Record Finder / 26-001014-TT
Michigan
Gasso Development LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Burton Respondent
- Petitioner
- Gasso Development LLC
- Respondent
- City Of Burton
Case overview
- Docket number
- 26-001014-TT
- Status
- Extended Default Respondent
- CaseType
- ET Property
- Division
- ET
- County
- Genesee
- Judge
- No judge assigned
Docket history
| Line # | Subject | Filer | Line Ref | Enter Date/Post Mark | Fee | Related Item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Order Extending R's Default | Not recorded | 5 | 10/06/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 5 | Order of Default of Respondent | Not recorded | Not recorded | 09/04/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 4 | Proof of service of petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 07/23/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 3 | Petition has been verified | PET | 1 | 07/13/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
| 2 | Notice of Docket Number ET | Not recorded | Not recorded | 07/13/2026 | Not recorded | Download |
| 1 | A petition was received. | PET | Not recorded | 05/15/2026 | $400.00 | Download |
| Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Download |
Documents
26-001014 Extend Default (no ans).pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gasso Development LLC, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 26-001014 City of Burton, Presiding Judge Respondent. Patricia L. Halm ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR RESPONDENT TO CURE DEFAULT The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that it entered an order holding Respondent in default on September 4, 2026, because they failed to file an answer.1 Respondent was required to cure the default by filing an answer within 14 days. Respondent has had ample time to comply, yet has failed to respond or submit the required filings. Though the Tribunal finds an extension of time to cure the default appropriate, Respondent’s failure to comply with Tribunal orders and its Rules of Practice and Procedure has established a history of deliberate delay that would justify the scheduling of a default hearing for failure to timely comply with this order.2 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the time for Respondent to cure the default is EXTENDED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent must complete the following to cure the default: (1) file an answer, (2) file a Motion to Set Aside Default, (3) pay the $50.00 fee required for the filing of the motion, and (4) file proof the motion and answer were served on Petitioner. The foregoing must be filed with the Tribunal within 14 days of the entry of this order.3 1 The order further stated, “Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee).” 2 See Grimm v Dep’t of Treasury, 291 Mich App 140 (2010). 3 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-001014 Page 2 of 2 Failure to comply with this order may result in the scheduling of a default hearing, as provided by TTR 237.4 Entered: October 6, 2026 By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm kac PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk 4 See also MCL 205.732.
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
Order_of_Default_of_Answer.2026-09-04_15-01-06.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gasso Development LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 26-001014 City Of Burton, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Respondent has failed to file an answer. As such, Respondent must file and serve an answer to the petition and file proof demonstrating service of the answer within 14 days of the entry of this order. See TTR 235 and 227. Tribunal rules and information on Entire Tribunal answers can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.1 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: September 4, 2026 1 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 2
MTT Docket No. 26-001014 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gasso Development LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL ENTIRE TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No. 26-001014 City Of Burton, Respondent. ORDER OF DEFAULT The Tribunal has reviewed the file in the above-captioned case and finds that: Respondent has failed to file an answer. As such, Respondent must file and serve an answer to the petition and file proof demonstrating service of the answer within 14 days of the entry of this order. See TTR 235 and 227. Tribunal rules and information on Entire Tribunal answers can be found on our website at www.michigan.gov/taxtrib. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is HELD IN DEFAULT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defaulted party shall cure the default, as indicated above, within 14 days of the entry of this order.2 Failure to comply with this order will result in the defaulted party being required to file a motion to set aside the default (with appropriate filing fee). By: /s/ Patricia L. Halm Entered: September 4, 2026 2 “A submission by mail is considered filed on the date indicated by the United States Postal Service postmark on the envelope containing the submission. A submission without a postmark or with an illegible postmark is considered filed on the date the submission is received by the tribunal. A submission by commercial delivery service is considered filed on the date the submission is given to the commercial service for delivery to the tribunal as indicated by the receipt date on the package containing the submission. A submission by personal service is considered filed on the date the submission is received. A submission through the tribunal’s e-filing system by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission by email to the email address designated by the tribunal by 11:59 p.m. on a business day is considered filed on that business day. A submission on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a holiday is considered filed on the following business day, as provided by section 35a of the tax tribunal act, MCL 205.735a.” TTR 225(5).
