Record Finder / 26-002268-TT
Michigan
Jack Casey Sebring Petitioner V City Of Rochester Hills Respondent
- Petitioner
- Jack Casey Sebring
- Respondent
- City Of Rochester Hills
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-002268-TT
- Status
- Default Petitioner
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Oakland
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Attachments to the Petition were filed | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/22/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Order of Default of Petitioner | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/09/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 09/09/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/09/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 06/10/2026 | $0.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
IMG_1310.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
pi TICE OF 2026 BOARD OF R VIEW DECISION - City of Rochester Hill S or, - Assessing Department The board's decision is 1000 Rochester Hills Drive for one year only Rochester Hills MI 48309 SEBRING, JACK C NOFAR, ABIGAIL R 159 E MARYKNOLL RD ROCHESTER HILLS MI 48309-1954 Parcel Number: 70-15-17-129-007 ; | : Property Class: 401 (RESIDENTIAL-IMPROVED) Property Address: 159 E MARYKNOLL RD Values set prior to the March Board of Review: 2026 Assessed Value 274,550 2026 Taxable Value 274,550 The Board of Review has examined your 2026 Assessed Value and/or Taxable Value and has made the following board determination: 2026 FINAL Assessed Value set by BEEZ627 500) the Board of Review 2026 FINAL Taxable Value set by ar TPE the Board of Review RES 0&5 A The 2025 Capped Value formula is 2025 Taxable Value, minus losses, increased by the consumer price index of 1.027 plus additions. The 2026 taxable value is the lower of the 5 Asse 2026 Capped value. Your taxes are levied on the Taxable Value. pent 9026 Assessed value or the Further Appeal of Valuation may be made, by filing a petition that can be obtained at www. michigan.gov/taxtrib (click Small Claims Tab) and mail to the Michigan Tax Tribunal, P.O. Box 30232, Lansing MI 48909. The final date for filing a residential valuation appeal to the Michigan Tax Tribunal is July 31 of the current year. The final date for filing a commercial or personal property valuation appeal is May 31 of the current year. Taxpayers who do not have access to the internet may call The City of Rochester Hills at (248) 656-4605 to obtain a petition. If you have any questions about this notice, pl please contact the Assessing Depart at (248) 656-4605. Bpan Sincerely, Laure A [aythr Secretary
Page 2
48309-1954 MICHIGAN Parcel Number: 70-15-17-129-007 2026 Taxable Value 274,550 = The Board of Review has examined your 2026 Assessed Value and/or Taxable Value and has made the following board determination: 2026 FINAL Assessed Value set by 262,500 the Board of Review » Capped value, our taxes are evie sessed value or the 2 ation may be made, by filing a petition that can be obtained at www. michigan.gov/taxtrib (click Small Claims Tab) and mail to the Michigan Tax Tribunal, P.O. Box 30232, Lansing MI 48909. The final date for filing a residential valuation appeal to the Michigan Tax Tribunal is July 31 of the current year. The final date for filing a commercial or personal property valuation appeal is May 31 of the current year. Taxpayers who do not have access to the internet may call The City of Rochester Hills at (248) 656-4605 to obtain a petition. Further Appeal of Valu If you have any questions about this noti i Fh pe notice, please contact the Assessing Department Sincerely, Laarie A Taglor Secretary
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
SubsequentFiling.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-002268 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? Yes Party Filing Document Petitioner Files Document Type: Attachments to Petition Attachment File Name: IMG_1310 Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
SC_Order_of_Default_of_Petition.2026-09-09_15-00-21.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Jack Casey Sebring, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002268 City Of Rochester Hills, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 14 days of the entry of this order. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: September 9, 2026 1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002268 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Jack Casey Sebring, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002268 City Of Rochester Hills, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 14 days of the entry of this order. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.2 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: September 9, 2026 2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 26-002268 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
