Record Finder / 26-001339-TT
Michigan
Lb Troy Mi 1 Ut LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Troy Respondent
- Petitioner
- Lb Troy Mi 1 Ut LLC
- Respondent
- City Of Troy
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-001339-TT
- Status
- Ready Schedule
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Oakland
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 09/17/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Proof of service of petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 09/04/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 08/07/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/07/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/24/2026 | $400.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
Respondent's Answer and Affirmative Defenses.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL LB-TROY, MI-1-UT, LLC., Petitioner, MTT Docket: 26-001339 Parcel ID 88-20-14-102-044 CITY OF TROY, Respondent. / JAY A. SCHWARTZ LORI GRIGG BLUHM (P46908) Property Tax Reduction Services, LLC. JULIE QUINLAN DUFRANE (P59000) Petitioner's Representative TROY CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 37887 West Twelve Mile Road Attorneys for Respondent Suite B 500 W. Big Beaver Road Farmington Hills, MI 48331 Troy, MI 48084 (248) 672-1922 (248) 524-3320 JSchwartz@Property Tax BLUHMLG@TROYMI.gov ReductionServices.org / RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITION AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES NOW COMES, Respondent, CITY OF TROY, by and through its attorney, Lori Grigg Bluhm, and for its Answer to Petitioner's Petition, states as follows: ii 2. As to Paragraph 1, Respondent admits the allegation. As to Paragraph 2, Respondent admits the allegation. As to Paragraph 3, no answer is required. As to Paragraph 4, no answer is required.
Page 2
7. As to Paragraph 7, Respondent admits that there was no board of review protest filed. 8. As to Paragraph 8, no answer is required. 9. As to Paragraph 9, no answer is required. 10. As to Paragraph 10, Respondent admits the allegation. 11. As to Paragraph 11, Respondent admits the allegation. 12. As to Paragraph 12, Respondent admits the allegation. 13. As to Paragraph 13, Respondent denies that there are any issues concerning the valuation, assessment, taxable value, and/or uniformity. 14. As to paragraph 14, Respondent admits the allegation. 15. As to Paragraph 15, no answer is required. 16. As to Paragraph 16, Respondent admits the allegation. 17. As to Paragraph 17, Respondent denies that the Petitioner's alleged values for the subject parcel is correct or supported by any basis. 18. As to Paragraph 18, Respondent admits that Petitioner has correctly calculated the difference between Petitioner's claimed values for the subject property and the Respondent's value determinations. Respondent denies that the Petitioner's values are correct. 19. As to Paragraph 19, Respondent denies that Petitioner is entitled to its requested relief. 20. As to Paragraph 20, Respondent denies the allegation for the reason that it is
Page 3
Dated: September 17, 2026 CITY OF TROY Le LORI GRIGG BLUHM (P46908) Attorney for Respondent 500 W. Big Beaver Road Troy, MI 48084 (248) 524-3320 BluhmLG@troymi.gov AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES For its further Answer to Petitioners’ Petition, Respondent relies on the following Affirmative Defenses: 1. Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action against Respondent and to support its claim for relief. Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, error of law, discrimination, application of wrong principles or illegality on the part of the Respondent or its agents. Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish the true cash value, assessed value, and taxable value of its property. Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegations that the property's taxable value is improper, or failed to conform with the mode and method applied in the case of all properties in the City of Troy for 2026. Any decrease in the value of Petitioner's property was a result of its own intentional
Page 4
6. Respondent has properly and lawfully assessed Petitioner's property and established its assessed and taxable value in accordance with statutory and constitutional requirements. 7. Respondent reserves the right to argue additional Affirmative Defenses during the pendency of this action. WHEREFORE, Respondent, CITY OF TROY denies that Petitioner is entitled to its requested relief, and requests that the subject property’s assessment and taxable value be affirmed or increased, that Petitioners’ Petition be dismissed with prejudice, and that Respondent be granted costs and attorney fees so wrongfully sustained. Dated: September 17, 2026 CITY OF TROY ui(=22d LORI GRIGG BLUHM (P46908) Attorneys for Respondent 500 W. Big Beaver Road Troy, MI 48084 (248) 524-3320 BluhmLG@troymi.gov
Page 5
Certificate of Service | hereby certify that on September 17, 2026, | served a copy of this Answer and Affirmative Defenses via email to Petitioner's representative Jay A. Schwartz at JSchwartz@propertytaxreductionservices.org and the following via first class mail: Chief Clerk, Michigan Tax Tribunal; P.O. Box 30232, Lansing, MI 48909; Michigan Department of Treasury, State Treasurer, 430 W. Allegan, Lansing, MI 49822; Secretary of School Board, Troy Public Schools, 4400 Livernois Road, Troy, MI 48098; Director of Equalization; Oakland Pointe Office Building, 250 Elizabeth Lake Road Suite 1000; Pontiac, MI 48341; and Clerk, Oakland County; 1200 N. Telegraph, Building 12 East, Pontiac, MI 48341. Dated: September 17, 2026 MU Le / | Clara Reid Legal Administrative Coordinator 500 W. Big Beaver Road Troy, MI 48084 (248) 524-3320
