Kamal Isso Petitioner V Township Of Waterford Respondent
- Petitioner
- Kamal Isso
- Respondent
- Township Of Waterford
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-002262-TT
- Status
- Ready Schedule
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Oakland
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Notice of Filing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/25/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 07/01/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 06/10/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/10/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 04/29/2026 | $250.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Kamal Isso, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002262 Township Of Waterford, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied by either the Michigan Department of Treasury or a County. Also, state taxes levied by the Michigan Department of Treasury, such as income taxes, are not subject to the informal settlement conference process.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002262 Page 2 of 2 MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a mutually acceptable settlement. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. If you have any questions, please contact the Tribunal by phone at (517) 335-9760 or email taxtrib@michigan.gov. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Kamal Isso, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002262 Township Of Waterford, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied
Page 4
M
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
¥ CHARTER TWP OF WATERFORD Q & 5200 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 2 WATERFORD MI 48329-3773 KTIP 1 LLC 1922 CASS LAKE RD KEEGO HARBOR MI 48320 PARCEL IDENTIFICATION # W -13-16-378-019 BOARD OF REVIEW PETITION #: 096 ---NOTICE OF BOARD OF REVIEW ACTION--- The Board of Review has examined your 2026 Assessed Value and/or Capped Value and has made the following decision: 2026 ~~ Assessed Value From: $476,140 2026 Assessed Value To: $464,250 2026 Taxable Value From: $476,140 2026 Taxable Value To: $464,250 Board of Review reason (code) 060 Agree Board of Review Comment Maintenance issues The 2026 Capped Value formula is the 2025 Taxable Value, minus Losses, increased by the Inflation Rate Multiplier of 1.027%, plus Additions. Taxable Value is the lower of Assessed Value or Capped Value unless there was a transfer of ownership in 2025. Your Taxes are levied on the Taxable Value. Further appeal of valuation may be made to the Michigan Tax Tribunal, PO Box 30232, Lansing MI 48909, https://www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. The final date for filing a valuation appeal is: MAY 31ST OF THE CURRENT YEAR CHARTER TWP OF WATERFORD Board of Review
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. 26-002262 Respondent’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government: Township Of Waterford (OAKLAND) First Name M.I. Last Name Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information, if any: First Name Tyler M.I. Last Name Longmeyer Firm Name (if any) Waterford Charter Township Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 5200 Civic Center Dr City or Town Waterford State Michigan ZIP Code 48329 Telephone Number (248) 674-6231 E-mail Address tlongmeyer@waterfordmi.gov Subject Property Information: Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. *If necessary, attach a separate sheet. N/A Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more? No
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal: Respondent contends property has been assessed in a fair and uniform manner and will present evidence to support said claim. Jurisdictional Issues: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES: Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended: March If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, please cite the Board’s authority? Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, please explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? No If yes, when was it issued? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE: When was the Notice of Uncapping issued? Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Valuation Information: Parcel Identification Number: W-13-16-378-019 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 464250 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 464250 What do you believe is the fair market value? 952280 What do you believe is the taxable value? 476140 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent’s Signature: /s/ Tyler Longmeyer Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR STATE OF MICHIGAN RECEIVED MAY © 4 2026 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAI DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR LANSING PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Other Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name ( | M.1. Last Name/Company Name Wamp A560 Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 1922 Cass Lally Front Lol. City or Town State ZIP Code Ke ono Haro MP | 48320 Telephone Lessor o¢YE- 227— 9933 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) i850 a gio e9 omar .0rm Section 2: Petitioner’ Ss Altorneyiutorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name NM A Last Name ] Firm Name (if any) Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) Section 3: Subject Property Information suse the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. How many parcels are you If you are appegling more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? appealing? [] ves (A **If No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel Property Address (No., S72 5790 Hignland Rel City or Town “ey State ZIP Code \W ote Coc atlanel ML | Yer
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing heck at inat appiy) o True Cash and Taxable Value [J Taxable Value Only (calculation) [ll] Uncapping of Taxable Value Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal I 1 The decision from the Board of Review was made and agreed upon, but a very minimal change was made for the commercial retail plaza. Similar recently sold commercial retait properties have been sold in the same area of Waterford for less than our assessed value. One of our major tenants defaulted on their lease leaving 30% of the plaza unoccupied within the first year of the building purchase. The property requires repairs and operating expenses reduce its value: For example, the roof needs to be replaced, and the cost estimate submitted to the board was at $65,000. Attached are comparables that are significantly lower than our assessed and taxable values. ) Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Eves [Hl] No If Yes, check which BOR you attended: Daren [i] July [a] December If No, please check the applicable reason(s): [I] Not required to attend [i] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) [| Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order [m} Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping [3 other If you checked “other” above, explain:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 7: Valuation Information “use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.