159 E Maryknoll.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
File No. File Number: In accordance with your request, I have appraised the real property at: The purpose of this appraisal is to develop an opinion of the defined value of the subject property, as improved. The property rights appraised are the fee simple interest in the site and improvements. In my opinion, the defined value of the property as of is: The attached report contains the description, analysis and supportive data for the conclusions, final opinion of value, descriptive photographs, assignment conditions and appropriate certifications. 159 E Maryknoll Susan Ignash Four Hundred Eighty-Seven Thousand Dollars $487,000 March 9, 2026 Rochester Hills, MI 48309-1954 159 E Maryknoll Road 159 E Maryknoll Rochester Hills, MI 48309-1954 159 E Maryknoll Road Jack C Sebring/Abigail R Nofar
Page 2
Residential Appraisal Report File No. The purpose of this appraisal report is to provide the client with a credible opinion of the defined value of the subject property, given the intended use of the appraisal. Client Name/Intended User E-mail Client Address City State Zip Additional Intended User(s) Intended Use PURPOSE Property Address City State Zip Owner of Public Record County Legal Description Assessor's Parcel # Tax Year R.E. Taxes $ Neighborhood Name Map Reference Census Tract Property Rights Appraised Fee Simple Leasehold Other (describe) SUBJECT My research did did not reveal any prior sales or transfers of the subject property for the three years prior to the effective date of this appraisal. Prior Sale/Transfer: Date Price Source(s) Analysis of prior sale or transfer history of the subject property (and comparable sales, if applicable) Offerings, options and contracts as of the effective date of the appraisal SALES HISTORY Neighborhood Characteristics One-Unit Housing Trends One-Unit Housing Present Land Use % Location Urban Suburban Rural Property Values Increasing Stable Declining PRICE AGE One-Unit % Built-Up Over 75% 25-75% Under 25% Demand/Supply Shortage In Balance Over Supply $(000) (yrs) 2-4 Unit % Growth Rapid Stable Slow Marketing Time Under 3 mths 3-6 mths Over 6 mths Low Multi-Family % Neighborhood Boundaries High Commercial % Pred. Other % Neighborhood Description Market Conditions (including support for the above conclusions) NEIGHBORHOOD Dimensions Area Shape View Specific Zoning Classification Zoning Description Zoning Compliance Legal Legal Nonconforming (Grandfathered Use) No Zoning Illegal (describe) Is the highest and best use of the subject property as improved (or as proposed per plans and specifications) the present use? Yes No If No, describe. Utilities Public Other (describe) Public Other (describe) Off-site Improvements—Type Public Private Electricity Water Street Gas Sanitary Sewer Alley Site Comments SITE GENERAL DESCRIPTION FOUNDATION EXTERIOR DESCRIPTION materials INTERIOR materials Units One One w/Acc. unit Concrete Slab Crawl Space Foundation Walls Floors # of Stories Full Basement Partial Basement Exterior Walls Walls Type Det. Att. S-Det./End Unit Basement Area sq. ft. Roof Surface Trim/Finish Existing Proposed Under Const. Basement Finish % Gutters & Downspouts Bath Floor Design (Style) Outside Entry/Exit Sump Pump Window Type Bath Wainscot Year Built Storm Sash/Insulated Car Storage None Effective Age (Yrs) Screens Driveway # of Cars Attic None Heating FWA HW Radiant Amenities WoodStove(s) # Driveway Surface Drop Stair Stairs Other Fuel Fireplace(s) # Fence Garage # of Cars Floor Scuttle Cooling Central Air Conditioning Patio/Deck Porch Carport # of Cars Finished Heated Individual Other Pool Other Att. Det. Built-in Appliances Refrigerator Range/Oven Dishwasher Disposal Microwave Washer/Dryer Other (describe) Finished area above grade contains: Rooms Bedrooms Bath(s) Square Feet of Gross Living Area Above Grade Additional Features Comments on the Improvements IMPROVEMENTS Page 1 of 4 This form Copyright © 2005-2016 ACI, a First American Company. All Rights Reserved. (gPAR™) General Purpose Appraisal Report 3/2017 GPARSUM_17 03272017 Produced using ACI software, 800.234.8727 www.aciweb.com 159 E Maryknoll Determine Market Value None 48309-1954 MI Rochester Hills 159 E Maryknoll Road Jack C Sebring/Abigail R Nofar X 1930 MSA47644 Spring Hill 4,695.00 2025 70-15-17-129-007 T3N, R11E, SEC 17 SPRING HILL SUB NO 1 LOT 80 Oakland Jack C Sebring/Abigail R Nofar 48309-1954 MI Rochester Hills 159 E Maryknoll Road The subject property is not known to be currently listed for sale. Prior sale of the subject property was arm's length, 43 days on market, 96.79% sale price/list price. No other prior sales or transfers found for the subject property in the past 36 months. No prior sales or transfers of the comparable sales in the last 12 months other than noted in the grid on Page 2. Liber/Page -60655/0628, RealcompMLS#20251025607 $482,000 10/21/2025 X Median home value in this market is approximately $463,539, reflecting a 3.1% year- over-year increase as of late December 2025 and reported at $432,450 in January 2026, a modest 1.4% increase compared to the previous year. Homes typically stay on the market for 38 to 58 days. This is notably longer than the 20-day average seen in early 2025, indicating a slower pace for sellers. Homes are selling at 98% of the original asking price on average. The neighborhood consists of predominantly single family homes built in 1960's and 1970's, ranch, split level and colonial styles. 