Macatawa Bank, Petitioner Vs. Township Of Grand Rapids, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Macatawa Bank N A
- Respondent
- Township Of Grand Rapids
Case overview
- Docket number
- 25-002794-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Kent
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | Consent Judgment | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/09/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 11 | Granted | PET | 10 | 09/09/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 10 | A Stipulation has been received. | PET | Not recorded | 09/08/2025 | $50.00 | Download |
| 9 | Order Denying Motion | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/04/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | A Stipulation has been received. | PET | Not recorded | 08/28/2025 | $50.00 | Download |
| 7 | Proof of Service of Misc Documents was received. | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/21/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/21/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | ET Case Info Sheet | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/21/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Proof of service of petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 08/01/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 07/22/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/22/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/29/2025 | $250.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Macatawa Bank, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-002794 Grand Rapids Township, Presiding Judge Respondent. Marcus L. Abood ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the Stipulation and finds that it comports with the mandates of State law.1 As a result, the Tribunal shall enter the parties’ Stipulation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all attachments, terms and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise indicated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be corrected to reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values as provided in this Consent Judgment within 20 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment.2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund as required by the Consent Judgment within 28 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall, unless otherwise indicated, include a proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and of penalty and interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also, unless otherwise indicated, separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being refunded. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall, unless otherwise indicated, bear interest from the date of payment to the date of judgment and the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any time period prior to 28 days after the issuance of this Consent Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2013, through June 30, 2016, at the rate of 4.25%, (ii) after June 30, 2016, through December 31, 2016, at the rate of 4.40%, (iii) after December 31, 2016, through June 30, 2017, at the rate of 4.50%, (iv) after June 30, 1 See MCL 211.27a. 2 See MCL 205.755.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002794 Page 2 of 2 2017, through December 31, 2017, at the rate of 4.70%, (v) after December 31, 2017, through June 30, 2018, at the rate of 5.15%, (vi) after June 30, 2018, through December 31, 2018, at the rate of 5.41%, (vii) after December 31, 2018, through June 30, 2019, at the rate of 5.9%, (viii) after June 30, 2019, through December 31, 2019, at the rate of 6.39%, (ix) after December 31, 2019, through June 30, 2020, at the rate of 6.40%, (x) after June 30 2020, through December 31, 2020, at the rate of 5.63%, (xi) after December 31, 2020, through June 30, 2022, at the rate of 4.25%, (xii) after June 30, 2022, through December 31, 2022, at the rate of 4.27%, (xiii) after December 31, 2022, through June 30, 2023, at the rate of 5.65%, (xiv) after June 30, 2023, through December 31, 2023, at the rate of 8.25%, (xv) after December 31, 2023, through June 30, 2024, at the rate of 9.30%, (xvi) after June 30, 2024, through December 31, 2024, at the rate of 9.50%, (xvii) after December 31, 2024, through June 30, 2025, at the rate of 9.47%, and (xviii) after June 30, 2025, through December 31, 2025, at the rate of 8.66%. This Consent Judgment resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. See docket look up for a copy of stipulation and for any possible refund paragraph. By Entered: September 9, 2025 am PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
wx p jo = a State of Michigan GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ORLENE HAWKS GOVERNOR Lansing DIRECTOR MACATAWA BANK, NA Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MOAHR Docket No. 25-002794 GRAND RAPIDS CHARTER TOVVNSHIP Respondent. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT (VALUATION) 1. The subject property is in Kent County. 2. Parcel Number: __ 41-14-36-451-009 . (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax year Assessed Value (AV) | Taxable Value (TV) 2025 $345,500 $345,500 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax year True Cash Value AV TV 2025 $691,000 $345,500 $304,875 5. If the stipulated TV does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable inflation rate multiplier, explain why (e.g., transfer of ownership, additions, losses, omitted property etc.) 6. List any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would affect the execution of a Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint payment MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, Mi 48906
Page 2
MOAHR Docket No. 25-002794 Page 2 of 2 of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): Ti ies stipulate agree ownership_n 2024 and therefore stipulate and agree to reinstate the 2024 capped value and apply the inflation rate multiplier to reach the 2025 taxable value. NOTE: The Stipulation MUST include ALL parcels and ALL tax years included in the appeal (including subsequent tax years on or after April 1 of each year for appeals pending in the Small Claims Division). The parties may agree, however, to withdraw the appeal of specific parcels and/or tax year(s). IF APPLICABLE, complete the following section(s). Otherwise, LEAVE BLANK. 7. The parties agree to the withdrawal of parcel number: (If more than one parcel is being withdrawn, attach a separate page addressing all other parcels being withdrawn.) 8. The parties agree to the withdrawal of tax year(s) Signature of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: /s/ Peter D. Rhoades PrintedName: Peter D. Rhoades (P49515) 9/5/2025 Date: Signature of Respondent's authorized representative: /s/ Joshua D. Beard PrintedName: Joshua D. Beard (P73388) 9/5/2025 Date:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
