Gipson Fabrication Inc Petitioner V Michigan Department Of Treasury Respondent
- Petitioner
- Gipson Fabrication Inc
- Respondent
- Michigan Department Of Treasury
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-002680-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- SC Property
- Division
- Small Claims Division
- County
- Kent
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Order of Dismissal | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/09/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 10 | Order Denying Motion | Not recorded | 8 | 09/09/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 9 | Order Correcting Docket | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/09/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | Motion to Set Aside Default was received. | PET | Not recorded | 08/20/2026 | $0.00 | Download |
| 7 | Filing Fee Received | PET | 1 | 08/20/2026 | $125.00 | Download |
| 6 | Order Correcting Docket | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/17/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Order Extending P's Default | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/17/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Order of Default of Petitioner | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/22/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 09/01/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number SC | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/15/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 04/27/2026 | $0.00 | Download |
Documents
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gipson Fabrication Inc, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002680 Michigan Department of Treasury, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER CORRECTING DOCKET ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT ORDER OF DISMISSAL On August 20, 2026, Petitioner filed a motion requesting that the Tribunal set aside the default entered in this case on July 22, 2026. In the motion, Petitioner states that its previous attempt to respond to the Tribunal’s orders was not received via e-filing. Respondent has not filed a response to the motion. The Tribunal has considered the motion and the case file and finds that the petition filed by Petitioner’s authorized representative indicated that “Gipson Manufacturing Inc” was the petitioner in this matter. However, the notice giving rise to the appeal indicates that “Gipson Fabrication Inc” is the proper party in interest. Thus, the Tribunal shall correct the docket to reflect Gipson Fabrication Inc as the petitioner. The authorized representative will remain the same. Further, the Tribunal finds that Petitioner was held in default because it failed to pay the fee required for the filing of the petition and failed to file a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal, i.e., the Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property exemption recission notice. Petitioner failed to respond, and the Tribunal entered an order extending the time to cure on August 17, 2026. Having now filed the notice giving rise to the appeal and the Motion to Set Aside Default, Petitioner has partially complied with the Tribunal’s orders as required by TTR 237. Petitioner failed, however, to complete section 7 of the petition. As a result, the Tribunal is unable to determine whether the petition is properly pending in the Small Claims Division and whether the appropriate filing fee for the filing of the petition has been paid. As such, granting the motion is not warranted at this time. Moreover, the Tribunal finds that Petitioner did not file an appeal by December 31 of the year the recission was issued, as required by MCL 211.1057(7). As such, and inasmuch as the Tribunal has no equitable power to waive or otherwise disregard
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002680 Page 2 of 3 statutory filing requirements and deadlines, it has no authority to hear the appeal or grant the relief requested.1 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the docket shall be CORRECTED to reflect that Gipson Fabrication Inc is the proper petitioner in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Set Aside Default is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending claims and closes the docket. APPEAL RIGHTS If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee. Entered: September 9, 2026 By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm cs/sb 1 See Sixarp, LLC v Byron Twp, __ Mich __; __ NW3d __ (2025).
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 26-002680 Page 3 of 3 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gipson Fabrication Inc, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002680 Michigan Department of Treasury, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER CORRECTING DOCKET ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT ORDER OF DISMISSAL On August 20, 2026, Petitioner filed a motion requesting that the Tribunal set aside the default entered in this case on July 22, 2026. In the motion, Petitioner states that its previous attempt to respond to the Tribunal’s orders was not received via e-filing. Respondent has not filed a response to the motion. The Tribunal has considered the motion and the case file and finds that the petition filed by Petitioner’s authorized representative indicated that “Gipson Manufacturing Inc” was the petitioner in this matter. However, the notice giving rise to the appeal indicates that “Gipson Fabrication Inc” is the proper party in interest. Thus, the Tribunal shall correct the docket to reflect Gipson Fabrication Inc as the petitioner. The authorized representative will remain the same. Further, the Tribunal finds that Petitioner was held in default because it failed to pay the fee required for the filing of the petition and failed to file a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal, i.e., the Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property exemption recission notice. Petitioner failed to respond, and the Tribunal entered an order extending the time to cure on August 17, 2026. Having now filed the notice giving rise to the appeal and the Motion to Set Aside Default, Petitioner has partially complied with the Tribunal’s orders as required by TTR 237. Petitioner failed, however, to complete section 7 of the petition. As a result, the Tribunal is unable to determine whether the petition is properly pending in the Small Claims Division and whether the appropriate filing fee for the filing of the petition has been paid. As such, granting the motion is not warranted at this time. Moreover, the Tribunal finds that Petitioner did not file an appeal by December 31 of the year the recission was issued, as required by MCL 211.1057(7). As such, and inasmuch as the Tribunal has no equitable power to waive or otherwise disregard
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002680 Page 2 of 3 statutory filing requirements and deadlines, it has no authority to hear the appeal or grant the relief requested.1 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the docket shall be CORRECTED to reflect that Gipson Fabrication Inc is the proper petitioner in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Set Aside Default is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending claims and closes the docket. APPEAL RIGHTS If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee. Entered: September 9, 2026 By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm cs/sb 1 See Sixarp, LLC v Byron Twp, __ Mich __; __ NW3d __ (2025).
