Record Finder / 25-003286-TT
Michigan

Martin Jeff Heppler, Petitioner Vs. Township Of Emmett, Respondent

Petitioner
Martin Jeff Heppler
Respondent
Township Of Emmett

Case overview

Docket number
25-003286-TT
Status
Disposed
CaseType
ET Property
Division
ET
County
Calhoun
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
9Order of DismissalNot recordedNot recorded09/11/2025Not recordedDownload
8Filing Fee Transferred to 25-002666Not recordedNot recorded09/11/2025($400.00)Not recorded
7No Action TakenNot recorded409/11/2025Not recordedNot recorded
6Petition has been verifiedPET209/11/2025Not recordedDownload
5Notice of Docket Number ETNot recordedNot recorded09/11/2025Not recordedDownload
4Motion to Set Aside Default was received.PETNot recorded08/29/2025Not recordedDownload
3Attachments to the Petition were filedPETNot recorded08/29/2025Not recordedDownload
2A petition was received.PETNot recorded08/29/2025Not recordedDownload
1ET Case Info SheetNot recordedNot recorded08/29/2025$400.00Download

Documents

Order_of_Dismissal.2025-09-11_13-39-36.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Martin Jeff Heppler, 

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v 

 MTT Docket No. 25-003286

Township Of Emmett,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

The issue in this case is already pending in another case and, as such, this appeal is 

duplicative and shall be dismissed. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED.

This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case.

APPEAL RIGHTS

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for 

reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of 

Appeals. 

A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee 

within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision 

closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing 

system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such 

motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless 

the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a 

principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the 

decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, 

if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the 

opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to 

electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the 

motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral 

arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal.

Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the 

claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-003286

Page 2 of 6

the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal 

by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the 

record on appeal. There is no certification fee. 

By:___________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: September 11, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Martin Jeff Heppler, 

Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v 

 MTT Docket No. 25-003286

Township Of Emmett,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that:

The issue in this case is already pending in another case and, as such, this appeal is 

duplicative and shall be dismissed. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED.

This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case.

APPEAL RIGHTS

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for 

reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of 

Appeals. 

A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee 

within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision 

closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing 

system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such 

motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless 

the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a 

principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the 

decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, 

if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the 

opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to 

electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the 

motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral 

arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal.

Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the 

claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If

Page 4

MTT Docket No. 25-003286

Page 4 of 6

the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal 

by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the 

record on appeal. There is no certification fee. 

By:___________________________________

Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair

Entered: September 11, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 5

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN,

Page 6

M

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET Petition Amended w Attached Exhibit.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

 

_____________________________, 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

 

v 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 

 

 

 

 

_____________________________, 

Respondent(s) 

 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

 

1. 

Property Parcel No: _____________________________________________ 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

 

2. 

The property identified above is ___real ___personal. 

 

3. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non-

contiguous parcel.) 

 

4. 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal.) 

 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

6. 

The property identified above is classified as _________________________ 

 

7. 

If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made 

to Respondent’s ___ March ___ July ___December Board of Review. 

 

 

 

 

Martin J. Heppler

25-002666

Emmett Charter Township

10-008-005-00

x

x

x

commercial

x

Page 2

MTT Docket No. _________________ 

Page 2 of 4 

 

8. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

9. 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

10. 

The property or properties at issue are located in _______________County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

 

 

 

 

 

11. 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable 

local governmental unit): ________________________________________ 

 

12. 

Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 

 

 

 

 

 

13. 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

________the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

________the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes ___No 

________uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment 

________the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation 

 under MCL ______ 

 

14. 

The tax year(s) at issue are: _______________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25-002666

Calhoun

2000 E Columbia Ave, Battle Creek, MI 49014 

Emmett Charter Township, Calhoun County

8666 E D. Ave, Richland, MI, 49083

x

2025

Page 3

MTT Docket No. _________________ 

Page 3 of 4 

 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior 

tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 

Board of Review are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

Assessed Value

Taxable Value

 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

State Equalized Value

Taxable Value

 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

State Equalized Value

Taxable Value

 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20. 

List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the 

relief requested (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25-002666

2025

485,000

485,000

242,500

2025

310,000

155,000

155,000

2025

175,000

87,500

87,500

Order that the assessed value for the parcel numbered 10-008-005-00 be adjusted to 

$310,000, with the taxable value and tax bill changed to reflect that figure. 

