Record Finder / 25-002023-TT
Michigan
Gedr Landmark LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Ann Arbor, Respondent
- Petitioner
- Gedr Landmark LLC
- Respondent
- City Of Ann Arbor
Case overview
- Docket number
- 25-002023-TT
- Status
- Disposed
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Washtenaw
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | Consent Judgment | Not recorded | Not recorded | 10/30/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 14 | Granted | PET | 13 | 10/30/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 13 | Amended Stipulation | PET | Not recorded | 09/26/2025 | $0.00 | Download |
| 12 | Amended Answer | RESP | Not recorded | 09/22/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 11 | Order Denying Motion | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/19/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 10 | Amended Stipulation | PET | Not recorded | 09/11/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 9 | Answer was received | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/11/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 8 | ET Case Info Sheet | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/11/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 7 | Order Denying Motion | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/09/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 6 | A Stipulation has been received. | PET | Not recorded | 09/08/2025 | $50.00 | Download |
| 5 | Proof of service of petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 06/30/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Petition has been verified | PET | 2 | 08/06/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 08/06/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/30/2025 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | ET Case Info Sheet | Not recorded | Not recorded | 05/30/2025 | $600.00 | Download |
Documents
25-002023 Consent Judgment.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 GEDR Landmark LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 25-002023 City of Ann Arbor, Presiding Judge Respondent. Joshua M. Wease ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the Stipulation and finds that it comports with the mandates of State law.1 As a result, the Tribunal shall enter the parties’ Stipulation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment including all attachments, terms and conditions is GRANTED and ADOPTED, unless otherwise indicated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with maintaining the assessment rolls for the tax years at issue shall correct or cause the assessment rolls to be corrected to reflect the property’s true cash and taxable values as provided in this Consent Judgment within 20 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment.2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officer charged with collecting or refunding the affected taxes shall collect taxes and any applicable interest or issue a refund as required by the Consent Judgment within 28 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment. If a refund is warranted, it shall, unless otherwise indicated, include a proportionate share of any property tax administration fees paid and of penalty and interest paid on delinquent taxes. The refund shall also, unless otherwise indicated, separately indicate the amount of the taxes, fees, penalties, and interest being refunded. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been unlawfully paid shall, unless otherwise indicated, bear interest from the date of payment to the date of judgment and the judgment shall bear interest to the date of its payment. A sum determined by the Tribunal to have been underpaid shall not bear interest for any time period prior to 28 days after the issuance of this Consent Judgment. Pursuant to MCL 205.737, interest shall accrue (i) after December 31, 2013, through June 30, 2016, at the rate of 4.25%, (ii) after June 30, 2016, through December 31, 2016, at the rate of 4.40%, (iii) after December 31, 2016, through June 30, 2017, at the rate of 4.50%, (iv) after June 30, 1 See MCL 211.27a. 2 See MCL 205.755.
