Record Finder / 26-003889-TT
Michigan
Jimmy A Kogut Petitioner V Township Of Peacock Respondent
- Petitioner
- Jimmy A Kogut
- Respondent
- Township Of Peacock
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-003889-TT
- Status
- Petition Received
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Lake
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/26/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 08/18/2026 | $0.00 | Download |
Documents
SC_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-10-26_14-57-08.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Jimmy A Kogut, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-003889 Township Of Peacock, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: October 26, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Jimmy A Kogut, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-003889 Township Of Peacock, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: October 26, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Kogut.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED
Ef
AUG 3 4 2026
STATE OF MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL
- GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON |. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
VALUATION / UNCAPPING
Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Other
Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes.
Pursuant
to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal {i.e., Board of
Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, if applicable.
If you do not submit this document, you may be held in
default.
First Name
Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information
Bui
Last Name/Company
Name
Jimmy
A
Kogut
Maiting Address {No., Street, P.O. Box or Rurat Route)
15415 Susanna Circle
City or Town
State
ZiP Code
Livonia
Mi
48154
Telephone Humber (734) 462-1033
Email Address (do not enter unless you want #TT to send ell correspondence via emai)
Jmmy@EQUALIZ-AIR.COM
First Name
Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information
NL
Last Name
Firm Nama (if any)
Mailing Address {(No., Street, P.O. Box or Fuzal Houle)
City or Town
State
Telephone Number
Email Address (do not enter unless you want BITT
£5 sexd 28 correspondence via ema)
Section 3: Subject Property Information «use the mutiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.
How many parcels are you
Hyou are
more than one parce), are they contigusus or adjoining?
appealing?
[1 vest
i
] How
if No, yous must file separate appeals for each parcel
Property Address (No., Street)
parcel 43-06-143-013-01
City or Town
Coury
State
ZIP Code
Baldwin
Lake
Ml
49304Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 4: Check which of the following you are appealing (check
ai that appty)
True Cash and Taxable Value
[1 Taxable Value Only (calculation)
[7] Uncapping of Taxable Value
Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal
Around 1995 a 100 foot lot was divided into 4 equal 25 foot lots. For explanation purposes
| wilt refer to them ss lot 1,2,3 and 4 which are all contiguous
to each other. Approximately
in 1936
ot #1 was roadie
oval a buews eddiion was added.
The remaining 3 lots have not changed.
Around 1997 lot 4 added a Gazebo. Here
is the issue: The assessor made a mistake and Ested
it on my propery ist 2
Two parcels
off.
Last year talking taxes vith my neighbor Lat 3.
1 nofioed wey Stale Equalized Value and Taxable Valor was significantly higher evan though neither
proparty has Changed in
the
past 32 years
| immediately started fe provess fo dently why. was wife bo Selenmine Swat the assessors olive wexie a misisle in iSlng where the Gazebo was
located in 1
In addition around 2005 (est.) the Gazebo was removed from Lot 4 and no changes were made to my lot.
| appealed the mistakes to the Peacock Board in Feltmuzary 2026 claling thal
Jot 2 is erica
tn Lot 3 and Grerefore fo taxes should be the same.
In March 2026 the board agreed with the folowing nuling: “Properties are contiguous and identical prety much Should be same value.”
The State Equalized Value and Taxable amounts have me been comecied and amended,
My request
is for a refund of the 25 years of over{ereerndt due in the bao desical emars made by te Peacock Assessors Office.
| am submitting the letter now to ensure
| meet all dead Enes while
| gather the dada of the significant overpayments from the Lake County Treasurer
and will submit them as soon 2s they ase made awaiiable tome.
Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues
Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Wi Yes
O No
{f Yes, check which BOR you attended: i March
BA July
[| December
If No, please chack the applicable reason(s):
[J Not required
to attend
Appealing a prurported Clerical Ervor or ilulusl
stake of Fact {Hf yes, include explanation in Secon 5)
[1 Appeating within 35 days of State Tax Comwnission Order
Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping
[i] Other
If you checked “other” above, explain:
Yeariey dor see=t 1995 -2025Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON I. BROWN, DPA
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 7: Valuation Information *use the multipte parcel forms for additional, contiguous parcels.
Foret mie 43-06-143-013-01
Classification of Property:
Real]
Personal {J (check one)
Agricutturail]
~~ Commercial]
industrial]
Residential
Tieber-Cutover [1
Developmental [1
usitty [J (check one)
Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established | Taxable Value established by the Board of Review:
by the Board
of Review: NA
NA
What do you bekeve is the far market value (also known as true cash value)?
NA
What do you believe is the assessed vatue? (multiply true cash
What do you betieve is the taxable value? (cannot exceed
value
by 5)
NA
assessed value) NA
Fee Information
Does the properly have a Principal Residence Exemption of al least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for ali tax years at
issue?
O Yes
#4 no
Hf you answered yes to the above question, you ane rad requires
to pay any filing fees.
1f the property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the fifing of this petition for all tax years at
issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of he State Equalized Value or Taxable Vales in dispute.
you are appealing
more than one
parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00
will be added for each additional parcel being appeated, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00
1f your property is residential property (see $C 285.762) and
the State Equalized ValuePage 4
S
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.