Macatawa Bank, Petitioner Vs. Township Of Cascade, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Macatawa Bank N A
- Respondent
- Township Of Cascade
Case overview
- Docket number
- 25-002785-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Kent
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Order of Dismissal | Not recorded | Not recorded | 11/05/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Notice of Filing of Motion to Withdraw | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/22/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Motion to Withdraw Appeal was received. | PET | Not recorded | 10/22/2025 | $0.00 | Download |
| 5 | Order Holding Party in Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/15/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Proof of service of petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 08/01/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 07/22/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/22/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/29/2025 | $250.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Macatawa Bank, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002785 Township Of Cascade, Respondent. ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner has filed a Motion to Withdraw the Petition and Respondent has not filed an objection to the requested withdrawal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. APPEAL RIGHTS If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002785 Page 2 of 6 the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee. By:___________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: November 5, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Macatawa Bank, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002785 Township Of Cascade, Respondent. ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner has filed a Motion to Withdraw the Petition and Respondent has not filed an objection to the requested withdrawal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. APPEAL RIGHTS If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 25-002785 Page 4 of 6 the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee. By:___________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: November 5, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN,
Page 6
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Macatawa Bank, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002785 Township Of Cascade, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL TAKE NOTICE that Petitioner has filed a Motion to Withdraw (Motion) in the above- captioned appeal. Because the motion was not filed jointly (i.e. signed by both parties or representatives), Respondent has seven days from the service of the motion to file a response. Respondent may respond by agreeing to (i.e. concurrence) the withdrawal of the case or by objecting to the motion. If Respondent does not timely submit a concurrence or objection to the request, it will be deemed to be a concurrence and the request will be granted, unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. If the request is granted, the case will be dismissed. If a request is not granted or the Tribunal has not notified you that it has been granted, you are required to attend the hearing. For your convenience, you may use the Tribunal’s form “Response to Motion to Withdraw Appeal” located on the Tribunal’s website. To access the form, please go to our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib and go to either the “Entire Tribunal” or “Small Claims” page, depending on the division in which the case is pending. To submit the response, please fill out the form and file it with the Tribunal by e-mail or e-filing.1 By: Tribunal Clerk__________ Entered: October 22, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 1 Though you may file the response by hard copy (i.e. mail), filing by e-mail or e-filing will facilitate the efficient administration of justice.
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Macatawa Bank, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002785 Township Of Cascade, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL TAKE NOTICE that Petitioner has filed a Motion to Withdraw (Motion) in the above- captioned appeal. Because the motion was not filed jointly (i.e. signed by both parties or representatives), Respondent has seven days from the service of the motion to file a response. Respondent may respond by agreeing to (i.e. concurrence) the withdrawal of the case or by objecting to the motion. If Respondent does not timely submit a concurrence or objection to the request, it will be deemed to be a concurrence and the request will be granted, unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. If the request is granted, the case will be dismissed. If a request is not granted or the Tribunal has not notified you that it has been granted, you are required to attend the hearing. For your convenience, you may use the Tribunal’s form “Response to Motion to Withdraw Appeal” located on the Tribunal’s website. To access the form, please go to our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib and go to either the “Entire Tribunal” or “Small Claims” page, depending on the division in which the case is pending. To submit the response, please fill out the form and file it with the Tribunal by e-mail or e-filing.2 By: Tribunal Clerk__________ Entered: October 22, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 2 Though you may file the response by hard copy (i.e. mail), filing by e-mail or e-filing will facilitate the efficient administration of justice.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
£m, TERT aD STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR MACATAWA RANK : MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No._25-002785 TOWNSHIP OF CASCADE Respondent(s) MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL 1. 1 wish to withdraw my appeal in the above-captioned docket. 2. Good cause exists to grant withdrawal because: The Appeal regards the 2025 un-capping. The amount is approximately $9,000 and Respondent has agreed to re-instate the cap at its December Board of Review. 3. | ask this Tribunal to grant my request to withdraw the appeal and dismiss the above- captioned docket. Please select one of the following: X_ | am filing this Motion to Withdraw before Respondent filed an Answer or a responsive motion with the Tribunal. ___ lam filing this Motion to Withdraw after Respondent has filed an Answer or Responsive Motion with the Tribunal. | attached to this Motion Respondent's written consent to withdraw my petition, or | shall grant Respondent the opportunity to object to this withdrawal. 0% /s/ Peter D. Rhoades (P49515) Parfy/Representative (sign here) Print name of person signing | certify that on this date | served a copy of this Motion, and any additional documentation, on the opposing party or their representative. tof) jz Date (Sign here) MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, Mi 48906