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002023 Page 2 of 2 2017, through December 31, 2017, at the rate of 4.70%, (v) after December 31, 2017, through June 30, 2018, at the rate of 5.15%, (vi) after June 30, 2018, through December 31, 2018, at the rate of 5.41%, (vii) after December 31, 2018, through June 30, 2019, at the rate of 5.9%, (viii) after June 30, 2019, through December 31, 2019, at the rate of 6.39%, (ix) after December 31, 2019, through June 30, 2020, at the rate of 6.40%, (x) after June 30 2020, through December 31, 2020, at the rate of 5.63%, (xi) after December 31, 2020, through June 30, 2022, at the rate of 4.25%, (xii) after June 30, 2022, through December 31, 2022, at the rate of 4.27%, (xiii) after December 31, 2022, through June 30, 2023, at the rate of 5.65%, (xiv) after June 30, 2023, through December 31, 2023, at the rate of 8.25%, (xv) after December 31, 2023, through June 30, 2024, at the rate of 9.30%, (xvi) after June 30, 2024, through December 31, 2024, at the rate of 9.50%, (xvii) after December 31, 2024, through June 30, 2025, at the rate of 9.47%, and (xviii) after June 30, 2025, through December 31, 2025, at the rate of 8.66%. This Consent Judgment resolves all pending claims in this matter and closes this case. See docket look up for a copy of stipulation and for any possible refund paragraph. By _____________________________ Entered:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
25-002023 Amended Stipulation.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL GEDR Landmark LLC, Vv Petitioner, MTT Docket No. 25-002023-TT City of Ann Arbor, Respondent. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The case is pending in the Entire Tribunal. 2. The property is in Washtenaw County. 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Year Parcel True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 09-09-28-309-040 $112,269,200 $56,134,600 $54,015,031 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Year Parcel True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 09-09-28-309-040 $102,000,000 $51,000,000 $51,000,000 5. This stipulation addresses only the tax year that was originally appealed, and tax years added through motions to amend. 6. There shall be no interest paid on refunds (as applicable) if refunds are issued within 60 days of entry of the consent judgment. dw
Page 2
/s/ John W. Reiser August 22, 2025 MTT Docket No. 25-002023-TT Entire Tribunal Stipulation, Page 2 of 2 7. Refund (as applicable) is to be made payable to “GEDR Landmark LLC” and mailed to the attention of: GEDR Landmark LLC c/o Sarah Belloli, Ryan, LLC 101 W. Big Beaver Road, Suite 945 Troy, MI 48084 Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: /s/ Sarah R. Belloli Sarah Belloli, Ryan, LLC Date: 08/22/2025 Signature of Respondent’s authorized representative: /s/ John W. Reiser John W. Reiser (P45050), City of Ann Arbor -,__ Date: August 22, 2025
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
25-002023 Amended Stipulation.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL GEDR Landmark LLC, Vv Petitioner, MTT Docket No. 25-002023-TT City of Ann Arbor, Respondent. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The case is pending in the Entire Tribunal. 2. The property is in Washtenaw County. 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Year Parcel True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 09-09-28-309-040 $112,269,200 $56,134,600 $54,015,031 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Year Parcel True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 09-09-28-309-040 $102,000,000 $51,000,000 $51,000,000 5. This stipulation addresses only the tax year that was originally appealed, and tax years added through motions to amend. 6. There shall be no interest paid on refunds (as applicable) if refunds are issued within 60 days of entry of the consent judgment. dw
Page 2
/s/ John W. Reiser August 22, 2025 MTT Docket No. 25-002023-TT Entire Tribunal Stipulation, Page 2 of 2 7. Refund (as applicable) is to be made payable to “GEDR Landmark LLC” and mailed to the attention of: GEDR Landmark LLC c/o Sarah Belloli, Ryan, LLC 101 W. Big Beaver Road, Suite 945 Troy, MI 48084 Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: /s/ Sarah R. Belloli Sarah Belloli, Ryan, LLC Date: 08/22/2025 Signature of Respondent’s authorized representative: /s/ John W. Reiser John W. Reiser (P45050), City of Ann Arbor -,__ Date: August 22, 2025
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
25-002023 Amended Answer.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL GEDR LANDMARK, LLC, Petitioner, v. CITY OF ANN ARBOR, Respondent. MTT Docket No. 25-002023 Sarah R. Belloli RYAN, LLC Representative for Petitioner 101 West Big Beaver, Suite 945 Troy, Michigan 48084 (313) 230-0104 sarah.belloli@ryan.com John W. Reiser (P45050) OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Attorney for Respondent 301 E. Huron Street, 3rd Floor Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104-1908 (734) 794-6184 Jreiser@a2gov.org RESPONDENT CITY OF ANN ARBOR’S RESPONSE TO PETITION Respondent City of Ann Arbor (“Respondent”), through the Ann Arbor City Attorney’s Office, responds in opposition to the Petition of GEDR LANDMARK, LLC (“Petitioner”) and states as follows: 1. Admit. 2. Admit. 3. No response required. 4. No response required. 5. No response required. 6. Admit. 7. No response required. 8. No response required. 9. No response required.
