Magna Check Inc, Petitioner Vs. City Of Warren, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Magna Check Inc
- Respondent
- City Of Warren
Case overview
- Docket number
- 25-001894-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Macomb
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Order of Dismissal | Not recorded | Not recorded | 03/16/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 10 | Appearance | RESP | Not recorded | 01/15/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 9 | Motion to Withdraw Appeal was received. | PET | Not recorded | 03/13/2026 | $0.00 | Download |
| 8 | Prehearing General Call | Not recorded | Not recorded | 01/16/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Proof of service of petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 08/22/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/20/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | ET Case Info Sheet | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/20/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Petition has been verified | PET | 2 | 07/29/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/29/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/30/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | ET Case Info Sheet | Not recorded | Not recorded | 05/30/2025 | $400.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Magna Check Inc, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-001894 City Of Warren, Respondent. ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that the parties have filed a Joint Motion to Withdraw the appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. By:_____________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: March 16, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Magna Check Inc, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-001894 City Of Warren, Respondent. ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that the parties have filed a Joint Motion to Withdraw the appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. By:_____________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: March 16, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
15 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MAGNA CHECK INC, Petitioner, MTT Docket No. 25-001894 v CITY OF WARREN, Respondent. / JOSHUA T. SHILLAIR (P72674) LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL SETH A. O'LOUGHLIN (P80257) Attorney for Petitioner KELSEA M. MELCHER (P85821) 400 W. Fourth St., Suite 350 HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Royal Oak, MI 48067 Attorneys for Respondent (248) 226-1632 1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 (248) 731-3089 RESPONDENT’S SUBSTITUTION OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Laura M. Hallahan of Hallahan & Associates, P.C. substitutes in place of Mary Michaels and Candice M. Mayer, Attorneys for the City of Warren, as authorized representative for Respondent City of Warren and requests that she be copied on all future matters in the above docket. Landes Ng Ne) /s/ Laura M. Hallahan MARY MICHAELS (P44601 LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) CANDICE M. MAYER (P85 SETH A. O'LOUGHLIN (P80257) ATTORNEYS FOR THE CITY or KELSEA M. MELCHER (P85821)
Page 2
15 PROOF OF SERVICE On the date below I sent by electronic mail a copy of the foregoing Respondent’s Substitution of Authorized Representative to: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. joshua.shillair@ecolliers.com karen.cameron@colliers.com 1 declare that the statement above is true to the best of my information, knowledge and belief. /s/ Holly McIntyre Dated: January 15,2026 Holly McIntyre
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Magna Check Inc, Petitioner, v MOAHR Docket No. 25-001894 City of Warren, Respondent. ________________________________________________________________________/ Joshua T. Shillair, Esq., (P72674) Of Colliers International Attorney for Petitioner 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, MI 48067 O: 248-226-1632 LAURA M. HALLAHAN (P42101) SETH A. O'LOUGHLIN (P80257) KELSEA M. MELCHER (P85821) HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Attorneys for Respondent 1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 (248) 731-3089 _______________________________________________________________________/ STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL Now comes Petitioner, Magna Check Inc, by and through their counsel, Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. of Colliers International and stipulates to withdraw its appeal. Signed: _/s/Joshua T. Shillair____ Date:__March 12, 2026______ Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) Attorney for Petitioner Now comes Respondent, City of Warren, by and through its counsel and concurs and stipulates to the withdrawal of this appeal. Signed: __/s/Kelsea M. Melcher______ Date:__March 13, 2026__________ Kelsea M. Melcher (P85821) Attorney for Respondent
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906 NOTICE OF DECEMBER 16 - 30, 2026 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND ORDER OF PROCEDURE Magna Check Inc, Petitioner, v City Of Warren, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 25-001894 Please be advised that 25-001894 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General Call commencing December 16, 2026. Unless ordered otherwise, parties will be notified at least 28 days before they are scheduled to appear. Scheduling will not necessarily occur in the order in which the cases are listed below. Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning. See TTR 203 and TTR 241. Users who file documents with the Tribunal are advised that filed documents are public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tribunal’s Tax Docket Lookup. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Tribunal and prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents covered by the order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a Protective Order will be published. In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9) and TTR 209, the responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII contained in a previously filed document by submitting a Request for Redactions. The Request for Redactions form is available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages of the Tribunal’s website. Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on the Tribunal’s website for more information.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-001894 Page 2 of 3 IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall: a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties in writing within 21 days of entry of this order that no valuation disclosure is being filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or reasons why no valuation disclosure is required (i.e., exemption claim, etc.). b. If a valuation disclosure is required, file and exchange their valuation disclosures by August 19, 2026. Valuation disclosures will not be admitted into evidence unless disclosed and furnished in accordance with this order (even though admissible) except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file and exchange their Prehearing Statements by August 19, 2026. Witnesses, with the exception of rebuttal witnesses, will not be allowed to testify unless disclosed in the Prehearing Statement and the Prehearing Statement is furnished in accordance with this order except upon a finding of good cause by the Tribunal. Failure to file the Prehearing Statement may result in holding a party or parties in default. See TTR 237. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on August 19, 2026, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. Discovery relative to the valuation disclosure prepared for purposes of litigating this case or the valuation expert that prepared that valuation disclosure is not permitted during “Pre-Valuation Disclosure” discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is CLOSED on December 16, 2026, which means all discovery has been requested, all Motions to Compel have been filed, and all requested or ordered discovery has been exchanged by that date. “Post-Valuation Disclosure” discovery is limited to the opposing party’s valuation disclosure, the opposing party’s valuation expert, and the witnesses identified on the opposing party’s Prehearing Statement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if this case is not scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference during the time frame indicated it may be scheduled for a date certain prehearing conference at any time subsequent to the completion date for this Prehearing General Call. Parties will, however, be notified in writing approximately one week before they are scheduled to appear. By:_____________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: January 16, 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 25-001894 Page 3 of 3 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or
Page 4
STATE OF
Page 5
MT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
2025 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Magna Check Inc v City of Warren Parcel Number: 12-13-19-351-017 MTT Docket No.: 25-001894 Page 1 of 2 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Magna Check Inc, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-001894 City of Warren, Respondent. _____________________________________________________________________________/ Colliers International By: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) Vice President | Tax Appeal Representative for Petitioner 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, MI 48067 O: 248-226-1632 F: 248-226-1633 Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com Karen.Cameron@Colliers.com City of Warren Department of Assessing One City Square, Suite 310 Warren, MI 48093 (586) 574-4532 _____________________________________________________________________________/ PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF MICHIGAN ) )ss COUNTY OF OAKLAND ) Jennifer Lunsford, states that on 8/21/2025, in compliance with TTR 221, she did place in the US mail a copy of Petitioner’s 2025 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition with docket number, the Notice of Docket Number issued by the Michigan Tax Tribunal for this appeal as well as this Proof of Service of Petition for the above captioned appeal to the units of government listed on the second page of this Proof of Service of Petition. /s/Jennifer Lunsford___ Jennifer Lunsford Joshua T. Shillair Esq. States that he submitted electronically on 8/22/2025, to the Michigan Tax Tribunal a copy of this Proof of Service of Petition at eFile through www.etaxappeal.lara.state.mi.us.
Page 2
2025 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Magna Check Inc v City of Warren Parcel Number: 12-13-19-351-017 MTT Docket No.: 25-001894 Page | 2 /s/Joshua T. Shillair Joshua T. Shillair Esq By Certified Mail Assessor’s Office City of Warren Department of Assessing One City Square, Suite 310 Warren, MI 48093 Office of the City/Township Clerk City of Warren Clerk's Office One City Square, Warren, MI 48093 By First Class Mail Director of Equalization Macomb County Equalization Director 1 S Main St 6th Floor Mount Clemens, MI 48043 County Clerk’s Office Macomb County Clerk's Office 120 N Main St Mount Clemens, MI 48043 Secretary of the School Board Fitzgerald Public Schools 23200 Ryan Rd Warren, MI 48091 Treasurer for the State of Michigan Michigan Department of Treasury Lansing, MI 48922
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MAGNA CHECK INC, MTT Docket No. 25-001894 Parcel ID Nos. 12-13-19-351-017 Petitioner, -v- CITY OF WARREN, Respondent. ___________________________________/ COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL JOSHUA T. SHILLAIR (P72674) Attorney for Petitioner 400 W. 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, Michigan 48067 (248) 226-1632 joshua.shillair@colliers.com karen.cameron@colliers.com WARREN CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE MARY MICHAELS (P44601) CANDICE M. MAYER (P85421) Attorneys for Respondent One City Square, Suite 400 Warren, Michigan 48093 (586) 574-4671 cmayer@cityofwarren.org ______________________________________________________________________ RESPONSE TO PETITION Respondent, CITY OF WARREN, by and through its attorneys, MARY MICHAELS, Acting City Attorney, and CANDICE M. MAYER, Assistant City Attorney, in response to the Petition states as follows: 1. Respondent admits ¶ 2, however Respondent’s records reflect Petitioner’s name as “Magna Chek Inc,” rather than Magna Check Inc. 2. Respondent admits ¶ 2.
