Intl Properties Of Mi LLC, Petitioner Vs. Township Of Macomb, Respondent

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

GOVERNOR 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

DIRECTOR 

 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 

Intl Properties of MI LLC, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Petitioner, 

 

 

v 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-002768 

 

Macomb Township, 

 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

 

Jason C. Grinnell 

 

 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT 

 

CONSENT JUDGMENT 

 

The Tribunal has reviewed the Stipulation and finds that it comports with the mandates 

of State law.1 As a result, the Tribunal shall enter the parties’ Stipulation. 

 

Therefore, 

 

IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all 

attachments, terms and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise 

indicated. 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment 

rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be 

corrected to reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values as provided in this 

Consent Judgment within 20 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment.2 

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the 

affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund as 

required by the Consent Judgment within 28 days of the entry of the Consent 

Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall, unless otherwise indicated, include a 

proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and of penalty and 

interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also, unless otherwise indicated, 

separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being 

refunded. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall, unless 

otherwise indicated, bear interest from the date of payment to the date of judgment and 

the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A sum determined by the 

Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any time period prior to 28 

days after the issuance of this Consent Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest 

shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2013, through June 30, 2016, at the rate of 4.25%, 

 

1 See MCL 211.27a. 

2 See MCL 205.755.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-002768 

Page 2 of 2 

 

(ii) after June 30, 2016, through December 31, 2016, at the rate of 4.40%, (iii) after 

December 31, 2016, through June 30, 2017, at the rate of 4.50%, (iv) after June 30, 

2017, through December 31, 2017, at the rate of 4.70%, (v) after December 31, 2017, 

through June 30, 2018, at the rate of 5.15%, (vi) after June 30, 2018, through December 

31, 2018, at the rate of 5.41%, (vii) after December 31, 2018, through June 30, 2019, at 

the rate of 5.9%, (viii) after June 30, 2019, through December 31, 2019, at the rate of 

6.39%, (ix) after December

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

OCT 13 2025 

Mit GAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

: 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

ORLENE HAWKS 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Intl Properites of Mi LLC 

Petitioner, 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

v 

MOAHR Docket No. 25-002768 

Twp of Macomb 

Respondent. 

STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT 

(VALUATION) 

1. 

The subject property is in Macomb 

County. 

2. 

Parcel Number: 20-08-34-351-003 

, 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

3. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board 

of Review are: 

Tax year 

Assessed Value (AV) | Taxable Value (TV) 

2025 

682,900 

617,684 

4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for 

settlement purposes are: 

Tax year 

True Cash Value 

AV 

TV 

2025 

1,200,000 

600,000 

600,000 

5. 

If the stipulated TV does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable 

inflation rate multiplier, explain why (e.g., transfer of ownership, additions, losses, 

omitted property etc.)

Page 2

MOAHR Docket No. 25-002768 

Page 2 of 2 

of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): 

All refunds to be made payable jointly to Petitioner and "Polter Law" (Rep) and 

mailed to: Polter Law Group, 2600 W Big Beaver, Ste L100, Troy, MI 48084. 

NOTE: The Stipulation MUST include ALL parcels and ALL tax years included in the 

appeal (including subsequent tax years on or after April 

1 of each year for appeals 

pending in the Small Claims Division). The parties may agree, however, to withdraw the 

appeal of specific parcels and/or tax year(s). 

IF APPLICABLE, complete the following section(s). Otherwise, LEAVE BLANK. 

7. 

The parties agree to the withdrawal of parcel number: 

(If more than one parcel is being withdrawn, attach a separate page addressing 

all other parcels being withdrawn.) 

8. 

The parties agree to the withdrawal of tax year(s) 

Signature 

of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Sa 

7 

[®) 

- 

Printed Name: Stephen Polter (P72591) 

\J 

Date: Oct 1, 2025 

Signature of Respondent's “7 pL 

LAN 

Printed 

Name: Tim Tomlinson, Counsel, Macomb Twp 

Date: Oct 1, 2025

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Intl Properties of MI LLC, 

Petitioner, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL 

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-002768 

Township Of Macomb, 

Respondent. 

ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT 

The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on September 18, 

2025, and finds that the parties have failed to provide the correct assessed value or 

taxable value, as established by Respondent's Board of Review, for the 2025 tax year. 

Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is 

DENIED. 

IT IS

Page 4

P

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

OCT 13 2025 

Mit GAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

: 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

ORLENE HAWKS 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Intl Properites of Mi LLC 

Petitioner, 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

v 

MOAHR Docket No. 25-002768 

Twp of Macomb 

Respondent. 

STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT 

(VALUATION) 

1. 

The subject property is in Macomb 

County. 

2. 

Parcel Number: 20-08-34-351-003 

, 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

3. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board 

of Review are: 

Tax year 

Assessed Value (AV) | Taxable Value (TV) 

2025 

682,900 

617,684 

4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for 

settlement purposes are: 

Tax year 

True Cash Value 

AV 

TV 

2025 

1,200,000 

600,000 

600,000 

5. 

If the stipulated TV does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable 

inflation rate multiplier, explain why (e.g., transfer of ownership, additions, losses, 

omitted property etc.)

Page 2

MOAHR Docket No. 25-002768 

Page 2 of 2 

of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): 

All refunds to be made payable jointly to Petitioner and "Polter Law" (Rep) and 

mailed to: Polter Law Group, 2600 W Big Beaver, Ste L100, Troy, MI 48084. 

NOTE: The Stipulation MUST include ALL parcels and ALL tax years included in the 

appeal (including subsequent tax years on or after April 

1 of each year for appeals 

pending in the Small Claims Division). The parties may agree, however, to withdraw the 

appeal of specific parcels and/or tax year(s). 

IF APPLICABLE, complete the following section(s). Otherwise, LEAVE BLANK. 

7. 

The parties agree to the withdrawal of parcel number: 

(If more than one parcel is being withdrawn, attach a separate page addressing 

all other parcels being withdrawn.) 

8. 

The parties agree to the withdrawal of tax year(s) 

Signature 

of Petitioner's Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: 

Sa 

7 

[®) 

- 

Printed Name: Stephen Polter (P72591) 

\J 

Date: Oct 1, 2025 

Signature of Respondent's “7 pL 

LAN 

Printed 

Name: Tim Tomlinson, Counsel, Macomb Twp 

Date: Oct 1, 2025

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Intl Properties of MI LLC, 

Petitioner, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL 

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-002768 

Township Of Macomb, 

Respondent. 

ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT 

The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on September 18, 

2025, and finds that the parties have failed to provide the correct assessed value or 

taxable value, as established by Respondent's Board of Review, for the 2025 tax year. 

Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is 

DENIED. 

IT IS

Page 4

P

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N GRAND RIVER AVE, LANSING, MI 48906

NOTICE OF SEPTEMBER 1 - 15, 2026 PREHEARING GENERAL CALL AND 

ORDER OF PROCEDURE

Intl Properties of MI LLC,

Petitioner,

v

 

 

Township Of Macomb,

Respondent.

 MTT Docket No. 25-002768

Please be advised that 25-002768 has been placed on a two-week Prehearing General 

Call commencing September 01, 2026. Unless ordered otherwise, parties will be 

notified at least 28 days before they are scheduled to appear. Scheduling will not 

necessarily occur in the order in which the cases are listed below.

Parties are required to submit a valuation disclosure or written notification that no 

valuation disclosure is required by the dates indicated herein. A “valuation disclosure” 

is defined as documentary or other tangible evidence in a property tax proceeding that a 

party relies upon in support of the party’s contention as to the true cash value of the 

subject property or any portion thereof and contains the party’s value conclusion and 

data, valuation methodology, analysis or reasoning. See TTR 203 and TTR 241.

Users who file documents with the Tribunal are advised that filed documents are 

public records and will appear for public viewing on the Tribunal’s Tax Docket 

Lookup. If a user wishes to file a document for consideration by the Tribunal and 

prevent its publication on the Tax Docket Lookup, the user MUST file a Motion for 

Protective Order under MCR 2.302(C)(8). If a Protective Order is issued, documents 

covered by the order will not be published. Documents filed prior to the issuance of a 

Protective Order will be published.

