Record Finder / 26-002135-TT
Michigan

Maple Plaza Shopping Center II LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Walled Lake Respondent

Petitioner
Maple Plaza Shopping Center II LLC
Respondent
City Of Walled Lake

Case overview

Docket number
26-002135-TT
Status
Answer Due
CaseType
ET Property
Division
ET
County
Oakland
Judge
No judge assigned

Docket history

Line #SubjectFilerLine RefEnter Date/Post MarkFeeRelated Item
5Proof of service of petition was received.PETNot recorded10/16/2026Not recordedDownload
Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedDownload
4Petition has been verifiedPET109/08/2026Not recordedDownload
3Notice of Docket Number ETNot recordedNot recorded09/08/2026Not recordedDownload
2Attachments to the Petition were filedPETNot recorded06/01/2026Not recordedDownload
1A petition was received.PETNot recorded06/01/2026$400.00Download

Documents

Petitioner's POS 10-16-2026.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Maple Plaza Shopping Center II LLC, 

Petitioner, 

\4 

MTT Docket No.: 26-002135 

City of Walled Lake, 

Respondent. 

Parcel No. 92-17-35-103-014 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

Ansam Isteepho, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that she is an employee of KASSAB 

LAW GROUP, P.C., and that on the 

_16" day of October, 2026, she served a copy of the following 

documents: Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition, Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet, the Notice of 

Docket Number, and a copy of this Proof of Service upon: 

1. 

Max Griffin, Assessor, (via Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested) 

City of Walled Lake 

1499 E. West Maple Road 

Walled Lake, MI 48390 

2. 

Jennifer A. Stuart, City of Walled Lake Clerk (via Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested) 

City Clerk’s Office 

1499 E. West Maple Road 

Walled Lake, MI 48390

Page 2

4. 

Lisa Brown, Oakland County Clerk (via First-Class Mail) 

Oakland County Clerk's Office 

1200 North Telegraph Road, Building 12E 

Pontiac, MI 48341 

5. 

Ronald Lippitt, Board Secretary (via First-Class Mail) 

Walled Lake Consolidated Schools 

850 Ladd Road, Building D 

Walled Lake, MI 48390 

6. 

Rachael A. Eubanks, State Treasurer (via First-Class Mail) 

Michigan Department of Treasury 

430 West Allegan Street 

Lansing, Michigan 48922 

by placing same in a duly addressed, stamped envelope, with applicable postage prepaid thereon, and by 

cnr Lolo 

— 

depositing same in the United States Mail. 

Further deponent saith not. 

Subscribed and sworn to before me 

Ansam Isteepho 

this_16th 

day of October, 2026. 

for ~ loro 

KARYNIM. KLEMPTNER, Notary Public 

Oakland County, Michigan 

Acting in Oakland County, Michigan 

My Commission expires: 04/09/2028

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

Docket Number: 26-002135

Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No

Party Filing Document 

Petitioner

Files

Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition

Attachment File Name: Petitioner's POS 10-16-2026

Fee Information

Filing Fee: $ 0.00

Payment Information

Payment: $ 0.00

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Petition.filed.6.01.2026 - Maple Shopping Center II LLC.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

MAPLE PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER, LLC 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

MTT Docket No. 

CITY OF WALLED LAKE 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

Property Parcel No: 92-17-35-103-014 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

The property identified above is X__real ___personal. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? ___Yes ___ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- 

contiguous parcel.) 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? ___ Yes __ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel of personal property not located on a parce! of real property under 

appeal.) 

if parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

The property identified above is classified as COMMERCIAL

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 4 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

The property or properties at issue are located in OAKLAND 

County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

1186 E WEST MAPLE RD, WALLED LAKE, MI 48390 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable 

local governmental unit): CITY OF WALLED LAKE 

Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 

C/O KEYSTONE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT 

31000 NORTHWESTERN HWY, SUITE 200 

FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48334 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

X 

the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? X__Yes No 

es’ assessment

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 

Page 3 of 4 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the prior 

tax vear or years (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

646,140 

323,070 

303,900 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

350,000 

175,000 

175,000 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

296,140 

148,070 

128,800 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

Petitioner requests that the Tribunal determine the true cash value, assessed value, state 

equalized value, and taxable value of the subject property for the 2026 tax year and enter an 

Order reducing the assessment to lawful levels, together with such other and further relief as 

the Tribunal deems just and proper.

Page 4

20. 

Facts Supporting Requested Relief 

a. The subject property consists of a single-tenant commercial restaurant building located 

at 1186 E, West Maple Road, Walled Lake, Michigan. 

b. The building was constructed in 1970 and experienced substantial water damage, after 

which the property remained vacant for an extended period of time. 

¢. The property was leased to Arabian Delights 

Grill, 

LLC pursuant to 

a Lease dated 

September 13, 2024. 

d. The lease provided for a rent-abatement period from September 1, 2024 through May 31, 

2025, reflecting the condition of the property and the substantial work required to place the 

property into service. 

e. Base rent during the first rent-paying year of the lease 

is $4,591.67 per month, 

or 

approximately $55,100 annually. 

f. The lease is a gross lease pursuant to which Landlord remains responsible for payment of 

real estate taxes, insurance, common area maintenance expenses, and other operating 

expenses. 

g. After deduction of operating expenses, the property's net operating income supports a 

true cash value substantially below the assessment established by Respondent. 

h. The primary landlord-funded repairs and improvements consisted of replacement of an 

existing roof at a cost of approximately $30,500 and replacement of HVAC equipment at a 

cost of approximately $15,000, replacement of an electrical panel, and metal awnings. 

i. The foregoing expenditures constituted replacement of existing building components and 

do not support the substantial increase in value reflected on the assessment roll. 

j. Respondent improperly treated a preexisting cooler/storage area as a 2025 addition. The 

cooler existed at the property prior to the current tenancy, was previously utilized by a former 

tenant, was removed, and was subsequently reinstalled. The cooler constitutes a removable 

trade fixture and is not a newly constructed building addition. 

k. Respondent also identified a dumpster area as having been added in 2025. The dumpster

Page 5

MTT Docket No. 