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Macatawa Bank, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002785 Township Of Cascade, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Respondent has failed to file an answer. As such, Respondent must file and serve an answer to the petition and file proof demonstrating service of the answer within 14 days of the entry of this order. See TTR 235 and 227. Tribunal rules and information on Entire Tribunal answers can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.i Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By:_______________________________ Entered: October 15, 2025 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk i “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002785 Page 2 of 6 A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Macatawa Bank, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002785 Township Of Cascade, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Respondent has failed to file an answer. As such, Respondent must file and serve an answer to the petition and file proof demonstrating service of the answer within 14 days of the entry of this order. See TTR 235 and 227. Tribunal rules and information on Entire Tribunal answers can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.ii Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By:_______________________________ Entered: October 15, 2025 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk ii “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 25-002785 Page 4 of 6 A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5)
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Macatawa Bank, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002785 Township Of Cascade, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case
Page 6
MT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
rhoades Jon Andersh | Attorney m k office: 616.235.3500 PO Box 2271 ; Gee direct: 616.233.5121 Holland, MI 49422 attorneys fax 616.233.5269 11377 James Street email: jandersh@rhoadesmckee.com Holland, MI 49424 July 28, 2025 RECEIVED Via Certified US Mail AUG 0 1 2025 Michigan Tax Tribunal PQ Box. 5252 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Lansing, Michigan 48909 Re: Macatawa Bank — Proof of Service for Property Tax Petitions Dear Sir or Madam: On behalf of Macatawa Bank, N.A., as petitioner, please find enclosed for a Proof of Service for Property Tax Petition documenting proof of service to the noticed parties in connection with the following tax petitions: 1. Grand Rapids Township: Docket No. 25-002794 2. Cascade Township: Docket No. 25-002785 3. City of Walker: Docket No. 25-002801 4. Plainfield Township: Docket No. 25-002799 5. City of Douglas: Docket No. 25-002800 6. City of Wyoming: Docket No. 25-002793 7. City of Grand Rapids: Docket No. 25-002804 8. City of Grand Rapids: Docket No. 25-002795 9. Gaines Township: Docket No. 25-002803 Should you have any questions, please direct them to my attention. Sincerely, RHOADES McKEE PC py Jon Andersh
Page 2
RECEIVED
AUG 0.1 2025
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
t
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
MACATAWA BANK, N.A,
,
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
Petitioner(s)
v
MTT Docket No0.25-002785
CASCADE CHARTER TOWNSHIP
,
Respondent(s)
PROOF OF SERVICE FOR PROPERTY TAX PETITION
*To be filed after the Tribunal issues the Notice of Docket Number*
Kayshlanie Lamboy
states that on July 24, 2025
he/she
[Name of person serving/mailing petition]
[date of service]
served a copy of the Petition relative to the above-captioned matter upon:
[Provide name and address of the following entities]
1.
Assessor (via certified mail):
Cascade Charter Township Assessing - Attn: Jennifer Genter
2
D
i
ichi
2.
City Clerk or Township Supervisor/Clerk (via certified mail):
Cascade Charter Township Clerk's Office - Attn: Susan Slater
5920 Tahoe Dr. SE, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49546
3.
County Equalization Director (via first class mail or personal service):
Kent County Equalization,
Attn. Megan VanHoose
300 Monroe Avenue NW, County Administration Building, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503
4.
County Clerk {via first class mail or personal service):
Kent County Clerk - Attn: Lisa Posthumus Lyons
300 Monroe Avenue NW, County Administration Building, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503
5.
Secretary of the local school board (via first class mail or personal service):
Forest Hills Public Schools Board of Education - Attn: Malorie Ninemeier
620 Forest Hill Avenue SE, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49546
6.
State Treasurer (via first class mail):
Michigan Department of Treasury, State Treasurer
W. AlleganPage 3
CERTIFIED MAIL —— B94403 1) US F 063
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED JUN 04 2025 gray, ayes MICHIGAN Tax TRIBUNAL STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR MACATAWA BANK, N.A. MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) MTT Docket No. CASCADE CHARTER TOWNSHIP Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1 Property Parcel No: 41-19-17-229-003 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is X real ___ personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___ Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4, Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? Yes __ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 6. The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial-Improved
Page 2
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): N/A If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): Appeal is timely. The property or properties at issue are located in Kent County. The property or properties’ address is: 6380 28th Street SE, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49546 The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit). Cascade Charter Township Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 10753 Macatawa Drive, Holland, Michigan 49424 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values X the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes X No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 $950,800.00 $475,400.00 $475,400.00 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 $950,800.00 $475,400.00 $466,121.00 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 $0.00 $0.00 $9,279.00 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): Reinstatement of "cap" on the Property's Taxable Value. Please see attachment for additional information.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. Page 4 of 4 sggaursalsiiiners hazed Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Wa 7 Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Peter D. Rhoades, Rhoades McKee PC Email Address: pdrhoades@rhoadesmckee.com Mailing Address: Rhoades McKee PC PO Box 2271 Holland MI 49422 Telephone Number: (616) 233-5237 Date: Me, 24, WIS
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MACATAWA BANK, N.A., a national banking association Petitioner, MTT Docket No. Vs. CASCADE CHARTER TOWNSHIP, Respondent. Peter D. Rhoades (P49515) Jonathon J. Andersh (P81965) Rhoades McKee PC Attorneys for Petitioner PO Box 2271 Holland, MI 49422 (616) 233-5237 pdrhoades@rhoadesmckee.com ATTACHMENT TO ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION Petitioner, through its attorneys, Rhoades McKee PC, petitions this Tribunal as follows: 1. Petitioner, Macatawa Bank, N.A. (“Bank”), is a national banking association, with an address of 10753 Macatawa Drive, Holland, Michigan 49424. 2. Petitioner owns certain property with Property Parcel No. 41-19-17-229-003, commonly known as 6380 28" Street SE, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49546 (the “Property”). The Property is classified as 201: Commercial-Improved, Real Property.