See attached appraisal dated May 29, 2025.

Page 4

MTT Docket No. _________________ 

Page 4 of 4 

 

Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

Printed Name of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

Email Address: _________________________________________________________ 

 

Mailing Address: 

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

Telephone Number: _____________________________________________________ 

 

Date: _________________________________________________________________ 

 

25-002666

/s/ Nelson Karre

Nelson Karre

nkarre@vcflaw.com

70 Michigan Ave W

Suite 450

Battle Creek, MI, 49017

269-965-7000

August 29, 2025

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2025-09-11_09-38-38.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Martin Jeff Heppler, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 25-003286

Township Of Emmett, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: __Tribunal Clerk________

Entered: September 11, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT HEPPLER.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

MARTIN JEFF HEPPLER, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002666 

 

Petitioner, 

 

v. 

 

 

EMMETT CHARTER TOWNSHIP 

 

 

Respondent, 

 

Nelson Karre (P27639) 

Attorney for Petitioner 

Vandervoort, Christ, & Fisher P.C. 

70 Michigan Ave, Suite 450 

Battle Creek, MI, 49017 

(269)-965-7000 

 

MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT 

Petitioner MARTIN JEFF HEPPLER (“Petitioner”), by and through his attorney Nelson 

Karre of VANDERVOORT, CHRIST, & FISHER P.C., states as follows for his Motion to Set 

Aside Default: 

1. Petitioner filed an appeal with the Small Claims Division of the Tribunal on June 23, 

2025. 

2. This Tribunal held Petitioner in default on July 8, 2025, as Petitioner, filing without 

counsel, mistakenly filed the appeal with the Small Claims division of the Michigan 

Tax Tribunal. 

3. This Tribunal initially considered the default cured in an order issued on August 12, 

2025, but subsequently reversed its August 12 order in an order issued on August 18,

Page 2

2025. This Tribunal held that because the petition had not been amended from its 

initial Small Claims Division filing, nor had the filing fee been paid, it was 

incomplete. EXHIBIT 1. 

4. This Tribunal further ordered Petitioner to file a Motion to Set Aside Default in its 

August 18, 2025 order. 

5. A party held in default shall cure the default as provided by the order holding the 

party in default. R 792.10237(1). 

6. Concurrent with the filing of this motion, Petitioner has also filed an amended 

petition and paid the balance of the unpaid filing fee, totaling $400. 

Therefore, for the above reasons, Petitioner asks that this Tribunal (1) set aside the default 

entered on August 18, 2025, (2) set this matter for a prehearing conference, and (3) apply any 

further relief the Tribunal deems appropriate. 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

August 29, 2025 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Nelson Karre (P27639) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nelson Karre (P27639) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vandervoort, Christ, & Fisher 

P.C. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

70 Michigan Ave, Suite 450 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Battle Creek, MI, 49017 

(269)-965-7000

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Martin Jeff Heppler, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner, 

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-002666 

Emmett Township, 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

Patricia L. Halm 

ORDER VACATING AUGUST 12, 2025 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE FROM 

. 

SMALL CLAIMS TO ENTIRE TRIBUNAL 

ORDER VAGATING AUGUST 12, 2025 ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER 

TO CURE DEFAULT 

ORDER VACATING AUGUST 12, 2025 ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL 

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE FROM SMALL CLAIMS TO ENTIRE TRIBUNAL 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT 

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL 

Tribunal petition, the default has not been cured because Petitioner failed to complete 

the petition. Specifically, Petitioner failed to complete Paragraph 18 of the petition form 

and indicated in Paragraph 14 of the petition form that the 2023 and 2024 tax years are 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

- 611W, OTTAWA ST, LANSING, Mi 48933 

- 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, Mi 48909 

- Other Carrlers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Page 4

MTT Docket No, 25-002666 

Page 2 of 3 

in dispute, but it appears to the Tribunal that Petitioner is actually attempting to appeal 

the 2024 and 2025 tax years, which have valuation dates of December 31, 2023, and 

December 31, 2024, respectively. 

Further, Petitioner failed to pay the full fee required 

for the filing of the Entire Tribunal petition. 

(i-e., “an error of a transpositional, typographical, or mathematical nature”) or a mutual 

mistake of fact (i.e., “an erroneous belief, which is shared and relied on by both 

parties”).3 And though MCL 211.53p provides July and December Boards of Review 

Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that the August 12, 2025 Order Transferring Case from Small Claims 

to Entire Tribunal is VACATED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the August 12, 2025 Order Extending Time for 

Petitioner 

to Cure Default is VACATED, 

TIS FURTHER ORDERED that the August 12, 2025 Order of Partial Dismissa is 

VACATED, 

ITS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is TRANSFERRED from the Small Claims 

Division to the Entire Tribunal division. 