10 90 47 66 2 475 1,150 250 The neighborhood is north of Avon Rd, south of Walton, east of Adams and west of Livernois. X X X X X X No adverse site conditions known. None X Asphalt X X X X X X One Family Residential District R-1 Residential Rectangular 20000 sf 125 X 160 The subject property is a colonial style home with partial basement and attached garage. Typical wear and tear noted, the home appears to be in average condition based on the prior MLS photos. No inspection of the subject property was conducted by this
Page 3
Residential Appraisal
Page 4
Residential
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
scpetition_valuation.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 1 of 3 PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. Petitioner’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Individual Local Unit of Government: First Name Jack M.I. Casey Last Name Sebring Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 159 E Maryknoll Rd City or Town Rochester Hills State Michigan ZIP Code 48309 Telephone Number 2485340693 E-mail Address jackcsebring@gmail.com Subject Property Information: How many parcels are you appealing? 1 If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? *If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel N/A Property Address (No., Street) 159 E Maryknoll Rd City or Town Rochester Hills County Oakland State Michigan ZIP Code 48309 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Rochester Hills (OAKLAND) Check which of the following you are appealing: (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values Taxable Value Only (calculation) Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal:
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 2 of 3 On August 16, 2025, 159 E Maryknoll went up for sale for $525,000. On August 29, 2025, the list price was dropped to $498,000. On October 1st, 2025, our offer of $482,000 was accepted. On February 25, 2026, the City of Rochester Hills assessed our home at $549,100 or a Taxable Value of $274,550. On March 9, 2026, our home was appraised at $487,000 or a Taxable Value of $243,500. On March 10, 2026, I argued our case to the Rochester Hills Board of Review. On March 23, 2026, The Rochester Hills Board of Review updated their assessment to $525,000 or a Taxable Value of $262,500. Based on the facts above and attached appraisal, we believe that the Taxable Value of our home should be $243,500. Jurisdictional Issues: Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: March If No, please check the applicable reason(s): Year(s) Under Appeal: 2026 Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal: Parcel Number: 70-15-17-129-007 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 262500 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 262500 What do you believe is the fair market value? 487000
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 3 of 3 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 243500 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner’s Signature: /s/ Jack C. Sebring Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/ Fee Information: If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for the filing of this appeal. The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. Property tax appeal: Residential** Non-Residential SEV or TV in contention* Filing fee*** Filing Fee** $100,000 or less...........................................................................................$ 125.00 $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00.........................................................................$ 200.00 N/A More than $500,000…..................................................................................$ 300.00 N/A Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? Yes
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
SC_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-09-09_14-57-54.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Jack Casey Sebring, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002268 City Of Rochester Hills, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: September 9, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Jack Casey Sebring, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002268 City Of Rochester Hills, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: September 9, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