In accordance with MCR 1.109(D)(9) and TTR 209, the responsibility for excluding or 

redacting personal identifying information (PII) from all documents filed with or offered to 

the Tribunal rests solely with the parties and their attorneys. The Tribunal is not 

responsible for or required to review, redact, or screen documents at the time of filing 

for PII whether filed electronically or on paper. A party, representative, or interested 

person (i.e. third party not part of an appeal) may request that the Tribunal redact PII 

contained in a previously filed document by submitting a Request for Redactions. The 

Request for Redactions form is available on the Entire Tribunal and Small Claims pages 

of the Tribunal’s website. 

Please refer to the Tribunal’s FAQs and Glossary of Terms pages on the Tribunal’s 

website for more information.

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-002768

Page 2 of 3

IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall:

a. If no valuation disclosure is required, notify the Tribunal and the opposing parties 

in writing within 21 days of entry of this order that no valuation disclosure is being 

filed. The notice shall indicate the reason or

Page 3

MTT

Page 4

S

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Intl Properties of MI LLC, 

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No. 25-002768

Township Of Macomb,

Respondent.

ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT

The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on September 18, 

2025, and finds that the parties have failed to provide the correct assessed value or 

taxable value, as established by Respondent’s Board of Review, for the 2025 tax year. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is 

DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be placed on a Prehearing General Call 

in the normal course of scheduling.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any 

future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance 

of this order, no additional filing fee is required.

By _____________________________

 Patricia L. Halm, Tribunal Chair 

Entered: September 26, 2025

 

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 25-002768

Page 2 of 8

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Intl Properties of MI LLC, 

Petitioner,

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No. 25-002768

Township Of Macomb,

Respondent.

ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT

The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on September 18, 

2025, and finds that the parties have failed to provide the correct assessed value or 

taxable value, as established by Respondent’s Board of Review, for the 2025 tax year. 

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is 

DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be placed on a Prehearing General Call 

in the normal course of scheduling.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent 

Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any 

future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance 

of this order, no

Page 4

MT

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

SEP 2 5 2025 

SER 

seu 

ey 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

ORLENE HAWKS 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Intl Properties of MI LLC 

i 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner, 

MOAHR Docket No. 25-002768 

Traninfo:4606 

26058224-1 

09/24/25 

/ Moder mo Tw, 

hil: 

1866 

ut: $50.00 

Respondent. 

ID: 

FOLTER LAW GROUP 

STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT 

(VALUATION) 

1. 

The subject property is in Macomb 

County. 

2. 

Parcel Number: 20-08-34-351-003 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Stipulation 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

3. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's Board 

of Review are: 

Tax year 

Assessed Value (AV) 

| Taxable Value (TV) 

2025 

682,900 

652,121 

4. 

The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for 

settlement purposes are: 

Tax year 

True Cash Value 

AV 

TV 

2025 

1,200,000 

600,000 

600,000 

5. 

If the stipulated TV does not equal the prior year TV multiplied by the applicable 

inflation rate multiplier, explain why (e.g., transfer of ownership, additions, losses, 

omitted property etc.)

Page 2

MOAHR Docket No. 25-002768 

Page 2 of 2 

of the refund, the waiver of interest, etc. (attach additional page if necessary): 

All refunds shall be made payable jointly to Petitioner and "Polter Law Group" 

(Rep), and mailed to Polter Law, 2600 W Big Beaver, Ste 1.100, Troy, 

MI 48084 

NOTE: The Stipulation MUST include ALL parcels and ALL tax years included in the 

appeal (including subsequent tax years on or after April 1 of each year for appeals 

pending in the Small Claims Division). The parties may agree, however, to withdraw the 

appeal of specific parcels and/or tax year(s). 

IF APPLICABLE, complete the following section(s). Otherwise, LEAVE BLANK. 

7. 

The parties agree to the withdrawal of parcel number: 

(If more than one parcel is being withdrawn, attach a separate page addressing 

all other parcels being withdrawn.) 

8. 

The parties agree to the withdrawal of tax year(s) 

i 

wry of Petitioner's nd Repfesentatjve or, if none, Petitioner: 

MANNA 

EA 

Avo 

[ARE 

Printed Name: Stephe Polter (P72591) 

Date: Sep 15, 2025 

Signature of Respondent's authorized épres 

tive: 

A 

Printed Name: Tim Tomlinson, Counsel, Macomb Twp. 