Page 2
3. Respondent admits ¶ 3. 4. Respondent denies ¶ 4, as parcel no. 12-13-19-351-017 is classified as “Industrial - Improved.” 5. Respondent admits ¶ 5. 6. Respondent admits ¶ 6. 7. Respondent is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation in ¶ 7 and therefore, leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 8. Respondent admits ¶ 8. 9. Respondent denies ¶ 9, as the True Cash Value for parcel no. 12-13-19- 351-017 is $1,079,829.00. 10. Respondent denies the allegations set forth in ¶ 10a. through 10d. for the reason that they are untrue and therefore, leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 11. Respondent lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation set forth in ¶ 11 and therefore, leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 12. Respondent lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation set forth in ¶ 12 and therefore, leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 13. Respondent lacks sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations set forth in ¶ 13 and therefore, leaves Petitioner to its proofs.
Page 3
WHEREFORE, Respondent, CITY OF WARREN, requests the Tribunal deny the requested relief, dismiss the Petition with prejudice, and award Respondent costs incurred by having to defend against this matter. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________ CANDICE M. MAYER (P85421) Assistant City Attorney Attorney for Respondent Dated: August 20, 2025 ID 114378 Candice M. Mayer
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MAGNA CHECK INC, MTT Docket No. 25-001894 Parcel ID Nos. 12-13-19-351-017 Petitioner, -v- CITY OF WARREN, Respondent. ___________________________________/ COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL JOSHUA T. SHILLAIR (P72674) Attorney for Petitioner 400 W. 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, Michigan 48067 (248) 226-1632 joshua.shillair@colliers.com karen.cameron@colliers.com WARREN CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE MARY MICHAELS (P44601) CANDICE M. MAYER (P85421) Attorneys for Respondent One City Square, Suite 400 Warren, Michigan 48093 (586) 574-4671 cmayer@cityofwarren.org ______________________________________________________________________ AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Respondent, CITY OF WARREN, by and through its attorneys, MARY MICHAELS, Acting City Attorney, and CANDICE MAYER, Assistant City Attorney, submit the following Affirmative Defenses: 1. Petitioner failed to state any facts that would warrant relief from the assessment. 2. This Petition is barred by laches and principles of equity. 3. Petitioner failed to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, error
Page 5
of law, discrimination, application of wrong principles, or illegality on the part of Respondent or its agents. 4. Respondent reserves the right to challenge the Petition, should taxes not be timely paid. 5. Petitioner failed to allege that the mode and method of assessing the subject property fails to conform to the mode and method applied in the case of all other properties in Respondent’s taxing unit for the year in question. 6. Petitioner failed to plead facts and law establishing jurisdiction of the Tribunal. 7. Petitioner failed to show that any factor other than fifty percent (50%) was applied to the true cash value of Petitioner’s property, as well as all others, to arrive at the respective assessments appearing on the roll and also failed to allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegations that the property’s taxable value is improper. 8. Petitioner, in essence, seeks by this petition to challenge the process of county and state equalization to which it has no legal standing and cannot maintain as cause of action. 9. Respondent reserves the right to raise additional defenses as may become known during the course of these proceedings. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________ CANDICE M. MAYER (P85421) Assistant City Attorney Attorney for Respondent Dated: August 20, 2025 ID 114378 Candice M. Mayer
Page 6
Candice M. Mayer STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-001894 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City Of Warren (MACOMB) Local Unit of Government/First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Candice M.I. Last Name Mayer Firm Name (if any) Warren City Attorney's Office Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) One City Square Suite 400 City or Town Warren State Michigan ZIP Code 48093 Telephone Number 586-574-4671 Fax Number 586-574-4530 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) cmayer@cityofwarren.org Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: Candice Mayer /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