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 26-002680 Page 3 of 3 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gipson Fabrication Inc, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002680 Michigan Department of Treasury, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER CORRECTING DOCKET ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT ORDER OF DISMISSAL On August 20, 2026, Petitioner filed a motion requesting that the Tribunal set aside the default entered in this case on July 22, 2026. In the motion, Petitioner states that its previous attempt to respond to the Tribunal’s orders was not received via e-filing. Respondent has not filed a response to the motion. The Tribunal has considered the motion and the case file and finds that the petition filed by Petitioner’s authorized representative indicated that “Gipson Manufacturing Inc” was the petitioner in this matter. However, the notice giving rise to the appeal indicates that “Gipson Fabrication Inc” is the proper party in interest. Thus, the Tribunal shall correct the docket to reflect Gipson Fabrication Inc as the petitioner. The authorized representative will remain the same. Further, the Tribunal finds that Petitioner was held in default because it failed to pay the fee required for the filing of the petition and failed to file a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal, i.e., the Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property exemption recission notice. Petitioner failed to respond, and the Tribunal entered an order extending the time to cure on August 17, 2026. Having now filed the notice giving rise to the appeal and the Motion to Set Aside Default, Petitioner has partially complied with the Tribunal’s orders as required by TTR 237. Petitioner failed, however, to complete section 7 of the petition. As a result, the Tribunal is unable to determine whether the petition is properly pending in the Small Claims Division and whether the appropriate filing fee for the filing of the petition has been paid. As such, granting the motion is not warranted at this time. Moreover, the Tribunal finds that Petitioner did not file an appeal by December 31 of the year the recission was issued, as required by MCL 211.1057(7). As such, and inasmuch as the Tribunal has no equitable power to waive or otherwise disregard
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002680 Page 2 of 3 statutory filing requirements and deadlines, it has no authority to hear the appeal or grant the relief requested.1 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the docket shall be CORRECTED to reflect that Gipson Fabrication Inc is the proper petitioner in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Set Aside Default is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This order resolves all pending claims and closes the docket. APPEAL RIGHTS If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal’s web-based e-filing system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. If the claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” If the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the record on appeal. There is no certification fee. Entered: September 9, 2026 By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm cs/sb 1 See Sixarp, LLC v Byron Twp, __ Mich __; __ NW3d __ (2025).