wx p jo = a State of Michigan GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ORLENE HAWKS GOVERNOR Lansing DIRECTOR MACATAWA BANK, NA Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MOAHR Docket No. 25-002794 GRAND RAPIDS CHARTER TOVVNSHIP Respondent. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT (VALUATION) 1. The subject property is in Kent County. 2. Parcel Number: __ 41-14-36-451-009 . (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax year Assessed Value (AV) | Taxable Value (TV) 2025 $345,500 $345,500 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax year True Cash Value AV TV 2025 $691,000 $345,500 $304,875 5. If the stipulated TV does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable inflation rate multiplier, explain why (e.g., transfer of ownership, additions, losses, omitted property etc.) 6. List any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would affect the execution of a Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint payment MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, Mi 48906
Page 2
MOAHR Docket No. 25-002794 Page 2 of 2 of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): Ti ies stipulate agree ownership_n 2024 and therefore stipulate and agree to reinstate the 2024 capped value and apply the inflation rate multiplier to reach the 2025 taxable value. NOTE: The Stipulation MUST include ALL parcels and ALL tax years included in the appeal (including subsequent tax years on or after April 1 of each year for appeals pending in the Small Claims Division). The parties may agree, however, to withdraw the appeal of specific parcels and/or tax year(s). IF APPLICABLE, complete the following section(s). Otherwise, LEAVE BLANK. 7. The parties agree to the withdrawal of parcel number: (If more than one parcel is being withdrawn, attach a separate page addressing all other parcels being withdrawn.) 8. The parties agree to the withdrawal of tax year(s) Signature of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: /s/ Peter D. Rhoades PrintedName: Peter D. Rhoades (P49515) 9/5/2025 Date: Signature of Respondent's authorized representative: /s/ Joshua D. Beard PrintedName: Joshua D. Beard (P73388) 9/5/2025 Date:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Macatawa Bank, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002794 Township of Grand Rapids, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on August 28, 2025, and finds that the parties have failed to provide the values, as established by Respondent’s Board of Review, for all tax years at issue. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be placed on a Prehearing General Call in the normal course of scheduling. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance of this order, no additional filing fee is required. By _____________________________ Joshua M. Wease, Tribunal Member Entered: September 4, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Macatawa Bank, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002794 Township of Grand Rapids, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on August 28, 2025, and finds that the parties have failed to provide the values, as established by Respondent’s Board of Review, for all tax years at issue. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be placed on a Prehearing General Call in the normal course of scheduling. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance of this order, no additional filing fee is required. By _____________________________ Joshua M. Wease, Tribunal Member Entered: September 4, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Macatawa Bank, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002794 Township of Grand Rapids, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on August 28, 2025, and finds that the parties have failed to provide the values, as established by Respondent’s Board of Review, for all tax years at issue. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be placed on a Prehearing General Call in the normal course of scheduling. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance of this order, no additional filing fee is required. By _____________________________ Joshua M. Wease, Tribunal Member Entered: September 4, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal
Page 4
ST
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ORLENE HAWKS GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR MACATAWA BANK, NA . MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MOAHR Docket No. 25-002794 GRAND RAPIDS CHARTER TOWNSHIP Respondent. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT (VALUATION) 1. The subject property is in Kent County. 2. Parcel Number: _ 41-14-36-451-009 . (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax year Assessed Value (AV) | Taxable Value (TV) 2024 $345,500 $345,500 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Tax year True Cash Value AV TV 2025 $691,000 $345,500 $304,875 5. If the stipulated TV does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable inflation rate multiplier, explain why (e.g., transfer of ownership, additions, losses, omitted property etc.) 6. List any special terms or conditions being proposed by the parties that would affect the execution of a Consent Judgment including, but not limited to, the joint payment MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 43906
Page 2
MOAHR Docket No. 25-002794 Page 2 of 2 of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): The Parties sti n ree re w. sfer of own ip in 2024 and therefore stipulate and agree to reinstate the 2024 capped value and apply the inflation rate multiplier to reach the 2025 taxable value. NOTE: The Stipulation MUST include ALL parceis and ALL tax years included in the appeal (including subsequent tax years on or after April 1 of each year for appeals pending in the Small Claims Division). The parties may agree, however, to withdraw the appeal of specific parcels and/or tax year(s). IF APPLICABLE, complete the following section(s). Otherwise, LEAVE BLANK. 7. The parties agree to the withdrawal of parcel number: (If more than one parcel is being withdrawn, attach a separate page addressing all other parcels being withdrawn.) 8. The parties agree to the withdrawal of tax year(s) Signature of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: /s/ Peter D. Rhoades Printed Name: Peter D. Rhoades (P49515) 8/27/2025 Date: Signature of Respondent's authorized representative: /s/ Joshua D. Beard Printed Name: Joshua D. Beard (P73388) 8/27/2025 Date:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
{03691869 1 }
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
_____________________
MACATAWA BANK, N.A.,
Petitioner,
v
GRAND RAPIDS CHARTER TOWNSHIP,
Respondent.