Page 4
MTT Docket No. 26-001014 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
POS_Gasso_Development_LLC_801155309_26-001014.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Gasso Development LLC 801155309 v Burton Parcel Number: 59-28-501-185 MTT Docket No.: 26-001014 Page 1 of 2 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL GASSO DEVELOPMENT LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. 26-001014 BURTON, Respondent. _____________________________________________________________________________/ Colliers International By: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) Senior Vice President | Tax Appeal Representative for Petitioner 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, MI 48067 O: 248-226-1632 F: 248-226-1633 Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com Karen.Cameron@Colliers.com City of Burton Assessing Department 4303 S Center Road Burton, MI 48519 810-743-1500 _____________________________________________________________________________/ PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF MICHIGAN ) )ss COUNTY OF OAKLAND ) Jennifer Lunsford, states that on 7/23/2026, in compliance with TTR 221, she did place in the US mail a copy of Petitioner’s 2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition with docket number, the Notice of Docket Number issued by the Michigan Tax Tribunal for this appeal as well as this Proof of Service of Petition for the above captioned appeal to the units of government listed on the second page of this Proof of Service of Petition. /s/Jennifer Lunsford Jennifer Lunsford Karen Cameron states that she submitted electronically on 7/23/2026, to the Michigan Tax Tribunal a copy of this Proof of Service of Petition at eFile through www.etaxappeal.lara.state.mi.us. /s/Karen Cameron Karen Cameron
Page 2
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Gasso Development LLC 801155309 v Burton Parcel Number: 59-28-501-185 MTT Docket No.: 26-001014 Page 2 of 2 By Certified Mail Assessor’s Office City of Burton Assessing Department 4303 S Center Road Burton, MI 48519 Office of the City/Township Clerk Burton Clerk's Office 4303 S Center Road Burton, MI 48519 By First Class Mail Director of Equalization Genesee County Equalization Director 1101 Beach Street Flint, MI 48502 County Clerk’s Office Genesee County Clerk’s Office 900 S Saginaw Street Flint, MI 48502 Secretary of the School Board Atherton Community Schools 3354 S Genesee Road Burton, MI 48519 Treasurer for the State of Michigan Michigan Department of Treasury Lansing, MI 48922
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
SubsequentFiling.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Docket Number: 26-001014 Is this case currently pending in the Small Claims Division? No Party Filing Document Petitioner Files Document Type: Proof of Service: Petition Attachment File Name: POS_Gasso_Development_LLC_801155309_26-001014 Fee Information Filing Fee: $ 0.00 Payment Information Payment: $ 0.00
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
GassoDevelopmentLLC.PET & POS.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Gasso Development LLC v City of Burton Parcel Number: 59-28-501-185 MTT Docket No.: Page 1 of 5 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Gasso Development LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. City of Burton, Respondent. _____________________________________________________________________________/ Colliers International By: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) Vice President | Tax Appeal Representative for Petitioner 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, MI 48067 O: 248-226-1632 F: 248-226-1633 Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com Karen.Cameron@Colliers.com City of Burton Assessing 4303 S. Center Rd Burton, MI 48519 (810) 743-1500 ext. 1300 _____________________________________________________________________________/ 2026 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. The Petitioner in this matter, Gasso Development LLC, has the legal residence or principal office address of 20320 W. 8 Mile, Southfield, MI 48076_. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property taxes on property parcel no(s). (hereinafter referenced as the Subject Property) 59-28-501-185. If the Subject Property in this petition includes more than one (1) real property tax parcel, the Subject Property’s tax parcels are contiguous. 2. The Subject Property is located in Genesee County.
Page 2
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Gasso Development LLC v City of Burton Parcel Number: 59-28-501-185 MTT Docket No.: Page 2 of 5 3. Respondent, City of Burton Assessing of Genesee County, assesses and collects property taxes on the Subject Property. 4. The Subject Property is real property and is classified as Commercial. The Subject Property is presently used or available for use for Commercial purposes. Petitioner believes that the Subject Property was originally designed to be used for Commercial purposes. 5. Protest to the 2026 Board of Review was not made and is not required by law for the Subject Property. 6. The Subject Property’s address is: G 3009 S Dort Hwy, Burton MI 48529 7. This appeal involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value and (d) uniformity. 8. The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026 9. The values for the Subject Property as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 59-28-501-185 $803,200.00 $401,600.00 $354,878.00 10. The 2026 assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value imposed upon all parcels of the Subject Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: a. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value exceeds the amounts permitted by the Michigan Constitution, applicable statutes and case law;
Page 3
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Gasso Development LLC v City of Burton Parcel Number: 59-28-501-185 MTT Docket No.: Page 3 of 5 b. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution, applicable statutes and case law; c. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that portion of the Subject Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and d. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and denies Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal protection and dues process of law. 11. Petitioner contends that the actual values for the Subject Property are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 59-28-501-185 $530,000.00 $265,000.00 $265,000.00 12. The amount of value in contention for the Subject Property is: Tax Year Parcel Number Assessed Value in Contention 2026 59-28-501-185 $136,600.00 13. Petitioner relies on the following specific facts to support the relief requested: Market sales and income data indicates that the subject property’s assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value exceed 50% of its actual market value. In addition, the cost less depreciation method Respondent utilizes to establish the Subject Property’s assessment at issue is not related to the Subject Property’s actual market value.
