Kirsten Bentley Petitioner V Township Of Baldwin Respondent
- Petitioner
- Kirsten Bentley
- Respondent
- Township Of Baldwin
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-002677-TT
- Status
- Default Petitioner
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Iosco
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Response to Order | PET | Not recorded | 09/29/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Order of Default of Petitioner | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/25/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 09/25/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/25/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 07/15/2026 | $125.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RIZCIIVED
RE Se
Fan
MAR 0 5 2026
—
BY: Coal
Petition to Board of Review
Initial: __Qg
——-
L435
TS SUR Under he Bulorty 8 PA 208 of 1884
10
the Michigan Tax Tnbunef unless you frst protest
“Me
Bop.
m8 emanded Filing ts voluntary; hawsver, you may not appest
to
dy omar
Revrw. avoant when the OrO0ty 1 iessifod a4 commercial
nl industial real a devaiopmental teal. You may not appesi sroperty dasstiation in the State
YRVOT Unless yo Wt protest fo the Boars of Review.
TOBE COMPLETED BY OWNER OR OWNER'S AGENT
| TUTE Nae Passe Orn or Type]
Poitoner a Nem (If Other than Owner. Plaass Poni or Type)
Keston Bertie
| “omen or Cy
—)
County
Er of Appest
Baldwin Townaiio
losco
202
—
re Undersigned protests the asseased vale andior the tentative taxable value and/or the property classification and/or the qualified
Qricuttyral Property exemption of the following described property:
Prope igenthec (Parcel coo requres Prope
my address ang legal description optional)
©33- 20-600 ~ 028-0
| '8S(
Irie Dr., Bact Tawas, i, sw
000i
Protested item:
Assessed Value
Tentative
Taxable Status [_] Classification
[| Qualified Agricuttural
&
© Taxable Value
o (exemption)
U
Property Exemption
-—
1) PROTEST OF ASSESSMENT
Complete this secbon {or a protest of assessed value, induding assessed value changes associated with exempt status and dened of late fied
Personal property forms,
Ascoused Valse
Maviketd
Owner's Esbmate of True Cash Value (Markel Vabie]
{
volute
103,100
0
150,000 (NE dnsran
preach)
2. PROTEST OF T,
LE V,
E
N
Complete this section for 8 protest of Taxable Value,
Reason:
[J value of Losses
[J value of Additions
[0] Poverty Exemption
[J uncapping %
3. PROTEST OF CLASSIFICATION
Complete this section for a request io change the diasslication, The Board of Review must make their decision regarding classification in accordance
ot opary's si
so
4 mor, Comede
Lowe. The Bord of Review shall nt bo nfvenced by tn aot
rms
colo,
CCEA
that property's status as 8 homeowner's principal residence or qualified agricytural property.)
Classification of property on Gus ysar's assessment (ol
Classification
shousd be (check one of the following)"
O Agricuttural
Od Industrial
0 Timber Culover
0 Utility (Personal Property Only)
[J commerciai
[J Residential
[J pevelopmental
4. PROTEST OF EXEMPTION FOR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY
f the assessor hse denied or changed the percentage of the axemption fram the 18 mils of
tax for quaifed
-
assacsor (Enter 0 If exemption
Quaified agncutural sxempuon requasied
owner
100
)
Garnad)
AX8Mption requesiad|
[REASON
FOR
PROTEST
Re
———
CERTIFICATION
=
J
FATT
BrenTAay
3.52020 [7343307338
Address”
1
=]
Iris Dr.
eyPage 2
3/20/2026 ( 2026 BOARD OF REVIEW DECISION FROM Assessing Department Baldwin Township P.O. Box 25 Rogers City, MI 49779 NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OR PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: (Parcel Code required. Property address and legal description optional.) BENTLEY DOUGLAS & KIRSTEN 363 SYDNEY CT 033-C20-000-028-00 1851 IRIS ST Saline M1 48176 CBI 28 FIRST ADDITION TO CRESCENT BEACH SUB LOTS 28&29 THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED 401 (RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) Thank you for attending this years March Board of Review. The Board has reviewed the information you supplied and the data necessary to compute your assessment and taxable value. The Board has completed their review of parcel number 033-C20-000-028-00 They have made the following determination based on the information you supplied. Board of Review Comments DENIED: PROVIDED COMPS HAVE SIMILAR OR HIGHER ASSESSED VALUES. ASSESSMENT ALIGNS WITH MARKET [2026 ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE 103,100 ] [2026 "BOARD OF REVIEW" ASSESSED VALUE 103,100 (If the above amounts are the same, no revisions have occured) [2026 ORIGINAL TAXABLE VALUE 103,100 2026 "BOARD OF REVIEW" TAXABLE VALUE 103,100 2026 PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION/QUALIFIED AG 0.0000 Please feel free to contact the assessor at the address listed above or call if you have any questions. If you disagree with the decision of the Board of Review regarding tentative taxable value, further appeal may be made to the Michigan Tax Tribunal, by submitting a petition (available on their website at http:/www.mi.gov/taxtrib) by May 31 for Commercial Real, Industrial Real, Developmental Real, Commercial Personal, Industrial Personal and Utility Personal Property by July 31 for Agricultural Real, Residential Real, Timber - Cut Over Real, and Agricultural Personal Property. Property Classification appeals ONLY may be appealed to the State Tax Commission by submitting a petition by June 30th and visiting their webiste at http://www.mi.gov/statetaxcommission
Page 3
618 Page 3 FOR BOARD OF REVIEW USE ONLY INSTRUCTIONS: Incorporate a copy of this form and the assigned number in the Board of Review minutas wr ETT 1. ASSESSED VALUE = Ow by Boa of Ry The Bowd of Review must state the reoscn for is chon Below [ Jo & Denies [J Assexsec Verse Changed From LL Recore of Vote — Boag con tee of board Member: ves Jif Ms’ Member. [Jes Ome “en J Chairperson: Pid Cres hoe, saihr PY higher assed oglu. Fhe Gssessmnt ols pcb you may appeal that decision by fing a pettion with he ¥ yOu Ceagree wan te OF he Board of Review regarding tentative assessed valve, 8 PO Bax 30232 Laneng. M1 48908. Commerceal Raa, industrial Real, Developmental Resl, Commercial Persons, Indusinal Personal and a yy. by May 31. Agr Real, R Ros. Tmbar-Culovar Roel and Agnaulurs! Personal Property may be appealed by July 31. The petition must be STE: eo or a fm ssxovad bye icon Te Tmt Mea POPS ey boo 2. TENTATIVE TAXABLE VALUE Bax of Review. The Sowrd of Review muel Wis Ti Toman 13 TS Sm EE x Deniec [J Tentative Texate value Changes From 0 (See attached L4035A) Recor of Vole — Board o Dvwemember Commies 7 Bod Fores Ow Ore ____