_____________________________________/
MTT Docket No. 25-002794
Parcel No. 41-14-36-451-009
PROOF OF SERVICE
Peter D. Rhoades (P49515)
Rhoades McKee PC
Counsel for Petitioner
PO Box 2271
Holland, MI 49422
(616) 233-5237
pdrhoades@rhoadesmckee.com
_____________________________________/
Joshua D. Beard (P73388)
Mika Meyers PLC
Counsel for Respondent
900 Monroe Avenue, NW
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
(616) 632-8000
tax.tribunal.efile@mikameyers.com
jbeard@mikameyers.com
I, Kristi Solomon, hereby state that I am an employee in the law firm of Mika Meyers PLC,
and that on August 21, 2025, I served copies of the following document(s):
Respondent’s Answer to Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition;
Respondent’s Answer to Attachment to Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition; and
Proof of Service.
upon the following individuals by email:
Peter D. Rhoades
Rhoades McKee PC
pdrhoades@rhoadesmckee.com
I declare that the statements above are true to the best of my information, knowledge, and
belief.
Dated: August 21, 2025
/s/ Kristi SolomonThese are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
{03691868 1 }
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
_____________________
MACATAWA BANK, N.A.,
Petitioner,
v
GRAND RAPIDS CHARTER TOWNSHIP,
Respondent.
_____________________________________/
MTT Docket No. 25-002794
Parcel No. 41-14-36-451-009
RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO
ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY
TAX PETITION
Peter D. Rhoades (P49515)
Rhoades McKee PC
Counsel for Petitioner
PO Box 2271
Holland, MI 49422
(616) 233-5237
pdrhoades@rhoadesmckee.com
_____________________________________/
Joshua D. Beard (P73388)
Mika Meyers PLC
Counsel for Respondent
900 Monroe Avenue, NW
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
(616) 632-8000
tax.tribunal.efile@mikameyers.com
jbeard@mikameyers.com
Respondent, Grand Rapids Charter Township, by and through its attorneys, Mika Meyers
PLC, answers Petitioner’s Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition as follows:
1.
Property Parcel No: 41-14-36-451-009. (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach
a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.)
ANSWER:
Respondent admits that Property Parcel No. 41-14-36-451-009 is the subject
of this uncapping appeal.
2.
The property identified above is real.
ANSWER:
The allegation contained in paragraph 2 of the Petition is admitted.
3.
If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties
contiguous? _ Yes _No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non-contiguous parcel.)Page 2
2
{03691868 1 }
ANSWER: The form allegations contained in paragraph 3 of the Petition appear to be
inapplicable because it appears that this appeal involves a single parcel and therefore no
answer is required.
4.
Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under
appeal? _Yes X No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not
located on a parcel of real property under appeal.)
ANSWER:
The form allegations contained in paragraph 4 of the Petition appear to be
inapplicable because this appeal concerns a parcel of real, not personal, property and
therefore no answer is required.
5.
If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property
statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary). N/A
ANSWER:
The form allegations contained in paragraph 5 of this Petition appear to be
inapplicable because this appeal concerns a parcel of real, not personal, property and
therefore no answer is required.
6.
The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial-Improved.
ANSWER:
The allegations contained in paragraph 6 of this Petition are admitted.
7.
If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to
Respondent’s X March _ July _ December Board of Review.
ANSWER:
The allegations contained in paragraph 7 of the Petition are admitted.
8.