159 E Maryknoll.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
File No. File Number: In accordance with your request, I have appraised the real property at: The purpose of this appraisal is to develop an opinion of the defined value of the subject property, as improved. The property rights appraised are the fee simple interest in the site and improvements. In my opinion, the defined value of the property as of is: The attached report contains the description, analysis and supportive data for the conclusions, final opinion of value, descriptive photographs, assignment conditions and appropriate certifications. 159 E Maryknoll Susan Ignash Four Hundred Eighty-Seven Thousand Dollars $487,000 March 9, 2026 Rochester Hills, MI 48309-1954 159 E Maryknoll Road 159 E Maryknoll Rochester Hills, MI 48309-1954 159 E Maryknoll Road Jack C Sebring/Abigail R Nofar
Page 2
Residential Appraisal Report File No. The purpose of this appraisal report is to provide the client with a credible opinion of the defined value of the subject property, given the intended use of the appraisal. Client Name/Intended User E-mail Client Address City State Zip Additional Intended User(s) Intended Use PURPOSE Property Address City State Zip Owner of Public Record County Legal Description Assessor's Parcel # Tax Year R.E. Taxes $ Neighborhood Name Map Reference Census Tract Property Rights Appraised Fee Simple Leasehold Other (describe) SUBJECT My research did did not reveal any prior sales or transfers of the subject property for the three years prior to the effective date of this appraisal. Prior Sale/Transfer: Date Price Source(s) Analysis of prior sale or transfer history of the subject property (and comparable sales, if applicable) Offerings, options and contracts as of the effective date of the appraisal SALES HISTORY Neighborhood Characteristics One-Unit Housing Trends One-Unit Housing Present Land Use % Location Urban Suburban Rural Property Values Increasing Stable Declining PRICE AGE One-Unit % Built-Up Over 75% 25-75% Under 25% Demand/Supply Shortage In Balance Over Supply $(000) (yrs) 2-4 Unit % Growth Rapid Stable Slow Marketing Time Under 3 mths 3-6 mths Over 6 mths Low Multi-Family % Neighborhood Boundaries High Commercial % Pred. Other % Neighborhood Description Market Conditions (including support for the above conclusions) NEIGHBORHOOD Dimensions Area Shape View Specific Zoning Classification Zoning Description Zoning Compliance Legal Legal Nonconforming (Grandfathered Use) No Zoning Illegal (describe) Is the highest and best use of the subject property as improved (or as proposed per plans and specifications) the present use? Yes No If No, describe. Utilities Public Other (describe) Public Other (describe) Off-site Improvements—Type Public Private Electricity Water Street Gas Sanitary Sewer Alley Site Comments SITE GENERAL DESCRIPTION FOUNDATION EXTERIOR DESCRIPTION materials INTERIOR materials Units One One w/Acc. unit Concrete Slab Crawl Space Foundation Walls Floors # of Stories Full Basement Partial Basement Exterior Walls Walls Type Det. Att. S-Det./End Unit Basement Area sq. ft. Roof Surface Trim/Finish Existing Proposed Under Const. Basement Finish % Gutters & Downspouts Bath Floor Design (Style) Outside Entry/Exit Sump Pump Window Type Bath Wainscot Year Built Storm Sash/Insulated Car Storage None Effective Age (Yrs) Screens Driveway # of Cars Attic None Heating FWA HW Radiant Amenities WoodStove(s) # Driveway Surface Drop Stair Stairs Other Fuel Fireplace(s) # Fence Garage # of Cars Floor Scuttle Cooling Central Air Conditioning Patio/Deck Porch Carport # of Cars Finished Heated Individual Other Pool Other Att. Det. Built-in Appliances Refrigerator Range/Oven Dishwasher Disposal Microwave Washer/Dryer Other (describe) Finished area above grade contains: Rooms Bedrooms Bath(s) Square Feet of Gross Living Area Above Grade Additional Features Comments on the Improvements IMPROVEMENTS Page 1 of 4 This form Copyright © 2005-2016 ACI, a First American Company. All Rights Reserved. (gPAR™) General Purpose Appraisal Report 3/2017 GPARSUM_17 03272017 Produced using ACI software, 800.234.8727 www.aciweb.com 159 E Maryknoll Determine Market Value None 48309-1954 MI Rochester Hills 159 E Maryknoll Road Jack C Sebring/Abigail R Nofar X 1930 MSA47644 Spring Hill 4,695.00 2025 70-15-17-129-007 T3N, R11E, SEC 17 SPRING HILL SUB NO 1 LOT 80 Oakland Jack C Sebring/Abigail R Nofar 48309-1954 MI Rochester Hills 159 E Maryknoll Road The subject property is not known to be currently listed for sale. Prior sale of the subject property was arm's length, 43 days on market, 96.79% sale price/list price. No other prior sales or transfers found for the subject property in the past 36 months. No prior sales or transfers of the comparable sales in the last 12 months other than noted in the grid on Page 2. Liber/Page -60655/0628, RealcompMLS#20251025607 $482,000 10/21/2025 X Median home value in this market is approximately $463,539, reflecting a 3.1% year- over-year increase as of late December 2025 and reported at $432,450 in January 2026, a modest 1.4% increase compared to the previous year. Homes typically stay on the market for 38 to 58 days. This is notably longer than the 20-day average seen in early 2025, indicating a slower pace for sellers. Homes are selling at 98% of the original asking price on average. The neighborhood consists of predominantly single family homes built in 1960's and 1970's, ranch, split level and colonial styles. 