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-002677 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? Yes Party Filing Document Petitioner Files Document Type: Response to Order Attachment File Name: 26-002677 Default response Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Kirsten Bentley, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002677 Township Of Baldwin, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 14 days of the entry of this order. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: September 25, 2026 1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002677 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Kirsten Bentley, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002677 Township Of Baldwin, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 14 days of the entry of this order. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.2 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: September 25, 2026 2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 26-002677 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Kirsten Bentley, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002677 Township Of Baldwin, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of action taken by
Page 6
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 1 of 3 PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. Petitioner’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Individual Local Unit of Government: First Name Kirsten M.I. Last Name Bentley Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 363 Sydney Court City or Town Saline State Michigan ZIP Code 48176 Telephone Number 734-330-7338 E-mail Address kgbentley@comcast.net Subject Property Information: How many parcels are you appealing? 1 If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? *If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel Yes Property Address (No., Street) 1851 Iris St. City or Town East Tawas County Iosco State Michigan ZIP Code 48730 Taxing Authority (City or Township) Township Of Baldwin (IOSCO) Check which of the following you are appealing: (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal:
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 2 of 3 New taxable and assessed value is not in line with the condition of the house when purchased, purchase price, similar sales/sqft, condition and updates of comparable sales both prior and after purchase. Lack of maintenance and overall expenses just to bring it to livable condition. Jurisdictional Issues: Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: March If No, please check the applicable reason(s): Year(s) Under Appeal: 2026 and beyond Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal: Parcel Number: 033-C20-000-028-00 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 103100 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 103100 What do you believe is the fair market value? 150000 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 75000 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner’s Signature: /s/ Kirsten Bentley
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 3 of 3 Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/ Fee Information: If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for the filing of this appeal. The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. Property tax appeal: Residential** Non-Residential SEV or TV in contention* Filing fee*** Filing Fee** $100,000 or less...........................................................................................$ 125.00 $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00.........................................................................$ 200.00 N/A More than $500,000…..................................................................................$ 300.00 N/A Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? No
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Kirsten Bentley, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002677 Township Of Baldwin, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: September 25, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Kirsten Bentley, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002677 Township Of Baldwin, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: September 25, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Kirsten Bentley, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002677 Township Of Baldwin, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: September 25, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 1 of 3 PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. Petitioner’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Individual Local Unit of Government: First Name Kirsten M.I. Last Name Bentley Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 363 Sydney Court City or Town Saline State Michigan ZIP Code 48176 Telephone Number 734-330-7338 E-mail Address kgbentley@comcast.net Subject Property Information: How many parcels are you appealing? 1 If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? *If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel Yes Property Address (No., Street) 1851 Iris St. City or Town East Tawas County Iosco State Michigan ZIP Code 48730 Taxing Authority (City or Township) Township Of Baldwin (IOSCO) Check which of the following you are appealing: (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal:
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 2 of 3 New taxable and assessed value is not in line with the condition of the house when purchased, purchase price, similar sales/sqft, condition and updates of comparable sales both prior and after purchase. Lack of maintenance and overall expenses just to bring it to livable condition. Jurisdictional Issues: Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: March If No, please check the applicable reason(s): Year(s) Under Appeal: 2026 and beyond Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal: Parcel Number: 033-C20-000-028-00 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 103100 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 103100 What do you believe is the fair market value? 150000 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 75000 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner’s Signature: /s/ Kirsten Bentley
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 3 of 3 Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/ Fee Information: If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for the filing of this appeal. The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. Property tax appeal: Residential** Non-Residential SEV or TV in contention* Filing fee*** Filing Fee** $100,000 or less...........................................................................................$ 125.00 $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00.........................................................................$ 200.00 N/A More than $500,000…..................................................................................$ 300.00 N/A Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? No
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.