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
EntireTribunalCaseISAnswer.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MTT DOCKET NO. 26-001339 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government City Of Troy (OAKLAND) First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Lori M.I. Grigg Last Name Bluhm Firm Name (if any) City of Troy City Attorney Office Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 500 W. Big Beaver Road City or Town Troy State Michigan ZIP Code 48084 Telephone Number 2485243320 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Bluhmlg@TroyMI.gov Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: Lori Grigg Bluhm /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
POS re Petition (LB-Troy v Troy 26-001339) 9-4-26.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL LB-TROY, MI-1-UT, LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 26-001339 CITY OF TROY, Respondent. ____________________________________/ PROOF OF SERVICE FOR PROPERTY TAX PETITION I, Lyn Zarem, state that on September 4, 2026, I served a copy of the 2026 Property Tax Petition (with noted docket number), relative to the above-captioned matter: By CERTIFIED MAIL, on: City of Troy Assessing Department 500 West Big Beaver Road Troy, Michigan 48084 Clerk for the City of Troy 500 West Big Beaver Road Troy, Michigan 48084 and FIRST-CLASS MAIL, on: Oakland County Director of Equalization Suite 1000W 250 Elizabeth Lake Road Pontiac, Michigan 48341 Oakland County Clerk Building 12E 1200 North Telegraph Road Pontiac, Michigan 48341 Secretary of School Board Troy Public Schools 4400 Livernois Troy, Michigan 48098
Page 2
2 State Treasurer Michigan Department of Treasury 430 West Allegan Lansing, Michigan 48922 I declare under the penalty of perjury that the statement above is true to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. /s/ Lyn Zarem Property Tax Reduction Services, LLC 37887 West Twelve Mile Road, Suite B Farmington Hills, Michigan 48331 (248) 672-1922
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
SubsequentFiling.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-001339 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Petitioner Files Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition Attachment File Name: POS re Petition (LB-Troy v Troy 26-001339) 9-4-26 Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
2026 Property Tax Petition (LB-Troy v Troy) 5-24-26.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 _____________________________ MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. _____________________________ Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: _____________________________________________ (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is ___real ___personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as _________________________ 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s ___ March ___ July ___December Board of Review. LB-TROY, MI-1-UT, LLC, CITY OF TROY, 88-20-14-102-044 X Commercial
Page 2
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 2 of 4 8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 10. The property or properties at issue are located in _______________County. The property or properties’ address is: 11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): ________________________________________ 12. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 13. This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): ________the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values ________the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes ___No ________uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment ________the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______ 14. The tax year(s) at issue are: _______________________________________ Oakland 4810 Rochester Road Troy, Michigan 48085 City of Troy 4747 Williams Drive Georgetown, Texas 78633 X 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 20. List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the relief requested (attach additional page if necessary): 2026 $1,889,580 $944,790 $944,790 2026 $1,400,000 $700,000 $700,000 2026 $499,580 $244,790 $244,790 The Tribunal reduce the assessed value, state equalized and taxable value on the subject property and issue a refund with interest as provided by the Tax Tribunal Act, together with such further relief as the Tribunal deems just. The subject assessments are excessive and do not reflect the true cash value of the property.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 4 of 4 Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: ______________________________________________________________________ Printed Name of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: ______________________________________________________________________ Email Address: _________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Telephone Number: _____________________________________________________ Date: _________________________________________________________________ /s/ Jay A. Schwartz Jay A. Schwartz, Authorized Representative jschwartz@propertytaxreductionservices.org Property Tax
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name LB-TROY, MI-1-UT, LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 4747 Williams Drive City or Town Georgetown State Texas ZIP Code 78633 Telephone Number (248) 672-1922 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jschwartz@propertytaxreductionservices.org Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Jay M.I. A. Last Name Schwartz Firm Name (if any) Property Tax Reduction Services, LLC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 37887 West Twelve Mile Road Suite B City or Town Farmington Hills State Michigan ZIP Code 48331 Telephone Number (248) 672-1922 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jschwartz@propertytaxreductionservices.org Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 4810 Rochester Troy