Page 3
MTT Docket No. 26-002680 Page 3 of 3 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
che Response Attic ey RECEIVED AUG 2 6 2026 STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DF GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Gipson Manufacturing Inc, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002680 Michigan Department of Treasury, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT ORDER CORRECTING DOCKET The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that it entered an order holding Petitioner in default on July 22, 2026, because Petitioner failed to pay the fee required for the filing of the petition and failed to file a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal, i.e., the Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property exemption recission notice." Petitioner was required to cure the default by paying the required filing fee and obtaining a copy of the final assessment notice from the Michigan Department of Treasury and filing a copy with the Tribunal within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner's failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply with this order.? Further, the Tribunal finds that based on the Small Claims petition filed by Petitioner on July 15, 2026, the Tribunal listed the City of Wyoming as Respondent in this case. The proper Respondent, however, is the Michigan Department of Treasury, as it is the entity that rescinded the subject property's Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property exemption for the 2024 tax year. Co Jacltenging J61G7060-1 08/25/26 kit: 1067 Ant: $195.00 Therefore, ID: KEN TVESTHENT LLL IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the
Page 2
“7 Respamse Aha che %° MTT Docket No. 26-002680 Page 2 of 2 proof the motion was served on Respondent. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the docket shall be CORRECTED to reflect the Michigan Department of Treasury as the proper Respondent in this case. Petitioner's failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this case, as provided by TTR 237.4 Entered: August 17, 2026 By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm kac/gc PROOF OF SERVICE | certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by
Page 3
Michigan Department of Treasury - Essential Services Assessment (ESA) 5513 (Rev. 10-16), Page 1 Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property Exemption — Order of Rescission Michigan Department of Treasury Issued under authority of Public Act 92 of 2014, as amended. Essential Services Assessment (ESA) P.O. Box 30710 Lansing, MI 48909 517-241-0310 www.michigan.gov/esa GIPSON FABRICATION INC Notice Date: May 27, 2025 2151 CHICAGO DR SW Tax Year: 2024 WYOMING, MI 49519-1214 FEIN: Claimant ~~: GIPSON FABRICATION INC Parcel ID(s) : 41-50-93-987-596 Local Unit: CITY OF WYOMING County : KENT Under MCL 211.9m and 211.9n of the General Property Tax Act, Public Act 206 of 1893, as amended, Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (EMPP) is exempt from local property taxes if the local tax collecting unit grants the exemption upon receipt of the Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property Tax Exemption Claim, Personal Property Statement, and Report of Fair Market Value of Qualified New and Previously Existing Personal Property (Combined Document) (Form 5278). Further, the Act requires the claimant to electronically certify a completed statement and to electronically make full payment of an Essential Services Assessment liability not later than August 15 in each assessment year. Public Act 92 of 2014, MCL 211.1051 through MCL 211.1061, requires that the Michigan Department of Treasury (Department) rescind the EMPP exemption on any parcel if an eligible claimant does not submit electronic payment of ESA liability and any applicable late payment penalties in full by April 16 of the year immediately following the assessment year or if the Department discovers that the property is not eligible for the exemption under section 9m or 9n of the General Property Tax Act. In such cases, the Department is required to rescind the claimant's EMPP exemption no later than the first Monday in June of the year immediately following the assessment year. Pursuant to its authority under MCL 211.1057(5), the Department is ordering the rescission of the Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property exemption claimed on the personal property parcel(s) listed above. This Order of Rescission is being issued for the following
Page 4
Mic
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
che Response Attic ey RECEIVED AUG 2 6 2026 STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DF GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Gipson Manufacturing Inc, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002680 Michigan Department of Treasury, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT ORDER CORRECTING DOCKET The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that it entered an order holding Petitioner in default on July 22, 2026, because Petitioner failed to pay the fee required for the filing of the petition and failed to file a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal, i.e., the Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property exemption recission notice." Petitioner was required to cure the default by paying the required filing fee and obtaining a copy of the final assessment notice from the Michigan Department of Treasury and filing a copy with the Tribunal within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner's failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply with this order.? Further, the Tribunal finds that based on the Small Claims petition filed by Petitioner on July 15, 2026, the Tribunal listed the City of Wyoming as Respondent in this case. The proper Respondent, however, is the Michigan Department of Treasury, as it is the entity that rescinded the subject property's Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property exemption for the 2024 tax year. Co Jacltenging J61G7060-1 08/25/26 kit: 1067 Ant: $195.00 Therefore, ID: KEN TVESTHENT LLL IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the
Page 2
“7 Respamse Aha che %° MTT Docket No. 26-002680 Page 2 of 2 proof the motion was served on Respondent. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the docket shall be CORRECTED to reflect the Michigan Department of Treasury as the proper Respondent in this case. Petitioner's failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this case, as provided by TTR 237.4 Entered: August 17, 2026 By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm kac/gc PROOF OF SERVICE | certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by
Page 3
Michigan Department of Treasury - Essential Services Assessment (ESA) 5513 (Rev. 10-16), Page 1 Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property Exemption — Order of Rescission Michigan Department of Treasury Issued under authority of Public Act 92 of 2014, as amended. Essential Services Assessment (ESA) P.O. Box 30710 Lansing, MI 48909 517-241-0310 www.michigan.gov/esa GIPSON FABRICATION INC Notice Date: May 27, 2025 2151 CHICAGO DR SW Tax Year: 2024 WYOMING, MI 49519-1214 FEIN: Claimant ~~: GIPSON FABRICATION INC Parcel ID(s) : 41-50-93-987-596 Local Unit: CITY OF WYOMING County : KENT Under MCL 211.9m and 211.9n of the General Property Tax Act, Public Act 206 of 1893, as amended, Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (EMPP) is exempt from local property taxes if the local tax collecting unit grants the exemption upon receipt of the Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property Tax Exemption Claim, Personal Property Statement, and Report of Fair Market Value of Qualified New and Previously Existing Personal Property (Combined Document) (Form 5278). Further, the Act requires the claimant to electronically certify a completed statement and to electronically make full payment of an Essential Services Assessment liability not later than August 15 in each assessment year. Public Act 92 of 2014, MCL 211.1051 through MCL 211.1061, requires that the Michigan Department of Treasury (Department) rescind the EMPP exemption on any parcel if an eligible claimant does not submit electronic payment of ESA liability and any applicable late payment penalties in full by April 16 of the year immediately following the assessment year or if the Department discovers that the property is not eligible for the exemption under section 9m or 9n of the General Property Tax Act. In such cases, the Department is required to rescind the claimant's EMPP exemption no later than the first Monday in June of the year immediately following the assessment year. Pursuant to its authority under MCL 211.1057(5), the Department is ordering the rescission of the Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property exemption claimed on the personal property parcel(s) listed above. This Order of Rescission is being issued for the following