ITISFURTHER ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is 

EXTENDED, 

tax year;* (2) pay the remaining filing fee due for the filing of the Entire Tribunal 

petitions (3) file a Motion 

to Set Aside Default, (4) pay the $50.00 fee required for the 

failure to properly complets the petition. 

2 See MCL 205.7352. 

8 See Iriternational Place Apartments - IV v Ypsilanti Township, 216 Mich App*104, 109 (1 986), and Ford 

Motor Company v City of Woodhaven, 475 Mich 425, 442 (2008). 

“TTR 233, 

5TTR 223,

Page 5

MTT Docket No. 25-002666 

Page 3 of 3 

filing of the motion; and (4) file proof the motion was served on Respondent. The 

foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of entry of this Order. 

IT'S FURTHER ORDERED that the amended Entire Tribunal petition shall note the 

docket 

number assigned by the Tribunal in this case. Unfortunately, payment of the 

remaining filing fee due may not be made via efiling. 

Information on Entire Tribunal petitions, Tribunal rules, and a filing fee calculator can be 

found on our website at www.michigan.gov/iaxtrip. 

ITI8 FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's assessment appeal is PARTIALLY 

DISMISSED. The appeal shall continue for the 2025 tax year only. 

Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of the case as provided by TTR 

2377 

Entered: August 18, 2025 

- Licey 2 Hada, 

bw/kacfjcr/am 

utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as 

ji 

I 

j 

eys, or authorized 

representatives, 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

on a business day is considered filed on that business day. 

A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a 

holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal

Page 6

ST

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET Petition Amended w Attached Exhibit.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

 

_____________________________, 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

 

v 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 

 

 

 

 

_____________________________, 

Respondent(s) 

 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

 

1. 

Property Parcel No: _____________________________________________ 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

 

2. 

The property identified above is ___real ___personal. 

 

3. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non-

contiguous parcel.) 

 

4. 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal.) 

 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

6. 

The property identified above is classified as _________________________ 

 

7. 

If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made 

to Respondent’s ___ March ___ July ___December Board of Review. 

 

 

 

 

Martin J. Heppler

25-002666

Emmett Charter Township

10-008-005-00

x

x

x

commercial

x

Page 2

MTT Docket No. _________________ 

Page 2 of 4 

 

8. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

9. 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

10. 

The property or properties at issue are located in _______________County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

 

 

 

 

 

11. 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable 

local governmental unit): ________________________________________ 

 

12. 

Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 

 

 

 

 

 

13. 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

________the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

________the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes ___No 

________uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment 

________the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation 

 under MCL ______ 

 

14. 

The tax year(s) at issue are: _______________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25-002666

Calhoun

2000 E Columbia Ave, Battle Creek, MI 49014 

Emmett Charter Township, Calhoun County

8666 E D. Ave, Richland, MI, 49083

x

2025

Page 3

MTT Docket No. _________________ 

Page 3 of 4 

 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior 

tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 

Board of Review are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

Assessed Value

Taxable Value

 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

State Equalized Value

Taxable Value

 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

State Equalized Value

Taxable Value

 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20. 

List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the 

relief requested (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25-002666

2025

485,000

485,000

242,500

2025

310,000

155,000

155,000

2025

175,000

87,500

87,500

Order that the assessed value for the parcel numbered 10-008-005-00 be adjusted to 

$310,000, with the taxable value and tax bill changed to reflect that figure. 

See attached appraisal dated May 29, 2025.

Page 4

MTT Docket No. _________________ 

Page 4 of 4 

 

Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

Printed Name of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

Email Address: _________________________________________________________ 

 

Mailing Address: 

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

Telephone Number: _____________________________________________________ 

 

Date: _________________________________________________________________ 

 

25-002666

/s/ Nelson Karre

Nelson Karre

nkarre@vcflaw.com

70 Michigan Ave W

Suite 450

Battle Creek, MI, 49017

269-965-7000

August 29, 2025

Page 5

SITE DESCRIPTION 

GRR250041 

General Description 

The subject 

site consists 

of 

1 

parcel. As noted 

below, 

the subject 

site has 

1,666,587 SF (38.26 AC) of land area. The area is

Page 6

SIT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET Petition Amended w Attached Exhibit.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

 

_____________________________, 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

 

v 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 

 

 

 

 

_____________________________, 

Respondent(s) 

 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

 

1. 

