Jack P Ochodnicky, Petitioner V Township Of Oakfield, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Jack P Ochodnicky
- Respondent
- Township Of Oakfield
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-000351-TT
- Status
- Ready Schedule
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Kent
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Notice of Filing | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/12/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 10 | Attachments to the Answer were filed | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/10/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 9 | Attachments to the Answer were filed | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/10/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | Attachments to the Answer were filed | Not recorded | Not recorded | 06/10/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 06/10/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | Answer was received | RESP | Not recorded | 06/10/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 04/22/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 04/22/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 03/23/2026 | $200.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Jack P Ochodnicky, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-000351 Township Of Oakfield, Respondent. NOTICE OF FILING TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims answer has been filed and the electronic copy of the answer can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup on the Tribunal’s website. Unless Respondent was defaulted, this case is ready to be scheduled for a Small Claims hearing and will be scheduled in the normal course of scheduling. You will receive a Notice of Hearing from the Tribunal by e-mail if you have identified an email address in the petition or other documentation. The Notice of Hearing will inform you of the date, time, and location of your hearing (note that your hearing will likely be conducted by telephone). Please read the Notice of Hearing as it includes important information. EVIDENCE: Parties are required to submit all evidence to the Tribunal and send a copy to the opposing party at least 21 days before the hearing date even if the documents had been submitted to the local Board of Review or the Michigan Department of Treasury. If the documents are not timely submitted to the Tribunal and served on the opposing party, the documents may be excluded. Documents may be filed with the Tribunal by mail or through the Tribunal’s e-filing system. Documents may be sent to the opposing party by mail or by e-mail, if the parties agree to service by e-mail. Users who file documents with the Michigan Tax Tribunal are advised that filed documents are public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tax Docket Lookup. Users who file documents are responsible for ensuring sensitive or personal identifying information is withheld or redacted. See TTR 209. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Michigan Tax Tribunal and prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents covered by the Order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a Protective Order will be published. The responsibility for excluding or redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII contained in a previously-filed document by
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-000351 Page 2 of 2 submitting a Request for Redactions. The Request for Redactions form will be available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages of our website. Alternate Dispute Resolution Options INFORMAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Parties have the option of handling this case through an informal settlement conference. An informal settlement conference is a meeting between the parties and/or their representatives to discuss the issues in a case in an effort to settle the case. This process may be an alternative to a hearing with a judge and may result in the parties’ filing a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment. Visit the Tribunal’s ADR webpage for more information. NOTE: The parties may not request an informal settlement conference to discuss an appeal of a principal residence exemption that was denied by either the Michigan Department of Treasury or a County. Also, state taxes levied by the Michigan Department of Treasury, such as income taxes, are not subject to the informal settlement conference process. MEDIATION: Parties have the option of handling this case through mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process where a mediator facilitates communication between the parties, assists in identifying issues, and helps explore solutions to promote a mutually
Page 3
STATE
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