Page 4
Mic
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gipson Manufacturing Inc, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002680 Michigan Department of Treasury, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT ORDER CORRECTING DOCKET The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that it entered an order holding Petitioner in default on July 22, 2026, because Petitioner failed to pay the fee required for the filing of the petition and failed to file a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal, i.e., the Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property exemption recission notice.1 Petitioner was required to cure the default by paying the required filing fee and obtaining a copy of the final assessment notice from the Michigan Department of Treasury and filing a copy with the Tribunal within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply with this order.2 Further, the Tribunal finds that based on the Small Claims petition filed by Petitioner on July 15, 2026, the Tribunal listed the City of Wyoming as Respondent in this case. The proper Respondent, however, is the Michigan Department of Treasury, as it is the entity that rescinded the subject property’s Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property exemption for the 2024 tax year. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is EXTENDED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the default: (1) pay the fee required for the filing of the petition, (2) file a copy of the Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property exemption recission notice, (3) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, (4) pay the $25.00 fee required for the filing of the motion, and (5) file 1 The order further stated: “Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002680 Page 2 of 2 proof the motion was served on Respondent. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this order.3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the docket shall be CORRECTED to reflect the Michigan Department of Treasury as the proper Respondent in this case. Petitioner’s failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this case, as provided by TTR 237.4 Entered: August 17, 2026 By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm kac/gc PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5). 4 See also MCL 205.732.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gipson Manufacturing Inc, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002680 Michigan Department of Treasury, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PETITIONER TO CURE DEFAULT ORDER CORRECTING DOCKET The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that it entered an order holding Petitioner in default on July 22, 2026, because Petitioner failed to pay the fee required for the filing of the petition and failed to file a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal, i.e., the Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property exemption recission notice.1 Petitioner was required to cure the default by paying the required filing fee and obtaining a copy of the final assessment notice from the Michigan Department of Treasury and filing a copy with the Tribunal within 14 days. Petitioner has had ample time to comply, yet failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Petitioner’s failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of deliberate delay that would justify dismissal of the case for failure to timely comply with this order.2 Further, the Tribunal finds that based on the Small Claims petition filed by Petitioner on July 15, 2026, the Tribunal listed the City of Wyoming as Respondent in this case. The proper Respondent, however, is the Michigan Department of Treasury, as it is the entity that rescinded the subject property’s Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property exemption for the 2024 tax year. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the time for Petitioner to cure the default is EXTENDED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must complete the following to cure the default: (1) pay the fee required for the filing of the petition, (2) file a copy of the Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property exemption recission notice, (3) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, (4) pay the $25.00 fee required for the filing of the motion, and (5) file 1 The order further stated: “Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002680 Page 2 of 2 proof the motion was served on Respondent. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this order.3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the docket shall be CORRECTED to reflect the Michigan Department of Treasury as the proper Respondent in this case. Petitioner’s failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this case, as provided by TTR 237.4 Entered: August 17, 2026 By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm kac/gc PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5). 4 See also MCL 205.732.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gipson Manufacturing Inc, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002680 City of Wyoming, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 14 days of the entry of this order. Furthermore, Petitioner did not pay the required fee for the filing of the petition. See TTR 269. Because of this, the appeal is not properly pending. Petitioner must pay the required fee for the filing of the petition within 14 days of the entry of this order. A filing fee calculator can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, the payment may not be made via e-filing. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). 1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-002680 Page 2 of 2 By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: July 22, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gipson Manufacturing Inc, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002680 City of Wyoming, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Petitioner did not submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., notice of action taken by Board of Review, uncapping notice, PRE denial notice, final assessment notice, etc.), as required by TTR 279. As such, Petitioner must submit the notice within 14 days of the entry of this order. Furthermore, Petitioner did not pay the required fee for the filing of the petition. See TTR 269. Because of this, the appeal is not properly pending. Petitioner must pay the required fee for the filing of the petition within 14 days of the entry of this order. A filing fee calculator can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Unfortunately, the payment may not be made via e-filing. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.2 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). 2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by
Page 4
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED
APR 2 9 2026
’
STATE OF MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN TAX EREBUNA
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
Al
.