Date: 

715, /: a5

Page 3

POLTER LAW GROUP 

2600 W. BIG BEAVER, SUITE L100 

| TROY, MI 48084 

PUETROPLEX 

HO 

. 

— 

_ 

U

18 

SEP 

PAT L 

3 

EH 

£ 

H 

AESIE TT REED 

TL 

a 

LL 

Py 

rr 

I 

ey 

Te rR 

r

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

AUG 2 6 2025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Intl Properties MI LLC 

Petitioner(s) 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

v 

MTT Docket No.25-002768 

Twp of Macomb 

Respondent(s) 

PROOF OF SERVICE FOR PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

*To be filed after the Tribunal issues the Notice of Docket Number* 

Stephen Polter 

states that on August 21 

he/she 

[Name of person serving/mailing petition] 

[date of service] 

served a copy of the Petition relative to the above-captioned matter upon: 

[Provide name and address of the following entities] 

1. Assessor (via certified mail): 

54111 Broughton Road 

tstfoor 

Macomb, MI 48042 

2. 

City Clerk or Township Supervisor/Clerk (via certified mail): 

54111 Broughton Rd, Macomb, MI 48042 

3. 

County Equalization Director (via first class mail or personal service): 

1 8 Main St 6th floor, Mt Clemens, MI 48043 

4. County Clerk (via first class mail or personal service): 

120 N Main St, Mt Clemens, MI 48043 

5. 

Secretary of the local school board (via first class mail or personal service): 

44001 Garfield Rd #1100, Clinton Township, MI 48038 

6. 

State Treasurer (via first class mail):

Page 2

Te X

EDTA 

RO 

: 

: 

EXPRESS PROPERTY TAX ARPEALS LL 

§ 

USposToEM 

© 

A division of Polter Law Group 

06350002268383 

FROM 48084 is

2600 W Big Beaver | Ste L100 

| 

Troy, MI'48084 

~ oe MTT 

OR 30232 

Lows 

ing Mz 4304

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

INTL PROPERTIES OF MI LLC 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

MTT Docket No. 25-002768 

TOWNSHIP OF MACOMB 

Respondent. 

STEPHEN POLTER 

TIMOTHY D. TOMLINSON (P48519) 

Attorney for Petitioner 

YORK, DOLAN & TOMLINSON, P.C. 

2600 W. Big Beaver 

Attorneys for Respondent 

Suite 100 

22600 Hall Rd., Ste. 205 

Troy, MI 

48084 

Clinton Township, MI 48036 

(248) 213-6800 

(586) 263-5050 

spolter@polterlaw.com 

ttomlinson@yorkdolanlaw.com 

RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITION 

NOW COMES the Respondent, Township of Macomb, by and through its attorneys, York, 

Dolan & Tomlinson, P.C., and in answer to Petitioner’s Petition, states as follows: 

1. 

Respondent admits paragraph 1. 

2. 

Respondent admits paragraph 2. 

3. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies paragraph 3 being without sufficient 

information to form a reasonable belief thereto. 

4. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies paragraph 4 being without sufficient 

information to form a reasonable belief thereto. 

wn 

Respondent neither admits nor denies paragraph 5 being without sufficient 

information to form a reasonable belief thereto. 

6. 

Respondent admits paragraph 6. 

1

Page 2

7. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies paragraph 7 being without sufficient 

information to form a reasonable belief thereto. 

8. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies paragraph 8 being without sufficient 

information to form a reasonable belief thereto. 

9. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies paragraph 9 being without sufficient 

information to form a reasonable belief thereto. 

10. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies paragraph 10 being without sufficient 

information to form a reasonable belief thereto. 

11. 

Respondent admits paragraph 11. 

12. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies paragraph 12 being without sufficient 

information to form a reasonable belief thereto. 

13. 

Respondent denies paragraph 13 because it is untrue, leaving Petitioner to its proofs. 

14. 

Respondent admits paragraph 14. 

15. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies paragraph 15 being without sufficient 

information to form a reasonable belief thereto. 

16. 

Respondent admits paragraph 16. 

17. 