Page 1 © iLOOKABOUT (US) Inc. dba Apex Software SKETCH/AREA TABLE ADDENDUM SUBJECT INFO File No.: Parcel No.: 41-08-19-226-027 Property Address: 10243 NE POPLAR DR City: ROCKFORD County: KENT State: MI ZipCode: 49341 Owner: OCHODNICKY JACK P II Client: 0 Client Address: Appraiser Name: Inspection Date: SKETCH 14.0' 10.0' WGEP 140 sf 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 24.0' 10.0' 11.0' 8.0' WD 88 sf 14.0' 14.0' WD 196 sf 4.0' BRK PATIO 40 sf 3.0' 2.0' 8.0' 2.0' 1 STY/SL 1376 sf 47.0' 4.0' 16.0' BRK PATIO 64 sf Sketch by ApexSketch AREA CALCULATIONS SUMMARY Code Description Factor Net Size Perimeter Net Totals 1 STY 1 STY/SL 1 1376 180 1376 P/P WGEP 1 140 48 WD 1 88 38 WD 1 196 56 BRK PATIO 1 40 28 BRK PATIO 1 64 40 528 COMMENT TABLE 1 COMMENT TABLE 2 COMMENT TABLE 3
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 of 1 Docket #: 26-000351 Party Filing Document Party Filing Document: Respondent Respondent If 'other', Identify: File Document Type: fuFile:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
ARCHIVED Valuation Report DB: 2026 Oakfield Twp 06/10/2026 03:42 PM 245,600 245,600 245,600 197,779 197,779 0 2026 Assessed MBOR S.E.V. Capped ->Taxable<- PRE/MBT 245,600 0 0 0 197,779 0 2026 New Eq. Adjustment Loss Additions Tax Adjustment Losses 0 0 0 192,580 2.70 2025 Assessed MBOR S.E.V. Base for Cap IRM Est. TCV/Total Floor Area = 357.04 2026 Est. T.C.V. 41-08-19-226-027 = 491,288 ECF (SCRAM) 1.889 => TCV: 229,723 Notes: Totals: 209,676 121,611 Exterior 1 Story 1 6,261 3,631 Interior 1 Story 1 5,131 2,976 Fireplaces Water Well, 50 Feet 1 3,278 1,901 Public Sewer 1 1,436 833 Water/Sewer Treated Wood 88 2,261 1,311 Treated Wood 196 3,855 2,236 Deck WGEP (1 Story) 140 12,446 7,219 Porches Other Additions/Adjustments Total: 175,008 101,504 1 Story Siding Slab 1,376 Stories Exterior Foundation Size Cost New Depr. Cost Building Areas Phy/Ab.Phy/Func/Econ/Comb. % Good=58/100/100/100/58 Ground Area = 1376 SF Floor Area = 1376 SF. (11) Heating System: Forced Air w/ Ducts Cost Est. for Res. Bldg: 1 Single Family RANCH Cls C Blt 1960 Total Estimated Land Improvements True Cash Value = 1,280 SEWER 0.00 1 76 0 SPETIC 0.00 1 76 0 Description Rate Size % Good Cash Value Residential Local Cost Land Improvements D/W/P: Brick on Sand 16.20 40 76 492 D/W/P: Brick on Sand 16.20 64 76 788 Description Rate Size % Good Cash Value Land Improvement Cost Estimates 79 Actual Front Feet, 0.31 Total Acres Total Est. Land Value = 260,285 SCRAM FF 86.00 152.00 0.7997 1.0813 3500 100 260,285 Description Frontage Depth Front Depth Rate %Adj. Reason Value * Factors * POPLAR POINT Land Value Estimates for Land Table SCRAM.SCRAM 9/19/23: NOH. PICS UPDATED AND MEASUREMENTS CONFIRMED. MLB Map #: KENT OAKFIELD TOWNSHIP ROCKFORD, MI 49341 Property Class: 401 10243 NE POPLAR DR 41-08-19-226-027 2026 Est. T.C.V. OCHODNICKY JACK P II
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 of 1 Docket #: 26-000351 Party Filing Document Party Filing Document: Respondent Respondent If 'other', Identify: File Document Type: fuFile:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
*** Information herein deemed reliable but not guaranteed*** KENT County: OAKFIELD TOWNSHIP Jurisdiction: Printed on Parcel Number: 41-08-19-226-027 0 0 0 0 2023 0 0 0 0 2024 0 0 0 0 2025 197,779C 245,600M 245,600 115,500 130,100 2026 Taxable Value Tribunal/ Other Board of Review Assessed Value Building Value Land Value Year Work Description for Permit PBOK24-0007, Issued 03/06/2024: Tear Off Shingles & Resheet The Roof & Install New Shingles & Venting. Land Improvement Cost Estimates Description Rate Size % Good Cash Value D/W/P: Brick on Sand 16.20 64 76 788 D/W/P: Brick on Sand 16.20 40 76 492 Residential Local Cost Land Improvements Description Rate Size % Good Cash Value SPETIC 0.00 1 76 0 SEWER 0.00 1 76 0 Total Estimated Land Improvements True Cash Value = 1,280 * Factors * POPLAR POINT Description Frontage Depth Front Depth Rate %Adj. Reason Value SCRAM FF 86.00 152.00 0.7997 1.0813 3500 100 260,285 79 Actual Front Feet, 0.31 Total Acres Total Est. Land Value = 260,285 Land Value Estimates for Land Table SCRAM.SCRAM MLB 09/19/2023 INSPECTED/ MSM 04/06/2022 NO ACTIVIT LAK 10/27/1992 INSPECTED Who When What Level Rolling Low High Landscaped Swamp Wooded Pond Waterfront Ravine Wetland Flood Plain Topography of Site Dirt Road Gravel Road Paved Road Storm Sewer Sidewalk Water Sewer Electric Gas Curb Street Lights Standard Utilities Underground Utils. X Public Improvements Vacant Improved X The Equalizer. Copyright (c) 1999 - 2009. Licensed To: Township of Oakfield, County of Kent, Michigan 9/19/23: NOH. PICS UPDATED AND MEASUREMENTS CONFIRMED. MLB Split/Comb. on 06/25/2025 completed 06/25/2025 MATTHEW OWNER REQUEST ; Parent Parcel(s): 41-08-19-226-007, 41-08-19-226-006, 41-08-19-226-026; Child Parcel(s): 41-08-19-226-027, 41-08-19-226-028; ----------------------------------------- Comments/Influences 410819226027 LOTS 32 & 33 ALSO THAT PART OF VAC PORTION OF PARK ADJ THERETO ON THE E * POPLAR POINT SPLIT/COMBINED ON 06/05/2025 FROM 41-08-19-226-006, 41-08-19-226-007, 41-08-19-226-026; Tax Description OCHODNICKY JACK P II 12855 HARVARD AVE NE CEDAR SPRINGS MI 49319 Owner's Name/Address 10243 NE POPLAR DR Property Address 2026 Est TCV 491,288 TCV/TFA: 357.04 MAP #: KENT P.R.E. 0% REFERENCE PBOK24-0007 03/06/2024 Res. Alteration School: CEDAR SPRINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS Status Number Date Building Permit(s) Zoning: LRD Class: RESIDENTIAL-IMPROV 0.0 DEED 202503200014685 31-SPLIT IMPROVED QC 03/12/2025 0 OCHODNICKY JACK P II OCHODNICKY JACK P II Prcnt. Trans. Verified By Liber & Page Terms of Sale Inst. Type Sale Date Sale Price Grantee Grantor 06/10/2026
Page 2
