Record Finder / 25-002898-TT
Michigan
John A Asmaro, Petitioner V City Of Warren, Respondent
- Petitioner
- John A Asmaro
- Respondent
- City Of Warren
Case overview
- Docket number
- 25-002898-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Macomb
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Denied | PET | 6 | 10/14/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Order Denying Motion | Not recorded | 6 | 10/14/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Motion for Reconsideration was received. | PET | Not recorded | 10/06/2025 | $25.00 | Download |
| 5 | Order of Dismissal | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/15/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 09/15/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/15/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Attachments to the Petition were filed | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/28/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 07/28/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
25-002898.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED OCT 1.8 2075 LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW BRODERICK, P.L.C.""CHIGAN TAX TRigunaL ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 411 West 13 Mile Road, Suite 150 Madison Heights, Michigan 48071 248-733-3585 — m.broderick@broderickslaw.com October 6, 2025 Via Regular First-Class Mail Michigan Tax Tribunal ] 611 W. Ottawa St. Pobox Boz Lansing, MI 48933 Arsene, Azecf 2214 RE: MTT Docket No. 25-002898 Sir/Madam: Enclosed please find a motion for reconsideration for the small claims division together with a money order for $25.00 made payable to the State of Michigan. Please process in your usual manner. Should you have questions or comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Matthew Broderick cc. City of Warren, Assessments
Page 2
el EE STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA soven LANSING DIRECTOR John A. Asmaro MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. 25-002898 City of Warren ) Respondent(s) MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 1. | wish this Tribunal to reconsider Order of Dismissal dated September 15. 2025 - 2. Good cause exists to grant reconsideration because: | was never provided notice of the Assessment of the property by the City of Warren. My neighbor also did not receive a notice of assessment. | cannot appeal something | am not aware of and did not receive. Accordingly, the case noted by the Tribunal in its order is not applicable. | have been denied both substantive and procedural due process. 3. 1 ask this Tribunal to grant my request for reconsideration. Alot LTP Party/Representative (sign here) Matthew Broderick [Print/type name of person signing] | certify that on this date | served a copy of this Motion, and any additional documentation, on the opposing party or their representative § ota” | Llc K =r
Page 3
N74 £7 / V4 LS Cen . Fuh 3 METROPLEX MI 480 Ado pisens tc by 77, 2 6 OCT 2025 PM15L Lttas AC Meds ban) / H¥ourg
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
25-002898 Reconsideration Deny.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 John A Asmaro, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISON v MTT Docket No. 25-002898 City of Warren, Presiding Judge Respondent. Jason C. Grinnell ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION On October 6, 2025, Petitioner filed a motion requesting that the Tribunal reconsider the Order of Dismissal entered in this case on September 15, 2025. In the motion, Petitioner states that they never received the notice of assessment, and that they cannot appeal something they are not aware of. Further, Petitioner states they have been denied substantive and procedural due process. The Tribunal has considered the motion and the case file and finds that Petitioner has failed to demonstrate a palpable error relative to the Order of Dismissal that misled the Tribunal and the parties and that would have resulted in a different disposition if the error was corrected.1 The Tribunal properly concluded that it has no authority over Petitioner’s appeal because they failed to protest the assessment to Respondent’s March Board of Review. Although Petitioner contends that they did not receive the notice of assessment, the Michigan Supreme Court recently reaffirmed that the Tribunal lacks any equitable authority to assume jurisdiction in cases presenting potential due- process violations when the statutory requirements for filing an appeal under MCL 205.735a have not been met, and that jurisdiction in such cases may only be vested upon the Tribunal by a judicial body with powers of equity.2 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. This order resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. 1 See MCR 2.119(F)(3). A palpable error is one that is “easily perceptible, plain, obvious, readily visible, noticeable, patent, distinct, or manifest.” Luckow v Luckow, 291 Mich App 417, 426 (2011) (quotation marks and citation omitted). 2 Sixarp, LLC v Byron Twp, __Mich__ (2025). See also Federal-Mogul Corp v Dep’t of Treasury, 161 Mich App 346 (1987), Elec Data Sys Corp v Flint Twp, 253 Mich App 538 (2002), and VanderWerp v Plainfield Twp, 278 Mich App 624 (2008), noting that the Tribunal’s powers are limited to those authorized by statute and do not include powers of equity.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002898 Page 2 of 2 APPEAL RIGHTS If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee. Entered: October 14, 2025 By _______________________________ cs PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
25-002898.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED OCT 1.8 2075 LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW BRODERICK, P.L.C.""CHIGAN TAX TRigunaL ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 411 West 13 Mile Road, Suite 150 Madison Heights, Michigan 48071 248-733-3585 — m.broderick@broderickslaw.com October 6, 2025 Via Regular First-Class Mail Michigan Tax Tribunal ] 611 W. Ottawa St. Pobox Boz Lansing, MI 48933 Arsene, Azecf 2214 RE: MTT Docket No. 25-002898 Sir/Madam: Enclosed please find a motion for reconsideration for the small claims division together with a money order for $25.00 made payable to the State of Michigan. Please process in your usual manner. Should you have questions or comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Matthew Broderick cc. City of Warren, Assessments