Respondent denies paragraph 17 because it is untrue, leaving Petitioner to its proofs. 

18. 

Respondent denies paragraph 18 because it is untrue, leaving Petitioner to its proofs. 

19. 

Respondent denies paragraph 19 because it is untrue, leaving Petitioner to its proofs. 

20. 

Respondent denies paragraph 20 because it is untrue, leaving Petitioner to its proofs. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent respectfully requests that this Honorable Tribunal dismiss the 

Petition, affirm the values as determined by Respondent, and award costs and attorney fees

Page 3

wrongfully incurred in having to defend this matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

YORK, DOLAN & TOMLINSON, P.C. 

wl 4 

TIMOTHY D. TOMLINSON (P48519) 

Attorneys for Respondent 

22600 Hall Rd., Ste. 205 

Clinton Township, MI 48036 

(586) 263-5050 

ttomlinson@yorkdolanlaw.com 

Dated: August 27, 2025 

ERTIFICATE

Page 4

S

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-002768

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Local Unit of Government

Township Of Macomb (MACOMB)

Local Unit of Government/First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Timothy

M.I.

D

Last Name

Tomlinson

Firm Name (if any)

York, Dolan & Tomlinson, P.C.

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

22600 Hall Rd

Ste 205

City or Town

Clinton Twp

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48036

Telephone Number

586-263-5050

Fax Number

586-263-4763

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

ttomlinson@yorkdolanlaw.com

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: 

Timothy D. Tomlinson

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

INTL PROPERTIES OF MI LLC, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

MTT Docket No. 25-002768 

MACOMB TOWNSHIP, 

Respondent. 

STEPHEN POLTER 

TIMOTHY D. TOMLINSON (P48519) 

EPTA 

YORK, DOLAN & TOMLINSON, P.C. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

Attorneys for Respondent 

2600 W. Big Beaver Rd, Ste L100 

22600 Hall Road, Ste. 205 

Troy, MI 48084 

Clinton Township, MI 48036 

(248) 213-6800 

(586) 263-5050 

spolter@polterlaw.com 

ttomlinson@yorkdolanlaw.com 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

On July 24, 2025, I served by first class U.S. Mail a copy of Respondent's Answer to 

Petitioner's Petition, Affirmative Defenses and this Proof of Service in the above-captioned 

matter upon: 

STEPHEN POLTER 

2600 W. BIG BEAVER, Ste L100 

TROY, MI 

48084 

1 declare that the statements above are true to the best of my information, knowledge and 

belief. 

Donna L. Hall 

York, Dolan & Tomlinson, P.C.

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

INTL PROPERTIES OF MI LLC, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

MTT Docket No. 25-002768 

MACOMB TOWNSHIP, 

Respondent. 

STEPHEN POLTER 

TIMOTHY D. TOMLINSON (P48519) 

EPTA 

YORK, DOLAN & TOMLINSON, P.C. 

Representatives for Petitioner 

Attorneys for Respondent 

2600 W. Big Beaver Rd, Ste L100 

22600 Hall Road, Ste. 205 

Troy, MI 48084 

Clinton Township, MI 48036 

(248) 213-6800 

(586) 263-5050 

spolter@polterlaw.com 

ttomlinson@yorkdolanlaw.com 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

On July 24, 2025, I served by first class U.S. Mail a copy of Respondent's Answer to 

Petitioner's Petition and Affirmative Defenses in the above-captioned matter upon: 

STEPHEN POLTER 

2600 W. BIG BEAVER, Ste L100 

TROY, MI 

48084 

I declare that the statements above are true to the best of my information, knowledge and 

rrp thr 

Donna L. Hall 

York, Dolan & Tomlinson, P.C. 

belief.

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

INTL PROPERTIES OF MI LLC 

Petitioner, 

VS. 

MTT Docket No. 25-002768 

MACOMB TOWNSHIP, 

Respondent. 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

On July 24, 2025, I served by first class U.S. Mail a copy of Respondent’s Answer to 

Petitioner’s Petition and Affirmative Defenses in the above-captioned matter upon: 

STEPHEN POLTER 

2600 W. BIG BEAVER 

SUITE L100 

TROY, MI 48084 

1 declare that the statements above are true to the best of my information, knowledge and belief. 