EROWN, DPA
.
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
VALUATION / UNCAPPING
Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultura! Exemption, Other
Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes.
Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of
Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, If applicable.
i you do not submit this document, you may be held in
default,
Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information
First Name
MI
Last Name/Company Name
Gipson Manufactiring Inc
Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
2151 Chicago Dr SW
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Wyoming
MI
49519-1214
Telephone Number (616)245-7331
Email Address {do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email)
Section 2: Petitioner's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information
First Name
Mm.L
Last Name
Mark
A
Davey
Firm Name (if any)
Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
2131 Lake Michigan Dr NW
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Grand Rapids
Ml
49504
Telephone CY 6)71 7 3331
Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email)
mdavey@pbsgr.com
Section 3: Subject Property Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.
How many parcels are you
If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?
appealing?
Yes*
No**
1
*if No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel
Property Address (No., Street}
2151Chicago Dr SWPage 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA : GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4. Check which of the following you are appealing (check ai that appiy) [1 True Cash and Taxable Value 3 Taxable Value Only (calculation) [J uncapping of Taxable Value Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal See attachment Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [Wm] Yes No if Yes, check which BOR you attended: [0] March [8] July [HN] Gecember If No, please check the applicable reason(s): |] Not required to attend Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) [I] Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping Other If you checked “other” above, explain:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON |. BROWN, DPA
:
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 7: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels,
Parce! Number:
1-50-93-987-596
Classification of Property:
Real]
Personal [J (check one)
Agricultural 0
Commercial
1
Industrial I
Residential
0
Timber-Cutover (J
Developmental
1
Utility [0 (check one)
Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established
| Taxable Value established by the Board of Review:
by the Board of Review:
What do you believe is the fair market value {also known as true cash value)?
What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash
What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed
value by .5)
assessed value)
Fee Information
Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at
issue?
[J ves
Mino
if you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees.
If the property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 60% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at
issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute.
if you are appealing more than one
parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00
will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00
if your property is residential property (see MCL 205,762) and
the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention Is:
Filing Fee is:
$100,000.00 and under
$1256.00
$100,000.01 to $500,000.00
$200.00
$Over $500,000.00
$300.00
if the property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and
the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is:
Filing Fee is:
$100,000.00 and under
$250.00
* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above,
If the properly is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or greater the
appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed.
Signature *Required
Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized 2;
re:
51 ST ot Dey
2/47/3¢Page 4
Attachment Gipson Fabrication Inc Parcel # 41-50-93-987-596 We respectfully submit this letter to appeal against the decision to rescind the Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (EMPP) exemption for the 2024 tax year due to nonpayment. We made numerous good faiths attempts to pay the 2024 liability prior to
Page 5
M
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gipson Manufacturing Inc, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002680 City of Wyoming, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: July 15, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gipson Manufacturing Inc, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION v MTT Docket No. 26-002680 City of Wyoming, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that a Small Claims petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. The assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with the Tribunal’s rules. The docket number needs to be included on all documents submitted in this case. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 28 days of the issuance of a copy of this Notice to Respondent. Tribunal answer forms are available on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Respondents must utilize the appropriate answer form. Failure to file the answer within the 28-day time frame may result in the placement of Respondent in default, as provided by TTR 281. Further, an electronic copy of the petition can be reviewed by utilizing the Docket Lookup Search on the Tribunal’s website. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: July 15, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
RECEIVED
APR 2 9 2026
’
STATE OF MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN TAX EREBUNA
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
Al
.