Page 4
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Gasso Development LLC v City of Burton Parcel Number: 59-28-501-185 MTT Docket No.: Page 4 of 5 WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that this Honorable Michigan Tax Tribunal enter an Order reducing the 2026 assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value for the Subject Property to the values stated in Paragraph 11 above and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. Respectfully Submitted, COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL Representative for Petitioner By:_/s/ Joshua T. Shillair__Dated:05/15/2026 Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) Vice President | Tax Appeal 400 E 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, MI 48067 O: 248-226-1632 F: 248-226-1633 Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com
Page 5
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Gasso Development LLC v City of Burton Parcel Number: 59-28-501-185 MTT Docket No.: Page 5 of 5 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Gasso Development LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. City of Burton,
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Gasso Development LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 20320 W. 8 Mile City or Town SOUTHFIELD State Michigan ZIP Code 48075 Telephone Number 2482261632 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) tax.efile@colliers.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Joshua M.I. Thomas Last Name Shillair Firm Name (if any) Colliers International Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 City or Town Royal Oak State Michigan ZIP Code 48067 Telephone Number 248-226-1632 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) tax.efile@colliers.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] G 3009 S Dort Hwy BURTON
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Michigan 48529 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Burton (GENESEE) County Genesee If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 59-28-501-185 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 401600 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 354878 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 530000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 265000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ /s/Joshua T. Shillair Payment Information Amount: 400 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26051585589536 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
ET_Notice_of_Docket_Number.2026-07-13_06-39-41.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL · 611 W. OTTAWA ST., LANSING, MI 48933 · 517-335-9760 PO BOX 30232, LANSING, MI 48909 · Other Carriers: 2407 N. GRAND RIVER AVE., LANSING, MI 48906 Gasso Development LLC, Petitioner, MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL v MTT Docket No.: 26-001014 City Of Burton, Respondent. NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.735a, even if the petition was served when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. Under TTR 235(1), “[t]he respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so will result in Respondent being placed in default. The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements or the Tribunal’s rules. By: Tribunal Clerk Entered: July 13, 2026 PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, if any, utilizing either the mailing or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized representatives. By: Tribunal Clerk
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
GassoDevelopmentLLC.PET & POS.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Gasso Development LLC v City of Burton Parcel Number: 59-28-501-185 MTT Docket No.: Page 1 of 5 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Gasso Development LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. City of Burton, Respondent. _____________________________________________________________________________/ Colliers International By: Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) Vice President | Tax Appeal Representative for Petitioner 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, MI 48067 O: 248-226-1632 F: 248-226-1633 Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com Karen.Cameron@Colliers.com City of Burton Assessing 4303 S. Center Rd Burton, MI 48519 (810) 743-1500 ext. 1300 _____________________________________________________________________________/ 2026 ENTIRE TRIBUNAL PROPERTY TAX PETITION 1. The Petitioner in this matter, Gasso Development LLC, has the legal residence or principal office address of 20320 W. 8 Mile, Southfield, MI 48076_. Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property taxes on property parcel no(s). (hereinafter referenced as the Subject Property) 59-28-501-185. If the Subject Property in this petition includes more than one (1) real property tax parcel, the Subject Property’s tax parcels are contiguous. 2. The Subject Property is located in Genesee County.
Page 2
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Gasso Development LLC v City of Burton Parcel Number: 59-28-501-185 MTT Docket No.: Page 2 of 5 3. Respondent, City of Burton Assessing of Genesee County, assesses and collects property taxes on the Subject Property. 4. The Subject Property is real property and is classified as Commercial. The Subject Property is presently used or available for use for Commercial purposes. Petitioner believes that the Subject Property was originally designed to be used for Commercial purposes. 5. Protest to the 2026 Board of Review was not made and is not required by law for the Subject Property. 6. The Subject Property’s address is: G 3009 S Dort Hwy, Burton MI 48529 7. This appeal involves issues relating to: (a) valuation, (b) assessment, (c) taxable value and (d) uniformity. 8. The tax year(s) at issue are: 2026 9. The values for the Subject Property as established by Respondent’s Board of Review are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 59-28-501-185 $803,200.00 $401,600.00 $354,878.00 10. The 2026 assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value imposed upon all parcels of the Subject Property, and the taxes to be levied and collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: a. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value exceeds the amounts permitted by the Michigan Constitution, applicable statutes and case law;
Page 3
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Gasso Development LLC v City of Burton Parcel Number: 59-28-501-185 MTT Docket No.: Page 3 of 5 b. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution, applicable statutes and case law; c. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value are based upon an erroneous determination of the true cash value of that portion of the Subject Property that is taxable under Michigan law, and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and d. The assessment, assessed value, state equalized value and/or taxable value, and the mode of assessment adopted by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and denies Petitioner its constitutional rights to uniformity, equal protection and dues process of law. 11. Petitioner contends that the actual values for the Subject Property are: Tax Year Parcel Number True Cash Value Assessed Value Taxable Value 2026 59-28-501-185 $530,000.00 $265,000.00 $265,000.00 12. The amount of value in contention for the Subject Property is: Tax Year Parcel Number Assessed Value in Contention 2026 59-28-501-185 $136,600.00 13. Petitioner relies on the following specific facts to support the relief requested: Market sales and income data indicates that the subject property’s assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value exceed 50% of its actual market value. In addition, the cost less depreciation method Respondent utilizes to establish the Subject Property’s assessment at issue is not related to the Subject Property’s actual market value.