10 90 47 66 2 475 1,150 250 The neighborhood is north of Avon Rd, south of Walton, east of Adams and west of Livernois. X X X X X X No adverse site conditions known. None X Asphalt X X X X X X One Family Residential District R-1 Residential Rectangular 20000 sf 125 X 160 The subject property is a colonial style home with partial basement and attached garage. Typical wear and tear noted, the home appears to be in average condition based on the prior MLS photos. No inspection of the subject property was conducted by this
Page 3
Residential Appraisal
Page 4
Residential
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
scpetition_valuation.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 1 of 3 PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM VALUATION / UNCAPPING APPEAL MTT DOCKET NO. Petitioner’s Contact Information: Filer Type: Individual Local Unit of Government: First Name Jack M.I. Casey Last Name Sebring Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 159 E Maryknoll Rd City or Town Rochester Hills State Michigan ZIP Code 48309 Telephone Number 2485340693 E-mail Address jackcsebring@gmail.com Subject Property Information: How many parcels are you appealing? 1 If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? *If no, you must file separate appeals for each parcel N/A Property Address (No., Street) 159 E Maryknoll Rd City or Town Rochester Hills County Oakland State Michigan ZIP Code 48309 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Rochester Hills (OAKLAND) Check which of the following you are appealing: (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values Taxable Value Only (calculation) Please Explain the Reason for this Appeal:
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 2 of 3 On August 16, 2025, 159 E Maryknoll went up for sale for $525,000. On August 29, 2025, the list price was dropped to $498,000. On October 1st, 2025, our offer of $482,000 was accepted. On February 25, 2026, the City of Rochester Hills assessed our home at $549,100 or a Taxable Value of $274,550. On March 9, 2026, our home was appraised at $487,000 or a Taxable Value of $243,500. On March 10, 2026, I argued our case to the Rochester Hills Board of Review. On March 23, 2026, The Rochester Hills Board of Review updated their assessment to $525,000 or a Taxable Value of $262,500. Based on the facts above and attached appraisal, we believe that the Taxable Value of our home should be $243,500. Jurisdictional Issues: Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review? Yes If Yes, check which Board of Review you attended: March If No, please check the applicable reason(s): Year(s) Under Appeal: 2026 Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal: Parcel Number: 70-15-17-129-007 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Residential (check one) Current Assessed Value as established by the Board of Review: 262500 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 262500 What do you believe is the fair market value? 487000
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR 3 of 3 Multiply the True Cash Value by .5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value. 243500 If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner’s Signature: /s/ Jack C. Sebring Attorney or Authorized Agent’s Signature: /s/ Fee Information: If you do not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% at the time of the filing of this petition, you are required to pay a filing fee for the filing of this appeal. The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. Property tax appeal: Residential** Non-Residential SEV or TV in contention* Filing fee*** Filing Fee** $100,000 or less...........................................................................................$ 125.00 $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00.........................................................................$ 200.00 N/A More than $500,000…..................................................................................$ 300.00 N/A Does the subject property have a principal residence exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition? Yes
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.