EROWN, DPA
.
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL PETITION FORM
VALUATION / UNCAPPING
Do not use this form to appeal Classification, Principal Residence Exemption, Qualified Agricultura! Exemption, Other
Exemptions, Special Assessments, or Non-Property tax disputes.
Pursuant to Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 279, you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (i.e., Board of
Review Decision or other notice) with this petition, If applicable.
i you do not submit this document, you may be held in
default,
Section 1: Petitioner's Contact Information
First Name
MI
Last Name/Company Name
Gipson Manufactiring Inc
Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
2151 Chicago Dr SW
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Wyoming
MI
49519-1214
Telephone Number (616)245-7331
Email Address {do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email)
Section 2: Petitioner's Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information
First Name
Mm.L
Last Name
Mark
A
Davey
Firm Name (if any)
Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)
2131 Lake Michigan Dr NW
City or Town
State
ZIP Code
Grand Rapids
Ml
49504
Telephone CY 6)71 7 3331
Email Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via email)
mdavey@pbsgr.com
Section 3: Subject Property Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.
How many parcels are you
If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining?
appealing?
Yes*
No**
1
*if No, you must file separate appeals for each parcel
Property Address (No., Street}
2151Chicago Dr SWPage 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS MARLON I. BROWN, DPA : GOVERNOR LANSING DIRECTOR Section 4. Check which of the following you are appealing (check ai that appiy) [1 True Cash and Taxable Value 3 Taxable Value Only (calculation) [J uncapping of Taxable Value Section 5: Explain the Reason for this Appeal See attachment Section 6: Jurisdictional Issues Did you protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? [Wm] Yes No if Yes, check which BOR you attended: [0] March [8] July [HN] Gecember If No, please check the applicable reason(s): |] Not required to attend Appealing a purported Clerical Error or Mutual Mistake of Fact (if yes, include explanation in Section 5) [I] Appealing within 35 days of State Tax Commission Order Appealing within 35 days of receipt of Notice of Uncapping Other If you checked “other” above, explain:
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN
GRETCHEN WHITMER
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS
MARLON |. BROWN, DPA
:
GOVERNOR
LANSING
DIRECTOR
Section 7: Valuation Information use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels,
Parce! Number:
1-50-93-987-596
Classification of Property:
Real]
Personal [J (check one)
Agricultural 0
Commercial
1
Industrial I
Residential
0
Timber-Cutover (J
Developmental
1
Utility [0 (check one)
Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) established
| Taxable Value established by the Board of Review:
by the Board of Review:
What do you believe is the fair market value {also known as true cash value)?
What do you believe is the assessed value? (multiply true cash
What do you believe is the taxable value? (cannot exceed
value by .5)
assessed value)
Fee Information
Does the property have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 50% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at
issue?
[J ves
Mino
if you answered yes to the above question, you are not required to pay any filing fees.
If the property does not have a Principal Residence Exemption of at least 60% as of the date of the filing of this petition for all tax years at
issue, the filing fee is based on the greater of the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute.
if you are appealing more than one
parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00
will be added for each additional parcel being appealed, not to exceed a total filing fee of $1,000.00
if your property is residential property (see MCL 205,762) and
the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention Is:
Filing Fee is:
$100,000.00 and under
$1256.00
$100,000.01 to $500,000.00
$200.00
$Over $500,000.00
$300.00
if the property is NOT residential property (see MCL 205.762) and
the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is:
Filing Fee is:
$100,000.00 and under
$250.00
* Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, as indicated above,
If the properly is NOT residential property and the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in dispute is $100,000.01 or greater the
appeal does not qualify for Small Claims. Therefore, an Entire Tribunal petition must be filed.
Signature *Required
Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized 2;
re:
51 ST ot Dey
2/47/3¢Page 4
Attachment Gipson Fabrication Inc Parcel # 41-50-93-987-596 We respectfully submit this letter to appeal against the decision to rescind the Eligible Manufacturing Personal Property (EMPP) exemption for the 2024 tax year due to nonpayment. We made numerous good faiths attempts to pay the 2024 liability prior to
Page 5
M
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.