Class: C Effec. Age: 42 Floor Area: 1,376 Total Base New : 209,676 E.C.F. Total Depr Cost: 121,611 X 1.889 Estimated T.C.V: 229,723 Cost Est. for Res. Bldg: 1 Single Family RANCH Cls C Blt 1960 (11) Heating System: Forced Air w/ Ducts Ground Area = 1376 SF Floor Area = 1376 SF. Phy/Ab.Phy/Func/Econ/Comb. % Good=58/100/100/100/58 Building Areas Stories Exterior Foundation Size Cost New Depr. Cost 1 Story Siding Slab 1,376 Total: 175,008 101,504 Other Additions/Adjustments Porches WGEP (1 Story) 140 12,446 7,219 Deck Treated Wood 196 3,855 2,236 Treated Wood 88 2,261 1,311 Water/Sewer Public Sewer 1 1,436 833 Water Well, 50 Feet 1 3,278 1,901 Fireplaces Interior 1 Story 1 5,131 2,976 Exterior 1 Story 1 6,261 3,631 Totals: 209,676 121,611 Notes: ECF (SCRAM) 1.889 => TCV: 229,723 Carport Area: Roof: Bsmnt Garage: Year Built: Car Capacity: Class: Exterior: Brick Ven.: Stone Ven.: Common Wall: Foundation: Finished ?: Auto. Doors: Mech. Doors: Area: % Good: Storage Area: No Conc. Floor: (17) Garage WGEP (1 Story) Treated Wood Treated Wood 140 196 88 Type Area (16) Porches/Decks Interior 1 Story Interior 2 Story 2nd/Same Stack Two Sided Exterior 1 Story Exterior 2 Story Prefab 1 Story Prefab 2 Story Heat Circulator Raised Hearth Wood Stove Direct-Vented Gas 1 1 (15) Fireplaces Appliance Allow. Cook Top Dishwasher Garbage Disposal Bath Heater Vent Fan Hot Tub Unvented Hood Vented Hood Intercom Jacuzzi Tub Jacuzzi repl.Tub Oven Microwave Standard Range Self Clean Range Sauna Trash Compactor Central Vacuum Security System
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
1 of 1 Docket #: 26-000351 Party Filing Document Party Filing Document: Respondent Respondent If 'other', Identify: File Document Type: fuFile:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL JACK P. OCHODNICKY II SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION Petitioner, MOAHR Docket No. 26-000351 v Parcel No. 41-08-19-226-027 OAKFIELD TOWNSHIP Respondent. / Jack P. Ochodniky II 12855 Harvard Ave, Cedar Springs, MI 49319 ochodnickyelectric@yahoo.com Matthew Smith Oakfield Township Assessor 10300 14 Mile Rd Rockford, MI 49341 616-754-5679 assessor@oakfieldtwp.org / PROOF OF SERVICE I, Matthew Smith, state that on June 9, 2026 Respondent served copies of the subject property 2026 property record card, valuation statement, building sketch, and aerial photos by email to the Michigan Tax Tribunal Small Claims Division and also to Petitioner by email upon: Jack P. Ochodniky II 12855 Harvard Ave, Cedar Springs, MI 49319 ochodnickyelectric@yahoo.com /s/ Matthew Smith / Matthew Smith Oakfield Township Assessor 10300 14 Mile Rd NE Rockford, MI 49341 (616) 754-5679 assessor@oakfieldtwp.org
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. 26-000351 Respondent’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government: Township Of Oakfield (KENT) First Name M.I. Last Name Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information, if any: First Name Matthew M.I. J Last Name Smith Firm Name (if any) Oakfield Township Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 10300 14 Mile Rd NE City or Town Rockford State Michigan ZIP Code 48838 Telephone Number 616-754-5679 E-mail Address assessor@oakfieldtwp.org Subject Property Information: Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. *If necessary, attach a separate sheet. N/A Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more? No
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal: The subject 2026 Assessd Value represents 50% of an accurate estimate of True Cash Value for the year in question based on analysis of comparable sales wich occurred between April 1, 2023 and March 31, 2025. 2026 Taxable Value based on the year of acquisition, intervening boundary line changes, and rates of inflation. Petitioner condends that the subject inprovmement suffers from substantial deferred maintence. This statement is supported by a physical inspection conducted by the assessor office on September 19, 2023. Since that inspection petitioner has pulled building and electrical permits to remodel the interior of the subject structure in order to cure said deferred maintenance. All permits were finaled by the Oakfield Township Building Inspector prior to the valuation date of December 31, 2026. Respondent believes all outstanding deferred maintenance issues have been cured. Jurisdictional Issues: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES: Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended: March If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, please cite the Board’s authority? Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, please explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? No If yes, when was it issued? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE: When was the Notice of Uncapping issued?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped? Valuation Information: Parcel Identification Number: 41-08-19-226-027 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 245600 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 197779 What do you believe is the fair market value? 491200 What do you believe is the taxable value? 