Page 6
5. This matter involves Respondents decision to uncap the taxable value of the Property for the 2025 tax year. Petitioner disputes Respondent’s decision to uncap the taxable value of the Property. There is otherwise not a dispute relative to valuation, assessment or the value of any addition or loss. 6. Respondent initially issued its 2025 Notice of Assessment indicating that there was not a transfer of ownership of the Property in 2024. 7. While Petitioner did not appeal to the 2025 March Board of Review, Respondent issued a 2025 Board of Review Decision citing a “delayed uncapping,” thereby adjusting the taxable value of the Property so as to “uncap” its taxable value, increasing such amount by $23,294.00 or 5.15% over the previous year’s taxable value. 8. Petitioner did not execute and record a deed or similar instrument conveying title to the Property in 2024, but Petitioner assumes that Respondent decided to
Page 7
12.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Macatawa Bank, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 25-002785 Township Of Cascade, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: __Tribunal Clerk________ Entered: July 22, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED JUN 04 2025 gray, ayes MICHIGAN Tax TRIBUNAL STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR MACATAWA BANK, N.A. MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) MTT Docket No. CASCADE CHARTER TOWNSHIP Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1 Property Parcel No: 41-19-17-229-003 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is X real ___ personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___ Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4, Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? Yes __ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 6. The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial-Improved
Page 2
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): N/A If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): Appeal is timely. The property or properties at issue are located in Kent County. The property or properties’ address is: 6380 28th Street SE, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49546 The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit). Cascade Charter Township Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 10753 Macatawa Drive, Holland, Michigan 49424 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values X the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes X No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): N/A 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 $950,800.00 $475,400.00 $475,400.00 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 $950,800.00 $475,400.00 $466,121.00 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 $0.00 $0.00 $9,279.00 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): Reinstatement of "cap" on the Property's Taxable Value. Please see attachment for additional information.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. Page 4 of 4 sggaursalsiiiners hazed Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Wa 7 Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Peter D. Rhoades, Rhoades McKee PC Email Address: pdrhoades@rhoadesmckee.com Mailing Address: Rhoades McKee PC PO Box 2271 Holland MI 49422 Telephone Number: (616) 233-5237 Date: Me, 24, WIS
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MACATAWA BANK, N.A., a national banking association Petitioner, MTT Docket No. Vs. CASCADE CHARTER TOWNSHIP, Respondent. Peter D. Rhoades (P49515) Jonathon J. Andersh (P81965) Rhoades McKee PC Attorneys for Petitioner PO Box 2271 Holland, MI 49422 (616) 233-5237 pdrhoades@rhoadesmckee.com ATTACHMENT TO ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION Petitioner, through its attorneys, Rhoades McKee PC, petitions this Tribunal as follows: 1. Petitioner, Macatawa Bank, N.A. (“Bank”), is a national banking association, with an address of 10753 Macatawa Drive, Holland, Michigan 49424. 2. Petitioner owns certain property with Property Parcel No. 41-19-17-229-003, commonly known as 6380 28" Street SE, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49546 (the “Property”). The Property is classified as 201: Commercial-Improved, Real Property.
Page 6
5. This matter involves Respondents decision to uncap the taxable value of the Property for the 2025 tax year. Petitioner disputes Respondent’s decision to uncap the taxable value of the Property. There is otherwise not a dispute relative to valuation, assessment or the value of any addition or loss. 6. Respondent initially issued its 2025 Notice of Assessment indicating that there was not a transfer of ownership of the Property in 2024. 7. While Petitioner did not appeal to the 2025 March Board of Review, Respondent issued a 2025 Board of Review Decision citing a “delayed uncapping,” thereby adjusting the taxable value of the Property so as to “uncap” its taxable value, increasing such amount by $23,294.00 or 5.15% over the previous year’s taxable value. 8. Petitioner did not execute and record a deed or similar instrument conveying title to the Property in 2024, but Petitioner assumes that Respondent decided to
Page 7
12.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.