Page 2
2 10. Admit. 11. Admit. 12. Respondent leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 13. Respondent leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 14. Admit. 15. No response required. 16. Admit. 17. Respondent leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 18. Respondent leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 19. Respondent requests the Tribunal deny Petitioner’s request and sustain Respondent’s values. 20. Respondent leaves Petitioner to its proofs and further denies a. and b. as untrue. For the reasons stated above, Respondent asks the Tribunal to deny Petitioner’s request and affirm 2025 assessed and taxable values. Dated: September 22, 2025 Respectfully submitted, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY By: /s/ John W. Reiser John W. Reiser (P45050) Attorney for City of Ann Arbor 301 E. Huron Street, 3rd Floor Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104-1908 (734) 794-6170 jreiser@a2gov.org
Page 3
3 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Respondent City of Ann Arbor (“Respondent”), through the Ann Arbor City Attorney’s Office, and for its Affirmative Defenses to the Petition of GEDR LANDMARK, LLC (“Petitioner”) states as follows: 1. Respondent reserves the right to raise affirmative defenses as the same become apparent in the course of this litigation. Dated: September 22, 2025 Respectfully submitted, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY By: /s/ John W. Reiser John W. Reiser (P45050) Attorney for City of Ann Arbor 301 E. Huron Street, 3rd Floor Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104-1908 (734) 794-6184 jreiser@a2gov.org PROOF OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I emailed a true and correct copy of the foregoing Response to Petition and Affirmative Defenses to the above-named representative for petitioner at the address listed above this July 29, 2025 and upon refiling, September 11, 2025 and September 22, 2025. /s/ Dawn Bagozzi Legal Assistant
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Deny_Stip-Abood.2025-09-19_14-31-09.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 GEDR Landmark LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002023 City Of Ann Arbor, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on September 11, 2025, and finds that: a consent judgment can only be entered if a stipulation is filed after the filing of a petition and answer. See TTR 253 and 283. Respondent’s answer is incomplete and amounts to an excerpt without details found within a completed answer form. Because the answer in this case is incomplete, the stipulation cannot be entered at this time and must be denied. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be placed on a Prehearing General Call in the normal course of scheduling. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance of this order, no additional filing fee is required. By _____________________________ Marcus L. Abood, Tribunal Member Entered: September 19, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002023 Page 2 of 8
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 GEDR Landmark LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002023 City Of Ann Arbor, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on September 11, 2025, and finds that: a consent judgment can only be entered if a stipulation is filed after the filing of a petition and answer. See TTR 253 and 283. Respondent’s answer is incomplete and amounts to an excerpt without details found within a completed answer form. Because the answer in this case is incomplete, the stipulation cannot be entered at this time and must be denied. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be placed on a Prehearing General Call in the normal course of scheduling. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance of this order, no additional filing fee is required. By _____________________________ Marcus L. Abood, Tribunal Member Entered: September 19, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 25-002023 Page 4 of 8
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON
Page 6
MTT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
GEDR Landmark MI PT 2025 25-002023 Joint Stipulation Consent Judgment 2025-09-08 FULLY EXECUTED.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL GEDR Landmark LLC, Vv Petitioner, MTT Docket No. 25-002023-TT City of Ann Arbor, Respondent. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The case is pending in the Entire Tribunal. 2. The property is in Washtenaw County. 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Year Parcel True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 09-09-28-309-040 $112,269,200 $56,134,600 $54,015,031 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Year Parcel True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 09-09-28-309-040 $102,000,000 $51,000,000 $51,000,000 5. This stipulation addresses only the tax year that was originally appealed, and tax years added through motions to amend. 6. There shall be no interest paid on refunds (as applicable) if refunds are issued within 60 days of entry of the consent judgment. dw
Page 2
/s/ John W. Reiser August 22, 2025 MTT Docket No. 25-002023-TT Entire Tribunal Stipulation, Page 2 of 2 7. Refund (as applicable) is to be made payable to “GEDR Landmark LLC” and mailed to the attention of: GEDR Landmark LLC c/o Sarah Belloli, Ryan, LLC 101 W. Big Beaver Road, Suite 945 Troy, MI 48084 Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: /s/ Sarah R. Belloli Sarah Belloli, Ryan, LLC Date: 08/22/2025 Signature of Respondent’s authorized representative: /s/ John W. Reiser John W. Reiser (P45050), City of Ann Arbor -,__ Date: August 22, 2025
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
03. Submission Page re City's 2nd Filing of Response - GEDR Landmark LLC - 25-002023.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
GRETCHEN WHITMER STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS GOVERNOR LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-002030 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City OF Ann Arbor (WASHTENAW) Local Unit of Government/First Name MI Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State ZIP Code Michigan Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name MI Last Name John Reiser Firm Name (if any) City of Ann Arbor Attorney's Office “Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 301 East Huron Street 3rd Floor City or Town State ZIP Code Ann Arbor Michigan 48104 Telephone Number 734-794-6784 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jreiser@a2gov.org Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: John W. Reiser Js!