If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific
facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or
assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): N/A
ANSWER:
The allegations contained in paragraph 8 of the Petition appear to be
inapplicable because a protest was made before the March Board of Review.Page 3
3
{03691868 1 }
9.
If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the
classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year
involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s
authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): Appeal
is timely.
ANSWER:
The allegations in paragraph 9 of the Petition are admitted.
10.
The property or properties at issue are located in Kent County. The property or
properties’ address is: 4590 Cascade Road SE, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49546.
ANSWER:
The allegations in paragraph 10 of the Petition are admitted.
11.
The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local
governmental unit): Grand Rapids Charter Township.
ANSWER:
The allegations contained in paragraph 11 of the Petition are admitted.
12.
Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is 10753 Macatawa Drive,
Holland, Michigan 49424.
ANSWER:
The allegations contained in paragraph 12 of the Petition are admitted upon
information and belief.
13.
This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable):
X the property or properties’ taxable values only
ANSWER:
The allegations contained in paragraph 13 of the Petition are admitted upon
information and belief.
14.
The tax year(s) at issue are: 2025.
ANSWER:
The allegations contained in paragraph 14 of the Petition are admitted.Page 4
4
{03691868 1 }
15.
If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific
factsPage 5
5
Page 6
{These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-002794 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Township of Grand Rapids (KENT) Local Unit of Government/First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Joshua M.I. D Last Name Beard Firm Name (if any) Mika Meyers PLC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 900 Monroe Ave NW City or Town Grand Rapids State Michigan ZIP Code 49503 Telephone Number 616-632-8000 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Tax.Tribunal.Efile@mikameyers.com Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: Joshua D. Beard /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
rhoades Jon Andersh | Attorney m k ee office: 616.235.3500 PO Box 2271 : direct: 616.233.5121 Holland, MI 49422 attorneys fax: 616.233.5269 11877 James Street email: jandersh@rhoadesmckee.com Holland, MI 49424 July 28, 2025 RECEIVED Via Certified US Mail AUG 0 1 2025 Michigan Tax Tribunal FO Box.30252 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Lansing, Michigan 48909 Re: Macatawa Bank — Proof of Service for Property Tax Petitions Dear Sir or Madam: On behalf of Macatawa Bank, N.A., as petitioner, please find enclosed for a Proof of Service for Property Tax Petition documenting proof of service to the noticed parties in connection with the following tax petitions: 1. Grand Rapids Township: Docket No. 25-002794 2. Cascade Township: Docket No. 25-002785 3. City of Walker: Docket No. 25-002801 4. Plainfield Township: Docket No. 25-002799 5. City of Douglas: Docket No. 25-002800 6. City of Wyoming: Docket No. 25-002793 7. City of Grand Rapids: Docket No. 25-002804 8. City of Grand Rapids: Docket No. 25-002795 9. Gaines Township: Docket No. 25-002803 Should you have any questions, please direct them to my attention. Sincerely, RHOADES McKEE PC Wome / Jon Andersh
Page 2
RECEIVED
AUG 0 1 2025
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
.
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
MACATAWA BANK, N.A.
,
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
Petitioner(s)
v
MTT Docket No.25-002794
GRAND RAPIDS CHARTER TOWNSHIP
Respondent(s)
PROOF OF SERVICE FOR PROPERTY TAX PETITION
*To be filed after the Tribunal issues the Notice of Docket Number*
Kayshlanie Lamboy
states that on July 24, 2025
he/she
[Name of person serving/mailing petition]
[date of service]
served a copy of the Petition relative to the above-captioned matter upon:
[Provide name and address of the following entities]
1.
Assessor {via certified mail):
Grand Rapids Charter Township Assessing - Attn: Bryan Jager
1836 East Beltline NE, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49525
2.
City Clerk or Township Supervisor/Clerk (via certified mail):
Grand Rapids Charter Township Clerk - Attn: Edward J. Robinette
1836 East Beltline NE, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49525
3.
County Equalization Director (via first class mail or personal service):
Kent County Equalization, Attn. Megan VanHoose
300 Monroe Avenue NW, County Administration Building, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503
4.
County Clerk (via first class mail or personal service):
Kent County Clerk - Attn: Lisa Posthumus Lyons
300 Monroe Avenue NW, County Administration Building, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503
5.
Secretary of the local school board (via first class mail or personal service):
Forest Hills Public Schools Board of Education - Attn: Malorie Ninemeier
620 Forest Hill Avenue SE, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49546
6.