2025 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Magna Check Inc v City of Warren Parcel Number: 12-13-19-351-017 MTT Docket No.: Page 1 of 5 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Magna Check Inc, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. City of Warren, Respondent. _____________________________________________________________________________/ Colliers International By: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) Vice President | Tax Appeal Representative for Petitioner 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, MI 48067 O: 248-226-1632 F: 248-226-1633 Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com Karen.Cameron@Colliers.com City of Warren Department of Assessing One City Square, Suite 310 Warren, MI 48093 (586) 574-4532 _____________________________________________________________________________/ 2025 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. The Petitioner in this matter, Magna Check Inc, has the legal residence or principal office address of 18645 Canal Rd, Suite 5,Clinton Township, MI 48038. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property taxes on property parcel no(s). (hereinafter referenced as the Subject Property) 12-13-19-351-017. If the Subject Property in this petition includes more than one (1) real property tax parcel, the Subject Property’s tax parcels are contiguous. 2. The Subject Property is located in Macomb County.
Page 2
2025 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Magna Check Inc v City of Warren Parcel Number: 12-13-19-351-017 MTT Docket No.: Page 2 of 5 3. Respondent, City of Warren Department of Assessing of Macomb County, assesses and collects property taxes on the Subject Property. 4. The Subject Property is real property and is classified as Commercial. The Subject Property is presently used or available for use for Commercial purposes. Petitioner believes that the Subject Property was originally designed to be used for Commercial purposes. 5. Protest to the 2025 Board of Review was not made and is not required by law for the Subject Property. 6. The Subject Property’s address is: 2125 Riggs, Warren, MI 48091 7. This appeal involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value and (d) uniformity. 8. The tax year(s) at issue are: 2025 9. The values for the Subject Property as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 12-13-19-351- 017 $1,079,820.00 $539,910.00 $490,612.00 10. The 2025 assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value imposed upon all parcels of the Subject Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: a. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value exceeds the amounts permitted by the Michigan Constitution, applicable statutes and case law;
Page 3
2025 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Magna Check Inc v City of Warren Parcel Number: 12-13-19-351-017 MTT Docket No.: Page 3 of 5 b. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution, applicable statutes and case law; c. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that portion of the Subject Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and d. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and denies Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal protection and dues process of law. 11. Petitioner contends that the actual values for the Subject Property are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 12-13-19-351- 017 $600,000.00 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 12. The amount of value in contention for the Subject Property is: Tax Year Parcel Number Assessed Value in Contention 2025 12-13-19-351-017 $239,910.00 13. Petitioner relies on the following specific facts to support the relief requested: Market sales and income data indicates that the subject property’s assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value exceed 50% of its actual market value. In addition, the cost less depreciation method Respondent utilizes to establish the Subject Property’s assessment at issue is not related to the Subject Property’s actual market value.
Page 4
2025 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Magna Check Inc v City of Warren Parcel Number: 12-13-19-351-017 MTT Docket No.: Page 4 of 5 WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that this Honorable Michigan Tax Tribunal enter an Order reducing the 2025 assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value for the Subject Property to the values stated in Paragraph 11 above and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. Respectfully Submitted, COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL Representative for Petitioner By:_/s/ Joshua T.