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
10._Entire_Tribunal_Case_Information_Sheet_Must_Upload_Answer_.c573bf05-5e09-4261-9c61-28520684c879.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Respondent MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-002023 Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City Of Ann Arbor (WASHTENAW) Local Unit of Government/First Name M.I. Last Name Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) City or Town State Michigan ZIP Code Telephone Number Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name John M.I. Last Name Reiser Firm Name (if any) City of Ann Arbor Attorney's Office Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 301 East Huron Street 3rd Floor City or Town Ann Arbor State Michigan ZIP Code 48104 Telephone Number 734-794-6784 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) jreiser@a2gov.org Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Respondent or Authorized Attorney/Representative’s Signature: John W. Reiser /s/
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Deny_Stip-Abood.2025-09-09_10-43-41.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 GEDR Landmark LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002023 City Of Ann Arbor, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on September 8, 2025, and finds that: a consent judgment can only be entered if a stipulation is filed after the filing of a petition and answer. See TTR 253 and 283. Because no answer has been filed in this case, the stipulation cannot be entered at this time and must be denied. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be placed on a Prehearing General Call in the normal course of scheduling. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance of this order, no additional filing fee is required. By _____________________________ Marcus L. Abood, Tribunal Member Entered: September 9, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 25-002023 Page 2 of 6
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 GEDR Landmark LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 25-002023 City Of Ann Arbor, Respondent. ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The Tribunal has reviewed the case file and the stipulation, filed on September 8, 2025, and finds that: a consent judgment can only be entered if a stipulation is filed after the filing of a petition and answer. See TTR 253 and 283. Because no answer has been filed in this case, the stipulation cannot be entered at this time and must be denied. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be placed on a Prehearing General Call in the normal course of scheduling. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Stipulation for Entry of Consent Judgment is no longer pending before the Tribunal, a new stipulation is required for any future settlement. However, if the new stipulation is filed within 14 days of the issuance of this order, no additional filing fee is required. By _____________________________ Marcus L. Abood, Tribunal Member Entered: September 9, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 25-002023 Page 4 of 6
Page 5
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 GEDR Landmark LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN
Page 6
MT
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
GEDR Landmark MI PT 2025 25-002023 Joint Stipulation Consent Judgment 2025-09-08 FULLY EXECUTED.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL GEDR Landmark LLC, Vv Petitioner, MTT Docket No. 25-002023-TT City of Ann Arbor, Respondent. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT The case is pending in the Entire Tribunal. 2. The property is in Washtenaw County. 3. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Year Parcel True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 09-09-28-309-040 $112,269,200 $56,134,600 $54,015,031 4. The values for the property identified above as stipulated by the parties for settlement purposes are: Year Parcel True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 09-09-28-309-040 $102,000,000 $51,000,000 $51,000,000 5. This stipulation addresses only the tax year that was originally appealed, and tax years added through motions to amend. 6. There shall be no interest paid on refunds (as applicable) if refunds are issued within 60 days of entry of the consent judgment. dw
Page 2
/s/ John W. Reiser August 22, 2025 MTT Docket No. 25-002023-TT Entire Tribunal Stipulation, Page 2 of 2 7. Refund (as applicable) is to be made payable to “GEDR Landmark LLC” and mailed to the attention of: GEDR Landmark LLC c/o Sarah Belloli, Ryan, LLC 101 W. Big Beaver Road, Suite 945 Troy, MI 48084 Signature of Petitioner’s Authorized Representative or, if none, Petitioner: /s/ Sarah R. Belloli Sarah Belloli, Ryan, LLC Date: 08/22/2025 Signature of Respondent’s authorized representative: /s/ John W. Reiser John W. Reiser (P45050), City of Ann Arbor -,__ Date: August 22, 2025
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
25-002023.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