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Michigan 48085 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Troy (OAKLAND) County Oakland If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 88-20-14-102-044 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 944790 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 944790 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 1400000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 700000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Jay A. Schwartz Payment Information Amount: 400 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26052486739909 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-08-07_06-46-36.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 LB Troy MI 1 UT LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-001339 City Of Troy, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: August 7, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
2026 Property Tax Petition (LB-Troy v Troy) 5-24-26.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 _____________________________ MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. _____________________________ Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: _____________________________________________ (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is ___real ___personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as _________________________ 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s ___ March ___ July ___December Board of Review. LB-TROY, MI-1-UT, LLC, CITY OF TROY, 88-20-14-102-044 X Commercial
Page 2
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 2 of 4 8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 10. The property or properties at issue are located in _______________County. The property or properties’ address is: 11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): ________________________________________ 12. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 13. This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): ________the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values ________the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes ___No ________uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment ________the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______ 14. The tax year(s) at issue are: _______________________________________ Oakland 4810 Rochester Road Troy, Michigan 48085 City of Troy 4747 Williams Drive Georgetown, Texas 78633 X 2026
Page 3
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): 20. List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the relief requested (attach additional page if necessary): 2026 $1,889,580 $944,790 $944,790 2026 $1,400,000 $700,000 $700,000 2026 $499,580 $244,790 $244,790 The Tribunal reduce the assessed value, state equalized and taxable value on the subject property and issue a refund with interest as provided by the Tax Tribunal Act, together with such further relief as the Tribunal deems just. The subject assessments are excessive and do not reflect the true cash value of the property.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. _________________ Page 4 of 4 Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: ______________________________________________________________________ Printed Name of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: ______________________________________________________________________ Email Address: _________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Telephone Number: _____________________________________________________ Date: _________________________________________________________________ /s/ Jay A. Schwartz Jay A. Schwartz, Authorized Representative jschwartz@propertytaxreductionservices.org Property Tax
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name LB-TROY, MI-1-UT, LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 4747 Williams Drive City or Town Georgetown State Texas ZIP Code 78633 Telephone Number (248) 672-1922 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jschwartz@propertytaxreductionservices.org Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Jay M.I. A. Last Name Schwartz Firm Name (if any) Property Tax Reduction Services, LLC Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 37887 West Twelve Mile Road Suite B City or Town Farmington Hills State Michigan ZIP Code 48331 Telephone Number (248) 672-1922 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jschwartz@propertytaxreductionservices.org Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 4810 Rochester Troy
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Michigan 48085 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Troy (OAKLAND) County Oakland If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 88-20-14-102-044 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 944790 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 944790 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 1400000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 700000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Jay A. Schwartz Payment Information Amount: 400 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26052486739909 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.