Page 2
el EE STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA soven LANSING DIRECTOR John A. Asmaro MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) v MTT Docket No. 25-002898 City of Warren ) Respondent(s) MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 1. | wish this Tribunal to reconsider Order of Dismissal dated September 15. 2025 - 2. Good cause exists to grant reconsideration because: | was never provided notice of the Assessment of the property by the City of Warren. My neighbor also did not receive a notice of assessment. | cannot appeal something | am not aware of and did not receive. Accordingly, the case noted by the Tribunal in its order is not applicable. | have been denied both substantive and procedural due process. 3. 1 ask this Tribunal to grant my request for reconsideration. Alot LTP Party/Representative (sign here) Matthew Broderick [Print/type name of person signing] | certify that on this date | served a copy of this Motion, and any additional documentation, on the opposing party or their representative § ota” | Llc K =r
Page 3
N74 £7 / V4 LS Cen . Fuh 3 METROPLEX MI 480 Ado pisens tc by 77, 2 6 OCT 2025 PM15L Lttas AC Meds ban) / H¥ourg
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Order_of_Dismissal.2025-09-15_13-54-44.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 John A Asmaro, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-002898 City Of Warren, Respondent. ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner failed to protest the assessment to Respondent’s March Board of Review, as required by MCL 205.735a. As such, and inasmuch as the Tribunal has no equitable power to waive or otherwise disregard statutory filing requirements and deadlines, it has no authority to hear the appeal or grant the relief requested. See Sixarp, LLC v Byron Twp, __Mich__; __NW3d__ (2025). Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. APPEAL RIGHTS If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002898 Page 2 of 6 Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee. By:___________________________________ Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair Entered: September 15, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 John A Asmaro, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-002898 City Of Warren, Respondent. ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner failed to protest the assessment to Respondent’s March Board of Review, as required by MCL 205.735a. As such, and inasmuch as the Tribunal has no equitable power to waive or otherwise disregard statutory filing requirements and deadlines, it has no authority to hear the appeal or grant the relief requested. See Sixarp, LLC v Byron Twp, __Mich__; __NW3d__ (2025). Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending issues and closes the case. APPEAL RIGHTS If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 25-002898 Page 4 of 6 Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee.
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN
Page 6
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
01._Property_Tax_Appeal_Petition_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.0e9f0627-90e1-472c-860d-997b2986a1b0.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MOAHR DOCKET NO. Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer Type: Individual First Name John M.I. A Last Name/Company Name Asmaro Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 4701 Berwyn City or Town Warren State Michigan ZIP Code 48092 Telephone Number 586-738-4263 Fax Number E-mail Address john.asmaro@gmail.com Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Matthew M.I. S Last Name Broderick Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 411 West 13 Mile Road Ste 150 City or Town Madison Heights State Michigan ZIP Code 48071 Telephone Number 248-733-3585 Fax Number 248-588-6075 E-mail Address broderickslaw@gmail.com Section 3: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? *If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel. Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 4701 Berwyn
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Warren Michigan 48092 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Warren (MACOMB) County Macomb Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Value, Taxable Value Only (calculation) Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal Property has been overvalued by City. Many hidden defects after sale that will cost me over $30,000.00. Repairs of defects are not discretionary. Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Year(s) you are appealing: 2025 Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? No If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND upload the BOR decision: If No, check the applicable reason(s): Assessment Change Notice was not sent to Petitioner Did you request a Poverty Exemption at the BOR? If Yes, check which BOR considered your application AND upload the BOR decision: March July December If No, explain why: Section 7: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 12-13-05-178-013 Classification of Property: Real Residential
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 95810 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 95810 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 150000 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 75000 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep’t of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal* Parcel Identification Number: Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: What do you believe is the property’s classification? If improved property, how is the property currently being used? If improved property, for what use was the property designed? Fee Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? Yes Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption? No If you answered yes to either or both of these questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $125.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00 $Over $500,000.00 $300.00 If your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. If your property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is $100,000.01 or greater the appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed.