101 West Big Beaver Suite 945 Troy, Michigan 48084 an: Tel. 313.230.0104 onovatve Suton Fax 313.230.0114 to Toning Problems, Wwww.ryan.com RECEIVED June 27, 2025 JUN g 0 2025 Re: GEDR LANDMARK, LLC v City of Ann Arbor HIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL MOAHR Docket No.: 25-002023 mic h Dear Chief Clerk: Petitioner hereby serves all parties provided for in Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule 221 with its petition in this matter. Pursuant to the rule, the petition notes the docket number assigned by the tribunal and is served within 45-days of the issuance of the notice of docket number. If you have any questions regarding the enclosed pleading, please do not hesitate to contact our office directly at (313) 230-0104. Respectfully, oh 8. BLL Sarah R. Belloli Ryan, LLC cc: State of Michigan Treasurer ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS Washtenaw County Equalization Director Washtenaw County Clerk City of Ann Arbor Assessor City of Ann Arbor Clerk
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFARIS MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL GEDR LANDMARK, LLC Petitioner, v MOAHR Docket No.: 25-002023 City of Ann Arbor Respondent, Proof of Service Joan Kleiner, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on June 27, 2025 , she served a copy of the Petition relative to the above-captioned matter, via first class mail, upon: State of Michigan Treasurer ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS Department of Treasury School Board Secretary Treasury Building 2555 South State St 430 West Allegan Ann Arbor, MI 48104 Lansing, MI 48922 Washtenaw County Equalization Director ‘Washtenaw County Clerk 200 N. Main St., Suite 210 200 N. Main St. Ann Arbor, MI148104 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 and via certified mail, return receipt requested, upon: City of Ann Arbor Assessor City of Ann Arbor Clerk 100 N. 5th Ave. 301 E. Huron St. Ann Arbor, MI 48104 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 With proper postage affixed thereto. oar Abrozer
Page 3
This envelope is only yo ed h You can help us get items securely. Ne elas srt fe Pt LA ® hm EN... o_o | i RETO, WRN 1/24 15:47 £3 LU/ ad Puilto open. Check your FedEx Expr (TY \ ty Hh TWAOEL 1d30 J18VTIIE NON “0d ! 202 SOd NOILILd ny 100°1£5000006 “43 09.6-G€E (L15; 90687 [IN ONISNY1 40074 ANC INNIAV YAR ANVYO 'N L0vZ TYNNEIRL XV.L NVOIHOIN TYNNERLXYL o YIAN3S T1118 7808 IN 'AOYL Qf ¥3AVIE 918 'M LOL GEGYLINIEELEBILL) :QVO JTINVAY 100°} :LOMLIY YINITTINYOT SZNNILZ ALVA dIHS 010-062 (e1e) v130:I NI9I¥O 2465/5400/L1985
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
GEDR LANDMARK, LLC, v Ann Arbor.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS Lansing MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR GEDR LANDMARK LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. City of Ann Arbor , Respondent. ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: 09-09-28-309-040 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is X real personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? __Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? Yes No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial- Improved 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s March July December Board of Review. X NA MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 10. The property or properties at issue are located in Washtenaw County County. The property or properties’ address is: 1300 S UNIVERSITY AVE ANN ARBOR, MI 48104 11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): City of Ann Arbor 12. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 999 S. Shady Grove Road, Suite 600 Memphis TN 38120 13. This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): X the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? Yes No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL 14. The tax year(s) at issue are: 2025
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary):NA 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 $112,269,200.00 $56,134,600 $54,015,031 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 $99,000,000 $49,500,000 $49,500,000 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 $13,269,200
Page 4
MTT Docket
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2025-08-06_11-36-44.0000.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 GEDR Landmark LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 25-002023 City Of Ann Arbor, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: __Tribunal Clerk________ Entered: August 6, 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
GEDR LANDMARK, LLC, v Ann Arbor.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS Lansing MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR GEDR LANDMARK LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. City of Ann Arbor , Respondent. ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. Property Parcel No: 09-09-28-309-040 (If more than one parcel is at issue, attach a completed Multiple Parcel Petition Form addressing all other parcels at issue.) 2. The property identified above is X real personal. 3. If more than one parcel of real property is under appeal, are the properties contiguous? __Yes ___No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each non- contiguous parcel.) 4. Are all of the parcels of personal property located on a parcel of real property under appeal? Yes No. (If no, separate Petitions are required for each parcel of personal property not located on a parcel of real property under appeal.) 5. If parcels of personal property are under appeal, when were the personal property statements filed by parcel number (attach additional page if necessary): 6. The property identified above is classified as 201 Commercial- Improved 7. If the assessment or assessments at issue were protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s March July December Board of Review. X NA MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906