Page 5
2025
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Magna Check Inc, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 25-001894 City Of Warren, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: __Tribunal Clerk________ Entered: July 29, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
2025 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Magna Check Inc v City of Warren Parcel Number: 12-13-19-351-017 MTT Docket No.: Page 1 of 5 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Magna Check Inc, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. City of Warren, Respondent. _____________________________________________________________________________/ Colliers International By: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) Vice President | Tax Appeal Representative for Petitioner 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, MI 48067 O: 248-226-1632 F: 248-226-1633 Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com Karen.Cameron@Colliers.com City of Warren Department of Assessing One City Square, Suite 310 Warren, MI 48093 (586) 574-4532 _____________________________________________________________________________/ 2025 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. The Petitioner in this matter, Magna Check Inc, has the legal residence or principal office address of 18645 Canal Rd, Suite 5,Clinton Township, MI 48038. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property taxes on property parcel no(s). (hereinafter referenced as the Subject Property) 12-13-19-351-017. If the Subject Property in this petition includes more than one (1) real property tax parcel, the Subject Property’s tax parcels are contiguous. 2. The Subject Property is located in Macomb County.
Page 2
2025 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Magna Check Inc v City of Warren Parcel Number: 12-13-19-351-017 MTT Docket No.: Page 2 of 5 3. Respondent, City of Warren Department of Assessing of Macomb County, assesses and collects property taxes on the Subject Property. 4. The Subject Property is real property and is classified as Commercial. The Subject Property is presently used or available for use for Commercial purposes. Petitioner believes that the Subject Property was originally designed to be used for Commercial purposes. 5. Protest to the 2025 Board of Review was not made and is not required by law for the Subject Property. 6. The Subject Property’s address is: 2125 Riggs, Warren, MI 48091 7. This appeal involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value and (d) uniformity. 8. The tax year(s) at issue are: 2025 9. The values for the Subject Property as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 12-13-19-351- 017 $1,079,820.00 $539,910.00 $490,612.00 10. The 2025 assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value imposed upon all parcels of the Subject Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: a. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value exceeds the amounts permitted by the Michigan Constitution, applicable statutes and case law;
Page 3
2025 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Magna Check Inc v City of Warren Parcel Number: 12-13-19-351-017 MTT Docket No.: Page 3 of 5 b. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution, applicable statutes and case law; c. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that portion of the Subject Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and d. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and denies Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal protection and dues process of law. 11. Petitioner contends that the actual values for the Subject Property are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 12-13-19-351- 017 $600,000.00 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 12. The amount of value in contention for the Subject Property is: Tax Year Parcel Number Assessed Value in Contention 2025 12-13-19-351-017 $239,910.00 13. Petitioner relies on the following specific facts to support the relief requested: Market sales and income data indicates that the subject property’s assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value exceed 50% of its actual market value. In addition, the cost less depreciation method Respondent utilizes to establish the Subject Property’s assessment at issue is not related to the Subject Property’s actual market value.
Page 4
2025 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Magna Check Inc v City of Warren Parcel Number: 12-13-19-351-017 MTT Docket No.: Page 4 of 5 WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that this Honorable Michigan Tax Tribunal enter an Order reducing the 2025 assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value for the Subject Property to the values stated in Paragraph 11 above and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. Respectfully Submitted, COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL Representative for Petitioner By:_/s/ Joshua T.
Page 5
2025
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MOAHR DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization First Name/Company Name M.I. Last Name Magna Check Inc Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 18645 Canal Rd, Suite 5 City or Town Clinton Township State Michigan ZIP Code 48038 Telephone Number 248-597-0089 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) wally@magnacheck.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Joshua M.I. Thomas Last Name Shillair Firm Name (if any) Colliers International Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 City or Town Royal Oak State Michigan ZIP Code 48067 Telephone Number 248-226-1632 Fax Number 248-226-1633 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) tax.efile@colliers.com Section 5: Issue Please designate one: Valuation – Fill out Sections 4, 5, & 6 below Section 6: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing?1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 2125 Riggs Michigan Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Warren (MACOMB) County Macomb If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Section 7: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values Section 8: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 12-13-19-351-017 Classification of Property: Real Commercial Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 539910.00 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 490612.00 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 600000.00 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 300000.00 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Section 9: Assessment Information Type of Tax Assessment(s): Assessment Number(s): Check all that is being appealed: Check what action prompted this appeal: If “other,” please explain: Section 10: Special Assessment Information Type of Special Assessment: Did you protest the special assessment at the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? If Yes, what was the date of the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? If No, please explain: Section 11: Classification Information Parcel Number: Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: What do you believe is the property’s classification?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR If improved property, how is the property currently being used? If improved property, for what use was the property designed? Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Joshua Shillair
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.