197779 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent’s Signature: /s/ Matthew J. Smith Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL JACK P. OCHODNICKY II SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION Petitioner, MOAHR Docket No. 26-000351 v Parcel No. 41-08-19-226-027 OAKFIELD TOWNSHIP Respondent. / Jack P. Ochodniky II 12855 Harvard Ave, Cedar Springs, MI 49319 ochodnickyelectric@yahoo.com Matthew Smith Oakfield Township Assessor 10300 14 Mile Rd Rockford, MI 49341 616-754-5679 assessor@oakfieldtwp.org / PROOF OF SERVICE I, Matthew Smith, state that on June 9, 2026 Respondent served copies of the subject property 2026 property record card, valuation statement, building sketch, and aerial photos by email to the Michigan Tax Tribunal Small Claims Division and also to Petitioner by email upon: Jack P. Ochodniky II 12855 Harvard Ave, Cedar Springs, MI 49319 ochodnickyelectric@yahoo.com /s/ Matthew Smith / Matthew Smith Oakfield Township Assessor 10300 14 Mile Rd NE Rockford, MI 49341 (616) 754-5679 assessor@oakfieldtwp.org
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. 26-000351 Respondent’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Local Unit of Government Local Unit of Government: Township Of Oakfield (KENT) First Name M.I. Last Name Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Telephone Number E-mail Address Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information, if any: First Name Matthew M.I. Last Name Smith Firm Name (if any) Oakfield Township Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 10300 14 Mile Rd NE City or Town Rockford State Michigan ZIP Code 48838 Telephone Number 616-754-5679 E-mail Address assessor@oakfieldtwp.org Subject Property Information: Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If no, list all parcels that are adjoining in separate groupings. *If necessary, attach a separate sheet. N/A Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of 50% or more? No
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Please Explain Your Answer to this Appeal: The 2026 assessed and taxable values represent an accurate opinion of value based an an analysis of comparable sales that occurreed btween April 1, 2023 and March 31, 2025. The petiitioner contends that the subject improvement suffers form a high degree of deferred maintenance. This statement is supported by a physical inspection of the subject property conducted by my office on September 19, 2023. However; the petitioner has since remodeled the interior of subject improvement and the relevant permits have been finaled by the Oakfield Township Building Inspector prior to December 31, 2025. I believe the deferred maintence issues have been cured. Jurisdictional Issues: IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES: Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review Petitioner attended: March If No, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March Board of Review? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer. If the July or December Board of Review revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? If yes, please cite the Board’s authority? Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No If yes, please explain Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? No If yes, when was it issued? IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE: When was the Notice of Uncapping issued? Under what statutory section was the taxable value uncapped?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Valuation Information: Parcel Identification Number: 41-08-19-226-027 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 245600 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 197779 What do you believe is the fair market value? 491200 What do you believe is the taxable value? 197779 Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent’s Signature: /s/ Matthew J. Smith Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MOAHR DOCKET NO. Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer Type: Individual First Name Jack M.I. P Last Name/Company Name Ochodnicky Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 12855 Harvard Ave NE City or Town CEDAR SPRINGS State Michigan ZIP Code 49319 Telephone Number 6168892092 Fax Number E-mail Address ochodnickyelectric@yahoo.com Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name M.I. Last Name Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address Section 3: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? No *If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel. Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 10243 NE Poplar Dr
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Rockford Michigan 49341 Taxing Authority (City or Township) Township Of Oakfield (KENT) County Kent Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Value, Taxable Value Only (calculation) Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal The current assessment does not accurately reflect the true condition of the property. The home requires extensive repairs, including foundation deficiencies, outdated and unsafe electrical systems, significant water damage, and a fully gutted interior. These issues materially reduce the property’s market value and should be fully considered in determining an appropriate assessment. Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Year(s) you are appealing: 1 Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND upload the BOR decision: March If No, check the applicable reason(s): Did you request a Poverty Exemption at the BOR? If Yes, check which BOR considered your application AND upload the BOR decision: March July December If No, explain why: Section 7: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 41-08-19-226-027 Classification of Property: Personal Residential