EW = 18 (p= 378 ~ 01]
Classification of Property:
Real
p§
Personal
[1 (check one)
Agricuttural
J
Commercial j¢
Industrial
J
Residential [J
Timber-Cutover 0
Developmental
3
utility 3 (check one)
Assessed Value {also known as State Equalized Value) established
| Taxable Value established by the Board of Review:
by the Board of Review:
#4 qe
Q 5 pa
FE: 3 [7A Y 250
What do you believe is the fair market valde (also KrGwn as true cash iE
(7,000
What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply
true cash
What do you believe He taxable value? (cannot exceed
.5)
:
d
val
y
74
2
value by
.5)
2d 4 32, 00
assessed
value)
Y2
5 Qo
Fee Information
Does the properly have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for alt tax years at
issue?
[] Yes
Jr] No
If you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees.
if the property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at feast 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at
issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute.
If you are appealing more than one
parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00
will be added for each additional parcet being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00
ji
If your property is residential property (see MCL 205,762) and
the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is:
Filing Fee is:
$100,000.00 and under
$125.00
$100,000.01 to $500,000.00
$200.00
$Over $500,000.00
$300.00
.
0
If the property Is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and
the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is:
Filing Fee is:
$100,000.00 and under
+
$250.00
104,000
.
Vi
* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above.
Y
SLT
Ze [a 24 T
If the property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or greater the
appeat does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed.
Ss ig nature *Required
Petitioner or Altorney/A
rized Rel
tative’s Signature:
Ist
7
ra
[7 8Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF
Page 5
CHAR
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Kamal Isso, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002262 Township Of Waterford, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: June 10, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Kamal Isso, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002262 Township Of Waterford, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: June 10, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR STATE OF MICHIGAN RECEIVED MAY © 4 2026 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAI DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR LANSING PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Other Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information First Name ( | M.1. Last Name/Company Name Wamp A560 Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 1922 Cass Lally Front Lol. City or Town State ZIP Code Ke ono Haro MP | 48320 Telephone Lessor o¢YE- 227— 9933 Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) i850 a gio e9 omar .0rm Section 2: Petitioner’ Ss Altorneyiutorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name NM A Last Name ] Firm Name (if any) Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email) Section 3: Subject Property Information suse the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. How many parcels are you If you are appegling more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? appealing? [] ves (A **If No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel Property Address (No., S72 5790 Hignland Rel City or Town “ey State ZIP Code \W ote Coc atlanel ML | Yer
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing heck at inat appiy) o True Cash and Taxable Value [J Taxable Value Only (calculation) [ll] Uncapping of Taxable Value Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal I 1 The decision from the Board of Review was made and agreed upon, but a very minimal change was made for the commercial retail plaza. Similar recently sold commercial retait properties have been sold in the same area of Waterford for less than our assessed value. One of our major tenants defaulted on their lease leaving 30% of the plaza unoccupied within the first year of the building purchase. The property requires repairs and operating expenses reduce its value: For example, the roof needs to be replaced, and the cost estimate submitted to the board was at $65,000. Attached are comparables that are significantly lower than our assessed and taxable values. ) Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Eves [Hl] No If Yes, check which BOR you attended: Daren [i] July [a] December If No, please check the applicable reason(s): [I] Not required to attend [i] Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) [| Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order [m} Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping [3 other If you checked “other” above, explain:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 7: Valuation Information “use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.
EW = 18 (p= 378 ~ 01]
Classification of Property:
Real
p§
Personal
[1 (check one)
Agricuttural
J
Commercial j¢
Industrial
J
Residential [J
Timber-Cutover 0
Developmental
3
utility 3 (check one)
Assessed Value {also known as State Equalized Value) established
| Taxable Value established by the Board of Review:
by the Board of Review:
#4 qe
Q 5 pa
FE: 3 [7A Y 250
What do you believe is the fair market valde (also KrGwn as true cash iE
(7,000
What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply
true cash
What do you believe He taxable value? (cannot exceed
.5)
:
d
val
y
74
2
value by
.5)
2d 4 32, 00
assessed
value)
Y2
5 Qo
Fee Information
Does the properly have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for alt tax years at
issue?
[] Yes
Jr] No
If you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees.
if the property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at feast 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at
issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute.
If you are appealing more than one
parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00
will be added for each additional parcet being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00
ji
If your property is residential property (see MCL 205,762) and
the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is:
Filing Fee is:
$100,000.00 and under
$125.00
$100,000.01 to $500,000.00
$200.00
$Over $500,000.00
$300.00
.
0
If the property Is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and
the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is:
Filing Fee is:
$100,000.00 and under
+
$250.00
104,000
.
Vi
* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above.
Y
SLT
Ze [a 24 T
If the property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or greater the
appeat does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed.
Ss ig nature *Required
Petitioner or Altorney/A
rized Rel
tative’s Signature:
Ist
7
ra
[7 8Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF
Page 5
CHAR
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.