Property Parcel No: _____________________________________________ 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

 

2. 

The property identified above is ___real ___personal. 

 

3. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non-

contiguous parcel.) 

 

4. 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal.) 

 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

6. 

The property identified above is classified as _________________________ 

 

7. 

If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made 

to Respondent’s ___ March ___ July ___December Board of Review. 

 

 

 

 

Martin J. Heppler

25-002666

Emmett Charter Township

10-008-005-00

x

x

x

commercial

x

Page 2

MTT Docket No. _________________ 

Page 2 of 4 

 

8. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

9. 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

10. 

The property or properties at issue are located in _______________County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

 

 

 

 

 

11. 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable 

local governmental unit): ________________________________________ 

 

12. 

Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 

 

 

 

 

 

13. 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

________the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

________the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes ___No 

________uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment 

________the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation 

 under MCL ______ 

 

14. 

The tax year(s) at issue are: _______________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25-002666

Calhoun

2000 E Columbia Ave, Battle Creek, MI 49014 

Emmett Charter Township, Calhoun County

8666 E D. Ave, Richland, MI, 49083

x

2025

Page 3

MTT Docket No. _________________ 

Page 3 of 4 

 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior 

tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s 

Board of Review are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

Assessed Value

Taxable Value

 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

State Equalized Value

Taxable Value

 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

 

Tax Year

True Cash Value

State Equalized Value

Taxable Value

 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20. 

List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the 

relief requested (attach additional page if necessary): 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25-002666

2025

485,000

485,000

242,500

2025

310,000

155,000

155,000

2025

175,000

87,500

87,500

Order that the assessed value for the parcel numbered 10-008-005-00 be adjusted to 

$310,000, with the taxable value and tax bill changed to reflect that figure. 

See attached appraisal dated May 29, 2025.

Page 4

MTT Docket No. _________________ 

Page 4 of 4 

 

Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

Printed Name of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

Email Address: _________________________________________________________ 

 

Mailing Address: 

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

Telephone Number: _____________________________________________________ 

 

Date: _________________________________________________________________ 

 

25-002666

/s/ Nelson Karre

Nelson Karre

nkarre@vcflaw.com

70 Michigan Ave W

Suite 450

Battle Creek, MI, 49017

269-965-7000

August 29, 2025

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

09._Entire_Tribunal_Case_Information_Sheet_Must_Upload_Petition_.7ca21153-f7cf-4d33-9ede-f3ec2c5333c6.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: Individual

First Name/Company Name

Martin

M.I.

Jeff

Last Name

Heppler

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

8666 E D. Ave, Richland, MI, 49083

City or Town

Richland

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

49083

Telephone Number

2699657000

Fax Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

nkarre@vcflaw.com

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Nelson

M.I.

Last Name

Karre

Firm Name (if any)

Vandervoort, Christ, & Fisher P.C.

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

70 Michigan Ave West

Suite 450

City or Town

Battle Creek

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

49017

Telephone Number

269-965-7000

Fax Number

269-965-0646

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

nkarre@vcflaw.com

Section 5: Issue

Please designate one: 

Valuation – Fill out Sections 4, 5, & 6 below

Section 6: Subject Property Information

How many parcels are you 

appealing?1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

2000 E Columbia Ave, Battle Creek, MI, 49014

Battle Creek

Michigan

49015

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

Township Of Emmett (CALHOUN)

County

Calhoun

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Section 7: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply)

True Cash and Taxable Values

Section 8: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

10-008-005-00

Classification of Property: Real 

Commercial

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

485000

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

242500

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

310000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

155000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

Section 9: Assessment Information

Type of Tax Assessment(s):

Assessment Number(s):

Check all that is being appealed: Tax

Check what action prompted this appeal:

If “other,” please explain:

Section 10: Special Assessment Information

Type of Special Assessment:

Did you protest the special assessment at the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? 

If Yes, what was the date of the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll?

If No, please explain:

Section 11: Classification Information

Parcel Number:

10-008-005-00

Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: 

Commercial

What do you believe is the property’s classification? 

Commercial

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

If improved property, how is the property currently being used?

If improved property, for what use was the property designed?

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest 

State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Nelson Karre

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.