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 245600 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 245600 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 270000 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 135000 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep’t of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal* Parcel Identification Number: Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: What do you believe is the property’s classification? If improved property, how is the property currently being used? If improved property, for what use was the property designed? Fee Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? No Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption? No If you answered yes to either or both of these questions, you are not required to pay
Page 4
S
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Jack P Ochodnicky, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-000351 Township Of Oakfield, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: April 22, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Jack P Ochodnicky, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-000351 Township Of Oakfield, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: __Tribunal Clerk_____ Entered: April 22, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL MOAHR DOCKET NO. Do not use this form to appeal Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultural Exemption, Special Assessment, or Non-Property tax disputes. Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review Decision or Notice of Uncapping) with this Small Claims Petition, if applicable. If you do not submit this document, you may be held in default. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer Type: Individual First Name Jack M.I. P Last Name/Company Name Ochodnicky Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 12855 Harvard Ave NE City or Town CEDAR SPRINGS State Michigan ZIP Code 49319 Telephone Number 6168892092 Fax Number E-mail Address ochodnickyelectric@yahoo.com Section 2: Petitioner’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name M.I. Last Name Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address Section 3: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? No *If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel. Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] 10243 NE Poplar Dr
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Rockford Michigan 49341 Taxing Authority (City or Township) Township Of Oakfield (KENT) County Kent Section 4: Issues Being Appealed (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Value, Taxable Value Only (calculation) Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal The current assessment does not accurately reflect the true condition of the property. The home requires extensive repairs, including foundation deficiencies, outdated and unsafe electrical systems, significant water damage, and a fully gutted interior. These issues materially reduce the property’s market value and should be fully considered in determining an appropriate assessment. Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Year(s) you are appealing: 1 Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? Yes If Yes, check which BOR you attended AND upload the BOR decision: March If No, check the applicable reason(s): Did you request a Poverty Exemption at the BOR? If Yes, check which BOR considered your application AND upload the BOR decision: March July December If No, explain why: Section 7: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels. Parcel Identification Number: 41-08-19-226-027 Classification of Property: Personal Residential
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR: 245600 Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR: 245600 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 270000 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 135000 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Section 8: Classification Information *Only the MI Dep’t of Treasury may appeal this issue to the Tribunal* Parcel Identification Number: Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: What do you believe is the property’s classification? If improved property, how is the property currently being used? If improved property, for what use was the property designed? Fee Information Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? No Are you appealing ONLY the denial of a Poverty Exemption? No If you answered yes to either or both of these questions, you are not required to pay
Page 4
S
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.