Page 4
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Gasso Development LLC v City of Burton Parcel Number: 59-28-501-185 MTT Docket No.: Page 4 of 5 WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests that this Honorable Michigan Tax Tribunal enter an Order reducing the 2026 assessed value, state equalized value and taxable value for the Subject Property to the values stated in Paragraph 11 above and requiring Respondent to pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. Respectfully Submitted, COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL Representative for Petitioner By:_/s/ Joshua T. Shillair__Dated:05/15/2026 Joshua T. Shillair, Esq. (P72674) Vice President | Tax Appeal 400 E 4th Street, Suite 350 Royal Oak, MI 48067 O: 248-226-1632 F: 248-226-1633 Joshua.Shillair@Colliers.com
Page 5
2026 Entire Tribunal Property Tax Petition & Proof of Service Gasso Development LLC v City of Burton Parcel Number: 59-28-501-185 MTT Docket No.: Page 5 of 5 STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Gasso Development LLC, Petitioner, v MTT Docket No. City of Burton,
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.
EntireTribunalCaseISPetition.pdfRead complete document text →
Read document text excerpt
Page 1
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Entire Tribunal Case Information Sheet - Petitioner MTT DOCKET NO. Section 1: Petitioner’s Contact Information Filer type: Organization Local Unit of Government First Name M.I. Last Name/Company Name Gasso Development LLC Home Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 20320 W. 8 Mile City or Town SOUTHFIELD State Michigan ZIP Code 48075 Telephone Number 2482261632 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) tax.efile@colliers.com Section 2: Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information First Name Joshua M.I. Thomas Last Name Shillair Firm Name (if any) Colliers International Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route) 400 W 4th Street, Suite 350 City or Town Royal Oak State Michigan ZIP Code 48067 Telephone Number 248-226-1632 E-mail Address (do not enter unless you want MTT to send all correspondence via e-mail) tax.efile@colliers.com Section 3: Issue Please designate one: Valuation Section 4: Subject Property Information How many parcels are you appealing? 1 Property Address (No., Street, City, ST, ZIP) [If multiple, list first property’s address] G 3009 S Dort Hwy BURTON
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR Michigan 48529 Taxing Authority (City or Township) City Of Burton (GENESEE) County Genesee If you are appealing more than one parcel, are they contiguous or adjoining? (*If no, you must file separate appeals for each non-contiguous or non-adjoining parcel.) N/A Section 5: Check which of the following you are appealing (check all that apply) True Cash and Taxable Values If “Other”, please explain: Section 6: Valuation Information for Each Parcel under Appeal Parcel Number: 59-28-501-185 Classification of Property: Real (check one) Commercial (check one) Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the Board of Review: 401600 Current Taxable Value as established by the Board of Review: 354878 What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)? 530000 Multiply the True Cash Value by 50% and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value). 265000 If you belive the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. Fee Information The filing fee is based on the greater of State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention. If you are appealing more than one parcel, the parcel with the highest State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention will be used to determine your filing fee, plus $25.00 will be added for each additional parcel being appealed. If the State Equalized Value or Taxable Value in contention is: Your filing fee is: $100,000.00 and under $250.00 $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 $400.00 $Over $500,000.00 $600.00 * Plus $25.00 for each additional parcel, not to exceed a total filing fee of $2,000.00.
Page 3
STATE OF MICHIGAN GRETCHEN WHITMER GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LANSING MARLON I. BROWN, DPA DIRECTOR A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Special Assessment Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of an Equalization Tax Appeal. A fee of $250.00 is required for the filing of a Non-Property Tax Appeal. A fee of $150.00 is required for the filing of a Classification Tax Appeal Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature Petitioner or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: /s/ /s/Joshua T. Shillair Payment Information Amount: 400 Success: True Message: "" Waiver Code: Transaction Number: 26051585589536 Supporting Waiver Documents:
These are text excerpts, not the complete document. Text recognition and reading order can contain errors. Check the PDF for complete wording, formatting, and context.