Page 4 of 4 

(Ae of pe tone! s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or,

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-09-08_06-33-49.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Maple Plaza Shopping Center II LLC, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 26-002135

City Of Walled Lake, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: September 8, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Maple Plaza Shopping Center II LLC, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 26-002135

City Of Walled Lake, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Entered: September 8, 2026

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

EntireTribunalCaseISPetition (34).pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner

MTT DOCKET NO. 

 

Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information

Filer type: 

Organization 

Local Unit of Government

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name

MAPLE PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER II, LLC

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

C/O Kassab Law Group, PC

31000 NORTHWESTERN HIGHWAY, SUITE 100

City or Town

FARMINGTON HILLS

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48334

Telephone Number

248-215-2200

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

kklemptner@k2lawyers.com

 

 

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Karyn

M.I.

Last Name

Klemptner

Firm Name (if any)

Kassab Law Group, PC

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

31000 Northwestern Hwy, Suite 100

City or Town

Farmington Hills

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48334

Telephone Number

248-215-2200

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

kklemptner@k2lawyers.com

 

Section 3: Issue 

Please designate one: 

Valuation 

 

Section 4: Subject Property Information 

How many parcels are you 

appealing?

1

Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address]

1186 E WEST MAPLE RD

WALLED LAKE

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

Michigan

48390

Taxing Authority (City or Township)

City Of Walled Lake (OAKLAND) 

County

Oakland

If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? 

(*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)

N/A

 

 

Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) 

True Cash and Taxable Values

Uncapping of Taxable Value

If “Other”, please explain:

 

 

Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal

Parcel Number:

92-17-35-103-014

Classification of Property: Real (check one)

Commercial (check one)

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review:

323070

Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review:

303900

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

350000

Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value).

175000

If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value.

175000

Fee Information

The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the 

highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being 

appealed.

If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is:

 

 $100,000.00 and under $250.00

 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00

 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00

* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal.

A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal.

A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Karyn M. Klemptner

Payment Information

Amount: 400

Success: True

Message: ""

Waiver Code:

Transaction Number: 26060187741772

Supporting Waiver Documents:

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Petition.filed.6.01.2026 - Maple Shopping Center II LLC.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

MAPLE PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER, LLC 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

MTT Docket No. 

CITY OF WALLED LAKE 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

Property Parcel No: 92-17-35-103-014 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

The property identified above is X__real ___personal. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? ___Yes ___ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- 

contiguous parcel.) 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? ___ Yes __ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel of personal property not located on a parce! of real property under 

appeal.) 

if parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

The property identified above is classified as COMMERCIAL

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 4 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

The property or properties at issue are located in OAKLAND 

County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

1186 E WEST MAPLE RD, WALLED LAKE, MI 48390 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable 

local governmental unit): CITY OF WALLED LAKE 

Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 

C/O KEYSTONE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT 

31000 NORTHWESTERN HWY, SUITE 200 

FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48334 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

X 

the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? X__Yes No 

es’ assessment

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 

Page 3 of 4 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the prior 

tax vear or years (attach additional page if necessary): 

N/A 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

Assessed Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

646,140 

323,070 

303,900 

17. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

350,000 

175,000 

175,000 

18. 

The values in dispute for the property identified above are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value 

State Equalized Value 

Taxable Value 

2026 

296,140 

148,070 

128,800 

19. 

Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 

Petitioner requests that the Tribunal determine the true cash value, assessed value, state 

equalized value, and taxable value of the subject property for the 2026 tax year and enter an 

Order reducing the assessment to lawful levels, together with such other and further relief as 

the Tribunal deems just and proper.

Page 4

20. 

Facts Supporting Requested Relief 

a. The subject property consists of a single-tenant commercial restaurant building located 

at 1186 E, West Maple Road, Walled Lake, Michigan. 

b. The building was constructed in 1970 and experienced substantial water damage, after 

which the property remained vacant for an extended period of time. 

¢. The property was leased to Arabian Delights 

Grill, 

LLC pursuant to 

a Lease dated 

September 13, 2024. 

d. The lease provided for a rent-abatement period from September 1, 2024 through May 31, 

2025, reflecting the condition of the property and the substantial work required to place the 

property into service. 

e. Base rent during the first rent-paying year of the lease 

is $4,591.67 per month, 

or 

approximately $55,100 annually. 

f. The lease is a gross lease pursuant to which Landlord remains responsible for payment of 

real estate taxes, insurance, common area maintenance expenses, and other operating 

expenses. 

g. After deduction of operating expenses, the property's net operating income supports a 

true cash value substantially below the assessment established by Respondent. 

h. The primary landlord-funded repairs and improvements consisted of replacement of an 

existing roof at a cost of approximately $30,500 and replacement of HVAC equipment at a 

cost of approximately $15,000, replacement of an electrical panel, and metal awnings. 

i. The foregoing expenditures constituted replacement of existing building components and 

do not support the substantial increase in value reflected on the assessment roll. 

j. Respondent improperly treated a preexisting cooler/storage area as a 2025 addition. The 

cooler existed at the property prior to the current tenancy, was previously utilized by a former 

tenant, was removed, and was subsequently reinstalled. The cooler constitutes a removable 

trade fixture and is not a newly constructed building addition. 

k. Respondent also identified a dumpster area as having been added in 2025. The dumpster

Page 5

MTT Docket No. 

Page 4 of 4 

(Ae of pe tone! s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or,

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.