Page 2
MTT Docket No. Page 2 of 4 8. If a protest was required and no protest was made, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 9. If the appeal was not submitted by the deadline for the filing of an appeal for the classification or classifications of the properties at issue (i.e., May 31 or July 31 of the tax year involved), list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the assessment or assessments at issue (attach additional page if necessary): 10. The property or properties at issue are located in Washtenaw County County. The property or properties’ address is: 1300 S UNIVERSITY AVE ANN ARBOR, MI 48104 11. The assessment or assessments at issue were established by the (applicable local governmental unit): City of Ann Arbor 12. Petitioner’s legal residence or principal office address is: 999 S. Shady Grove Road, Suite 600 Memphis TN 38120 13. This appeal involves issues relating to the (check all that are applicable): X the property or properties’ true cash and taxable values the property or properties’ taxable value only If the property or properties’ taxable value is at issue, is there a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss? Yes No uniformity of the property or properties’ assessment the property or the properties’ exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL 14. The tax year(s) at issue are: 2025
Page 3
MTT Docket No. Page 3 of 4 15. If more than the current tax year is being appealed, list the separate and specific facts upon which Petitioner relies to invoke the Tribunal’s authority over the prior tax year or years (attach additional page if necessary):NA 16. The values for the property identified above as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2025 $112,269,200.00 $56,134,600 $54,015,031 17. Petitioner contends that the values for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 $99,000,000 $49,500,000 $49,500,000 18. The values in dispute for the property identified above are: Tax Year True Cash Value State Equalized Value Taxable Value 2025 $13,269,200
Page 4
MTT Docket
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
09._Entire_Tribunal_Case_Information_Sheet_Must_Upload_Petition_.27659e28-e26e-4969-b857-59d5c8d280c1.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MOAHR DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization First Name/Company Name M.I. Last Name GEDR LANDMARK LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 101 W. Big Beaver Suite 945 City or Town Troy State Michigan ZIP Code 48048 Telephone Number 3132300104 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) sarah.belloli@ryan.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Sarah M.I. Last Name Belloli Firm Name (if any) Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 101 West Big Beaver Road Suite 945 City or Town Troy State Michigan ZIP Code 48084 Telephone Number 313-230-0104 Fax Number E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) sarah.belloli@ryan.com Section 5: Issue Please designate one: Valuation – Fill out Sections 4, 5, & 6 below Section 6: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing?1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] Michigan Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Ann Arbor (WASHTENAW) County Washtenaw If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.)
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR Section 7: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values Section 8: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 09-09-28-309-040 Classification of Property: Real Commercial Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 56134600 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 54015031 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 99000000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 49500000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Section 9: Assessment Information Type of Tax Assessment(s): Assessment Number(s): Check all that is being appealed: Check what action prompted this appeal: If “other,” please explain: Section 10: Special Assessment Information Type of Special Assessment: Did you protest the special assessment at the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? If Yes, what was the date of the hearing held to confirm the special assessment roll? If No, please explain: Section 11: Classification Information Parcel Number: Current Classification of Property as established by Board of Review: What do you believe is the property’s classification?
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING ORLENE HAWKS DIRECTOR If improved property, how is the property currently being used? If improved property, for what use was the property designed? Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.