully request that the taxable value and assessed value be corrected to $850000 with the true cash value $1700000. The subject property is a car wash building. Review of this type building as well as an appraisal supports a much lower valuation. We would respectfully request the assessment be adjusted to more appropriately represent the value of the subject property.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 4 of 4 Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Integrity Tax Consulting Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 6615 Brotherhood Way City or Town Fort Wayne State Indiana ZIP Code 46825-4226 Telephone Number 2606378899 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) tbeerman@integritytax.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Brian M.I. Last Name Thomas Firm Name (if any) Integrity Tax Consulting Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 6615 Brotherhood Way City or Town Fort Wayne State Indiana ZIP Code 46815 Telephone Number 2606378899 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) bthomas@integritytax.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 1105 W State St Hastings
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Michigan 49058 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Hastings (BARRY) County Barry If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 55-140-012-00 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 2389100 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 2389100 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 1700000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 850000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Brian Thomas Payment Information Amount: 600 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26052086311232 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.