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Matthew Broderick
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
SC_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2025-09-15_13-52-50.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 John A Asmaro, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-002898 City Of Warren, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: September 15, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 John A Asmaro, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 25-002898 City Of Warren, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: September 15, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Asmaro MTT appeal.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
z= A STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR John Asmaro , MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner(s) \% MTT Docket No. City of Warren , Respondent(s) ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: 12-13-05-178-013 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is X_ real ___personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? ____ Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? ___Yes ___ No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): Not applicable 6. The property identified above is classified as residential-improved 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent's March July December Board of Review. MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL - 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 - 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 - Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): | was never provided a notice of assessment and/or advised of my appeal rights. The City won't allow me to appeal. After | bought my house, a number of problems were found including: water in the heat ducts, a cracked foundation causing water damage. This will cost me $30,000.00 and is not discretionary. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): | was never provided a notice of assessment and/or advised of my appeal rights. The City wont allow me to appeal. After | bought my house, a number of problems were found including: water in the heat ducts, a cracked foundation causing water damage. This will cost me $30,000.00 and is not discretionary. The property or properties at issue are located in Macomb County. The property or properties’ address is: 4701 Berwyn Drive Warren, MI 48092 The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): City of Warren Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 4701 Berwyn Drive Warren, MI 48092 This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): XXX the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ____Yes___ No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL The tax year(s) at issue are: 2025
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal's authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 182000 95810 95810 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 152000 76000 76000 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 152000 95810 95810 19. Petitioner requests the following relief (attach additional page if necessary): Find taxable value and state equailzed value to be 76000. 20. List the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to support the relief requested (attach additional page if necessary): See answers to above about hidden defects of water and foundation damage and how those items affect value.
Page 4
MTT Docket No. Page 4 of 4 Signature of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: ~~ /)' 7 v [74 a Printed Name of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: Memidsd Baoosacels ohn Asya? Email Address: Yeo Qeorieles led @ gra: com Mailing Address: Ub Hes 13 Mee Long Sit Te 18 Moaison Het wrs ont Gus Telephone Number: 2NQ- 433 -3¢p + Date: 7/25/25
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
01._Property_Tax_Appeal_Petition_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.0e9f0627-90e1-472c-860d-997b2986a1b0.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MOAHR DOCKET NO. Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer Type: Individual First Name John M.I. A Last Name/Company Name Asmaro Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 4701 Berwyn City or Town Warren State Michigan ZIP Code 48092 Telephone Number 586-738-4263 Fax Number E-mail Address john.asmaro@gmail.com Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Matthew M.I. S Last Name Broderick Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 411 West 13 Mile Road Ste 150 City or Town Madison Heights State Michigan ZIP Code 48071 Telephone Number 248-733-3585 Fax Number 248-588-6075 E-mail Address broderickslaw@gmail.com Section 3: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? *If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel. Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 4701 Berwyn
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Warren Michigan 48092 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Warren (MACOMB) County Macomb Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Value, Taxable Value Only (calculation) Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal Property has been overvalued by City. Many hidden defects after sale that will cost me over $30,000.00. Repairs of defects are not discretionary. Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Year(s) you are appealing: 2025 Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? No If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND upload the BOR decision: If No, check the applicable reason(s): Assessment Change Notice was not sent to Petitioner Did you request a Poverty Exemption at the BOR? If Yes, check which BOR considered your application AND upload the BOR decision: March July December If No, explain why: Section 7: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 12-13-05-178-013 Classification of Property: Real Residential
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 95810 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 95810 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 150000 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 75000 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep’t of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal* Parcel Identification Number: Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: What do you believe is the property’s classification? If improved property, how is the property currently being used? If improved property, for what use was the property designed? Fee Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? Yes Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption? No If you answered yes to either or both of these questions, you are not required to pay any filing fees. The filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000. If your property is residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $125.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $200.00 $Over $500,000.00 $300.00 If your property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Filing Fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above. If your property is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is $100,000.01 or greater the appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed.
Page 4
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ Matthew Broderick
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.