/s/ Donna L Hall 

Donna L. Hall

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-002768

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Local Unit of Government

Township Of Macomb (MACOMB)

Local Unit of Government/First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Timothy

M.I.

D

Last Name

Tomlinson

Firm Name (if any)

York, Dolan & Tomlinson, P.C.

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

22600 Hall Rd

Ste 205

City or Town

Clinton Twp

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48036

Telephone Number

586-263-5050

Fax Number

586-263-4763

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

ttomlinson@yorkdolanlaw.com

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: 

Timothy D. Tomlinson

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

INTL PROPERTIES OF MILLC 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

MTT Docket No. 25-002768 

MACOMB TOWNSHIP, 

Respondent. 

RESPONDENT’S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

NOW COMES the Respondent, Macomb Township, by and through its attorneys, York, 

Dolan & Tomlinson, P.C., and for its Affirmative Defenses, states as follows: 

1. 

Petitioner fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action 

against Respondent and to support its claim for relief. 

2. 

Petitioner fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, error of law, 

discrimination, the application of wrong principles or illegality on the part of the 

Respondent. 

3. 

Petitioner fails to allege that the mode and method of appraising its property failed 

to conform to the mode and method applied in the case of all of the properties in the 

Respondent’s taxing unit for the year in question. 

4. 

Petitioner fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish the true cash value, 

assessed value and taxable value of its property.

Page 2

5. 

Petitioner fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegation that the 

assessed value of its property, as equalized, is at a factor other than 50% and also 

fails to allege specific and sufficient facts to support is allegations that the 

property’s taxable value is improper. 

6. 

Petitioner fails to show that any rate other than 50% after equalization was applied 

to the true cash value of its property, as well as to the properties of all others to 

arrive at the respective equalized assessments. 

7. 

Petitioner, in essence, asks that this Honorable Tribunal grant it an illegal preference 

by application of a method of assessment different from that employed in the 

assessment of other properties in the Respondent’s taxing unit. 

8. 

Petitioner, in essence, seeks by Petition to challenge the process of county and state 

equalization as to the which it has no legal standing and cannot maintain a cause of 

action. 

9. 

Any decrease in the value of Petitioner’s property was a result of its own intentional 

acts and/or negligence and cannot be allowed to reduce Petitioner’s otherwise 

equitable tax burden. 

10. 

Respondent has properly and lawfully assessed Petitioner’s property and established 

its taxable value in accordance with statutory and constitutional requirements. 

11. 

Respondent reserves the right to add to these Affirmative Defenses any new 

Affirmative Defenses that discovery reveals. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent respectfully requests that this Honorable Tribunal dismiss the 

Petition, affirm the values as determined by Respondent, and award costs and attorney fees

Page 3

wrongfully incurred in having to defend this matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

YORK, DOLAN & TOMLINSON, P.C. 

/s/ Timothy D. Tomlinson 

TIMOTHY D. TOMLINSON (P48519) 

Attorneys for Respondent 

22600 Hall Rd., Ste. 205 

Clinton Township, MI 48036 

(586) 263-5050

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-002768

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Local Unit of Government

Township Of Macomb (MACOMB)

Local Unit of Government/First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Timothy

M.I.

D

Last Name

Tomlinson

Firm Name (if any)

York, Dolan & Tomlinson, P.C.

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

22600 Hall Rd

Ste 205

City or Town

Clinton Twp

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48036

Telephone Number

586-263-5050

Fax Number

586-263-4763

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

ttomlinson@yorkdolanlaw.com

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: 

Timothy D. Tomlinson

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

INTL PROPERTIES OF MILLC 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

MTT Docket No. 25-002768 

MACOMB TOWNSHIP, 

Respondent. 

ANSWER TO PETITION 

NOW COMES Respondent, MACOMB TOWNSHIP, by and through its attorneys, York, 

Dolan & Tomlinson, P.C., and in Answer to Petitioner’s Petition states as follows: 

1. 

Respondent admits the allegations set forth in Paragraph 1. 

2. 

Respondent admits the allegations set forth in Paragraph 2. 

3. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 3. 

4. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 4. 

5. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 5. 

6. 

Respondent admits the allegations set forth in Paragraph 6. 

7. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 7. 

8. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 8. 

9. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 9. 

10. 

Respondent admits the allegations set forth in Paragraph 10. 

11. 

Respondent admits the allegations set forth in Paragraph 11. 

1

Page 2

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

16. 

17. 

18. 

19. 

20. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 12. 

Respondent denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 13 as being untrue. 

Respondent admits the allegations set forth in Paragraph 14. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 15. 

Respondent admits the allegations set forth in Paragraph 16. 

Respondent denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 17 as being untrue. 

Respondent denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 18 as being untrue. 

Respondent denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 19 as being untrue. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 20. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent, MACOMB TOWNSHIP, respectfully requests the within 

cause of action be dismissed in its entirety, together with costs and attorney fees so wrongfully 

incurred. 

Respectfully submitted, 

YORK, DOLAN & TOMLINSON, P.C. 

/s/ Timothy D. Tomlinson 

TIMOTHY D. TOMLINSON (P48519) 

Attorneys for Respondent 

22600 Hall Rd., Ste. 205 

Clinton Township, MI 48036 

(586) 263-5050 

Dated: July 24, 2025

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-002768

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Local Unit of Government

Township Of Macomb (MACOMB)

Local Unit of Government/First Name

M.I.

Last Name

Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Timothy

M.I.

D

Last Name

Tomlinson

Firm Name (if any)

York, Dolan & Tomlinson, P.C.

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

22600 Hall Rd

Ste 205

City or Town

Clinton Twp

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48036

Telephone Number

586-263-5050

Fax Number

586-263-4763

E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail)

ttomlinson@yorkdolanlaw.com

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: 

Timothy D. Tomlinson

/s/

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUN 02 2025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Intl Properties of MI LLC 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No. 

Macomb Twp 

; 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No: 20-08-34-351-003 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

2. 

The property identified above is 

x 

__real ___ personal. 

3. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? Yes ___ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- 

contiguous parcel.) 

4, 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? ___Yes No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal.) 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

6. 

The property identified above is classified as 201 Comm

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 4 

8. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunals authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

The property or properties at issue are located in Macomb 

County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

20749 Hall Rd. 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable 

local governmental unit): Macomb Twp 

Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 

32825 NW Hwy. 

FH, MI 48334 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

X 

the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes __ No 

uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 

Page 3 of 4 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior 

tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value

Page 4

MTT

Page 5

May

Page 6

X

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA

DIRECTOR

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760

PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906

Intl Properties of MI LLC, 

Petitioner,

 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

v

MTT Docket No.: 25-002768

Township Of Macomb, 

Respondent.

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case.

Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default.

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules.

By: __Tribunal Clerk________

Entered: July 22, 2025

PROOF OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives.

By: Tribunal Clerk

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.

Page 1

RECEIVED 

JUN 02 2025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Intl Properties of MI LLC 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No. 

Macomb Twp 

; 

Respondent(s) 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

1. 

Property Parcel No: 20-08-34-351-003 

(If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition 

Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 

2. 

The property identified above is 

x 

__real ___ personal. 

3. 

If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties 

contiguous? Yes ___ No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- 

contiguous parcel.) 

4, 

Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property 

under appeal? ___Yes No. 

(If no, separate Petitions are required for each 

parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under 

appeal.) 

5. 

If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal 

property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 

6. 

The property identified above is classified as 201 Comm

Page 2

MTT Docket No. 

Page 2 of 4 

8. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunals authority over the 

assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the 

classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 

of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which 

Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or 

assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 

The property or properties at issue are located in Macomb 

County. The 

property or properties’ address is: 

20749 Hall Rd. 

The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable 

local governmental unit): Macomb Twp 

Petitioner's legal residence or principal office address is: 

32825 NW Hwy. 

FH, MI 48334 

This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): 

X 

the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values 

the property or properties’ taxable value only 

If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a 

dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? ___ Yes __ No 

uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment

Page 3

MTT Docket No. 

Page 3 of 4 

15. 

If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific 

facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior 

tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary): 

16. 

The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent's 

Board of Review are: 

Tax Year 

True Cash Value

Page 4

MTT

Page 5

May

Page 6

X

These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.