State Treasurer (via first class mail):
ichigan Department of Treasury, State Treasurer
0 W. AlleganPage 3
US F 063 B9A403.11
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED JUN 04 2023 pr Tranlnf hs: Chi: A MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL (57) ID: RHOADES MCKEE STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR MACATAWA BANK, N.A. ; MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) MTT Docket No. GRAND RAPIDS CHARTER TOWNSHIP Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: 41-14-36-451-009 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is X real personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___ Yes __ No. (If ho, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4, Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___ Yes __ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 6. The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial-Improved
Page 2
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): N/A If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): Appeal is timely. The property or properties at issue are located in Kent County. The property or properties’ address is: 4590 Cascade Road SE, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49546 The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): Grand Rapids Charter Township Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 10753 Macatawa Drive, Holland, Michigan 49424 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values X the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? _ Yes X No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunals authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 $691,000.00 $345,500.00 $345,500.00 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 $691,000.00 $345,500.00 $304,875.00 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 $0.00 $0.00 $40,625.00 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary). Reinstatement of "cap" on the Property's Taxable Value. Please see attachment for additional information.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. Page 4 of 4 Signat ioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 4 Pfinted Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Peter D. Rhoades, Rhoades McKee PC Email Address: pdrhoades@rhoadesmckee.com Mailing Address: Rhoades McKee PC PO Box 2271 Holland MI 49422 Telephone Number: (616) 233-5237 Date: Moy 29, pry
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MACATAWA BANK, N.A,, a national banking association Petitioner, MTT Docket No. vs. GRAND RAPIDS CHARTER TOWNSHIP, Respondent. Peter D. Rhoades (P49515) Jonathon J. Andersh (P81965) Rhoades McKee PC Attorneys for Petitioner PO Box 2271 Holland, MI 49422 (616) 233-5237 pdrhoades(@rhoadesmckee.com ATTACHMENT TO ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION Petitioner, through its attorneys, Rhoades McKee PC, petitions this Tribunal as follows: I. Petitioner, Macatawa Bank, N.A. (“Bank”), is a national banking association, with an address of 10753 Macatawa Drive, Holland, Michigan 49424. 2: Petitioner owns certain property with Property Parcel No. 41-14-36-451-009, commonly known as 4590 Cascade Road SE, Grand
Page 6
S.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Macatawa Bank, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 25-002794 Township of Grand Rapids, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: __Tribunal Clerk________ Entered: July 22, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED JUN 04 2023 pr Tranlnf hs: Chi: A MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL (57) ID: RHOADES MCKEE STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR MACATAWA BANK, N.A. ; MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) MTT Docket No. GRAND RAPIDS CHARTER TOWNSHIP Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: 41-14-36-451-009 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is X real personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___ Yes __ No. (If ho, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4, Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___ Yes __ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 6. The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial-Improved
Page 2
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): N/A If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): Appeal is timely. The property or properties at issue are located in Kent County. The property or properties’ address is: 4590 Cascade Road SE, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49546 The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): Grand Rapids Charter Township Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 10753 Macatawa Drive, Holland, Michigan 49424 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values X the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? _ Yes X No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunals authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 $691,000.00 $345,500.00 $345,500.00 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 $691,000.00 $345,500.00 $304,875.00 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 $0.00 $0.00 $40,625.00 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary). Reinstatement of "cap" on the Property's Taxable Value. Please see attachment for additional information.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. Page 4 of 4 Signat ioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 4 Pfinted Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Peter D. Rhoades, Rhoades McKee PC Email Address: pdrhoades@rhoadesmckee.com Mailing Address: Rhoades McKee PC PO Box 2271 Holland MI 49422 Telephone Number: (616) 233-5237 Date: Moy 29, pry
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MACATAWA BANK, N.A,, a national banking association Petitioner, MTT Docket No. vs. GRAND RAPIDS CHARTER TOWNSHIP, Respondent. Peter D. Rhoades (P49515) Jonathon J. Andersh (P81965) Rhoades McKee PC Attorneys for Petitioner PO Box 2271 Holland, MI 49422 (616) 233-5237 pdrhoades(@rhoadesmckee.com ATTACHMENT TO ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION Petitioner, through its attorneys, Rhoades McKee PC, petitions this Tribunal as follows: I. Petitioner, Macatawa Bank, N.A. (“Bank”), is a national banking association, with an address of 10753 Macatawa Drive, Holland, Michigan 49424. 2: Petitioner owns certain property with Property Parcel No. 41-14-36-451-009, commonly known as 4590 Cascade Road SE, Grand
Page 6
S.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.